Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Lupus / March 2005
New here- should I be worried?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Sen - 07 Mar 2005 12:13 GMT Hi folks,
I am new to this group (never used googe groups before actually) but am looking for information. From my experience some people in support groups have more knowledge about their own condition then you can ever learn from general information on the internet, so I thought I'd ask your help.
Ok, here's my question. I wonder whether I really should be worried about the question whether I could have lupus or not. Actually I am not worried at all, but of course something in my mind is, or I wouldn't post here at all. Why do I ask this question? My story in short: (or at least I'll try to be short, I am well known for rambling in my posts.. and in real life ;))
When I first saw a rheumatologist about a year and a half ago, my story was that I had had general joint pains for years. The problem with my knees had been put down to patellar chondropathy, and I always thought that the other pains would come from the same thing. Wrong thought, for this is not possible ;) but how should a teenager know this? Well the rheumy did some tests of course and a physical exam, then a few weeks later called me for the verdict. He told me my ANA was tested as positive, and that this could point to SLE, even more so because I had answered positive to his question if I were photosensitive. But because another test had been negative, he said he didn't think much of it and diagnosed me as having fibromyalgia. The fact that I did not even fulfill the criteria for this condition (I did not have the so called tender points) and that I had many problems with my joints (namely subluxations) that could not be explained from this diagnosis, did not seem important to him. Other doctors have said since then that I did not have fibromyalgia, and since I already doubted this diagnosis very much I do not think of myself as having it, though oficially it is still in my files. I did not think much of the positive ANA either, as I thought the rheumy would have taken action if it were a strong clue. He just said that if I wanted to have it ruled out, I should discuss it with my GP. I never did this, as my GP was not the one who refered my to the rheumy. Case closed, I thought.
Some time later, I discovered I had hypermobility syndrome, (HMS) a heritairy disorder of connective tissue in which the ligaments are too lax and thus can cause the joints to be painful and instable. This explained my symptoms of pains, fatigue and joint subluxations. I had been told I was hypermobile ("double jointed") before, but never knew about HMS. I wondered about the blood test again when I found out that SLE can also cause joint laxity, but thought that I would be very sick indeed if that was the case for me. So my diagnosis was HMS, and I think (still do) that that is correct.
Now I have had a recurring rash for many years. It always appears on my hands and elbows, and because it never bothered me and always went away by itself I have never seen a doctor for that. Some weeks ago I was at the docs with another question (HMS related) and because I was having this rash again, I asked him if he knew what it was. First he said it was some kind of eczema, but he thought it strange that my skin was not dry, as is usually the case in eczema. I then told him I had had short episodes of this rash for many years, that it always was on my hands and elbows, and that the sun made it worse. He then said he had no explanation for that, and off I wobbled. I thought my rash had such specific features that I had thought he would maybe know what it was, so I started to look on the internet myself. Maybe I am making too much of this all (which is, in my eyes anyway, just a simple rash) but the thing it is most similar to, is the discoid patches seen in lupus. My patches are red, raised, and usually become light in the middle, leaving a red border around a yellow-ish thingy. The fact that they react to sunlight is also a big ponder.. when I look at the ACR criteria for SLE, I see that together with my previous sun allergy, (which still occasionally flares up slightly) I display three of them, whilst many of the other things I have never been tested for. Now what do you think of this? Am I over- worried? Taking little symptoms which seperately would mean nothing and making things bigger then they actually are? I do not think I have SLE. I have some symptoms (arthralgia and fatigue) that are seen in SLE but which can also be explained from the HMS. I am not often sick, never had any major health problems other then the HMS which is quite disabling for me, and though almost all of my joints are sore, they have never been arthritic. But my ratio is trying to tell me to be sensible and at least dicuss it with my doc. I hate however knowing more then he does (as is already the case when it comes to HMS) and am terrified of bringing things up, especially now as SLE can be a dangerous condition and I don't want him to think I am worried about my health. (As some of you may know, when you have searched for years for the correct diagnosis you are told too often it is all in your head or that you are a hypochondriac- so if I tell him I searched on the internet and want to have checked some things out.. *sigh* well you probably know what I mean.)
People here will probably tell me to go see my doc, and they will be right. But I am hoping some will also be able to give me some information and maybe even answer some of my questions. Well so much for trying to be short! :P
Sen
Andy - 07 Mar 2005 15:34 GMT >Hi folks, Hi Sen
http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk/index.htm
and in particular
http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk/hughfaq.htm
will give you probably more information than you need!
