Hi M2
Interesting comments and not a bad site, but personally I would prefer
to know who is actually behind it.
I am working on a new herpes site myself and would appreciate it if you
would take the time to check it out too - would love some feedback on
the content.
It's still under development, so not all pages are complete but the
base articles and stories are there. the URL is www.livingsphere.com
BTY - we are looking for more content - real life stories, articles and
essays on any topic relating to 'living with herpes' if anyone is
interested in contributing.
Regards
Jeannie
M.L.S. - 27 May 2005 13:36 GMT
>Hi M2
>Interesting comments and not a bad site, but personally I would prefer
>to know who is actually behind it.
>I am working on a new herpes site myself and would appreciate it if you
>would take the time to check it out too - would love some feedback on
>the content.
>It's still under development, so not all pages are complete but the
>base articles and stories are there. the URL is www.livingsphere.com
I went to the diagnosis question and am somewhat less than thrilled
with what I found there:
"The implications of a positive test require some careful thought.
If a positive test would make a person feel bad about themselves,
but not change their sex lives or make them eligible for treatment,
one wonders if there is a point to doing the test at all. It is
always worthwhile taking the time to seriously think about the
consequences before agreeing to a test. For some people, taking the
plunge and getting the blood test is the right thing to do, but for
others it might do more harm than good."
No responsible herpes site should be in the business of promoting
ignorance. The only scenarios that I can think of where one might
not opt for a test are: if one is in a monogamous relationship and
herpes isn't a problem for both people; or if one is celibate.
Otherwise it behooves the person who suspects he or she has herpes
to find out his or her status.
Also, I've been using the "Sphere" name for some years now:
http://web.newsguy.com/sphere/
and
http://mysite.verizon.net/msoja9/sphere.html
I'm not complaining, just informing for the sake of interest.
Mike
>BTY - we are looking for more content - real life stories, articles and
>essays on any topic relating to 'living with herpes' if anyone is
>interested in contributing.
>Regards
>Jeannie
Angela S. - 27 May 2005 21:20 GMT
Mike,
Have you ever thought about joining my webring?
Sure would love to have you guys join in on the networking fun!
http://q.webring.com/hub?ring=herpeshelp
You too Jeanniemay!
((( hugs )))
Angela :)

Signature
Weblogs, Blogs, Blogging
www.oh-baby-baby.blogspot.com
www.herpes-help.blogspot.com
www.yoshi2me.blogspot.com
www.workathomemomblog.blogspot.com
>>Hi M2
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
>>Jeannie
M2slo2cht@nospam.invalid - 27 May 2005 14:01 GMT
>I would prefer
>to know who is actually behind it.
Agreed. Although I expect I'll eventually figure that out.
On the face of it though, they make some points clearly that other
sources don't get across very well. A good job of that in as few
words as possible isn't easy.
>I am working on a new herpes site myself and would appreciate it if you
>would take the time to check it out
Happy to. Although I'm more of a technical guy and not much help in
other areas (emotional, social, how to, etc). Might be a few days as
I'm about to be outta here for a long weekend (Memorial Day in the
States).
G'day Mate :-)
M2
>I've never seen a "Facts and Info" H-related web site that I couldn't
>find at least a nit or two to pick. Some are confusing as hell.. Even
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>seems to present H-info more clearly than most. At least I haven't
>found many problems with the way they've presented their info.
>Thought I'd post it here for the perusal of anyone interested.
>http://www.i4h.net/index.htm
>I have no idea who's site it is. Says they're based in a suburb of
>Atlanta though. There's a mention of "Meeting people with Herpes" but
>I see no hyperlink to Antopia and it seems the two sites aren't even
>related. I hope they haven't left themselves open to Copyright
>infringement.
Hey M2!
Looks to me like they're selling a dating place (free to register
and to use on a limited basis) to rival MPwH, fronted with some H
information. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Any good
resource is a good resource.
That said, the info looks good, though not particularly in-depth,
though I didn't read everything there, yet.
However, they do list the Diagnology POCkit test as one of the ways
to diagnose, and the link they give doesn't work for me. Hasn't the
POCkit test gone somewhere else, and is it really back on the
market, yet?
Mike
>Anyway, just looks like somebody did a good job of not only knowing
>their facts but writing them up in a clear and concise manner. Same
>basic info as other sites, but more clearly written than most imo.
>Y'all (Ar, MLS, Yosh, Tim... & other ash veterans) take a look and
>tell me what you think.
>Cheers,
>M2
M2slo2cht@nospam.invalid - 27 May 2005 17:37 GMT
>Looks to me like they're selling a dating place
Yep. Looks like they're connected. But like you say, good info is good
info. At least they're not selling snake oil (as far as I can tell).
>to rival MPwH
... the h-community can certainly use a competitive alternative to
that.
>not particularly in-depth
True but most people especially newbies, are looking for quick short
answers/explanations. And that's a big problem. Unfortunately, Herp
doesn't lend itself well to that. Which is why it's so hard to answer
a simple question accurately without being so verbose you lose the
attention of the reader. But I agree, it's not in-depth. Seems to me
though, it confuses the issue less than other otherwise accurate info
sites.
For example, it doesn't flip/flop between "Genital Herpes and 'Type
2". When it means "Genital Herpes" it says so rather than saying
"Type 2". I've seen sites that know better than to do that but they
do it anyway.
And they've managed to avoid some of my other (granted, picky) pet
pieves as well.
,
>though I didn't read everything there, yet.
I haven't either. But I like what I've seen so far.
>However, they do list the Diagnology POCkit test as one of the ways
>to diagnose,
LoL! That's one of the parts I haven't read yet.
>Hasn't the
>POCkit test gone somewhere else
Yep. Diagnology went bankrupt and the technology was bought by a
British company. Here:
http://www.biokit.com/welcome.htm
and here's their brochure (.pdf format)
http://www.yoshi2me.com/research/biokitHSV-2-Brochure.pdf
M2
Check your e-mail M2.
Angela :)

Signature
Herpes Information
www.yoshi2me.com
www.herpes-help.org
www.herpesonline.org
> I've never seen a "Facts and Info" H-related web site that I couldn't
> find at least a nit or two to pick. Some are confusing as hell.. Even
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Cheers,
> M2
jeanniemay - 28 May 2005 06:26 GMT
I'm guilty of not reading it all too! And I found the shortness and
lack of depth a bit disappointing.... but as you say, newbies may need
brief info at the beginning.
Re your 'Sphere' site, have to admit that I had never seen it before.
Sorry.
Obviously we have used the word sphere for the same reason you have,
but have expanded it into 'LivingSphere' because the site is about more
than just what herpes is... and we have some BIG plans for the future.
But we're not out to rival anyone, or compete with anyone. We just want
to provide a comprehensive, well-rounded, information resource for
people living with the herpes virus, which informs, encourages,
supports and provides opportunities to 'connect' with others.
Regards
Jeannie
www.livingsphere.com
> I've never seen a "Facts and Info" H-related web site that I couldn't
> find at least a nit or two to pick. Some are confusing as hell.. Even
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Cheers,
> M2