Medical Forum / General / General / February 2004
DAFNz Dumped as Disabled...
|
|
Thread rating:  |
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 06 Feb 2004 10:56 GMT More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion:
http://www.spokesman-recorder.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=38252&sID=13 **************************** exZZZZZZZerpt *********************** Special Ed the new segregation -- Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder 2/4/2004
Forty-eight percent of African American boys drop out of the public schools in Hennepin County, and only one of every four African American boys in the Minneapolis Public Schools graduates on time... In 2000, African American boys accounted for 23 percent of the Minneapolis Public Schools student body; however, they made up 37 percent of all students in Special Ed programs, and 55 percent of all students in programs for emotional *BEHAVIORAL* disorders.
Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children who have behavior issues... ************ Natural testosterone levelz are GENETIC ******************
DAFNz - Genetically created with poor behavior -- Supreme Court, 1954, Brown vs. DNA - a total LOOZer...
Research by authors of The Reading Crisis reveals that one third of the low-income and low-achieving readers were reading below their intelligence level by a year or more.
Data from the Minneapolis Research Valuation and Assessment of 2002 exposes the reading achievement gap that exists between African American students and White students: 85 percent of White students passed the Minnesota MBST reading assessment, while only 39 percent of African American students passed. What is the reason for this?
The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that ...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the establishment. [The school system] has relegated poor children to the academic scrap heap [of Special Ed], blaming [the student,] their parents and the community instead of placing the blame where it belongs on the school system, its principals and its teachers.
Gross contends that its not because of racism, or less attention to African American and Hispanic children... Much of the real reason...is that the establishments theories on how to teach reading are ineffective.
From other research studies, we find that if the child is not reading well by the fourth grade, he is often feeling embarrassed, and he would rather be labeled bad rather than dumb. He acts out these aggressive behaviors to detract from his lack of reading skills.
Seed Academy Harvest Prepartory School (HPS), a Minneapolis charter school with over 95 percent African American students, substantiates Grosss conclusions. HPS is just one example of several schools that successfully educate poor and minority students. They use a core learning curriculum that emphasizes the basics: ...multiplication tables, spelling, phonics, rote learning.
And, in March 2003, third graders at HPS surpassed the state in reading. State scores were 76.3 percent at or above grade level. HPS scores were 95.7 percent at or above grade level. The state scored 17.3 percent superior performance beyond grade level, and HPS scored 23.4 percent superior performance beyond grade level.
Another successful approach was uncovered by Durkin. He used the research strategy
of comparing...low-income above-average readers with low-income below-average readers. The findings were that Black children who were highly successful at reading had books at home, had help with their homework from a parent or someone else... and that they were expected to go to college.
Many of these children were already reading prior to entering kindergarten. Obviously, some older sibling or adult had spent quality time with the child during the critical period of zero to five years, according to Durkin.
One of the critical causes of educational trouble for African American boys is low parental involvement. In Parents magazine, September 1997, Mitchell Trockmen, former associate superintendent for elementary and secondary education for Minneapolis Public Schools proclaims Parents who act as advocates [for their child] arent being pushy or meddling, they are appropriately concerned.
The bottom line here is that to prevent failure of Black boys in the public schools, we must forge a strong teacher/parent relationship.
Rose Tave, though born in Greenville, Texas, has spent most of her life in Minneapolis. She attended Minneapolis public schools, Minneapolis Community College, and the University of Minnesota. She has two sons and one grandson. She welcomes reader responses to LocallySpeaking@aol.com.
John Gilmer - 06 Feb 2004 11:12 GMT > Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children > who have behavior issues... Well, DUH!
There are also a way to "hide" underperformers from tests (e.g.: Virginia Standards of Learning tests) which are used to rate and compare schools.
The public schools are a battleground between those parents and taxpayers who want "accountability" and the professional "educators" who don't.