 Signature Andy Taylor [Chair, N E Lupus Group] See http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk for more!
Sen - 15 Mar 2005 09:53 GMT Hi,
Haven't been here for a few days and am currently too busy with other things to take more then a peek at the archives, which would probably be very interesting. I guess you guys are basically saying that it would maybe wise to have things checked out further, but that I have no need to worry. Well that's ok :). Anyway, I just wanted to let you know I will get back to you after I've seen the rheumy next month. I intend to bring it up but guess I have too many questions already for one appt! (HMS stuff.) I'll let you know how I get on. Thank you all for the replies, info and support.
Take care,
Sen
BJ - 16 Mar 2005 16:05 GMT Hi Sen, I would be most interested in knowing what the rheumy has to say, so please do let us know. Talk to us before then, if you have the time and energy. Good luck to you with your appointment. BJ-Sk. Canada
> Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Sen J - 07 Mar 2005 17:06 GMT > I am not often sick, never had any major > health problems other then the HMS which is quite disabling for me, > and though almost all of my joints are sore, they have never been > arthritic. But my ratio is trying to tell me to be sensible and at > least dicuss it with my doc. Hi there and welcome, there was so much there that I snipped most of it. Looks like the rheumatologist ruled out Lupus and fibromyalgia.
What ratio? My ANA was mildly positive some years back. I have 2 autoimmune problems..thyroid and Raynaud's. A positive ANA is often seen with Lupus, but can also be seen with other autoimmune diseases/disorders and/or the otherwise healthy population.
http://www.medicinenet.com/hypermobility_syndrome/article.htm The joint hypermobility syndrome is a condition that features joints that easily move beyond the normal range expected for a particular joint. The joint hypermobility syndrome is considered a benign condition. It is estimated that 10-15% of normal children have hypermobile joints, i.e. joints that can move beyond the normal range of motion. There is a tendency of the condition to run in families (familial). <quoted>
They mention Ehlers-Danlos syndrome there. Also I've seen on another newsgroup, where a patient who had lung cancer, presented with painful joints, so your GP is the person to sort all this out.
Individual joints can be hypermobile. I know because my knees are and possibly now in my hands. My knees point towards each other. (I forget the name of that) but the doctor who examined my knees seemed to think that was a factor. Weight is also a factor. The knees, ankles and hips are load-bearing joints. Stomping up and down stairs can also be a factor. (knee) Twists during falls (which I've had) can also be a factor. I fall a lot :-) The pain can interfere with sleep and cause fatigue Knee braces or wrapping AND combined with physiotherapy helps a lot.
DLE is mentioned here http://www.ghg.net/schwerpt/ASLFAQ/symptoms.htm Discoid lupus can appear similar to other skin lesions. For example, rosacea, fungal infections, sarcoidosis, seborrhea, dermatomyositis, and a sun-sensitive rash called polymorphous light eruption can be ruled out by a simple skin biopsy and blood tests before diagnosing DLE. <quoted>
Where I come from, after a doctor consult, a letter is written up summarizing what is or isn't found. That is sent to the GP and kept in the specialists' files, along with bloodwork results and scan results. I think you should collect all those and see a skin specialist for biopsies, then take all the information to your GP and let him/her help you sort out what is or isn't and what might help or not help. The GP can also keep an eye on your bloodwork (signs and symtoms), from time to time and if anything is seen that might be worrisome, act on it.
Work with your GP and let us know how you're making out.
I'm not a doctor. J
Sen - 08 Mar 2005 08:11 GMT Hi folks,
Thank you all for your replies and the information. I had not seen those particular websites mentioned but knew most of it (done some reading after rheumy mentioned SLE as I wanted to know what it was ;).
> What ratio? I meant my mind, at least the rational part of it :P
He did not rule out anything, in fact he diagnosed me with FMS, and said he could not rule out SLE but did not think I had it. If I wanted to have it ruled out I should discuss it with my GP. As my GP was not the one who refered me to him, I never even talked the visit through with my GP. (Learned from that now always to make an appt. to "report" back to GP after a specialist visit.) And as I saw the rheumy for a second opinion, I have never seen him again after that as well. So no follow-up on symptoms or anything. But as the HMS explains many of my symptoms we didn't look further after that.
