Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / General / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How accurate are routine heath physicals?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rgregoryclark@yahoo.com - 10 Apr 2007 18:19 GMT
Just read about a scientist and author experiencing and later dying
of a heart attack after he had had a full physical that pronounced him
in "excellent" health:

Stephen's Health.
http://forums.4aynrandfans.com/index.php?showtopic=5885

Stephen Speicher - 1939 - 2007.
http://forums.4aynrandfans.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=5969

I'm reminded of the the proponent of running Jim Fixx dying of a
heart attack while jogging. I presume Fixx being a proponent of health
living also had regular check ups.
Can routine physicals detect heart ailments?

   Bob Clark
Joe Doe - 10 Apr 2007 21:40 GMT
>  Just read about a scientist and author experiencing and later dying
> of a heart attack after he had had a full physical that pronounced him
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> living also had regular check ups.
>  Can routine physicals detect heart ailments?

>     Bob Clark

Good physicals can detect some heart ailments and alert you to potential
other time bombs (diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol,
cancerous skin lesions, colon, prostrate cancer etc. etc.).  

Passing even a stress test does not guarantee you will not have a
problem.  For a stress test to be positive you have to have considerable
ischaemic heart disease.  To have a heart attack the bar is lower - you
just need vulnerable plaque to rupture and trigger a clotting response
and the artery closes off rapidly.   A combination of genetics and
lifestyle dictates how susceptible you are to these ailments.  For
example a mutation inherited in some families makes plaque very
susceptible to rupture and the risk of heart attacks for these
individuals is probably 100 times the risk of those with high
cholesterol.  These individuals are in serious jeopardy.

Alternatively, you can lead a lifestyle that promotes accumulation of
lesions with plaque (smoke, high amounts of bad fats, high blood
pressure, sedentary, obesity, obesity induced diabetes etc.).

It makes most sense to adopt the healthiest lifestyle you can and hope
for the best.

Roland
rgregoryclark@yahoo.com - 11 Apr 2007 00:40 GMT
> In article <1176225551.771306.26...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,

>  "rgregorycl...@yahoo.com" <rgregorycl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >  Just read about a scientist and author experiencing and later dying
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Roland-

Thanks for that. This web page on Jim Fixx says he declined to take a
stress test. Given his family history that would have been a wise
precaution to take:

The Legacy of Jim Fixx.
Living longer.
"Jim Fixx may have done just that, given the fact that his father died
of a heart attack at age 43, and he survived nine years longer to age
52. He might have lived longer had he listened to Dr. Cooper, who
urged him to take a stress test during one visit to the Cooper Clinic
in Dallas. Despite having cholesterol levels above 250, Fixx demurred
for reasons we can only guess at. In the several months before his
death, Fixx ignored what hindsight reveals were the warning signs of
advanced coronary artery disease. An autopsy revealed blockage in
Fixx's three main arteries of 95 percent, 85 percent and 50 percent."
http://www.halhigdon.com/Articles/Fixx.htm

Are there for example non-invasive tests such as CAT scans that could
detect blockage of the arteries?

 Bob Clark
Kurt Gavin - 11 Apr 2007 00:45 GMT
>> In article <1176225551.771306.26...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> Are there for example non-invasive tests such as CAT scans that could
> detect blockage of the arteries?

Yes. See one of the Arthur Agatston books.

>  Bob Clark
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 11 Apr 2007 03:45 GMT
> >  "rgregorycl...@yahoo.com" <rgregorycl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>  Are there for example non-invasive tests such as CAT scans that could
> detect blockage of the arteries?

A stress test is a non-invasive test that would detect occlusive
coronary disease (blockage of the heart arteries).

Prayerfully in Jesus' ever-lasting love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

May HIS immortal brethren pray for our dying mortal friends and
neighbors:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

In memory of our dearly departed Bob(this one) Pastorio:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

The Official SMC FAQ List:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/TheTruth/FAQ
Port@nospam.invalid - 11 Apr 2007 18:34 GMT
rgregoryclark wrote:
>Are there for example non-invasive tests such as CAT scans that could
>detect blockage of the arteries?

Here's a link with some info along those lines.
http://www.ptca.org/imaging/index2.html

Port
rgregoryclark@yahoo.com - 11 Apr 2007 17:10 GMT
> In article <1176225551.771306.26...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Roland

Thanks for that. In the case I mentioned I don't know if Stephen
Speicher took a stress test during his yearly physical.
But are you also saying that even a CAT scan might not show
significant blockage; it just the blockage that is there happens to be
susceptible to causing heart attacks? In that case it might be
difficult to predict who would be susceptible to heart attacks with
non-invasive methods.

  Bob Clark
Jim Chinnis - 11 Apr 2007 18:30 GMT
"rgregoryclark@yahoo.com" <rgregoryclark@yahoo.com> wrote in part:

>> In article <1176225551.771306.26...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
>   Bob Clark

It's extremely difficult with either invasive or non-invasive methods. It
isn't the "blockage" that is the disease. It is fairly subtle changes in the
artery wall, inflammation, and clotting tendencies.

I think Roland's point is very good. Assume you are at risk and do the best
you can to bring down your risks. True, you'd like to know if you should be
on something like a statin, but a physical isn't likely to help you decide.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Kurt Gavin - 10 Apr 2007 21:55 GMT
Arthur Agatston, MD (South Beach diet etc) has a book which discusses some
of the things that typical physicals and blood tests don't get into.

Interesting and credible info, it's in most libraries.

> Just read about a scientist and author experiencing and later dying
> of a heart attack after he had had a full physical that pronounced him
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>    Bob Clark
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.