Bob LeChevalier - 06 Feb 2004 17:55 GMT >> Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children >> who have behavior issues... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >There are also a way to "hide" underperformers from tests (e.g.: Virginia >Standards of Learning tests) which are used to rate and compare schools. Such as?
Kids in special ed have to take the SOLs. (My kid has done OK so far).
And NCLB requires the percentage of special ed kids skipping the test to not exceed 5%, and the percentage passing has to improve every year of the school is listed as "failing".
>The public schools are a battleground between those parents and taxpayers >who want "accountability" and the professional "educators" who don't. Actually, the parents complain about the SOLs at least as much as the professionals. It is their little darlings who won't graduate, after all.
lojbab
 Signature lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
Eustace Bagg - 06 Feb 2004 12:40 GMT > More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental > intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion: http://www.spokesman-recorder.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=38252&sID=13
> **************************** exZZZZZZZerpt *********************** > Special Ed the new segregation -- Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder 2/4/2004 [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > DAFNz - Genetically created with poor behavior -- > Supreme Court, 1954, Brown vs. DNA - a total LOOZer... I bet these little fellows are special!
Girl raped at Lauderhill school by 2 fourth graders, BSO says http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-25girlassault,0,7891204.story ?coll=sfla-news-broward
LAUDERHILL - Two fourth grade boys were suspended from school after a classmate said she was raped in a bathroom at Royal Palm Elementary on Wednesday.
The 10-year-old victim was taken to a sexual assault center after the attack was reported and deputies said they received back positive indications she was raped.
The two boys - ages 11 and 12 -- have been turned over to juvenile authorities and each was charged with sexual battery of a child and lewd and lascivious exhibition.
At a Thursday afternoon hearing, a judge ordered the two boys, both dressed in jail uniforms and fitted with shackles, held in custody for 21 days. There was no reaction from either child.
Broward Sheriff's Office spokesman Jim Leljedal on Thursday said the attack occurred around 9 a.m. Wednesday during regular session at Royal Palm Elementary, 1951 NW 56 Ave. The school has more than 900 students.
The victim told investigators she had been harassed by the two boys for several months.
On Wednesday, the girl was confronted by the two boys and forced into a bathroom where the boys assaulted her, Leljedal said.
The assaults were reported to police after the girl told a friend who told a teacher who reported it to authorities.
Both boys confessed, deputies said.
****** Yeah, I know the article doesn't say they are negroes, but I'm sure they are.
E.B.
Alberto Moreira - 06 Feb 2004 23:56 GMT Said "Eustace Bagg" <Bagg@nowhere.net> :
>I bet these little fellows are special! Let's de-squawk this post, and see what we're left with...
[snip...]
>Yeah, I know the article doesn't say they are negroes, but >I'm sure they are. Opinion.
And that's it: one unfounded, unverified opinion. Fact, eh ?
Alberto.
Byker - 06 Feb 2004 14:14 GMT > More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental > intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion: http://www.spokesman-recorder.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=38252&sID=13
> **************************** exZZZZZZZerpt *********************** > Special Ed the new segregation -- Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder 2/4/2004 [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Special Ed programs often provide a place to *DISCARD* Black children > who have behavior issues... And mammy can hardly wait to get her hands on the "crazy checks" that da gubmint will award for each "disabled" sprog. With restrictions now placed on welfare, it's becoming a way of life. Entire nigger towns are now coaching their kids to act retarded or loonie long enough to qualify for SSI.
There was some little (pop. 300) all-black town in Alabama where EVERY burrhead family with niglets was drawing "crazy checks." A network camera crew showed up to investigate, and here was this globby fat sow who was not only on welfare, but also drawing $411 per month for each of her porch monkeys. Her cash income for sitting on her fat a.s was about $2,800 a month, not including food stamps and other gubmint goodies. When the reporter's questions got too intrusive, her oldest yard ape, about 16, stomped up to the camera waving a baseball bat and telling them on no uncertain terms to get off the property.....
