Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Cardiac arrest"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike - 10 Feb 2004 18:05 GMT
Cardiac arrest
Life: More health clubs, schools and airports than ever before are
being equipped with AEDs to prevent sudden cardiac arrests —
disruptions in the heart's normal rhythm — from proving deadly.
at http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20040209-101727-3896r.htm
Carey Gregory - 11 Feb 2004 02:46 GMT
>Cardiac arrest
>Life: More health clubs, schools and airports than ever before are
>being equipped with AEDs to prevent sudden cardiac arrests —
>disruptions in the heart's normal rhythm — from proving deadly.
>at http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20040209-101727-3896r.htm

Yes, public access AEDs are becoming much more common and that's a good
thing, but AEDs do not *prevent* cardiac arrest.  They're only useful once
cardiac arrest has already occurred.
PF Riley - 11 Feb 2004 06:32 GMT
>>Cardiac arrest
>>Life: More health clubs, schools and airports than ever before are
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>thing, but AEDs do not *prevent* cardiac arrest.  They're only useful once
>cardiac arrest has already occurred.  

The article actually says that AEDs "prevent sudden cardiac arrests...
from proving deadly."

Anyway, more technically, they are good for ventricullar fibrillation,
not cardiac arrest.

PF
Carey Gregory - 11 Feb 2004 07:09 GMT
>The article actually says that AEDs "prevent sudden cardiac arrests...
>from proving deadly."

Ah, okay, the slightly munged HTML copy/paste job led me to misread it.

>Anyway, more technically, they are good for ventricullar fibrillation,
>not cardiac arrest.

Well, heck, as long as we're being technical, v-fib *is* cardiac arrest,
along with pulseless ventricular tachycardia, asystole, and EMD.  (by
clinical definition)

Oh, and you left out pulseless v-tach.  AEDs are good for that too.
Technically, of course.  ;-)
anon - 22 Feb 2004 18:11 GMT
> Well, heck, as long as we're being technical, v-fib *is* cardiac arrest,
> along with pulseless ventricular tachycardia, asystole, and EMD.  (by
> clinical definition)
>
> Oh, and you left out pulseless v-tach.  AEDs are good for that too.
> Technically, of course.  ;-)

Well, *technically*, while asystole is indeed cardiac arrest, an AED
won't shock it.  ;-)

AEDs are great, but people still need to learn CPR.
Carey Gregory - 23 Feb 2004 00:34 GMT
>Well, *technically*, while asystole is indeed cardiac arrest, an AED
>won't shock it.  ;-)

No, but twitchy ER residents will.  

"Hey, it worked on 'ER!'"
anon - 23 Feb 2004 01:02 GMT
>> Well, *technically*, while asystole is indeed cardiac arrest, an AED
>> won't shock it.  ;-)
>
> No, but twitchy ER residents will.
> "Hey, it worked on 'ER!'"

And in "Flatliners."  ;-)
PF Riley - 23 Feb 2004 04:08 GMT
>>> Well, *technically*, while asystole is indeed cardiac arrest, an AED
>>> won't shock it.  ;-)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>And in "Flatliners."  ;-)

What's spookier to me than asystole is pulseless electrical activity.
I once checked a 4-year-old drowning victim minutes after she had been
declared dead as she had nearly normal PQRST complexes on her rhythm
monitor. I could hear her valves opening and closing softly in her
chest. But given the time she had been down and the fact that she had
no pulses, no blood pressure, no spontaneous respirations, and no
pupillary reflexes -- one could still only conclude that she really
was dead. It was just hard to walk away from her when you could hear a
heart beating, though.

PF
Beachhouse - 23 Feb 2004 14:12 GMT
i'm guessing she wasn't hypothermic...

> What's spookier to me than asystole is pulseless electrical activity.
> I once checked a 4-year-old drowning victim minutes after she had been
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> PF
PF Riley - 24 Feb 2004 04:19 GMT
>i'm guessing she wasn't hypothermic...

Correct.
Beachhouse - 23 Feb 2004 14:12 GMT
maybe it's fine v-fib!!!   ;)

> >Well, *technically*, while asystole is indeed cardiac arrest, an AED
> >won't shock it.  ;-)
>
> No, but twitchy ER residents will.
>
> "Hey, it worked on 'ER!'"
Carey Gregory - 23 Feb 2004 17:51 GMT
>maybe it's fine v-fib!!!   ;)

Yeah, but I can get fine v-fib off my refrigerator!
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 23 Feb 2004 17:18 GMT
> >Well, *technically*, while asystole is indeed cardiac arrest, an AED
> >won't shock it.  ;-)
>
> No, but twitchy ER residents will.  
>
> "Hey, it worked on 'ER!'"

Better would be to check the EKG monitoring leads.

Disconnected leads will also produce "asystole."

Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W1F522557

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?T13943F77

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867
Carey Gregory - 23 Feb 2004 17:48 GMT
>Better would be to check the EKG monitoring leads.
>
>Disconnected leads will also produce "asystole."

True, but if it's an AED we're talking about then a disconnected lead
produces a voice prompt to check the leads.  Most EKGs detect it too.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.