Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

DAFNz Dumped as Disabled...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 06 Feb 2004 10:56 GMT
More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental
intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion:

http://www.spokesman-recorder.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=38252&sID=13
**************************** exZZZZZZZerpt ***********************
Special Ed the new segregation -- Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder 2/4/2004

Forty-eight percent of African American boys drop out of the public
schools in Hennepin County, and only one of every four African
American boys in the Minneapolis Public Schools graduates on time...
In 2000, African American boys accounted for 23 percent of the
Minneapolis Public Schools student body; however, they made up
37 percent of all students in Special Ed programs, and 55 percent
of all students in programs for emotional *BEHAVIORAL* disorders.

Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children
who have behavior issues...
************ Natural testosterone levelz are GENETIC ******************

DAFNz - Genetically created with poor behavior --
Supreme Court, 1954, Brown vs. DNA - a total LOOZer...



Research by authors of The Reading Crisis reveals that one third of the
low-income and low-achieving readers were reading below their
intelligence level by a year or more.

Data from the “Minneapolis Research Valuation and Assessment of 2002”
exposes the reading achievement gap that exists between African American
students and White students: 85 percent of White students passed the
Minnesota MBST reading assessment, while only 39 percent of African
American students passed. What is the reason for this?

The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that
“...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the
establishment. [The school system] has relegated poor children to the
academic scrap heap [of Special Ed], blaming [the student,] their
parents and the community instead of placing the blame where it belongs
— on the school system, its principals and its teachers.”

Gross contends that “it’s not because of racism, or less attention to
African American and Hispanic children... Much of the real reason...is
that the establishment’s theories on how to teach reading are
ineffective.”

From other research studies, we find that if the child is not reading
well by the fourth grade, he is often feeling embarrassed, and he would
rather be labeled bad rather than dumb. He acts out these aggressive
behaviors to detract from his lack of reading skills.

Seed Academy Harvest Prepartory School (HPS), a Minneapolis charter
school with over 95 percent African American students, substantiates
Gross’s conclusions. HPS is just one example of several schools that
successfully educate poor and minority students. They use a core
learning curriculum that emphasizes the basics: “...multiplication
tables, spelling, phonics, rote learning.”

And, in March 2003, third graders at HPS surpassed the state in reading.
State scores were 76.3 percent at or above grade level. HPS scores were
95.7 percent at or above grade level. The state scored 17.3 percent
superior performance beyond grade level, and HPS scored 23.4 percent
superior performance beyond grade level.

Another successful approach was uncovered by Durkin. He used the
research strategy

of comparing“...low-income above-average readers with low-income
below-average readers. The findings were that Black children who were
highly successful at reading had books at home, had help with their
homework from a parent or someone else...” and that they were expected
to go to college.

Many of these children were already reading prior to entering
kindergarten. Obviously, some older sibling or adult had spent quality
time with the child during the critical period of zero to five years,
according to Durkin.

One of the critical causes of educational trouble for African American
boys is low parental involvement. In Parents magazine, September 1997,
Mitchell Trockmen, former associate superintendent for elementary and
secondary education for Minneapolis Public Schools proclaims “Parents
who act as advocates [for their child] aren’t being pushy or meddling,
they are appropriately concerned.”

The bottom line here is that to prevent failure of Black boys in the
public schools, we must forge a strong teacher/parent relationship.

Rose Tave, though born in Greenville, Texas, has spent most of her life
in Minneapolis. She attended Minneapolis public schools, Minneapolis
Community College, and the University of Minnesota. She has two sons and
one grandson. She welcomes reader responses to LocallySpeaking@aol.com.
John Gilmer - 06 Feb 2004 11:12 GMT
> Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children
> who have behavior issues...

Well, DUH!

There are also a way to "hide" underperformers from tests (e.g.: Virginia
Standards of Learning tests) which are used to rate and compare schools.

The public schools are a battleground between those parents and taxpayers
who want "accountability" and the professional "educators" who don't.
Bob LeChevalier - 06 Feb 2004 17:55 GMT
>> Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children
>> who have behavior issues...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>There are also a way to "hide" underperformers from tests (e.g.: Virginia
>Standards of Learning tests) which are used to rate and compare schools.

