Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What should I do?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 17 Jun 2007 23:55 GMT
I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about
"anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've
told the CDC, and they don't care. I've told the FOX, NBC, ABC, and
The Washington Post; they don't care.

What the hell is going on here?

Anxiety and depression or some of society's most costly illnesses;
does no one besides me give a sh.t that they're curable with
antibiotics? It's from an infection; it can be *cured*.

Am I the only one who wants to see these diseases cured?

------------------------------------------------------------

I graduated from Stanford, phi-beta-kappa, with a B.S. and a B.A. I'm
writing you because I've made a discovery that should help your
research in Infectious-Disease, Neurology, and Psychiatry. In short,
my reaction to Albendazole signifies the presence of an infectious-
disease, responsible for symptoms of depression / anxiety. The
infectious-organism is unidentified, but it's very sensitive to
Albendazole.

If this falls outside your areas of expertise and research, please be
a thoughtful human being, and forward this information to an expert
more interested.

I made the discovery by employing the scientific method: Conducting
experiments and recognizing correlations. You haven't had the
opportunity to conduct these experiments, since your work is
restrained by university-guidelines and medical-ethics. I've been able
to experiment on a human-subject (me), discovering something
important, with widespread medical implications.

I'm a patient, debilitated by signs and symptoms. The signs include
chronic diarrhea and transient skin lesions; the symptoms are
interpreted clinically as depression / anxiety.

In practice, the skin lesions appear, I request an appointment to see
a dermatologist, I wait for the appointment, and by the time of the
appointment, the skin lesions have resolved; so the lesions don't get
noted in doctors' (but I've photographed some of the lesions).

Doctors order stool exams, MRI, and one or two other tests. They find
nothing, so they default to a psychiatric diagnosis (depression,
anxiety, or somatization-disorder, depending on the particular
doctor's whims).

Over five years, I've self-administered about 10 different
antibiotics. My response has been unremarkable, except in one case:
the reaction I had to Albendazole was most remarkable.

When I self-administered Albendazole, my reaction was severe:

Severe headache
Exacerbation of depression / anxiety
Voices in my head and delusions. (I have experienced hallucinations
and delusions at no other time; I have never been diagnosed with
schizophrenia.)
Loss of consciousness

After regaining consciousness, I discontinued the Albendazole. After
two more days, the side-effects resolved. Several months later, I
repeated the experiment, with the same results.

I have researched Albendazole (not just Google; I use PubMed, and I'm
able to understand technical writing). I realize you probably have no
working experience with Albendazole, as it's so uncommon in the U.S.A.

My reaction to Albendazole was nothing like the allergic reaction
described in the literature. My reaction to Albendazole was entirely
consistent with Herxheimer reaction. A Herxheimer reaction is the
following chain of events:

1.An antibiotic is administered to a patient;
2.The antibiotic kills infectious organisms within the patient;
3.As the organisms die, they release chemicals toxic to the patient;
4.The patient reacts to the toxins.

My reaction to Albendazole signifies the presence of an infectious
disease, responsible for my symptoms of depression / anxiety. The
infectious-organism remains unidentified, but it is known to be
sensitive to Albendazole.

The implications are profound, as my symptoms are so common among the
general population, and so costly to society.

The less competent psychiatrists among you may assume my Albendazole-
reaction was psychosomatic; but there's no need for such reckless
assumptions, because this experiment is repeatable; my reaction to
Albendazole, including objectively measurable signs, can be evaluated
clinically, removing any question.

Then you experts would recognize the link between Albendazole and
depression / anxiety. Then you could work to understand the infectious-
disease causing these symptoms in so many people; you could manage the
infectious-disease, controlling its spread, maybe finding a cure
eventually.

If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask.
Howard McCollister - 19 Jun 2007 17:01 GMT
> I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about
> "anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
>
> If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask.

Wow. If it weren't for the internet, we wouldn't have access to this kind of
expertise. Damn the medical/industrial complex for suppressing such
brilliance. It's worse than General Motors suppressing those 1000
miles-per-gallon carburetors.

HMc
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 20 Jun 2007 22:54 GMT
Howard,

You're deluded. No one's suppressing anything. What's happening, is
people like you are wasting there time making snide comments, instead
of addressing objective scientific evidence.

Good luck with your personality disorder.
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 20 Jun 2007 23:02 GMT
p.s.

My spelling sucks, but my science is sound.
Jeff - 21 Jun 2007 15:24 GMT
> Howard,
>
> You're deluded. No one's suppressing anything. What's happening, is
> people like you are wasting there time making snide comments, instead
> of addressing objective scientific evidence.

Objective scientific evidence? Someone who claims he is a "Stanford
scientist" when he has bachelor's from Stanford and no other
affiliation? He self medicates and has delusions.

