Medical Forum / General / Laboratory / March 2006
Lymphoma blood test
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Pete - 22 Dec 2005 23:21 GMT Hi everyone,
Can someone tell me if there is a simple blood test, that will test for Lymphoma, and if there is, what is the name of it. I googled this, and it was not obvious, except for one article I found, which was rather confusing, and did not give the name of the test. Thanks...Pete
Shylirin - 23 Dec 2005 00:44 GMT > Hi everyone, > > Can someone tell me if there is a simple blood test, that will test for > Lymphoma, and if there is, what is the name of it. I googled this, and it > was not obvious, except for one article I found, which was rather confusing, > and did not give the name of the test. Thanks...Pete Pete,
First I'd say that if you are worried you might have this, SEE A DOCTOR. Lab tests must be interpreted with the findings from your exam. As far as I know, there is not one test that is used only to screen for lymphoma. It is usually detected from a combination of lab results, plus exam findings. The most common tests (other members please feel free to add any I might miss) are a CBC, Chem 14 Panel, LDH, and maybe a CD25 and beta-2 microglobulin. The most definitive test to diagnose lymphoma is a biopsy and pathology examination of the tissue.
Secondly, please don't take this list to your doctor and demand that he or she do them. Tell the physician your concerns and let him or her know you have been researching this. I can't diagnose you or give you medical advice over the internet, and the exam is essential.
Good luck with the research, and post again if you have more questions.
Shylirin MT(ASCP)
Robert - 23 Dec 2005 02:48 GMT > Hi everyone, > > Can someone tell me if there is a simple blood test, that will test for > Lymphoma, and if there is, what is the name of it. I googled this, and it > was not obvious, except for one article I found, which was rather confusing, > and did not give the name of the test. Thanks...Pete Lymphoma means a cancer starting out in the lymph nodes and working it's way out into surrounding tissue. The most accurate way to diagnose it is by doing a lymph node biopsy. One can look at tissue and also check for lymphoma cells or one can also look in the blood to see if it has spread into the blood. In checking for lymphoma cells in the blood one can do "flow cytometry" and look for monoclonal cells based on surface markers. Lymphoma cells are derived from a single clone of cells by checking cell markers . Normal lymphocytes are usually polyclonal in origin. Some lymphoma cells are morphologically distinct enough to be classified as abnormal based on appearance alone. The draw back with flow cytometry is sensitivity with 5% or more cells being the lower limit of detection. Leukemia/lymphoma panels by flow cytometry are often ordered.
Pete - 24 Dec 2005 02:04 GMT Shylirin and Robert...That's all I do is go to doctors, and have been to over 75 in my life and have some serious medical problems and I can't get any help from the damn doctors. I have been studying medicine for 15 years. I do have enlarged lymph nodes (from scans) which could be related to my sarcoidosis. It's too complicated to describe my medical problems. I get regular CD4 counts, CBC's and comprehensive panels and my T4 cells are below 200 much of the time, and I do not have hiv. So please don't tell me to go to a doctor. I know more about my immune system than my primary physician does, and he would admit that - trust me. And I have been to infectious disease doc and oncologist/hematologist and got sh.t. Could not get radiologists to show me the large nodes and the radiologist from two years ago read my scan wrong and I can prove it. The nodes are large and apparently unchanged from two years ago (which is good), but the damn radiologist two years ago said no adenopathy. I told them all that and they don't say anything. It's bullshit. And I have had too many catscans in my life and believe they have messed me up.
I read in a ng that there was a simple blood test for that would detect lymphoma (the person left the group, but I will write him and ask anyway). Is there such a test or not. I will also call my local lab and ask them.
All I could find was this site http://www.ramazziniusa.org/geneticprofiles.htm., but it talks about details but does not give the name of the test, and sounds like it is still in the developmental stage (in Italy). Could you check it out and get back to me. I feel like I am dying as I write this and this is not the kind of thing you can go to the ER for. I am currently having serious urological and rectal problems (no indication of prostate cancer), and uro's can't help me, and I have bad malaise. I have been to all the appropriate doctors and have had all kinds of scans and blood tests. My main blood problem is my lymphocytes and specifically the T4 cells like I mentioned. I just found out about the deficiency in 2002 but could have had it for many years.