Such as?  

Kids in special ed have to take the SOLs.  (My kid has done OK so
far).

And NCLB requires the percentage of special ed kids skipping the test
to not exceed 5%, and the percentage passing has to improve every year
of the school is listed as "failing".

>The public schools are a battleground between those parents and taxpayers
>who want "accountability" and the professional "educators" who don't.

Actually, the parents complain about the SOLs at least as much as the
professionals.  It is their little darlings who won't graduate, after
all.

lojbab
Signature

lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org

Eustace Bagg - 06 Feb 2004 12:40 GMT
> More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental
> intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion:

http://www.spokesman-recorder.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=38252&sID=13
> **************************** exZZZZZZZerpt ***********************
> Special Ed the new segregation -- Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder 2/4/2004
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> DAFNz - Genetically created with poor behavior --
> Supreme Court, 1954, Brown vs. DNA - a total LOOZer...

I bet these little fellows are special!

Girl raped at Lauderhill school by 2 fourth graders, BSO
says
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-25girlassault,0,7891204.story
?coll=sfla-news-broward


LAUDERHILL - Two fourth grade boys were suspended from
school after a classmate said she was raped in a bathroom at
Royal Palm Elementary on Wednesday.

The 10-year-old victim was taken to a sexual assault center
after the attack was reported and deputies said they
received back positive indications she was raped.

The two boys - ages 11 and 12 -- have been turned over to
juvenile authorities and each was charged with sexual
battery of a child and lewd and lascivious exhibition.

At a Thursday afternoon hearing, a judge ordered the two
boys, both dressed in jail uniforms and fitted with
shackles, held in custody for 21 days. There was no reaction
from either child.

Broward Sheriff's Office spokesman Jim Leljedal on Thursday
said the attack occurred around 9 a.m. Wednesday during
regular session at Royal Palm Elementary, 1951 NW 56 Ave.
The school has more than 900 students.

The victim told investigators she had been harassed by the
two boys for several months.

On Wednesday, the girl was confronted by the two boys and
forced into a bathroom where the boys assaulted her,
Leljedal said.

The assaults were reported to police after the girl told a
friend who told a teacher who reported it to authorities.

Both boys confessed, deputies said.

******
Yeah, I know the article doesn't say they are negroes, but
I'm sure they are.

E.B.
Alberto Moreira - 06 Feb 2004 23:56 GMT
Said  "Eustace Bagg" <Bagg@nowhere.net> :

>I bet these little fellows are special!

Let's de-squawk this post, and see what we're left with...

[snip...]

>Yeah, I know the article doesn't say they are negroes, but
>I'm sure they are.

Opinion.

And that's it: one unfounded, unverified opinion. Fact, eh ?

Alberto.
Byker - 06 Feb 2004 14:14 GMT
> More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental
> intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion:

http://www.spokesman-recorder.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=38252&sID=13
> **************************** exZZZZZZZerpt ***********************
> Special Ed the new segregation -- Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder 2/4/2004
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children
> who have behavior issues...

And mammy can hardly wait to get her hands on the "crazy checks" that da
gubmint will award for each "disabled" sprog.  With restrictions now placed
on welfare, it's becoming a way of life. Entire nigger towns are now
coaching their kids to act retarded or loonie long enough to qualify for
SSI.

There was some little (pop. 300) all-black town in Alabama where EVERY
burrhead family with niglets was drawing "crazy checks."  A network camera
crew showed up to investigate, and here was this globby fat sow who was not
only on welfare, but also drawing $411 per month for each of her porch
monkeys.  Her cash income for sitting on her fat a.s was about $2,800 a
month, not including food stamps and other gubmint goodies.  When the
reporter's questions got too intrusive, her oldest yard ape, about 16,
stomped up to the camera waving a baseball bat and telling them on no
uncertain terms to get off the property.....
Alberto Moreira - 06 Feb 2004 23:56 GMT
Said  "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> :


>And mammy can hardly wait to get her hands on the "crazy checks" that da
>gubmint will award for each "disabled" sprog.  With restrictions now placed
>on welfare, it's becoming a way of life. Entire nigger towns are now
>coaching their kids to act retarded or loonie long enough to qualify for
>SSI.

