I am not a medical or health professional - hence the possible
ignorance of my question. I hope the group will indulge my curiosity.
In an age when there are antibacterial/antiviral hand liquids which
can kill any known micro-organism, and when surgeons are gowned and
gloved with sterile products, is the surgeons' scrubbing-up process
still really necessary? It seems somewhat belts-and-braces but that's
from a layman.
FoggyTown
Howard McCollister - 26 Feb 2008 12:19 GMT
>I am not a medical or health professional - hence the possible
> ignorance of my question. I hope the group will indulge my curiosity.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> FoggyTown
Gloves tear or puncture fairly often, and most gowns aren't totally
impervious. Scrubbing decreases bacteria on the skin so that if there *is* a
glove tear, or if there is "strike-through" from a gown's forearms becoming
saturated to the point where it will transmit bacteria, there will be a
minimal number of bacteria that can be passed to the patient.
HMc