> "plutu" <plutu@walt-disneu.com> wrote in message
>
> Gallstone pancreatitis and chemical pancreatitis from those meds are two
> completely different mechanisms and her doctor should have no difficulty in
> determining which of the two mechanisms is the cause of her recurrent
> pancreatitis.
This is interesting but contrary to what I knew... I think I read in a
paper something like "the pancreatitis from meds has no distinguishable
features..."
Anyway: can you provide more detailed info about how to discriminate
between the two?
At the hospital they just said that "when they find gallstones they
assume that the reason for the pancreatitis is gallstones and not a rare
side effect from a widely used medication"
This leads me to believe that they didn't do a real estimation of what
you say.
If you can tell me more about the differences...
> I think one can be fairly certain that the basis is gallstones
> and that her meds are not contributing in any way.
> Obviously, she needs to have her gallbladder removed. The risk of her dying
> from that operation may very well be less than the risk of three or more
> episodes of pancreatitis.
This was my opinion also but they didn't want to operate her. The
anesthesist said she probably would not have passed the anesthesia. They
didn't speak about precise likelihoods.
Probably they thought that a death during an operation was not good for
their career, while the patient was alive and could be dismissed... :-(
It is sad but I kinda understand this.
Thanks for your help
Howard McCollister - 10 Mar 2007 01:15 GMT
>> "plutu" <plutu@walt-disneu.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Thanks for your help
"When you hear hoofbeats, think of horses, not zebras".
Common things present commonly...pancreatitis in the presence of stones in
the gallbladder is presumed to be gallstone pancreatitis. That it might be
due to medication is pretty much just wishful thinking.
In an episode of gallstone pancreatitis, one might expect to see elevated
direct bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase as well as radiographic evidence
of an enlarged common bile duct.
HMc
plutu - 10 Mar 2007 12:30 GMT
> "When you hear hoofbeats, think of horses, not zebras".
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> direct bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase as well as radiographic evidence
> of an enlarged common bile duct.
Thanks
Direct bilirubin normal at 0.18 mg/dl
Alkaline phosphatase elevated at 687 MU/ml however captopril is reported
to elevate alkaline phospatase sometimes
http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/captop_ad.htm so it might be the same
for enalapril
ecography results: (translating to english at my best...)
"Choledochus at ilum measures 5mm and does not contain stones." I think
5mm is normal, right?
"Cholecistis is 'hydropic' (? maybe) and contains numerous stones of
14-22 mm of size and biliary sludge."
14mm are not likely to pass IMO.
The other reason that leads me to think "meds" is that at the previous
hospitalization they said that the gallbladder (or duct?) was so much
blocked with stones that stones would probably not pass anymore, hence
they said this was probably the last pancreatitis she would have had.
Which turned out to be not true...
TIA
Howard McCollister - 10 Mar 2007 15:43 GMT
>> "When you hear hoofbeats, think of horses, not zebras".
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> they said this was probably the last pancreatitis she would have had.
> Which turned out to be not true...
Perhaps their whole proposed scenario makes more sense to someone who's
actually on-scene, and can review all the lab work/xrays, get a history, and
examine the patient. From here, it sounds like she's being mismanaged.
HMc