And this is opinion, therefore irrelevant shithurling. Try again ?

>There was some little (pop. 300) all-black town in Alabama where EVERY
>burrhead family with niglets was drawing "crazy checks."  A network camera
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>stomped up to the camera waving a baseball bat and telling them on no
>uncertain terms to get off the property.....

Source, please ?

Alberto.
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 13:00 GMT
>Said  "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> :
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>And this is opinion, therefore irrelevant shithurling. Try again ?

Actually, it's more than opinion.  The SSI disability criteria were
written to allow kids who were nothing but thugs to qualify on the
basis of a mental impairment.  To correct this problem, SSA rewrote
the criteria in the mid-1990s to eliminate certain sociopathic
behaviors from being considered, but with coaching and "friendly"
psychiatrists/psychologists, many are still able to qualify for
disability benefits.

BroJack

>>There was some little (pop. 300) all-black town in Alabama where EVERY
>>burrhead family with niglets was drawing "crazy checks."  A network camera
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Source, please ?
Byker - 07 Feb 2004 16:00 GMT
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:56:59 GMT, junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto
Moreira) wrote:

>Said  "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> :
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Source, please ?

CBN, c.1996.  ABC's "20/20" had also done a segment on SSI abuse around the
same time, focusing on a black school principal with health problems who
could have made better money had he quit, applied for SSI, and lived on the
dole rather than stay at his job as a matter of pride.  The subject first
got national attention on the Sam and Diane Show ("Primetime Live"),
prompting a slew of angry rebuttals.  Examples:
http://www.fair.org/extra/9505/disabled-children-fraud.html
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/07/07/time/ssi.kids.html

Less noticed were the subsequent op-ed pieces by conservative blacks:
http://www.suanews.com/articles/1995/welfarerunamok.htm

And while qualifications have been tightened, it's still going on.  Click on
the links to get the entire articles and note that none are from those
nasty-a.s "racist websites"....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know of one girl who had three children before she turned nineteen. She
was intelligent and could easily have obtained a high school diploma but why
bother waking up at 6 a.m. when you can be paid for producing a large brood
of progeny instead? Yes, why bother indeed. She never did. I used to see her
10 days a year. Whenever I'd try to discontinue her enrollment she'd
suddenly "see the light" and mock the system by showing up for a few days.
Then she'd disappear until the next drop notice arrived at her house. I do
not know what has become of her as I have not seen her since she turned
nineteen. This is the magical age at which juvenile SSI payments abruptly
end. She was eligible for special education services in two areas and the
state uses this certification as a means to rule them "disabled"- not only
inside of school but outside as well. The illogicality of such a work
negating label is Kafkaesque. Anyway, one of the conditions of the SSI check
is that they must remain in school. For many of them, the charade of their
schooling ends with their 19th birthday when they are no longer eligible for
what they call "crazy checks."

http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/chapin/chapin1.html

Pat Flanagin sells insurance in Forrest City, Arkansas. Two and a half years
ago, he had a hunch that one of his clients was ripping off the government
to the tune of $15,000 a year.

"This woman had no job," Flanagin recalls. "She lived in government housing.
But she had $ 10,000 in the bank and wanted a new house. First, I thought
she was a prostitute or selling drugs. But, she was getting the money from
the government-'crazy checks'."

This mother of three, explains Flanagin, was receiving about $ 15,000 a year
in Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments for each of her children, who
were supposed to suffer from mental disorders. But all three, he says, were
quite healthy.