Robert, in your response you mention a Leukemia/lymphoma panel by flow cytometry (I believe that is the same technique used for my CD counts - they have to send my blood to Mayo clinic for them). What is the name of the test (e.g. for my CD4 counts - all you have to write is "CD4 count" for the special test). Would my doctor write "Lymphoma panel". Is the leukemia panel separate. The damn oncologist never even did a bone marrow biopsy (she said there was nothing wrong with my bone marrow - but I don't know how she could state that). And she never suggested any kind of lymphoma or leukemia panel - I can't explain it all - it would take to long. I am done with her. And I am not volunteering for a biopsy which has risk and a lot of radiation and I don't know if I could get anyone to order it anyway. But damn it a blood test is simple.
Please let me know if there is a simple blood test like the site I gave you talks about (that a doctor can order - i.e. not a research and development test) for lymphoma (whether it be a single test or a series of tests as part of a panel). If all you know about is the lymphoma panel (Robert), please state so, and verify that there is also a leukemia panel, and that they are two separate panels. It sounds like the R&D test over in Italy may be more accurate than the 5% (or more) you mentioned Robert. Thanks...Pete
> Hi everyone, > > Can someone tell me if there is a simple blood test, that will test > for Lymphoma, and if there is, what is the name of it. I googled > this, and it was not obvious, except for one article I found, which > was rather confusing, and did not give the name of the test. Thanks...Pete JEDilworth - 24 Dec 2005 06:59 GMT Two techs have told you how lymphoma is usually diagnosed. There is no reason to take out your frustration with your doctors on them. If you have been to 75 docs how would you expect anyone to diagnose you over the internet? Techs do not do the diagnosing - the doctors do that.
There IS no simple test for lymphoma. Whoever told you that is telling you a lot of BS.
Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP) Microbiology
> Shylirin and Robert...That's all I do is go to doctors, and have been to > over 75 in my life and have some serious medical problems and I can't get > any help from the damn doctors. Robert - 24 Dec 2005 07:46 GMT "Pete" <pete@nospam.net> wrote in message What you are talking about I haven't got a clue. We all told you how lymphoma is diagnosed. Lymphoma in the blood (leukemic phase) is a late finding as is lymphoma in the bone marrow.
This is what I was talking about.
http://health.allrefer.com/health/cell-surface-antigen-studies-b-cell-leukemia-l ymphoma-panel-info.html
Manky Badger - 24 Dec 2005 10:40 GMT > Shylirin and Robert...That's all I do is go to doctors, and have been to > over 75 in my life and have some serious medical problems and I can't get > any help from the damn doctors. Hmmm - one of you and 75 of them. I wonder which group is correct?
>I have been studying medicine for 15 years. And what qualifications have you received during this time?
> I do have enlarged lymph nodes (from scans) which could be related to my > sarcoidosis. It's too complicated to describe my medical problems. For who?
> I get regular CD4 counts, CBC's and comprehensive panels and my T4 cells > are below 200 much of the time, and I do not have hiv. So please don't > tell me to go to a doctor. I know more about my immune system than my > primary physician does, and he would admit that - trust me. So you would know if you had a lymphoma!
>And I have been to infectious disease doc and oncologist/hematologist and >got sh.t. Could not get radiologists to show me the large nodes and the >radiologist from two years ago read my scan wrong and I can prove it. Then do so and sue for negligence.
> The nodes are large and apparently unchanged from two years ago (which is > good), but the damn radiologist two years ago said no adenopathy. I told > them all that and they don't say anything. It's bullshit. And I have had > too many catscans in my life and believe they have messed me up. Do elaborate
> I read in a ng that there was a simple blood test for that would detect > lymphoma (the person left the group, but I will write him and ask anyway). You read wrongly
> My main blood problem is my lymphocytes and specifically the T4 cells like > I mentioned. I just found out about the deficiency in 2002 but could > have had it for many years. Specifically what's wrong?
