Medical Forum / General / General / June 2007
What should I do?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 17 Jun 2007 23:55 GMT I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about "anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've told the CDC, and they don't care. I've told the FOX, NBC, ABC, and The Washington Post; they don't care.
What the hell is going on here?
Anxiety and depression or some of society's most costly illnesses; does no one besides me give a sh.t that they're curable with antibiotics? It's from an infection; it can be *cured*.
Am I the only one who wants to see these diseases cured?
------------------------------------------------------------
I graduated from Stanford, phi-beta-kappa, with a B.S. and a B.A. I'm writing you because I've made a discovery that should help your research in Infectious-Disease, Neurology, and Psychiatry. In short, my reaction to Albendazole signifies the presence of an infectious- disease, responsible for symptoms of depression / anxiety. The infectious-organism is unidentified, but it's very sensitive to Albendazole.
If this falls outside your areas of expertise and research, please be a thoughtful human being, and forward this information to an expert more interested.
I made the discovery by employing the scientific method: Conducting experiments and recognizing correlations. You haven't had the opportunity to conduct these experiments, since your work is restrained by university-guidelines and medical-ethics. I've been able to experiment on a human-subject (me), discovering something important, with widespread medical implications. I'm a patient, debilitated by signs and symptoms. The signs include chronic diarrhea and transient skin lesions; the symptoms are interpreted clinically as depression / anxiety.
In practice, the skin lesions appear, I request an appointment to see a dermatologist, I wait for the appointment, and by the time of the appointment, the skin lesions have resolved; so the lesions don't get noted in doctors' (but I've photographed some of the lesions).
Doctors order stool exams, MRI, and one or two other tests. They find nothing, so they default to a psychiatric diagnosis (depression, anxiety, or somatization-disorder, depending on the particular doctor's whims).
Over five years, I've self-administered about 10 different antibiotics. My response has been unremarkable, except in one case: the reaction I had to Albendazole was most remarkable. When I self-administered Albendazole, my reaction was severe:
Severe headache Exacerbation of depression / anxiety Voices in my head and delusions. (I have experienced hallucinations and delusions at no other time; I have never been diagnosed with schizophrenia.) Loss of consciousness
After regaining consciousness, I discontinued the Albendazole. After two more days, the side-effects resolved. Several months later, I repeated the experiment, with the same results.
I have researched Albendazole (not just Google; I use PubMed, and I'm able to understand technical writing). I realize you probably have no working experience with Albendazole, as it's so uncommon in the U.S.A.
My reaction to Albendazole was nothing like the allergic reaction described in the literature. My reaction to Albendazole was entirely consistent with Herxheimer reaction. A Herxheimer reaction is the following chain of events:
1.An antibiotic is administered to a patient; 2.The antibiotic kills infectious organisms within the patient; 3.As the organisms die, they release chemicals toxic to the patient; 4.The patient reacts to the toxins.
My reaction to Albendazole signifies the presence of an infectious disease, responsible for my symptoms of depression / anxiety. The infectious-organism remains unidentified, but it is known to be sensitive to Albendazole. The implications are profound, as my symptoms are so common among the general population, and so costly to society.
The less competent psychiatrists among you may assume my Albendazole- reaction was psychosomatic; but there's no need for such reckless assumptions, because this experiment is repeatable; my reaction to Albendazole, including objectively measurable signs, can be evaluated clinically, removing any question.
Then you experts would recognize the link between Albendazole and depression / anxiety. Then you could work to understand the infectious- disease causing these symptoms in so many people; you could manage the infectious-disease, controlling its spread, maybe finding a cure eventually.
If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask.
Howard McCollister - 19 Jun 2007 17:01 GMT > I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about > "anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] > > If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask. Wow. If it weren't for the internet, we wouldn't have access to this kind of expertise. Damn the medical/industrial complex for suppressing such brilliance. It's worse than General Motors suppressing those 1000 miles-per-gallon carburetors.
HMc
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 20 Jun 2007 22:54 GMT Howard,
You're deluded. No one's suppressing anything. What's happening, is people like you are wasting there time making snide comments, instead of addressing objective scientific evidence.
Good luck with your personality disorder.
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 20 Jun 2007 23:02 GMT p.s.
My spelling sucks, but my science is sound.
Jeff - 21 Jun 2007 15:24 GMT > Howard, > > You're deluded. No one's suppressing anything. What's happening, is > people like you are wasting there time making snide comments, instead > of addressing objective scientific evidence. Objective scientific evidence? Someone who claims he is a "Stanford scientist" when he has bachelor's from Stanford and no other affiliation? He self medicates and has delusions.
