Hello,
Just thinking & observing:-
Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?
I observed that few people in morning excecising programme formed
"laughter club" practicing odd/mad type of activities/excecises and
were quite happy & healthful looking. I also tried & felt quite
enjoying/relaxing. So my above question seemss to have some sense.:)
Best wishes.
Kumar - 15 Apr 2008 12:34 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Best wishes.
Can odd actions by mad people bring some relief or healing to them?
Randy Poe - 15 Apr 2008 15:15 GMT
> Hello,
>
> Just thinking & observing:-
Do you find these observations occur after you have had
four or five glasses of wine?
> Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
> opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
> law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
> reaction"?
No, the "actions" in Newton's Third Law has nothing to do with
"odd actions of people". It is a law of motion, as you note in the
title you give it. It has a specific physical meaning.
- Randy
Kumar - 16 Apr 2008 03:42 GMT
> > Hello,
>
> > Just thinking & observing:-
>
> Do you find these observations occur after you have had
> four or five glasses of wine?
Odd looking actions can occur but may or may not be similar.
> > Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
> > opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> - Randy
Odd Actions/activities can odd motions dependant.
tadchem - 15 Apr 2008 19:51 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
> reaction"?
People, whether 'mad' or 'normal looking', must obey the laws of
physics at all times. The physical universe tolerates no violations
of its laws.
> I observed that few people in morning excecising programme formed
> "laughter club" practicing odd/mad type of activities/excecises and
> were quite happy & healthful looking. I also tried & felt quite
> enjoying/relaxing. So my above question seemss to have some sense.:)
"Seeming" to make sense is no substitute for quantitative empirical
validation.
You are arguing by analogy - an especially inappropriate analogy.
"Analogies are like ropes; they tie things together well, but you
won't get very far if you try to push them." - Thaddeus Stout
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
> Best wishes.
Kumar - 16 Apr 2008 03:46 GMT
> > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> physics at all times. The physical universe tolerates no violations
> of its laws.
Law may mean--valid universely. Still do you agree that human actions
can cause equal & opposing reactions?
> > I observed that few people in morning excecising programme formed
> > "laughter club" practicing odd/mad type of activities/excecises and
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
??
tadchem - 17 Apr 2008 02:22 GMT
> > > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Law may mean--valid universely.
In physical science, that is exactly what "law" means - universally
valid. Such is one interpretation (corrolary, if you prefer) of the
Principle of Relativity.
> Still do you agree that human actions
> can cause equal & opposing reactions?
<snip>
Don't ask me to validate your anthropomorphic fantasy. The use of the
words "actions" and "reactions" in the context of human activity does
not correlate to their use in physics. To attempt such a misuse is a
well recognized fallacy of informal logic known as "equivocation":
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#equivocation
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Kumar - 17 Apr 2008 03:49 GMT
> > > > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Throwing a ball towards a wall & catching it back, is also a human
action & reaction. If law, it should also apply to humams actions/
motions.