> And I am not volunteering for a biopsy which has risk and a lot > of radiation WTF ?
>But damn it a blood test is simple. Oh yes - any simpleton can do a blood test.
Shylirin - 24 Dec 2005 13:28 GMT > Shylirin and Robert...That's all I do is go to doctors, and have been to > over 75 in my life and have some serious medical problems and I can't get [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 200 much of the time, and I do not have hiv. So please don't tell me to go > to a doctor. Sorry, I have to tell you that. I am NOT a physician, and as such cannot practice medicine. Most labs will not do a test unless you have a physician's order for that test. I can't diagnose you or give you medical advice without incurring legal liability and the chance I will lose my certification. As I value my job and career, I will continue to tell you to see a professional.
I know more about my immune system than my primary physician
> does, and he would admit that - trust me. And I have been to infectious > disease doc and oncologist/hematologist and got sh.t. Could not get [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > don't say anything. It's bullshit. And I have had too many catscans in my > life and believe they have messed me up. ?????
> I read in a ng that there was a simple blood test for that would detect > lymphoma (the person left the group, but I will write him and ask anyway). [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > and specifically the T4 cells like I mentioned. I just found out about the > deficiency in 2002 but could have had it for many years. The CDK9 and Cyclin T1 tests appear to be still in the research phase. I could not find any non-research lab performing this test. Also, this seems to be the only study on the topic. You could call the university and see if they would take you as a test subject, but otherwise, the test has not been FDA approved, or even verified by repeat studies. I would take this with a grain of salt until it is proven with another study.
> Robert, in your response you mention a Leukemia/lymphoma panel by flow > cytometry (I believe that is the same technique used for my CD counts - they [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > (she said there was nothing wrong with my bone marrow - but I don't know how > she could state that). If you had a bone marrow problem, by now you probably should have seen something on a CBC. Since your results are presumably normal given your low CD4 count, then she can (in all probability) tell you that with a high degree of certainty. Also, since lymphoma is a cancer of the LYMPH NODES, unless the lymphoma is advanced you wouldn't find it in the marrow anyway. I understand your frustration at not having a reason for your symptoms, but a look at the larger picture is important here. You stated you have studied medicine for 15 years, yet you don't understand how a trained oncologist could tell you there was nothing wrong with your marrow. This is basic medical study of what a CBC tells you. Just because you may not understand, does not mean the physician is wrong. And before you say it, no, I am not "on their side".
Robert, thanks for the flow cytometry catch... I forgot about that one!
And she never suggested any kind of lymphoma or
> leukemia panel - I can't explain it all - it would take to long. I am done > with her. And I am not volunteering for a biopsy which has risk and a lot > of radiation and I don't know if I could get anyone to order it anyway. But > damn it a blood test is simple. Ok, a biopsy involves putting a needle in a lymph node and pulling out some material, or it could involve taking out one node with a simple surgery. My husband had this done. It doesn't involve radiation with any procedure I'm familiar with. I have no idea where you got that information. Also, blood testing isn't the simple way out. You can choose the best method (biopsy), or you can choose an assortment of blood tests (less sensitive to finding lymphoma). This is your choice, and you can't blame a physician for "not finding" a lymphoma if you don't make the best choice.
> Please let me know if there is a simple blood test like the site I gave you > talks about (that a doctor can order - i.e. not a research and development [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > two separate panels. It sounds like the R&D test over in Italy may be more > accurate than the 5% (or more) you mentioned Robert. Thanks...Pete Again, there is no simple blood test for lymphoma that I know of. Period. If I remember correctly, in order to do flow cytometry for lymphoma or leukemia, a specifically tailored panel is selected based on the morphology and clinical characteristics of an already-suspected disease. In other words, they have to have abnormal leukemia or lymphoma cells they have already SEEN in order to get the right test done. If you don't have a biopsy and there aren't any cells showing up in your blood, then trying to do flow is like trying to hit a target in the dark. Robert, please let me know if I am misremembering my info.
