Good to see you haven't completely disappeared from the ng. Things
seem to be deteriorating on usenet--not just here, but on other ng I
participate in.
You may have missed my post from 3 or so weeks ago about a Japanese
study about polypoid vs. sessile or depressed intestinal cancers, and
wondered what you thought of the implications. I wrote then:
Saw in the NY Times today an article about a Japanese study published in
JAMA about flat and depressed colonic lesions.
Does this mean next time I get a colonoscopy by gastroenterologist
won't be happy with phosphosoda prep?
Just out of curiosity, if a significant number of cancers arise in
sessile lesions, wouldn't we have heard about this a long time ago?
Just wonderin',
Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
> Good to see you haven't completely disappeared from the ng. Things seem
> to be deteriorating on usenet--not just here, but on other ng I
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Just wonderin',
> Steve
The problem is that when we find a colon cancer, we don't really know what
kind of lesion it arose from. As the genetics of colon cancer become more
clear, however, we are finding that lesions we once thought trivial can
indeed be potentially dangerous. In many or most of these cases, the lesions
have been difficult or impossible to see at conventional colonscopy. Narrow
band imaging scopes will help us to see those lesions, but that is expensive
stuff and won't be widely available for awhile because of the cost.
IMHO, the Half-lytley or Miralax/Gatorade preps actually work better than
phosphosoda in terms of visualization. Additionally, Fleets has been
implicated in rare cases of phosphate-induced renal failure. If you google
"Fleets phospho soda" you'll see that several of the first hits are from
malpractice attornies. Unless your gastroenterologist has balls of steel
(most don't), he'll likely stopped using phosphosoda altogether on advice of
legal counsel.
HMc
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 25 Mar 2008 18:19 GMT
> The problem is that when we find a colon cancer, we don't really know what
> kind of lesion it arose from. As the genetics of colon cancer become more
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> HMc
I actually had heard that about renal toxicity--I guess I dodged a
bullet. ;-)
I don't have a strong family history of colon ca (possible in one
grandparent--they didn't tell me much, and she died years later of a
CVA). My wife forced me to go at age 53 (3 years ago) and my GE kind of
waffled about how often it should be done. I guess I have a couple of
years to think about it.
Thanks,
Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Peter - 26 Mar 2008 01:25 GMT
>> Good to see you haven't completely disappeared from the ng. Things
>> seem to be deteriorating on usenet--not just here, but on other ng I
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> HMc
Totally agree with Howard. I had fleets phospho soda once and it totally
tore me up (bleeding and raw) and there was no way I could do it all over
again the next morning like suggested. My last gastro told me it was banned
from the market but it sounds like some docs still use it. I asked for
saline solution for my last colonoscopy from a surgeon, and it was much
milder and I didn't get raw (if you can stand drinking all that salt water
without vomiting. The colyte or half-lytley is also better than the phospho
soda. I'd say the saline solution is the least damaging for me (but I go
forty times to the water closet and it wipes me out no matter what I use).
Don't like colonoscopy preps :-) . I would never take phospho soda again.
Pete
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 26 Mar 2008 15:59 GMT
> Totally agree with Howard. I had fleets phospho soda once and it totally
> tore me up (bleeding and raw) and there was no way I could do it all over
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Pete
Don't know where you're posting from, but in Brooklyn phospho soda is
OTC. Sorry you had a bad experience--my brother has had 2
colonoscopies, one with Go lytely and once with phosphosoda, and he
found the latter much less unpleasant. Perhaps the Half lytely is
easier to take. As far as efficacy, my gastroenterologist couldn't
resist sitting me down afterwards and showing me his "beautiful"
pictures of my bowel. I'm no expert, but it looked pretty clean to me.
I don't think anyone LIKES colonoscopy preps, but mine was certainly no
worse than I expected. Wouldn't want to discourage anyone having it
done. I'll probably ask my doc about the narrow band imaging scopes
Howard spoke of.
The article in the NYT (I assume the original paper in JAMA as well)
said that the findings of carcinoma apparently arising in flat or
depressed lesions put into further question the usefulness of the
so-called "virtual colonoscopies"--but frankly they really didn't sound
like a good idea to me in the first place.
Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Howard McCollister - 26 Mar 2008 17:30 GMT
>> Totally agree with Howard. I had fleets phospho soda once and it totally
>> tore me up (bleeding and raw) and there was no way I could do it all over
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> colonoscopies"--but frankly they really didn't sound like a good idea to
> me in the first place.
I agree about virtual colonscopy. Even our radiologists no longer think it's
a good idea except in rare circumstances.
As to preps, our switch to Miralax/gatorade has been interesting. Generally,
I think most patients that have had both it and Fleets prefer the Gatorade.
However, I have no worries about using Fleets PhosphoSoda in patients that
prefer it, as long as they are not in the well-publicized risk category for
phosphate-induced renal failure.
CoLyte and GoLytely are full 1-gallon preps. Half-Lytely and the
cheaper/more popular Gatorade/Miralax preps are two quarts. From an
endoscopist's standpoint, I'm fine with either. I think the Gatorade/Miralax
prep is a little more effective.
HMc
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 26 Mar 2008 20:51 GMT
> I agree about virtual colonscopy. Even our radiologists no longer think it's
> a good idea except in rare circumstances.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> HMc
Food for thought. ;-)
Thanks,
Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001