That made him angry. So Flanagin, who is also a Democratic state
representative, launched an investigation that eventually evolved into a
30-month media crusade contending that a program intended to help poor,
disabled children had become a cash cow for fraud-minded mothers. Many of
the press reporters charged that thousands of children were being coached by
parents to fake insanity or disabilities to qualify for the so-called crazy
checks. Standards for qualification had become so lax, the media reported,
that children who simply acted below their age level could get the $ 5,000 a
year in benefits.

http://www.ichp.edu/ssi/materials/892739751.html

Many disadvantaged families (note: abuses were rampant in the Mississippi
River Delta region of Mississippi and Arkansas) discovered that children
in special education often were eligible for an extra check that became
known as a "crazy check".  At first, it was families of children already
in special education who began filing for SSI.  As many of these families
were owed back payments, and many had more than one child in special
education, some families were getting checks big enough to buy cars and
make down payments on houses.  This generated notice, and soon schools
were getting calls asking how to get a crazy check for their child.  Less
scrupulous parents started asking kids to "act crazy" during testing so
they could get into special education.  Some slipped into special ed and
SSI that way, I don't know how many.  I guess it would depend on the
gullibility of the examiner.

http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/edlaw/frm00001.html
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 18:12 GMT
Said  "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> :

>http://www.fair.org/extra/9505/disabled-children-fraud.html

Opinion,

>http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/07/07/time/ssi.kids.html

opinion,

>Less noticed were the subsequent op-ed pieces by conservative blacks:
>http://www.suanews.com/articles/1995/welfarerunamok.htm

opinion,

>I know of one girl...

hearsay,

>http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/chapin/chapin1.html

opinion.

>http://www.ichp.edu/ssi/materials/892739751.html

opinion,

>http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/edlaw/frm00001.html

opinion.

Try again ?

Alberto.
Disability Coach - 07 Feb 2004 19:26 GMT
junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote in news:402a27a8.5784908
@news.mv.net:

> Said  "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> :
>  
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> opinion,

How the hell is this opinion???  This story presents FACTS.  It interviews
affected individuals.  

*Everything* that you don't agree with is opinion, isn't it, Alberto.

Hell, "2 + 2 = 4" is opinion too, right?

Why don't *you* try again?

Who's yer daddy, boy?!

King of SCAA
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 20:04 GMT
Said  Disability Coach <dsdf> :

>junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote in news:402a27a8.5784908
>@news.mv.net:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>How the hell is this opinion???  This story presents FACTS.  It interviews
>affected individuals.  

To quote:

========================================================
But the Eshelmans' world may be on the brink of collapse because of
new federal rules that could take away Jonathan's $74-a-week
disability check. "It's frightening," says Eshelman, who is worried
that with her two-person household's income cut almost a third, she
won't be able to meet her house payments, and she and her son will end
up homeless. "I really don't know what we would do."
========================================================

"May be" : opinion.

========================================================
a sign, his mother fears, that he may be on the verge of being cut
off.
========================================================

"his mother fears" : opinion.

========================================================
"The standards are vague and easily met," says Representative Jim
McCrery, a Louisiana Republican and supporter of the new rules. "Some
people regard it as just a super welfare program."
========================================================

"says Representative Jim McCrery" : opinion.

========================================================
Others may end up homeless, since SSI families are poor and the check
is a large percentage of household income. And some families may be
torn apart.
========================================================

"may" : opinion.

Grok it ? Talk about IQ.

Alberto.
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 18:39 GMT
>I know of one girl who had three children before she turned nineteen. She
>was intelligent and could easily have obtained a high school diploma but why
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/chapin/chapin1.html

This guy is confused.  He's mixing SSI childhood disability pmts.
under title XVI of the SSAct with "regular" SS childhood benefits
under title II.

Under the latter, a kid receives minor child's benefits on his
entitled parent's acct. until the age of 18.  He doesn't have to be
disabled.  Benefits stop at 18 unless he's a student or under a
disability that begins before age 22.  Student benefits ordinarily
cease at 19.  Childhood disability benefits continue as long as the
"child" remains disabled.  Any title II benefit requires a wage
earner, in this case, the kid's parent,  to be insured, i.e., pay
sufficiently into the FICA trust fund.