> They mention Ehlers-Danlos syndrome there. Also I've seen on another > newsgroup, where a patient who had lung cancer, presented with painful > joints, so your GP is the person to sort all this out. I don't see what you mean by that excactly, could it be that you are saying that joint pain can sometimes also be a feature in not-so-benign conditions?
The joint hypermobility syndrome is by some authorities considered to be one and the same as Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, hypermobility type. In any way they are related and difficult to distinguish, so that's why they would mention it.
> Individual joints can be hypermobile. I know because my knees are and > possibly now in my hands. I know, not all of my joints are hypermobile as well, though almost all of my joints are causing me pain and problems. Actually the pauciarticular form (where hypermobility exsist in four or less joints) is far more common then the polyarticular form. But now I have to be careful not to start a lecture about HMS, lol.
> My knees point towards each other. (I forget the name of that) but the > doctor who examined my knees seemed to think that was a factor. Some call them "frogs eyes". Mine do as well. The hypermobility of my feet and ankles, as well as a rotation and laxity from my hips is causing it in my case. Physio can help, but overhere (I'm from the Netherlands) HMS is not considered to be a chronic condition needing chronic treatment by the peeps who decide what gets covered by health care insurance and what not. As a result, I do not get more then seven(!) physio sessions per indication. (Don't get me started!)
Well thank all you for the advise, I do keep all the specialist letters. However my GP is the kind of doctor that would not soon act upon things himself. Usually I am the one to tell what I want or need, and he refers me or whatever. So if I would work with him I have to start the whole story form the begin.. BUT he is usually open to what patients say, and one thing I have learnt is to never, never be afraid he thinks what I say is silly. On the other hand, nothing happens unless I take control and tell him what I want. Not really how it should be, but at least I now know his "user's manual" as to speak, so I'd rather stay with him, and not change doctors, (if that is even possible in my town) as you, Shelagh suggested. You are however very right in saying that this probably is my mean problem now: the fact that I am afraid to mention things when I go to my GP. I know he will never link symptoms or things the rheumy said if I were to present with other symptoms, so it IS the way forward if I want to have it looked into. But don't be afraid I would be losing sleep on it at night, in fact whatever worries me, it doesn't worry me at night. Never has, actually. (And got new painkillers... wow haven't slept like that in ages!) And as I said before, to be honest I am NOT worried. But some part of me is wondering whether I should be (talking about making things complicated for yourself). Let's call it pre-worry, lol. Oh about the "dangerous"-thingy: I cannot read my message from where I'm typing right now, but I thought I put something like "potentially dangerous" or that it "could be dangerous" or the like. Well anyhow, what I meant is that it is potentially dangerous, but if I'm wrong there I stand corrected.
About seeing a skin doc: as my rash is just starting to disappear again, I was wondering.. Of course I can make an appt. with my GP next time it appears, but if he refers me to a dermatologist I will have to wait a while until I can be seen there. Is it possible to have it looked at whilst you are rash-free, or do they have to investigate the rash? For how can I ever see a specialist at the "correct" moment?
I also want to say that I am glad you seem to agree with me that it is too early, or too less to worry about. Think I will just wait until I'm having my rash again, and then see my GP again. (It seems a very little thing to go see the GP for though.. it never bothered me in any way.) OR -maybe another good opportunity- I'm seeing another rheumy next month, and they asked me to take any past letters from rheumys, if present. At least I can tell then that it was never excluded and that the rash sometimes makes me wonder about it. I will let you know how I get on.
Andy - 08 Mar 2005 10:14 GMT []
>About seeing a skin doc: as my rash is just starting to disappear >again, I was wondering.. Of course I can make an appt. with my GP next >time it appears, but if he refers me to a dermatologist I will have to >wait a while until I can be seen there. Is it possible to have it >looked at whilst you are rash-free, or do they have to investigate the >rash? For how can I ever see a specialist at the "correct" moment? You could get a camera, and take pictures of the rash. Many people find that the act of making a medical appointment to display a rash is the best cure for it!
 Signature Andy Taylor [Chair, N E Lupus Group] See http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk for more!
Sen - 08 Mar 2005 18:21 GMT Thanks again for the replies and the information. You are all very helpful :).
J: My other docs said I did not have FMS, that and I do not have the tender points. So I don't think I have it. However, the new rheumy I am going to see seems to know about HMS but his special interest is FMS, so I will ask him to rejudge the dx and think of his word as final.
