Those guys are dumber than I even thought.   The original article is
still on Wikipedia, along with all its history of revisions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medical_Scientism&oldid=2164762

Beware Wikipedia, in general.  It often has great and useful information.
It other times has very erroneous info and I've seen some medical articles
that are flat out sabotaged (intentionally).

So the people at Wikipedia are the morons and are stupid...... I guess
that must make you a genius. okie dokie.

Your post clearly breaks the rules.  For example, you state that scientism
is a religion.  You assert this as fact, yet it is opinion.  Under NPOV, you
could have said that Dr. Tinfoil Hat believes that scientism is a religion,
as described in his article in Mad Magazine dated 4/1/2009....

It took me about 5 minutes to figure this out.  I had never heard of NPOV.

http://naturalhealthperspective.com/gnu-dictionary/

The amount of work involved in developing any type of dictionary of
this type is absolutely mind-boggling.  But, the dictionary itself;
consists of 5 or 6 different index webpages.  And, is being converted
to an improve vision, called version 2.

Currently, every link has been verified to be operational.  The Google
custom search function searches only the dictionary.  So, searching
for information with a custom Google search engine is also
operational.  Unlike most dictionaries, each entry links to one or
more encyclopedia articles or to a website that covers the respective
topic.  In a few cases, such as medical scientism, it links to an
article on my own website.

My immediate goal, is to provide a short comment or definition for
every entry in the dictionary.  Next, I would like to get a precise
count of the total number of hyperlinks. There should around several
thousand hyperlinks in the dictionary.

Perfecting custom written articles, such as medical scientism, is at
the very bottom of my list of priorities.

http://naturalhealthperspective.com/gnu-dictionary/medical-scientism.html

Medical scientism was simply one topic that I should have covered
better a long time ago.  My oversight has been corrected. :)

My vengeance on Wikipedia was achieved long ago by defining the topic
of alternative medicine globally.  My dictionary includes a lot of
information that the medical scientism bigots at Wikipedia would choke
on, such as:

- Includes coverage of the Wellness Movement as well as wellness
related medical terms.
- Dramatically expands the coverage of exercise-based therapies.
- Dramatically expands the coverage of wellness-based therapies.
- Dramatically increases the accessibility of alternative health
information.

Version 2 is being restricted to providing better coverage of the
current set of entries.