With more and more treatments for illnesses, those born with a weak
constitution, who in earlier days might have died young are now living
to a ripe old age. My question is, and I don't know the answer, given
our medical knowledge today, and our ability to cheat death, are we
also cheating 'natural selection' (survival of the fittest), and
setting ourselves up for a future where almost everyone will have
congenital health problems?
With science and medicine having only been truly effective on a grand
scale in the past few generations, is this something that should be of
concern?
Regards,
Will Alber.
Kurt Ullman - 21 Mar 2007 23:44 GMT
> With more and more treatments for illnesses, those born with a weak
> constitution, who in earlier days might have died young are now living
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> setting ourselves up for a future where almost everyone will have
> congenital health problems?
That is a rather interesting conundrum that I don't think we know
how it will play out. This will be especially interesting since we are
increasing longevity in many of the genetically-transmitted diseases to
the point where more and more are surviving childhood and reaching the
age where THEY can reproduce.