Good Luck, Shylirin
> > Hi everyone, > > > > Can someone tell me if there is a simple blood test, that will test > > for Lymphoma, and if there is, what is the name of it. I googled > > this, and it was not obvious, except for one article I found, which > > was rather confusing, and did not give the name of the test. Thanks...Pete Robert - 25 Dec 2005 07:32 GMT "Shylirin" <shylirinsplinter@cox.net> wrote in message
> Robert, please let me > know if I am misremembering my info. No I agree with everything you said. I was only replying about a blood test for lymphoma.
Pete - 24 Dec 2005 23:47 GMT Thanks guys...I can see you have no experience with doctors, and there is a hell of a lot of stuff they don't know, and you indeed do have to study your disease/condition. A lot of them are total a.sholes. You could have at least commented on the site I gave you about the blood tests over in Italy.
> Shylirin and Robert...That's all I do is go to doctors, and have been > to over 75 in my life and have some serious medical problems and I [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] >> was rather confusing, and did not give the name of the test. >> Thanks...Pete Shylirin - 24 Dec 2005 13:35 GMT > Thanks guys...I can see you have no experience with doctors, and there is a > hell of a lot of stuff they don't know, and you indeed do have to study your > disease/condition. A lot of them are total a.sholes. You could have at > least commented on the site I gave you about the blood tests over in Italy. You could have at least remembered that this is the Christmas holiday and that perhaps we have other things to do than to read an article for you. For heaven's sakes, it's only been ONE day since you posted the link!
As medical technologists, I would beg to differ that we have no experience with doctors. All I do is work with doctors and nurses (and patients, of course) regarding testing, orders, billing... you name it. I agree that you, as a patient, should study your condition. And no, there is a lot that physicians don't know, and some of them are indeed not very professional. But there are a lot of good ones out there too, and if you've seen 75, I would bet that there have been more than a couple of highly intelligent, competent physicians in the group.
Best of luck,
Shylirin
> > Shylirin and Robert...That's all I do is go to doctors, and have been > > to over 75 in my life and have some serious medical problems and I [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > >> was rather confusing, and did not give the name of the test. > >> Thanks...Pete Robert - 25 Dec 2005 08:59 GMT You could have at
> least commented on the site I gave you about the blood tests over in Italy. Pete, we are involved in the clinical laboratory aspect and not the research arm of testing. We generally let them iron out all the problems before something is accepted in clinical practice. Let them experiment with a select few people. Assume that there are two malignant lymphoma cells in your whole body and one of them happens to be detected with that new test, what is the next step? Any test is always measured within the clinical utility or clinical context. Sometimes people like to hype their own research for grants.
Just a couple of points or comments on the cite that you had and it is hard to really read news articles that are not really precise on what is being done. From the article you cited.
"The researchers found that by taking a sample of blood and doing immunohistochemical analysis for the expression of CDK9 and CYCLIN T1"
Immunohistochemical analysis means you get a glass slide of tissue and then use antibodies and special stains and look at the cells. They tested lymph tissue and cross checked it for lymphoma by the classic definition. Immunocytochemistry stains individual cells which is found in blood. The person who wrote that above doesn't know what he is talking about.
http://www.jhc.org/cgi/content/full/49/6/685
""Basically, this new method is a very powerful tool in determining the presence of cancer by analyzing these two molecules in the lymphoid tissue,"
Molecules?
The following Pubmed Journal report states that CDK9/cyclin T1 is found in normal lymphoid tissue, reactive lymph nodes and is not found in mantle cell and marginal zone lymphomas. It also varies greatly in reactivity in T cell lymphoproliferative disorders. If you have a mantle cell lymphoma it can't pick it up and morphology is still needed along with other surface markers.
"Value of CD23 determination by flow cytometry in differentiating mantle cell lymphoma from chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1 1764079&dopt=Abstract
J Pathol. 2004 Aug;203(4):946-52. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
CDK9/CYCLIN T1 expression during normal lymphoid differentiation and malignant transformation.
