Is it of clinical significance to specieate, as long as one states that it
is non-falciprum? I have heard references D ( claimed from the CDC) that it
has some significance. My information is not up to date. We turned out a
report of malarial parasites non-falciprum (probable ovale). The treating
physician will not order serology testing (or PCR) but insists on definite
species from smears. I explained that one can never guarantee that there
are not two species present (Henry, claims that such mixed infestations are
only 5% of cases...). I tend to wonder if this latter data is old and how
it was verified. How does everyone else hand malaria (beside severe
sweating)?. :-)
-----
351 C RAM M code
JEDilworth - 17 Oct 2003 17:18 GMT
At a lab I previously worked at (independent lab, not hospital based)
all malaria smears were given to pathologists for final diagnosis. I'm
not sure how they signed them out. The only ones I ever heard about
there were CAP surveys or negative patients.
We recently had a positive on an 8 year old child that had been in
Kenya. Even though the smears are routed through hematology instead of
microbiology, our department gets in on it anyway. Luckily, one of our
techs worked for two years at Cleveland Clinic doing parasitology
exclusively all that time. She looked at the smears and determined that
it was indeed P. falciparum (in about 5 minutes). Our Ph.D.
microbiologist came in (second shift) to confirm it. We knew the patient
was being transferred to us from an outlying rural hospital as the ID
doc gave us a 4 hour heads-up. He requested that we speciate, if
possible, that evening. He must have been suspicious that it was P.
falciparum, possibly from severity of symptoms, although I never did
hear how the case came out.
I think that a lot of experience is the essential key to speciation. CC
obviously got patients from all over the world, and the experience she
gained there was the key to the quick diagnosis.
As far as your original question as to the speciation of non-falciparum,
I really can't say. We just don't get enough of them to comment. I've
only been at my current employer for 3 years and this was the first
positive we've had, I guess, in at least a decade or longer.
What do your pathologists say?
Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
Microbiology
> Is it of clinical significance to specieate, as long as one states that it
> is non-falciprum?
Robert - 17 Oct 2003 20:12 GMT
> Is it of clinical significance to specieate, as long as one states that it
> is non-falciprum? I have heard references D ( claimed from the CDC) that it
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> -----
> 351 C RAM M code
We speciate ours in hematology and all slides are submitted for review at
the county public health lab and again confirmed ID at the state public
health lab. Obviously from an epidemiology point of view it is important.
Ovale is very limited in geography to Africa so it is very rare. Vivax is
dependent on Duffy blood group and here in America the black ethnicity
parallels the African genetics where 80% are Duffy negative so most are
immune to Vivax.
Many ring forms and little else in a Black is most likely Falciparum.
Many variable intermediate forms in a Caucasian is vivax or malariae with
the dots being important etc.
We have seen mixed in the past with Vivax and falciparum where bananas were
seen and intermediate forms of vivax were present so one must always look a
long look at a slide to avoid a big mistake in seeing the obvious and
calling it non-falciparum.
slenon - 18 Oct 2003 16:24 GMT
I've always found speciating malaria fun and simple. Most of the work is
common sense.
----
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar
slenon@tampabay.rr.com
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/index.html/slhomepage92kword.htm
Robert - 18 Oct 2003 19:10 GMT
> I've always found speciating malaria fun and simple. Most of the work is
> common sense.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> slenon@tampabay.rr.com
> http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/index.html/slhomepage92kword.htm
The problem is as K mentioned and that being mixed infections. Most
falciparum don't have bananas present so having ring forms only with
intermediate forms of other species can make it a real challenge even if
only one reports falciparum or non-falciparum species.
slenon - 18 Oct 2003 20:28 GMT
Robert:
>Most falciparum don't have bananas present so having ring forms only with
>intermediate forms of other species can make it a real challenge even if
>only one reports falciparum or non-falciparum species.
If it were easy, they'd not need professionals to make the decision. But
there are some markers that are indicative and reliable even in mixed
infections. Of course, I first encountered the genus is S.E. Asia. And the
first actual patient's smear I saw that contained malarial parasites was my
own. My interest in the subject peaked rather suddenly.
----
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar
slenon@tampabay.rr.com
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/index.html/slhomepage92kword.htm
kuhnfucius - 20 Oct 2003 04:01 GMT
Just back from Cedar Creek (Middletown) Virginia.
Well, I have no trouble IDing Vivax or falciprum (anyone else ever seen a
good case of "black water fever = large load of P. falciprum). I am always
amazed to hear: But they took the prophylactic medicines. (They have been
used there so long, that the two past standards are useless). I am fairly
sure this was ovale, but still don't see what difference in this case (from
the treatment side) of stating : "non-falciprum" . I am however not going
out on the limb on a rare speciation, unless the serologies or pcr are
negative for the others. (No direct test for ovale...that I have heard).
> Robert:
> >Most falciparum don't have bananas present so having ring forms only with
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> slenon@tampabay.rr.com
> http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/index.html/slhomepage92kword.htm