By contrast, title XVI (SSI) payments are means-tested and made from
general revenues.  You don't need to contribute but even small amts.of
income or resources can disqualify you.  The resource limit for 2004
is something like $3,000 for a household, not counting the value of
your house and one vehicle.  Payments are not made to minor kids or
students.  The kid has to be disabled and payments do not cease at 19
as long as he remains so.

If you think that the "coaching" of kids is an outrage, you oughta get
a load of the adults who qualify for disability benefits on the basis
of drug addiction and/or alcoholism.

BroJack
COL RSJ - 07 Feb 2004 22:46 GMT
>On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:56:59 GMT, junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto
>Moreira) wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>http://www.fair.org/extra/9505/disabled-children-fraud.html
>http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/07/07/time/ssi.kids.html

Saw that show.  f.cking niggers still lived in a frame house with
broken windows and almost no clothes to wear cause their mammy be
buying so much beer and crack.

>Less noticed were the subsequent op-ed pieces by conservative blacks:
>http://www.suanews.com/articles/1995/welfarerunamok.htm
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
>http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/edlaw/frm00001.html

--

* All quotations from the Encyclopedia Galactica here
reproduced are taken from the 116th Edition published
in 1020 F.E. by the Encyclopedia Galactica Publishing
Co., Terminus, with permission of the publishers.
Alberto Moreira - 08 Feb 2004 12:51 GMT
Said  COL RSJ <colrsj@alltel.net> :


>Saw that show.  f.cking niggers

Namecalling: argument rejected.

[snip...]


Next ?

Alberto.
COL RSJ - 08 Feb 2004 17:00 GMT
>Said  COL RSJ <colrsj@alltel.net> :
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Alberto.

Truth hurts, and if the name fits, wear it.

Later and stay stupid.

--

"Conan, what is best in life?''

''To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.''
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 17:59 GMT
Said  BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :


>Actually, it's more than opinion.  The SSI disability criteria were
>written to allow kids who were nothing but thugs to qualify on the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>psychiatrists/psychologists, many are still able to qualify for
>disability benefits.

Source, please ? Inference, please ? Without either, yours too, is
just opinion.

Alberto.
Feelin' Groovy - 07 Feb 2004 17:54 GMT
junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote in news:40292773.5732222
@news.mv.net:

> Said  BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Source, please ? Inference, please ? Without either, yours too, is
> just opinion.

What's the point, Alberto?  If the poster does provide the source, you'll
just blow it off like everything else.

Now, why do males commit more crime than females, Alberto?  Why are you
afraid to answer that question?

Who's yer daddy, boy?!

King of SCAA
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 20:00 GMT
Said  "Feelin' Groovy" <sesss> :


>What's the point, Alberto?  If the poster does provide the source, you'll
>just blow it off like everything else.

The poster must provide BOTH source AND his own personal inference,
and that's got to be CONVINCING on its own terms. Just listing what
someone else said or did isn't enough: if you list sources without
your own inference, I call it "squawk", it's like a parrot, repeating
things you haven't even demonstrated you've understood.

>Now, why do males commit more crime than females, Alberto?  Why are you
>afraid to answer that question?

My opinions aren't under scrutiny. YOURS are. Now, you,

ANSWER THE QUESTION

and no squawking, please. Talk about IQ ?

>Who's yer daddy, boy?!

Where's your inference, boy ?

Alberto.
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 22:48 GMT
>Said  "Feelin' Groovy" <sesss> :
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>The poster must provide BOTH source AND his own personal inference,
>and that's got to be CONVINCING on its own terms

Typical response from someone who has been overwhelmed, flabbergasted,
and left speechless.

BroJack
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 22:18 GMT
>Said  BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Source, please ? Inference, please ? Without either, yours too, is
>just opinion.

Source?  My memory.  I was in SSA's Office of Disability, the
component that wrote SSA's disability regulations, rulings, operating
guidelines, recommendations to appeal court decisions, etc., and can
easily recall the folks in the SSI Childhood Disability Branch trying
to tighten-up the criteria to eliminate this problem, while at the
same time, being pressured by the bleeding heart left-wing legal aid
groups who were afraid that the regulatory revisions would go too far
and cause disabled children to be denied.  