About the old (former) rheumy: why is it odd I should discuss things further with my GP? And to clear op things: yes we do need referals over here to see a specialst, but it was my rehab doc that refered me to the rheumy, and now my GP is refering me to the other rheumy. For a skin doc I would also need a referal.
I haven't seen Andy mentioning Hughes syndrome but will look it up (I'm not used to this form of groups so got a bit confused with the messages there). Ah, should have added that before of course: I'm female and am 20 years old (21 this months, wheehee :P).
Keeping a dairy of my signs: wow that's a hard one. I try to ignore the symptoms as far as possible, because my HMS causes me to have specific problems with almost any joint in my body, and as I already can't function normally (can only walk short distances and look like a drunken duck in doing so, have difficulties with sitting on most chairs for any period of time, repetitive movements, etc.) the message is just PACE, pace pace and go on with what you can. Listen to your body but keep moving even though you are tired all the time and it hurts to do so. I don't even want to keep record, I think. I saw weight loss mentioned somewhere: well I'm sure I don't want to monitor that as I'm already underweight and seem to lose a few pounds now and then for no apperent reason and I don't always manage to regain my old weight. So what I'm trying to say is that there are so many symptoms I would lose track very soon if I wanted to keep record. It's just too much. I could monitor the rash though as this is a quite easy and straight forward symptom.
Hmm let's see what you other question were. Sleep: well it's better now with the new meds, I do sleep now and the only thing I have not been succesful in yet is to prevent myself from waking up early because of the pain. Sometimes I do manage though and I think that basically I am a good sleeper. I do have problems with turning in bed though as my shoulders use to sublux when I try that. And there are loads of other things, like ribs etc. and other pains, that often cause me to wake up in worse pain then I'm used to but that is not a big problem. I do have times I have trouble sleeping, but they always pass by and now with the meds the nights are really good. Fatigue: Yes, BIG TIME! But that's also very often part of HMS. I sleep like 12 hours a day if they let me (10 hours a night and 2 in the afternoon) and my body really needs it. I have to keep myself from saying out aloud all day that I am tired ;). So yes, fatigue is an issue. Nights sweats: at times. Low grade temperature: hmm, no, don't think so.
Andy: thanks for the tip about the camera, I do believe what you're saying, lol. I once took my cell phone to a phone store to ask advice because I couldn't get it working. It had been like that for weeks, but once I wanted to show the guy in the store what was wrong the stupid thing started to work again! :P
Well oh I think it was J that asked me about what bloodwork the rheumy did. Will have to look that one up. *Goes through her papers* Ah. Don't know if I know all the correct english equivalents, so if I use an abbrevation or word that doesn't sound familiar let me know! He did ask for BSE, HB, ery's, leuko's, diff., trombo's, electrolytes, calcium, CPK, alk. phos., protein, protein spectrum, TSH, FT4, ANA, ENA, anti DS-DNA (the last being negative by the way. Thought everyting else was normal as well, except for the ANA).
Think that was about it for now. Really have to tape my fingers up now, lol.
Sen
J - 08 Mar 2005 19:27 GMT > J: My other docs said I did not have FMS, that and I do not have the > tender points. So I don't think I have it. However, the new rheumy I > am going to see seems to know about HMS but his special interest is > FMS, so I will ask him to rejudge the dx and think of his word as > final. I was just pointing out that sometimes they diagnose FMS while waiting to see if the person eventually meets the criteria for Lupus. I did get the message that FMS has been ruled out for you. J
J - 08 Mar 2005 19:44 GMT > Well oh I think it was J that asked me about what bloodwork the rheumy > did. Will have to look that one up. *Goes through her papers* Ah. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ENA, anti DS-DNA (the last being negative by the way. Thought > everyting else was normal as well, except for the ANA). and what was the titre of the ANA? 1:160 1:40 1:320 1:640 1:1280 1:2560 Maybe you don't have Lupus. Let's see what the skin specialist says. Yes, a photo is good, but actually being able to biopsy is probably better..
J http://www.ghg.net/schwerpt/ASLFAQ/diag.htm
Doctors will typically rely on lab tests for complete diagnosis. Unfortunately, how each doctor interprets these tests is highly variable and leads to some cases taking years to diagnose.