Why would anyone take these findings seriously?

> Good luck with your personality disorder.
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 22 Jun 2007 02:24 GMT
>> Someone who claims he is a "Stanford scientist" when he has bachelor's from Stanford and no other affiliation?

Get over it. If you review my initial post, you'll see I admit
outright that my affiliation with Stanford U. ended with my
graduation, with a B.S. and a B.A. and nothing more. Since you're
looking for the worst in me, I'll offer you this: Technically, my
degree-status is a "B.A.S.":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Arts_and_Science

I hadn't imagined anyone could be so pedantic to care about such
tangential details, but since you are, I thought I'd inform you.

I also claim to have graduated Phi-Beta-Kappa. Did you? If so, from
which university?

I'll be back later to address the more relevant points from your post.
Jeff - 22 Jun 2007 02:28 GMT
>>> Someone who claims he is a "Stanford scientist" when he has bachelor's from Stanford and no other affiliation?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> I'll be back later to address the more relevant points from your post.

Having a BA or BS from Stanford does not make one a Stanford scientist.

Jeff
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 22 Jun 2007 17:23 GMT
> Having a BA or BS from Stanford does not make one a Stanford scientist.

I stand corrected; and what does make one a "Stanford scientist"?
Jeff - 22 Jun 2007 20:47 GMT
>> Having a BA or BS from Stanford does not make one a Stanford scientist.
>
> I stand corrected; and what does make one a "Stanford scientist"?

Working as a scientist at Stanford at the time.

jeff
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 30 Jun 2007 19:29 GMT
> Wow. If it weren't for the internet, we wouldn't have access to this kind of
> expertise. Damn the medical/industrial complex for suppressing such
> brilliance. It's worse than General Motors suppressing those 1000
> miles-per-gallon carburetors.

Only thing the internet is good for is porn. If you like hot chicks,
check out this site: http://www.swpictures.biz/
Pete - 19 Jun 2007 19:38 GMT
> I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about
> "anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> Severe headache
> Exacerbation of depression / anxiety

What the hell are you talking about.  If it exacerbates your depression how
the hell can it help your depression.  What planet do you live on.

> Voices in my head and delusions. (I have experienced hallucinations
> and delusions at no other time; I have never been diagnosed with
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask.
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 20 Jun 2007 22:51 GMT
>> If it exacerbates your depression how the hell can it help your depression.

Antibiotic treatment for Lyme-Disease exacerbates the symptoms Lyme-
Disease (google "Herxheimer Lyme").

Antibiotic treatment for Syphilis exacerbates the symptoms Syphilis
(google "Herxheimer Syphilis").

But these treatments cure these diseases. If you research "Herxheimer
Reaction", you will learn the mechanism by which an antibiotic-therapy
can exacerbates symptoms while also curing disease.

>> What the hell are you talking about...  What planet do you live on.

Earth and you? Why not spend your time researching "Herxheimer
Reaction", instead of ranting about things you haven't researched?
Pete - 21 Jun 2007 03:50 GMT
>>> If it exacerbates your depression how the hell can it help your
>>> depression.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Earth and you? Why not spend your time researching "Herxheimer
> Reaction", instead of ranting about things you haven't researched?

I will admit that the "cure can be worse than the cause", but I wasn't sure
what you were getting at due to your presentation.  So I guess that you were
saying it made you more depressed at first, but then your depression got
better.  I don't think that you can prove that it was the Albendazole that
accounted for that.

BTW, Howard is a prominent laparoscopic surgeon that has me plonked, because
of long ago disagreements, but he is a pretty smart guy most of the time,
when he is not being sarcastic.  :-)
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 21 Jun 2007 13:46 GMT
>> BTW, Howard is a prominent ... surgeon...

I can believe it, as so many N.P.D. sufferers are prominent M.D.'s.

>>  ... sarcastic...

It's all fun and games, until the arrogance of prominent doctors
causes the mismanagement of infectious-epidemics, the waste of
taxpayers' money, and the inhumane abuse of millions of patients. As
it's come to that, and ruined my life, I'm not particularly in the
mood for sarcastic comments from prominent narcissists like Howard.

>> ... has me plonked...

Howard put you on "ignore"? So Howard's a coward. Afraid of  your
thoughts and ideas; afraid of your words. Afraid of the alphabet.

>> he is a pretty smart guy most of the time

In 1981, pretty smart doctors were telling peptic-ulcer patients that
their condition was due to "stress".

In 1982,  when Warren and Marshall identified the link between ulcers
and infectious-disease, was Howard smart enough to address the
objective evidence; or did Howard ignore the evidence and instead
publish condescending remarks about Warren and Marshall?

