Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Surgical procedures

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
FoggyTown - 25 Feb 2008 21:30 GMT
I am not a medical or health professional - hence the possible
ignorance of my question.  I hope the group will indulge my curiosity.

In an age when there are antibacterial/antiviral hand liquids which
can kill any known micro-organism, and when surgeons are gowned and
gloved with sterile products, is the surgeons' scrubbing-up process
still really necessary?  It seems somewhat belts-and-braces but that's
from a layman.

FoggyTown
Howard McCollister - 26 Feb 2008 12:19 GMT
>I am not a medical or health professional - hence the possible
> ignorance of my question.  I hope the group will indulge my curiosity.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> FoggyTown

Gloves tear or puncture fairly often, and most gowns aren't totally
impervious. Scrubbing decreases bacteria on the skin so that if there *is* a
glove tear, or if there is "strike-through" from a gown's forearms becoming
saturated to the point where it will transmit bacteria, there will be a
minimal number of bacteria that can be passed to the patient.

HMc

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.