Why would anyone take these findings seriously?
> Good luck with your personality disorder. john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 22 Jun 2007 02:24 GMT >> Someone who claims he is a "Stanford scientist" when he has bachelor's from Stanford and no other affiliation? Get over it. If you review my initial post, you'll see I admit outright that my affiliation with Stanford U. ended with my graduation, with a B.S. and a B.A. and nothing more. Since you're looking for the worst in me, I'll offer you this: Technically, my degree-status is a "B.A.S.":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Arts_and_Science
I hadn't imagined anyone could be so pedantic to care about such tangential details, but since you are, I thought I'd inform you.
I also claim to have graduated Phi-Beta-Kappa. Did you? If so, from which university?
I'll be back later to address the more relevant points from your post.
Jeff - 22 Jun 2007 02:28 GMT >>> Someone who claims he is a "Stanford scientist" when he has bachelor's from Stanford and no other affiliation? > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > I'll be back later to address the more relevant points from your post. Having a BA or BS from Stanford does not make one a Stanford scientist.
Jeff
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 22 Jun 2007 17:23 GMT > Having a BA or BS from Stanford does not make one a Stanford scientist. I stand corrected; and what does make one a "Stanford scientist"?
Jeff - 22 Jun 2007 20:47 GMT >> Having a BA or BS from Stanford does not make one a Stanford scientist. > > I stand corrected; and what does make one a "Stanford scientist"? Working as a scientist at Stanford at the time.
jeff
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 30 Jun 2007 19:29 GMT > Wow. If it weren't for the internet, we wouldn't have access to this kind of > expertise. Damn the medical/industrial complex for suppressing such > brilliance. It's worse than General Motors suppressing those 1000 > miles-per-gallon carburetors. Only thing the internet is good for is porn. If you like hot chicks, check out this site: http://www.swpictures.biz/
Pete - 19 Jun 2007 19:38 GMT > I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about > "anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > Severe headache > Exacerbation of depression / anxiety What the hell are you talking about. If it exacerbates your depression how the hell can it help your depression. What planet do you live on.
> Voices in my head and delusions. (I have experienced hallucinations > and delusions at no other time; I have never been diagnosed with [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask. john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 20 Jun 2007 22:51 GMT >> If it exacerbates your depression how the hell can it help your depression. Antibiotic treatment for Lyme-Disease exacerbates the symptoms Lyme- Disease (google "Herxheimer Lyme").
Antibiotic treatment for Syphilis exacerbates the symptoms Syphilis (google "Herxheimer Syphilis").
But these treatments cure these diseases. If you research "Herxheimer Reaction", you will learn the mechanism by which an antibiotic-therapy can exacerbates symptoms while also curing disease.
>> What the hell are you talking about... What planet do you live on. Earth and you? Why not spend your time researching "Herxheimer Reaction", instead of ranting about things you haven't researched?
Pete - 21 Jun 2007 03:50 GMT >>> If it exacerbates your depression how the hell can it help your >>> depression. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Earth and you? Why not spend your time researching "Herxheimer > Reaction", instead of ranting about things you haven't researched? I will admit that the "cure can be worse than the cause", but I wasn't sure what you were getting at due to your presentation. So I guess that you were saying it made you more depressed at first, but then your depression got better. I don't think that you can prove that it was the Albendazole that accounted for that.
BTW, Howard is a prominent laparoscopic surgeon that has me plonked, because of long ago disagreements, but he is a pretty smart guy most of the time, when he is not being sarcastic. :-)
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 21 Jun 2007 13:46 GMT >> BTW, Howard is a prominent ... surgeon... I can believe it, as so many N.P.D. sufferers are prominent M.D.'s.
>> ... sarcastic... It's all fun and games, until the arrogance of prominent doctors causes the mismanagement of infectious-epidemics, the waste of taxpayers' money, and the inhumane abuse of millions of patients. As it's come to that, and ruined my life, I'm not particularly in the mood for sarcastic comments from prominent narcissists like Howard.
>> ... has me plonked... Howard put you on "ignore"? So Howard's a coward. Afraid of your thoughts and ideas; afraid of your words. Afraid of the alphabet.
>> he is a pretty smart guy most of the time In 1981, pretty smart doctors were telling peptic-ulcer patients that their condition was due to "stress".
