The single payer system of universal health care is the most cost
effective, economical, and efficacious form of the same.
It can be paid for through appropriate taxation such as increasing the
taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals both of which have been
reduced dramatically over the last 30 years.
The two party "winner take all", gerrymandered, and bought political
electoral system has resulted in the concentration of both political
and economic power in a few individuals and entities. The same has and
is, in part, responsible for the failure of the USA to enact some form
of Universal Health Care for all American citizens.
We should, therefore, change our current electoral system to some form
of "proportional" electoral system to ameliorate the aforementioned
unjust concentration of economic and political power so that the just
interests of the American people can both be represented and
promulgated.
Someone - 24 Aug 2009 05:39 GMT
In article
<e7fe807d-3913-4580-9cb0-b52b264a63b2@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
> It can be paid for through appropriate taxation such as increasing the
> taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals both of which have been
> reduced dramatically over the last 30 years.
Sorry, but all your socialist wet dreams for the future don't hold water.
There are not enough rich people out there to pay for all the projects
the socialists want to put thru.
You think that the rich are just there to bleed and bleed to pay for
your projects. Already, the top 1% of income earners in this country
(USA) pay more taxes than the bottom 95%! Just how much is fair?!
Someone

Signature
************************
someone@somewherever.com
John Q public - 25 Aug 2009 03:51 GMT
> In article
> <e7fe807d-3913-4580-9cb0-b52b264a63b2@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Someone
You could tax at 100% and you wouldn't get enough to pay for it