 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / General / May 2007Letter to Editor: "Where are the leaders?"
http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/hsletters/index.cfm#833596 Where are the leaders? In his March 18 column, Editor Bob Ashley talks about a problem that exists worldwide, not just in North Carolina. The problem is that our medical technology is much more advanced than the other technologies necessary to support the increasing population. The uneven application of technologies is what happens when we allow specialists to influence public policy. Specialists are blissfully unaware of the "big picture." Dr. Fauci of the NIH and Dr. Gerberding of the CDC are perfect examples. Then, too, there are the elected officials who act on the specialists' policy recommendations. I think we can all see that being good at getting elected is also a specialty and does not translate into being good at solving problems. So, basically, we're leaderless. David Polewka Chapel Hill March 28, 2007 > http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/hsletters/index.cfm#833596 > > Where are the leaders? ... They tend go where they are appreciated. They are not appreciated in politics. Voters don't want problems solved. They only want. They want laws to force other people to give them what they want. Mostly they want other people's bacon. http://www.capitaldistrict-lp.org/what.shtml http://www.capitaldistrict-lp.org/how.shtml > >http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/hsletters/index.cfm#833596 > > > Where are the leaders? > > They tend go where they are appreciated. > They are not appreciated in politics. We need to prohibit big government everywhere. We need to follow the Golden Rule everywhere. We need to stop suppressing influenza everywhere. . . -- > We need to prohibit big government everywhere. No, it's just that you have a strong need to tell everyone else what to do, always in ways that cannot possibly work. How, except by "big government", would you possibly enforce such a prohibition? > We need to follow the Golden Rule everywhere. No, it's just that you have a strong need to preach what you refuse to practice; your violations of the golden rule occur with each posting you create, each letter you send to an editor. > We need to stop suppressing influenza everywhere. Mo, it's just that you haven't recovered from your resentment of the medical science that kept your father alive and delayed your access to your inheritance, and still want to kill off all the aged to gain your revenge on your (deceased) father for living longer than you wanted him to live. > No, power addicts are the troublemakers. Yes, that would be you, addicted to "power" no sane person would ever grant to a brain-burned former alcoholic, trying to run an entire world when you can't even keep your postings to appropriate newsgroups. > They're not leaders. Yes, you are not a leader, just a blue-butted baboon, dancing your little endlessly repeated ritual mincing idiocies for the amusement of the onlookers. > They're sick. Yes, there is no question that what you have is a disease, a mental illness curable only by your demise. You could help reduce the surplus population by one by subtracting one heartbeat. Too bad about all that booze, and how little of your brain it left operational, none of your common sense at all, for example, but the damage is unrecoverable, and the sooner you face that, the sooner you'll take your own advice and depart, your first and only lifetime experience with practicing The Golden Rule. Sufficit. xanthian. > > We need to prohibit big government everywhere. > > No, it's just that you have a strong need to tell > everyone else what to do, always in ways that cannot > possibly work. How, except by "big government", > would you possibly enforce such a prohibition? The latest telephone poll taken by the Gov. of Calif. yielded results on whether or not people who live in Calif. think illegal immigration is a serious problem: a) 31% of people answered: "Yes, it's a serious problem." b) 69% of people answered: "Kent sucks." . . -- >> We need to prohibit big government everywhere. > >No, it's just that you have a strong need to ... No, you just don't like my not sharing in your atheism. >> We need to follow the Golden Rule everywhere. > >No, it's just that you have a strong need to preach... No, you just don't like my not sharing in your atheism. >> We need to stop suppressing influenza everywhere. > >No, it's just that you haven't recovered from your... No, you just don't like the fact that you might have to pay a price. ========================= "Endeavor to persevere" ========================= >>> http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/hsletters/index.cfm#833596 >>> Where are the leaders? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > We need to follow the Golden Rule everywhere. > We need to stop suppressing influenza everywhere. ... we need to kiss my porcelain, white irish bottom. b ps; no leprechauns were hurt in the making of this post  SignatureSometimes I'm in a good mood. Sometimes I'm in a bad mood. When all my moods have cum to pass i hope they bury me upside down so the world can kiss me porcelain, white, Irish bottom. > Then, too, there are the elected officials who act on the > specialists' policy recommendations. I think we can all see > that being good at getting elected is also a specialty and > does not translate into being good at solving problems. > > So, basically, we're leaderless. Thank the diety of your choice for that. Leaders are what cause wars and international chaos. Bob Kolker > > So, basically, we're leaderless. > > Thank the diety of your choice for that. Leaders are > what cause wars and international chaos. No, power addicts are the troublemakers. They're not leaders. They're sick. . . -- > No, power addicts are the troublemakers. > They're not leaders. They're sick. That's strange. Hitler was addressed as Der Fueher. He sure was the Leader and he lead Germany to destruction. Bob Kolker > > No, power addicts are the troublemakers. > > They're not leaders. They're sickos. > > That's strange. Hitler was addressed as Der Fueher. He sure was the > Leader and he lead Germany to destruction. Blind leading the blind. . . -- >>> No, power addicts are the troublemakers. >>> They're not leaders. They're sickos. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > . > -- that's: blind leading the visually impaired. b SignatureSometimes I'm in a good mood. Sometimes I'm in a bad mood. When all my moods have cum to pass i hope they bury me upside down so the world can kiss me porcelain, white, Irish bottom. > Blind leading the blind. Hitler was not blind and neither were his followers. Bob Kolker >> Blind leading the blind. > > Hitler was not blind and neither were his followers. ...you are a sh.t. you are only a sh.t. if you were say. ummm, a fuckup i'm sure you would feel compelled to strip off all your clothes and parade around naked with your itty= tiny-miny penis flapping in the breeze. b ps; but then you're a sh.t so ignore all that SignatureSometimes I'm in a good mood. Sometimes I'm in a bad mood. When all my moods have cum to pass i hope they bury me upside down so the world can kiss me porcelain, white, Irish bottom. > > No, power addicts are the troublemakers. > > They're not leaders. They're sick. > > That's strange. Hitler was addressed as Der Fueher. > He sure was the Leader and he led Germany to destruction. Oops, almost forgot...addicts don't lead, they TAKE HOSTAGES !! . . -- >>> No, power addicts are the troublemakers. >>> They're not leaders. They're sick. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > . > -- hey!~!~ you're phunny~!~ SignatureSometimes I'm in a good mood. Sometimes I'm in a bad mood. When all my moods have cum to pass i hope they bury me upside down so the world can kiss me porcelain, white, Irish bottom. > > Oops, almost forgot...addicts don't lead, > > they TAKE HOSTAGES !! > > hey!~!~ you're phunny~!~ Results 1 - 50 of about 12,300 for addiction "take hostages". . . -- > http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/hsletters/index.cfm#833596 > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > advanced than the other technologies necessary to > support the increasing population. The medical industry is no where near as advanced as the idiots make it out to be. Since three-quarters of the idiots think stem cells have something to do with evolution. And the other quarter of the imbeclies thinks Lawyers have something to with evolution. Which is Japan and Robot Technology enters their moron Chinese Einstonian "Big Picture". > The uneven application of technologies is what happens > when we allow specialists to influence public policy. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Chapel Hill > March 28, 2007 > And the other quarter of the imbeclies thinks Lawyers > have something to with evolution. > > When it is well established that Lawyers have EVERYTHING to do with de-evolution. Kurt (What sperm and lawyers have in common? Only one in a million become human) Ullman > In article <1179079790.945240.249...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > When it is well established that Lawyers have EVERYTHING to do with > de-evolution. Well, that's well esablished, but it's related to the simple case of cloture in Law. Which states that the reciprocal of pi is 3 on Mondays, 1 on Tuesdays, and 4 if you're an idiot New York Lawyer. > Kurt (What sperm and lawyers have in common? Only one in a million > become human) Ullman |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.