Alberto Moreira - 06 Feb 2004 23:56 GMT Said "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> :
>And mammy can hardly wait to get her hands on the "crazy checks" that da >gubmint will award for each "disabled" sprog. With restrictions now placed >on welfare, it's becoming a way of life. Entire nigger towns are now >coaching their kids to act retarded or loonie long enough to qualify for >SSI. And this is opinion, therefore irrelevant shithurling. Try again ?
>There was some little (pop. 300) all-black town in Alabama where EVERY >burrhead family with niglets was drawing "crazy checks." A network camera [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >stomped up to the camera waving a baseball bat and telling them on no >uncertain terms to get off the property..... Source, please ?
Alberto.
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 13:00 GMT >Said "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> : > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >And this is opinion, therefore irrelevant shithurling. Try again ? Actually, it's more than opinion. The SSI disability criteria were written to allow kids who were nothing but thugs to qualify on the basis of a mental impairment. To correct this problem, SSA rewrote the criteria in the mid-1990s to eliminate certain sociopathic behaviors from being considered, but with coaching and "friendly" psychiatrists/psychologists, many are still able to qualify for disability benefits.
BroJack
>>There was some little (pop. 300) all-black town in Alabama where EVERY >>burrhead family with niglets was drawing "crazy checks." A network camera [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Source, please ? Byker - 07 Feb 2004 16:00 GMT On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:56:59 GMT, junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote:
>Said "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> : > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Source, please ? CBN, c.1996. ABC's "20/20" had also done a segment on SSI abuse around the same time, focusing on a black school principal with health problems who could have made better money had he quit, applied for SSI, and lived on the dole rather than stay at his job as a matter of pride. The subject first got national attention on the Sam and Diane Show ("Primetime Live"), prompting a slew of angry rebuttals. Examples: http://www.fair.org/extra/9505/disabled-children-fraud.html http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/07/07/time/ssi.kids.html
Less noticed were the subsequent op-ed pieces by conservative blacks: http://www.suanews.com/articles/1995/welfarerunamok.htm
And while qualifications have been tightened, it's still going on. Click on the links to get the entire articles and note that none are from those nasty-a.s "racist websites".... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I know of one girl who had three children before she turned nineteen. She was intelligent and could easily have obtained a high school diploma but why bother waking up at 6 a.m. when you can be paid for producing a large brood of progeny instead? Yes, why bother indeed. She never did. I used to see her 10 days a year. Whenever I'd try to discontinue her enrollment she'd suddenly "see the light" and mock the system by showing up for a few days. Then she'd disappear until the next drop notice arrived at her house. I do not know what has become of her as I have not seen her since she turned nineteen. This is the magical age at which juvenile SSI payments abruptly end. She was eligible for special education services in two areas and the state uses this certification as a means to rule them "disabled"- not only inside of school but outside as well. The illogicality of such a work negating label is Kafkaesque. Anyway, one of the conditions of the SSI check is that they must remain in school. For many of them, the charade of their schooling ends with their 19th birthday when they are no longer eligible for what they call "crazy checks."
http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/chapin/chapin1.html
Pat Flanagin sells insurance in Forrest City, Arkansas. Two and a half years ago, he had a hunch that one of his clients was ripping off the government to the tune of $15,000 a year.
"This woman had no job," Flanagin recalls. "She lived in government housing. But she had $ 10,000 in the bank and wanted a new house. First, I thought she was a prostitute or selling drugs. But, she was getting the money from the government-'crazy checks'."
This mother of three, explains Flanagin, was receiving about $ 15,000 a year in Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments for each of her children, who were supposed to suffer from mental disorders. But all three, he says, were quite healthy.