Bellan C, De Falco G, Lazzi S, Micheli P, Vicidomini S, Schurfeld K, Amato T, Palumbo A, Bagella L, Sabattini E, Bartolommei S, Hummel M, Pileri S, Tosi P, Leoncini L, Giordano A.
Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Siena, Italy.
CDK9 is a member of the CDC2-like family of kinases. Its cyclin partners are members of the CYCLIN T family (T1, T2a, and T2b) and CYCLIN K. The CDK9/CYCLIN T1 complex is very important in the differentiation programme of several cell types, controlling specific differentiation pathways. Limited data are available regarding the expression of CDK9/CYCLIN T1 in haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. The aim of this study was to analyse the expression of the CDK9/CYCLIN T1 complex in lymphoid tissue, in order to assess its role in B- and T-cell differentiation and lymphomagenesis. CDK9/CYCLIN T1 expression was found by immunohistochemistry in precursor B and T cells. In peripheral lymphoid tissues, germinal centre cells and scattered B- and T-cell blasts in interfollicular areas expressed CDK9/CYCLIN T1, while mantle cells, plasma cells, and small resting T-lymphocytes displayed no expression of either molecule. CDK9/CYCLIN T1 expression therefore appears to be related to particular stages of lymphoid differentiation/activation. CDK9 and CYCLIN T1 were highly expressed in lymphomas derived from precursor B and T cells, from germinal centre cells, such as follicular lymphomas, and from activated T cells (ie anaplastic large cell lymphomas). Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma also showed strong nuclear staining. Diffuse large B-cell, Burkitt's lymphomas, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas, among T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, showed a wide range of values. No expression of CDK9 or CYCLIN T1 was detected in mantle cell and marginal zone lymphomas. However, at the mRNA level, an imbalance in the CDK9/CYCLIN T1 ratio was found in follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with germinal centre phenotype, and in the cell lines of classical Hodgkin's lymphomas, Burkitt's lymphomas, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma, in comparison with reactive lymph nodes. These results suggest that the CDK9/CYCLIN T1 complex may affect the activation and differentiation programme of lymphoid cells. The molecular mechanism through which the CDK9/CYCLIN T1 complex is altered in malignant transformation needs to be elucidated. Copyright 2004 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland
PMID: 15258998 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Here is a site where you can buy anti-CDK9 http://www.abcam.com/?datasheet=10874
And you have anti-Cyclin T1 http://www.abcam.com/?datasheet=2098
Mix the two together and go do flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry on tissue or blood smear immunocytochemistry.
Arcie Mizelle - 04 Mar 2006 03:18 GMT Pete,
Check with Quest Diagnostics. They have a Lymphoma/Leukemia Profile that you might want to have your doctor order. They also have several different Flow Cytometry profiles that might prove useful. These are expensive and you do need to target the selection to what disease you are suspecting, otherwise the bill could be outrageous and some testing will be redundant.
I hope this helps a little.
Arcie
JEDilworth - 04 Mar 2006 04:29 GMT Please also be aware that, if these tests are not clinically indicated from previous tests, i.e. a CBC (complete blood count) and/or other hematological and histological tests and biopsies, my guess is that insurance WILL NOT pay for them. Also, if these tests are submitted to be billed through your medical insurance, there is a big database in Boston that tracks all of this stuff for the insurance industry. If you ever try to get life or private medical insurance in the future, this database will be checked to possibly rate you/deny you on getting future policies.
I've told people who have asked me in the past, about HIV testing (example only) to pay cash for this type of testing, so the DB in Boston can't track you. Genetic testing would come under this also.
Just my 0.02.
Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP) Microbiology (I used to be a marketing rep and have talked with my life insurance man about these issues)
> Pete, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > you do need to target the selection to what disease you are suspecting, > otherwise the bill could be outrageous and some testing will be redundant. Pete - 25 Dec 2005 22:27 GMT Shylirin and Robert...I want to thank you for the time you spent in your last responses, and I will save them. I have been to many bad doctors in my life for all of the specialties, and I don't have a lot to show for it. Currently my urological and rectal problems and the malaise I have are consuming me, and I can't get any doc's to help me, like I said. I believe it is all tied in with my immune deficiency.
I was not asking you to diagnose me for sure. I am quite smart medically and do know more than some of the doctors in many instances, by my studies (regardless of the sarcasm I received from Manky Badger - and you can not sue a doctor unless he operates on the wrong side of your body Manky). I could write books on the incompetence and bad bedside manners of doctors (I hate the bastards, and only one in ten are good kind caring doctors at best - the rest of them are just in it for the money and to see how fast they can move on to the next patient, and if you indicate you research your disease/condition (even trying to be diplomatic), you may get dismissed. It sucks.
I understand you work with the doctors and some of them may be your bosses (and I am sure you know who some of the a.sholes are), but you need to be on the patient's side of the bed. I won't be going back to the a.shole oncologist. The first time I went to her for an opinion on my low CD4 counts, she told me she would do some research and get back to me. She didn't call me back, so I called her to remind her and she said all she could find for my T4 cell deficiencies (non hiv) was DiGeorge Syndrome. Duh!!! I ruled that out immediately after I first found out about my low T4 cell counts from the infectious disease doc in 2002. Apparently she looked in her pc, just like I did (she may have found a book on T cell deficiencies, but I doubt it).
There are a bunch of T-cell deficiencies (non hiv) published in a 2000 journal by a French doctor named Alain Fischer (which was copied for my by another doctor), but that stuff is pure black magic and one in a million stuff. I will never find out what is causing my T4 cell deficiencies (and I am certainly am not going to the University of Tennessee or Duke University where I was told by the same doctor, that the top researchers on immunological disorders are there). I know I will get cancer someday if I don't already have it, since the cellular immune system is purported to fight tumor cells as well as viruses.
Pertaining to my enlarged lymph nodes, the biggest one (2.5cm) is in the retrocrural area of my chest but a large one also showed up in way of my left kidney. They would be hard to get at without flouroscopic guidance like I implied before. Like I told you I couldn't get the radiologist to show them to me. I met with the head radiologist and he just said the retrocrural ones were unchanged from two years ago (which I am quite capable of reading in the report, and already knew), and didn't show them to me. I told him the radiologist two years ago (who is gone now) said no adenopathy, and he had nothing to say.
It could be related to my sarcoid (per my pulmonologist who is another bad doctor) like I said, and I asked him to show me the nodes, and even took him the disc, and he said he wasn't a radiologist. That's bullshit. In the old days gastro's and pulmo's used to read catscans and x-rays all the time and ask for them. My old pulmo (good doctor where I used to live) used to go over them with me all the time, and said I could read them as good as he could :-) . Nowadays, all the damn gastro's and pulmo's do, is read the damn radiologist report.
I still don't understand why my low CD4 counts couldn't be related to a bone marrow problem, even though the other CBC counts (besides lymphocytes) may be within the ranges, or close. My immune system is working (but very halfass - I have flulike malaise all the time), since I had a candida, mumps, saline (the control) skin test in Jan/03, and the mumps and candida showed a reaction, which means my good old T cells remembered them.
I am a retired engineer and live by myself in a small community and don't have any one to help me, so going to the tertiary care centers in Baltimore is difficult at best and basically out of the question (plus I have been there three times in the past for other things with nothing to show for it).
I appreciate your time, and certainly was not, and am not asking you for a diagnosis (just my original question about a blood test(s) for lymphoma). You have answered my questions. I hope you had a nice Christmas. Thank you...Pete
> Hi everyone, > > Can someone tell me if there is a simple blood test, that will test > for Lymphoma, and if there is, what is the name of it. I googled > this, and it was not obvious, except for one article I found, which > was rather confusing, and did not give the name of the test. Thanks...Pete
|
|
|