Basic lab tests should include a CBC with differential, blood chemistries/analyses (SMAC), ESR and urinalysis. Abnormal CBC results may include thrombocytopenia, leukopenia or lymphocytopenia, and/or anemia. It's not uncommon for there to be long-standing, slightly-low WBC's and RBC's. While a single such result might be dismissed as insignificant, long-standing results like these can be significant. Thus, making a graph of these lab results can be a very important tool to aid in diagnosis. There may also be an elevated ESR or C-reactive protein which merely indicates that an inflammatory process does exist. Finally, blood chemistries and a urinalysis are important to check for major organ involvement (such as kidney, liver and the thyroid gland). Signs of kidney involvement would include an elevated BUN and creatinine, or the presence of protein in the urine. Blood chemistries which evaluate liver function include AST, ALT, bilirubin, alk. phos. and GGT. Thyroid studies include the T3, T4, Free T4 and TSH.
A biopsy may be performed on a skin rash, mouth ulcer, or if there is a major organ involvement (such as the kidney), on the affected organ.
The following are some of the standard tests which most rheumatologists run when lupus is suspected. These include:
1. The ANA (antinuclear antibodies) which are considered the cornerstone of lupus diagnosis as they are present at some point in 95-98% of patients with lupus. 2. The anti-dsDNA found in 50% of patients with lupus. Anti-dsDNA is so rarely present in patients without SLE that its presence is generally considered diagnostic for SLE. 3. Anti-Ro (SSA) which is commonly found in cases of ANA-negative lupus and may indicate secondary Sjogren's Syndrome, and anti-La(SSB) which occurs mainly with primary Sjögren's Syndrome. 4. Anti-Sm which is seen in few lupus patients, but when present can help confirm the diagnosis. 5. The anti-RNP which may indicate mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) at high levels, or confirm a lupus diagnosis at low levels. 6. Anticardiolipins and the lupus anticoagulant. Since 1/3 of SLE patients test positive for one or all anticardiolipins (IgA, IgG, IgM) and APS is so common among lupus patients, rheumatologists will often run these tests. 7. Rheumatoid Factor (RF) which is positive in 80% of those with RA, but only 20-30% of those with lupus. A high RF titre may suggest an RA diagnosis rather than SLE. 8. Immune complexes or complements (C3, C4, CH50) which tend to be low when lupus is very active, and can also be an important gauge of disease severity.
Other important lab tests include CPK, PT and PTT. CPK tends to be elevated when there is muscle inflammation as is common with lupus myositis. Also, the PT and PTT tend to be prolonged in those who are positive for the lupus anticoagulant.
When looking at the above test results, it's important to consider them in context with other test results and symptoms. This means borderline and low-positive results may have more significance than they otherwise would. Also, it's important to track trends over a period of time and note whether the results are abnormal but stable, or fluctuating widely. Further, if there is fluctuation, keeping a symptom log may help pinpoint what caused it.
I'm adding this... http://www.itzarion.com/lupusana.html The pattern of the ANA test can sometimes be helpful in determining which autoimmune disease is present and which treatment program is appropriate. The speckled pattern is found in SLE and other connective tissue diseases, while the peripheral or rim pattern is found almost exclusively in SLE. Because the ANA is positive in so many conditions, the results of the ANA test have to be interpreted in light of the patient's medical history, as well as his or her clinical symptoms. Thus a positive ANA alone is NEVER enough to diagnose lupus. On the other hand, a negative ANA argues against lupus, but does not rule the disease out completely.
and http://dermnetnz.org/immune/cutaneous-lupus.html Investigations
When tests are performed in a patient with cutaneous LE, there may be no abnormalities, especially if the patient has discoid LE. Sometimes however mild anaemia or a reduction in the number of circulating white cells is detected, and there may be some abnormal antibodies to cell nuclei (called antinuclear antibodies or ANA). SLE is associated with high titres (titres reflect the strength of the reaction) of ANA as well as other autoantibodies. Extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), also known as antiRo/La antibodies, is nearly always present in patients with subacute LE.
The tests may need to be repeated every year or so. The severity of the condition may be reflected in the titre of ANA and/or ENA.