That made him angry. So Flanagin, who is also a Democratic state representative, launched an investigation that eventually evolved into a 30-month media crusade contending that a program intended to help poor, disabled children had become a cash cow for fraud-minded mothers. Many of the press reporters charged that thousands of children were being coached by parents to fake insanity or disabilities to qualify for the so-called crazy checks. Standards for qualification had become so lax, the media reported, that children who simply acted below their age level could get the $ 5,000 a year in benefits.
http://www.ichp.edu/ssi/materials/892739751.html
Many disadvantaged families (note: abuses were rampant in the Mississippi River Delta region of Mississippi and Arkansas) discovered that children in special education often were eligible for an extra check that became known as a "crazy check". At first, it was families of children already in special education who began filing for SSI. As many of these families were owed back payments, and many had more than one child in special education, some families were getting checks big enough to buy cars and make down payments on houses. This generated notice, and soon schools were getting calls asking how to get a crazy check for their child. Less scrupulous parents started asking kids to "act crazy" during testing so they could get into special education. Some slipped into special ed and SSI that way, I don't know how many. I guess it would depend on the gullibility of the examiner.
http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/edlaw/frm00001.html
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 18:12 GMT Said "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> :
>http://www.fair.org/extra/9505/disabled-children-fraud.html Opinion,
>http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/07/07/time/ssi.kids.html opinion,
>Less noticed were the subsequent op-ed pieces by conservative blacks: >http://www.suanews.com/articles/1995/welfarerunamok.htm opinion,
>I know of one girl... hearsay,
>http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/chapin/chapin1.html opinion.
>http://www.ichp.edu/ssi/materials/892739751.html opinion,
>http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/edlaw/frm00001.html opinion.
Try again ?
Alberto.
Disability Coach - 07 Feb 2004 19:26 GMT junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote in news:402a27a8.5784908 @news.mv.net:
> Said "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> : > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > opinion, How the hell is this opinion??? This story presents FACTS. It interviews affected individuals.
*Everything* that you don't agree with is opinion, isn't it, Alberto.
Hell, "2 + 2 = 4" is opinion too, right?
Why don't *you* try again?
Who's yer daddy, boy?!
King of SCAA
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 20:04 GMT Said Disability Coach <dsdf> :
>junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote in news:402a27a8.5784908 >@news.mv.net: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >How the hell is this opinion??? This story presents FACTS. It interviews >affected individuals. To quote:
======================================================== But the Eshelmans' world may be on the brink of collapse because of new federal rules that could take away Jonathan's $74-a-week disability check. "It's frightening," says Eshelman, who is worried that with her two-person household's income cut almost a third, she won't be able to meet her house payments, and she and her son will end up homeless. "I really don't know what we would do." ========================================================
"May be" : opinion.
======================================================== a sign, his mother fears, that he may be on the verge of being cut off. ========================================================
"his mother fears" : opinion.
======================================================== "The standards are vague and easily met," says Representative Jim McCrery, a Louisiana Republican and supporter of the new rules. "Some people regard it as just a super welfare program." ========================================================
"says Representative Jim McCrery" : opinion.
======================================================== Others may end up homeless, since SSI families are poor and the check is a large percentage of household income. And some families may be torn apart. ========================================================
"may" : opinion.
Grok it ? Talk about IQ.
Alberto.
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 18:39 GMT >I know of one girl who had three children before she turned nineteen. She >was intelligent and could easily have obtained a high school diploma but why [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/chapin/chapin1.html This guy is confused. He's mixing SSI childhood disability pmts. under title XVI of the SSAct with "regular" SS childhood benefits under title II.
Under the latter, a kid receives minor child's benefits on his entitled parent's acct. until the age of 18. He doesn't have to be disabled. Benefits stop at 18 unless he's a student or under a disability that begins before age 22. Student benefits ordinarily cease at 19. Childhood disability benefits continue as long as the "child" remains disabled. Any title II benefit requires a wage earner, in this case, the kid's parent, to be insured, i.e., pay sufficiently into the FICA trust fund.
By contrast, title XVI (SSI) payments are means-tested and made from general revenues. You don't need to contribute but even small amts.of income or resources can disqualify you. The resource limit for 2004 is something like $3,000 for a household, not counting the value of your house and one vehicle. Payments are not made to minor kids or students. The kid has to be disabled and payments do not cease at 19 as long as he remains so.