BroJack
Alberto Moreira - 08 Feb 2004 12:50 GMT
Said  BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :


>Source?  My memory.

Not enough in this ng. Try again ?

>I was in SSA's Office of Disability, the
>component that wrote SSA's disability regulations, rulings, operating
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>groups who were afraid that the regulatory revisions would go too far
>and cause disabled children to be denied.  

In other words: a conflict of interests. Nothing new here. But, if
this is true, blaming "them" - whoever they are - is a copout.

Alberto.
brojack - 08 Feb 2004 13:14 GMT
>Said  BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>In other words: a conflict of interests.

It's not a conflict of interests.  It's more of conservative pressure
on one side and liberals on the other squeezing.

> Nothing new here. But, if
>this is true, blaming "them" - whoever they are - is a copout.

Of course you blame "them," and even the liberals ultimately agreed
that coaching children to behave inappropriately is illegal.

BroJack
Alberto Moreira - 08 Feb 2004 15:01 GMT
Said  brojack@windswept.org (brojack) :


>It's not a conflict of interests.  It's more of conservative pressure
>on one side and liberals on the other squeezing.

Like I said: a conflict of interests.


Alberto.
brojack - 08 Feb 2004 15:50 GMT
>Said  brojack@windswept.org (brojack) :
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Alberto.

Looks like I'm discussing this with some 14-year-old pimple who needs
a little more education.

Put your papacita on the line and let me discuss the issue with him.

BroJack
COL RSJ - 08 Feb 2004 17:00 GMT
>Said  BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :
>
>>Source?  My memory.
>
>Not enough in this ng. Try again ?

Just state nothing will be enough cause you are a nigger or one of
their friends.  

>>I was in SSA's Office of Disability, the
>>component that wrote SSA's disability regulations, rulings, operating
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Alberto.

--

"Conan, what is best in life?''

''To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.''
Bob LeChevalier - 06 Feb 2004 17:50 GMT
>a fundamental
>intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion:

That's what you display every time you post.

lojbab
Signature

lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org

Alberto Moreira - 06 Feb 2004 23:54 GMT
Said  makemyday@worldnet.att.net :

>More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental
>intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion:

Actually, more squawk. So,

[big snip...]


>The bottom line here is that to prevent failure of Black boys in the
>public schools, we must forge a strong teacher/parent relationship.

Why ? Your inference, please ?

Alberto.
Belanger - 07 Feb 2004 07:46 GMT
> The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that
> ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> that the establishment's theories on how to teach reading are
> ineffective."

Sir, I must confess that I am quite confused by your post.  I see a
few paragraphs of the usual racist driven, followed by -- much to my
surprise -- a distinctly NON-RACIST article.  Did you have a sudden
change of heart and then forget to remove the first half?  Are simply
more retarded than we had all assumed, leading to a belief that this
article was, in fact, written by a slavering Southern-US-er?

Like I said, I am confused.
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 07 Feb 2004 11:54 GMT
> > The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that
> > ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> change of heart and then forget to remove the first half?
> Like I said, I am confused.

Many of theze articlez provide hard factz, and embed them in a warm
fuzzy politically-correct spin which iz entirely unzupported with
any subztance.  It waz a tezt to see if you could dizcern the
differenze...
Belanger - 08 Feb 2004 06:31 GMT
> > > The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that
> > > ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> any subztance.  It waz a tezt to see if you could dizcern the
> differenze...

You mean that the article provides similar "hard factz", but has a
different editorial stance, puts the emphases on entirely different
facets, and is written by someone without a crippling crack addiction?

your friend,
 BELANGER

P.S. Did I pass the test?
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 08 Feb 2004 09:11 GMT
> > > > The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that
> > > > ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> P.S. Did I pass the test?

As we say here in Japan (where we get along just fine without all the
imaginary "benefitz" of diverzity) you *FRUNKED*...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.