Andy - 09 Mar 2005 10:59 GMT [
>I haven't seen Andy mentioning Hughes syndrome but will look it up http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk/faqshets/faqs18.htm
http://www.lupus-support.org.uk
And another site I can't locate :(
 Signature Andy Taylor [Chair, N E Lupus Group] See http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk for more!
anon - 15 Mar 2005 12:47 GMT > >I haven't seen Andy mentioning Hughes syndrome but will look it up > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > And another site I can't locate :( http://www.hughes-syndrome.org/what2.htm
J - 08 Mar 2005 10:18 GMT > Thank you all for your replies and the information. I had not seen > those particular websites mentioned but knew most of it (done some > reading after rheumy mentioned SLE as I wanted to know what it was ;). > > He did not rule out anything, in fact he diagnosed me with FMS, Well, FMS can be a concurrent diagnosis or a diagnosis pending meeting the criteria of the ACR. In addition, some rheumys don't want to worry the patient unnecessarily. Stress can cause exacerbations...certain UV light (lighting and/or sun) can too.
And it's possible that they may refer back if the symptoms are readily treatable by the GP. (ie don't need the "big guns" of medicines - yet)
Also, some prefer not getting diagnosed, due to : extra health, life, disability, insurance costs for pre-existing conditions; if a person wanted to emigrate to another country, they would be screened out with a dx of SLE; these days, many employers don't want someone with a potential chronic illness;
> and > said he could not rule out SLE but did not think I had it. If I wanted > to have it ruled out I should discuss it with my GP. That's odd...given that you're in the Netherlands. (I thought you were in the US).
What exact bloodwork did he do? http://www.ghg.net/schwerpt/ASLFAQ/diag.htm
and the pattern does not seem to be mentioned in the above
http://www.itzarion.com/lupusana.html The pattern of the ANA test can sometimes be helpful in determining which autoimmune disease is present and which treatment program is appropriate. The speckled pattern is found in SLE and other connective tissue diseases, while the peripheral or rim pattern is found almost exclusively in SLE. Because the ANA is positive in so many conditions, the results of the ANA test have to be interpreted in light of the patient's medical history, as well as his or her clinical symptoms. Thus a positive ANA alone is NEVER enough to diagnose lupus. On the other hand, a negative ANA argues against lupus, but does not rule the disease out completely.
> As my GP was not > the one who refered me to him, I never even talked the visit through [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > saying that joint pain can sometimes also be a feature in > not-so-benign conditions? Yes, rarely have I seen it mentioned, but I suppose older patients might not think to mention joint pains and it's not what is thought to be the more common symptoms.. http://www.shands.org/health/information/article/007194.htm Actually a friend of mine was from Netherlands and got dx'd with FMS and she wondered 6? years later, why she'd not gotten a chest x-ray. She did have lung cancer. That can start years before it shows up on scans. I imagine if you're young and don't smoke, your doctor might "poo-poo" the idea of having a chest xray, but one every 3 or 4 years, might not be a bad idea. The first forms a baseline for comarison by the next one.
> <skipping HMS and physiotherapy, but you might be able to get advice about > that from "bae" on sci.med and/or find some exercises to do (and not do) on [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > upon things himself. Usually I am the one to tell what I want or need, > and he refers me or whatever. I guess you'll have to instruct him. ;-)
I don't get it. You can go direct to a rheumy but have to be referred to a skin specialist? Anyway can you reproduce it (timing the rash for the appointment)? http://www.ghg.net/schwerpt/ASLFAQ/symptoms.htm Discoid lupus can appear similar to other skin lesions. For example, rosacea, fungal infections, sarcoidosis, seborrhea, dermatomyositis, and a sun-sensitive rash called polymorphous light eruption can be ruled out by a simple skin biopsy and blood tests before diagnosing DLE.
Only about 5% of patients with DLE eventually develop SLE. This may take months or decades to happen. Conversely, about 20-25% of SLE patients have skin lesions indistinguishable from DLE at some time during their illness, possibly as the first symptom.<end quoted text>
Also see what Andy pointed you to. Hughes syndrome. Important, especially if you're female and young; productive years ahead. What age are you?
Best stick around with us for a while, until we see what shakes out. KCat doesn't seem to be around. There are archives to this newsgroup. If you're a teenager, you may wish to search on that word to see what some others with more wisdom than me say about Lupus in teens. http://groups-beta.google.com/advanced_search?q=& "herbwormwood" had it before her teens... Shelagh had problems in her teens (etc) (I used "teens" or "teenager")
Keep a diary of your signs (signs are what can be seen) and symptoms. How do you sleep? Okay? Sleep a lot? Fatique? Low grade temperature? Night sweats?