If you think that the "coaching" of kids is an outrage, you oughta get a load of the adults who qualify for disability benefits on the basis of drug addiction and/or alcoholism.
BroJack
COL RSJ - 07 Feb 2004 22:46 GMT >On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:56:59 GMT, junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto >Moreira) wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >http://www.fair.org/extra/9505/disabled-children-fraud.html >http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/07/07/time/ssi.kids.html Saw that show. f.cking niggers still lived in a frame house with broken windows and almost no clothes to wear cause their mammy be buying so much beer and crack.
>Less noticed were the subsequent op-ed pieces by conservative blacks: >http://www.suanews.com/articles/1995/welfarerunamok.htm [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > >http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/edlaw/frm00001.html --
* All quotations from the Encyclopedia Galactica here reproduced are taken from the 116th Edition published in 1020 F.E. by the Encyclopedia Galactica Publishing Co., Terminus, with permission of the publishers.
Alberto Moreira - 08 Feb 2004 12:51 GMT Said COL RSJ <colrsj@alltel.net> :
>Saw that show. f.cking niggers Namecalling: argument rejected.
[snip...] Next ?
Alberto.
COL RSJ - 08 Feb 2004 17:00 GMT >Said COL RSJ <colrsj@alltel.net> : > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Alberto. Truth hurts, and if the name fits, wear it.
Later and stay stupid.
--
"Conan, what is best in life?''
''To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.''
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 17:59 GMT Said BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :
>Actually, it's more than opinion. The SSI disability criteria were >written to allow kids who were nothing but thugs to qualify on the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >psychiatrists/psychologists, many are still able to qualify for >disability benefits. Source, please ? Inference, please ? Without either, yours too, is just opinion.
Alberto.
Feelin' Groovy - 07 Feb 2004 17:54 GMT junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote in news:40292773.5732222 @news.mv.net:
> Said BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) : > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Source, please ? Inference, please ? Without either, yours too, is > just opinion. What's the point, Alberto? If the poster does provide the source, you'll just blow it off like everything else.
Now, why do males commit more crime than females, Alberto? Why are you afraid to answer that question?
Who's yer daddy, boy?!
King of SCAA
Alberto Moreira - 07 Feb 2004 20:00 GMT Said "Feelin' Groovy" <sesss> :
>What's the point, Alberto? If the poster does provide the source, you'll >just blow it off like everything else. The poster must provide BOTH source AND his own personal inference, and that's got to be CONVINCING on its own terms. Just listing what someone else said or did isn't enough: if you list sources without your own inference, I call it "squawk", it's like a parrot, repeating things you haven't even demonstrated you've understood.
>Now, why do males commit more crime than females, Alberto? Why are you >afraid to answer that question? My opinions aren't under scrutiny. YOURS are. Now, you,
ANSWER THE QUESTION
and no squawking, please. Talk about IQ ?
>Who's yer daddy, boy?! Where's your inference, boy ?
Alberto.
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 22:48 GMT >Said "Feelin' Groovy" <sesss> : > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >The poster must provide BOTH source AND his own personal inference, >and that's got to be CONVINCING on its own terms Typical response from someone who has been overwhelmed, flabbergasted, and left speechless.
BroJack
BroJack - 07 Feb 2004 22:18 GMT >Said BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) : > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >Source, please ? Inference, please ? Without either, yours too, is >just opinion. Source? My memory. I was in SSA's Office of Disability, the component that wrote SSA's disability regulations, rulings, operating guidelines, recommendations to appeal court decisions, etc., and can easily recall the folks in the SSI Childhood Disability Branch trying to tighten-up the criteria to eliminate this problem, while at the same time, being pressured by the bleeding heart left-wing legal aid groups who were afraid that the regulatory revisions would go too far and cause disabled children to be denied.