Thirteen years after Warren and Marshall's discovery, 90% of ulcer
patients still believed their discomfort was due to a psychiatric
condition --- thanks to negligence like Howard's.

(http://www.cdc.gov/ulcer/history.htm)
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 21 Jun 2007 14:00 GMT
Pete,

Thanks for being constructive.

>> I will admit that the "cure can be worse than the cause", but I wasn't sure what you were getting at due to your presentation.

I'm sorry for having been unclear; please do ask for clarification any
time it's needed. (It's taken me eight hours to write-up this post, so
it may take more than a minute for readers to understand it.)

>> So I guess that you were saying [Albendazole] made you more depressed at first,...

Yes. And it also induced neurological signs and symptoms:

- weakness
- severe headache
- loss of consciousness
- voices in my head
- delusions

After the loss-of-consciousness, I discontinued treatment, not because
I'd recovered, but because the treatment side-effects were dangerous.

>>  but then your depression got better.

No. When I discontinued the Albendazole, the reaction resolved, and I
returned to my normal state, which is still interpreted clinically as
Anxiety or Depression.

On June 19, I asked a prominent infectious-disease specialist whether
the diseases Anxiety and Depression could be infectious-diseases, not
only in my case, but in many cases. He answered, without
justification, that he felt it was unlikely; however, he also admitted
that, prior to Warren and Marshall's discovery, he'd never expected
stomach-ulcers to be an infectious-disease.

I then asked whether the severe "psychiatric" symptoms I experienced
(in reaction to Albendazole), might have been an exacerbation of my
normal "psychiatric" symptoms, due to a surge of toxins released by
some infectious-organism sensitive to Albendazole (i.e., Herxheimer
reaction).

I also asked why I would have experienced auditory-hallucinations and
delusions in reaction to Albendazole, unless it was by mechanism of a
Herxheimer reaction.

His answer was, "I don't know. I'm an amateur in those fields."

So I had this Albendazole-reaction which was entirely consistent with
a Herxheimer reaction (an incomplete Herheimer reaction, leaving
behind a still-active infectious-disease); and no expert has been able
to account for the reaction.

In light of the data,

- It should be considered that my Albendazole-reaction might have been
Herxheimer.
- It should be considered that expert-investigation of my Albendazole-
reaction might discover an infectious-disease responsible for my
condition, which includes so-called "Depression" / "Anxiety".
- It should be considered that such an infectious-disease might
account for "Depression / Anxiety" not only in my case, but in many
cases.
- It should be considered, in light of the hallucinations and
delusions I experienced in reaction to Albendazole, that such an
infectious-disease might account for so-called "Schizophrenia", in
many cases.
- It should be considered that Depression, Anxiety, and Schizophrenia
are society's most costly, and least understood, diseases.

My Albendazole-reaction included objective signs, including loss of
consciousness. The objective signs could be measured clinically, if I
were administered Albendazole by an expert; I'd consent.

Albendazole-treatment might be rather beneficial, if treatment
included co-administration of steroids and anticonvulsants, to lessen
any inflammatory-response. This outcome is suggested by previous
research in Albendazole-treatments (http://geocities.com/
john_doe_united_states/albendazole.pdf).
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 21 Jun 2007 14:03 GMT
(link fixed)

http://geocities.com/john_doe_united_states/albendazole.pdf
CabinBoy - 22 Jun 2007 03:05 GMT
On Jun 17, 5:55 pm, "john_doe_united_sta...@yahoo.com"
<john_doe_united_sta...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm a Stanford scientist who's discovered something important about
> "anxiety" and "depression"; my discovery could lead to a cure. I've
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
>
> If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask.

You self-medicated, experienced delusions and think the CDC is going
to be interested in what happened to you?  This is like shooting your
eye out with a rubber band and telling the Army you have a powerful
new weapon in the war on terror.

You really should seriously be getting some medical help if you are
intent on injecting yourself with various drugs.  Also, while it is
very laudable that you graduated with 2 bachelor's degrees from
Stanford, without a lab and some graduate or post-grad work nobody is
going to take you seriously as a scientist.  This may not be fair, but
it is reality.

Please seek medical help and please stop injecting yourself with
drugs.

CB
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 30 Jun 2007 11:47 GMT
> without a lab and some graduate or post-grad work nobody is
> going to take you seriously as a scientist.  This may not be fair, but
> it is reality.

Another reality, is that attitude has earned America jihad.
john_doe_united_states@yahoo.com - 30 Jun 2007 19:21 GMT
(sent to me in email) >> Your reaction to albendazole shows a side-
effect of the medication, not anything to do with infectious disease.

I concede. Sorry for wasting your time.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.