Glad to read that the pain reliever is helping :-) J
J - 07 Mar 2005 17:24 GMT > When I first saw a rheumatologist about a year and a half ago, my > story was that I had had general joint pains for years. The problem [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > this diagnosis, did not seem important to him. Other doctors have said > since then that I did not have fibromyalgia well my other reply seems to have gotten lost. No, don't worry. See a skin specialist about getting biopsies Collect summary letters from all the doctors you've seen (and lab reports and scan reports, if any) and take them to your GP and talk to him/her about http://www.medicinenet.com/hypermobility_syndrome/article.htm
A positive ANA can happen and then disappear. A good GP will continue to monitor. (labwork, signs and symptoms) J - not a doctor.
Andy - 07 Mar 2005 18:55 GMT In article <422C8E5F.92183390@execulink.com>, J <anon@anon.inv> wrote []
>well my other reply seems to have gotten lost. Arrived here OK. Give it time :)
 Signature Andy Taylor [Chair, N E Lupus Group] See http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk for more!
J - 07 Mar 2005 19:11 GMT > In article <422C8E5F.92183390@execulink.com>, J <anon@anon.inv> wrote > [] > > > >well my other reply seems to have gotten lost. > > Arrived here OK. Give it time :) You see 2 replies from me? I can't even remember what I posted... and I was so ticked that I'd lost it, I decided to not try to replicate it. Ho, hum, maybe it'll show up later, like you say. J
Shelagh - 07 Mar 2005 19:33 GMT >> Arrived here OK. Give it time :) Both arrived here too J. btw, I agree with your assessment of what you wrote about Sen. I too think that to get all riled up about lupus at this point is premature.
However Sen, I too feel strongly about what you said re the neurotic/hypochondriacal type of patient labels we can get early in the process of acheiving a correct dx! That is probably the worst feeling and from what I read I think that is your biggest worry right now; not wanting to say you have read the internet info and that you are worried about other possible underlying problems can eat away at you and make you lose sleep at night. I think J is right in what she suggested re to gather together all the previous doctor's summary letters and test results you have had done in past years, file it all and take it into a doctor you feel comfortable with and to someone you can trust with your feelings; you should be able to open up completely with your gp and if that is not the case, IMO, you should change doctors.... The exchange of info with a doctor should be possible from a patient; I know my doctors are open to my input and they respond in kind and answer questions about anything I may have read. Wish you luck at any rate; and I do hope you don't have lupus but just a note on that too: lupus is not a 'dangerous' condition as you mentioned, in fact most people (90%) with lupus live a normal lifespan and the disease is as individual as each patient who has it; no two people with lupus have the same course or symptoms. Hope this has helped you, hugs from Shelagh http://clik.to/lupus
Andy - 07 Mar 2005 21:59 GMT In article <422CA779.9D207FA3@execulink.com>, J <anon@anon.inv> wrote
>> In article <422C8E5F.92183390@execulink.com>, J <anon@anon.inv> wrote >> [] [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Ho, hum, maybe it'll show up later, like you say. >J The other one begins
Hi there and welcome, there was so much there that I snipped most of it. Looks like the rheumatologist ruled out Lupus and fibromyalgia.
What ratio? My ANA was mildly positive some years back. I have 2 autoimmune problems..thyroid and Raynaud's. A positive ANA is often seen with Lupus, but can also be seen with other autoimmune diseases/disorders and/or the otherwise healthy population.
and continues for another 6 paragraphs
 Signature Andy Taylor [Chair, N E Lupus Group] See http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk for more!
J - 08 Mar 2005 10:25 GMT > The other one begins > > <snip> > > and continues for another 6 paragraphs How odd and/or what a mess..something weird happened to my newsreader. I must remember to save first, if it happens again. now she's replying to things I wrote but I a) don't remember saying and b) cannot see. Thanks Andy. J
Andy - 08 Mar 2005 12:00 GMT In article <422D7D84.C4D9C989@execulink.com>, J <anon@anon.inv> wrote [
>now she's replying to things I wrote but I a) don't remember saying and b) >cannot see. I have this trouble in conversation - as I don't have Lupus it must be the approach of middle age**
>Thanks Andy. Any time
>J *** That should lure the Kat from her lair :)
 Signature Andy Taylor [Chair, N E Lupus Group] See http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk for more!
J - 08 Mar 2005 19:56 GMT > The other one begins > <snip> > > and continues for another 6 paragraphs I just remembered that I can find it in the Google archives. Thanks for your replies. I'll leave your other (post) to the mewgirl. ;-) J
|
|
|