BroJack
Alberto Moreira - 08 Feb 2004 12:50 GMT Said BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) :
>Source? My memory. Not enough in this ng. Try again ?
>I was in SSA's Office of Disability, the >component that wrote SSA's disability regulations, rulings, operating [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >groups who were afraid that the regulatory revisions would go too far >and cause disabled children to be denied. In other words: a conflict of interests. Nothing new here. But, if this is true, blaming "them" - whoever they are - is a copout.
Alberto.
brojack - 08 Feb 2004 13:14 GMT >Said BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) : > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >In other words: a conflict of interests. It's not a conflict of interests. It's more of conservative pressure on one side and liberals on the other squeezing.
> Nothing new here. But, if >this is true, blaming "them" - whoever they are - is a copout. Of course you blame "them," and even the liberals ultimately agreed that coaching children to behave inappropriately is illegal.
BroJack
Alberto Moreira - 08 Feb 2004 15:01 GMT Said brojack@windswept.org (brojack) :
>It's not a conflict of interests. It's more of conservative pressure >on one side and liberals on the other squeezing. Like I said: a conflict of interests.
Alberto.
brojack - 08 Feb 2004 15:50 GMT >Said brojack@windswept.org (brojack) : > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Alberto. Looks like I'm discussing this with some 14-year-old pimple who needs a little more education.
Put your papacita on the line and let me discuss the issue with him.
BroJack
COL RSJ - 08 Feb 2004 17:00 GMT >Said BroJack@windswept.net (BroJack) : > >>Source? My memory. > >Not enough in this ng. Try again ? Just state nothing will be enough cause you are a nigger or one of their friends.
>>I was in SSA's Office of Disability, the >>component that wrote SSA's disability regulations, rulings, operating [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Alberto. --
"Conan, what is best in life?''
''To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.''
Bob LeChevalier - 06 Feb 2004 17:50 GMT >a fundamental >intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion: That's what you display every time you post.
lojbab
 Signature lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
Alberto Moreira - 06 Feb 2004 23:54 GMT Said makemyday@worldnet.att.net :
>More evidence for DAFN genetic inferiority (hard data), a fundamental >intrinzic inability to behave in a civilized fazhion: Actually, more squawk. So,
[big snip...]
>The bottom line here is that to prevent failure of Black boys in the >public schools, we must forge a strong teacher/parent relationship. Why ? Your inference, please ?
Alberto.
Belanger - 07 Feb 2004 07:46 GMT > The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that > ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > that the establishment's theories on how to teach reading are > ineffective." Sir, I must confess that I am quite confused by your post. I see a few paragraphs of the usual racist driven, followed by -- much to my surprise -- a distinctly NON-RACIST article. Did you have a sudden change of heart and then forget to remove the first half? Are simply more retarded than we had all assumed, leading to a belief that this article was, in fact, written by a slavering Southern-US-er?
Like I said, I am confused.
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 07 Feb 2004 11:54 GMT > > The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that > > ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > change of heart and then forget to remove the first half? > Like I said, I am confused. Many of theze articlez provide hard factz, and embed them in a warm fuzzy politically-correct spin which iz entirely unzupported with any subztance. It waz a tezt to see if you could dizcern the differenze...
Belanger - 08 Feb 2004 06:31 GMT > > > The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that > > > ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > any subztance. It waz a tezt to see if you could dizcern the > differenze... You mean that the article provides similar "hard factz", but has a different editorial stance, puts the emphases on entirely different facets, and is written by someone without a crippling crack addiction?
your friend, BELANGER
P.S. Did I pass the test?
makemyday@worldnet.att.net - 08 Feb 2004 09:11 GMT > > > > The author of Conspiracy of Ignorance, Martin L. Gross, writes that > > > > ?...more than likely the failure is due to the incompetence of the [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > P.S. Did I pass the test? As we say here in Japan (where we get along just fine without all the imaginary "benefitz" of diverzity) you *FRUNKED*...
|
|
|