In 1982, when Warren and Marshall identified the link between ulcers and infectious-disease, was Howard smart enough to address the objective evidence; or did Howard ignore the evidence and instead publish condescending remarks about Warren and Marshall?
Thirteen years after Warren and Marshall's discovery, 90% of ulcer patients still believed their discomfort was due to a psychiatric condition --- thanks to negligence like Howard's.
(http://www.cdc.gov/ulcer/history.htm)
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 21 Jun 2007 14:00 GMT Pete,
Thanks for being constructive.
>> I will admit that the "cure can be worse than the cause", but I wasn't sure what you were getting at due to your presentation. I'm sorry for having been unclear; please do ask for clarification any time it's needed. (It's taken me eight hours to write-up this post, so it may take more than a minute for readers to understand it.)
>> So I guess that you were saying [Albendazole] made you more depressed at first,... Yes. And it also induced neurological signs and symptoms:
- weakness - severe headache - loss of consciousness - voices in my head - delusions
After the loss-of-consciousness, I discontinued treatment, not because I'd recovered, but because the treatment side-effects were dangerous.
>> but then your depression got better. No. When I discontinued the Albendazole, the reaction resolved, and I returned to my normal state, which is still interpreted clinically as Anxiety or Depression.
On June 19, I asked a prominent infectious-disease specialist whether the diseases Anxiety and Depression could be infectious-diseases, not only in my case, but in many cases. He answered, without justification, that he felt it was unlikely; however, he also admitted that, prior to Warren and Marshall's discovery, he'd never expected stomach-ulcers to be an infectious-disease.
I then asked whether the severe "psychiatric" symptoms I experienced (in reaction to Albendazole), might have been an exacerbation of my normal "psychiatric" symptoms, due to a surge of toxins released by some infectious-organism sensitive to Albendazole (i.e., Herxheimer reaction).
I also asked why I would have experienced auditory-hallucinations and delusions in reaction to Albendazole, unless it was by mechanism of a Herxheimer reaction.
His answer was, "I don't know. I'm an amateur in those fields."
So I had this Albendazole-reaction which was entirely consistent with a Herxheimer reaction (an incomplete Herheimer reaction, leaving behind a still-active infectious-disease); and no expert has been able to account for the reaction.
In light of the data,
- It should be considered that my Albendazole-reaction might have been Herxheimer. - It should be considered that expert-investigation of my Albendazole- reaction might discover an infectious-disease responsible for my condition, which includes so-called "Depression" / "Anxiety". - It should be considered that such an infectious-disease might account for "Depression / Anxiety" not only in my case, but in many cases. - It should be considered, in light of the hallucinations and delusions I experienced in reaction to Albendazole, that such an infectious-disease might account for so-called "Schizophrenia", in many cases. - It should be considered that Depression, Anxiety, and Schizophrenia are society's most costly, and least understood, diseases.
My Albendazole-reaction included objective signs, including loss of consciousness. The objective signs could be measured clinically, if I were administered Albendazole by an expert; I'd consent.
Albendazole-treatment might be rather beneficial, if treatment included co-administration of steroids and anticonvulsants, to lessen any inflammatory-response. This outcome is suggested by previous research in Albendazole-treatments (http://geocities.com/ john_doe_united_states/albendazole.pdf).
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 21 Jun 2007 14:03 GMT (link fixed)
http://geocities.com/john_doe_united_states/albendazole.pdf
CabinBoy - 22 Jun 2007 03:05 GMT On Jun 17, 5:55 pm, "john_doe_united_sta...@yahoo.com" <john_doe_united_sta...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about > "anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] > > If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask. You self-medicated, experienced delusions and think the CDC is going to be interested in what happened to you? This is like shooting your eye out with a rubber band and telling the Army you have a powerful new weapon in the war on terror.
You really should seriously be getting some medical help if you are intent on injecting yourself with various drugs. Also, while it is very laudable that you graduated with 2 bachelor's degrees from Stanford, without a lab and some graduate or post-grad work nobody is going to take you seriously as a scientist. This may not be fair, but it is reality.
Please seek medical help and please stop injecting yourself with drugs.
CB
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 30 Jun 2007 11:47 GMT > without a lab and some graduate or post-grad work nobody is > going to take you seriously as a scientist. This may not be fair, but > it is reality. Another reality, is that attitude has earned America jihad.
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 30 Jun 2007 19:21 GMT (sent to me in email) >> Your reaction to albendazole shows a side- effect of the medication, not anything to do with infectious disease.
I concede. Sorry for wasting your time.
|
|
|