http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2005/0205/022805-oral-sex.htm
Herpes Risk Rises With Oral Sex
February 28, 2005
MND NEWSWIRE
PITTSBURGH, Feb. 28 The first clinical study to document risk of
acquiring herpes simplex virus type 1 infection based on sexual
activity has linked oral sex and vaginal intercourse with a
demonstrably higher rate of infection, particularly in young women,
researchers from the University of Pittsburgh report in the February
issue of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the journal of the American
Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association.
Genital herpes is one of the most common sexually transmitted
diseases in the United States. Nationwide, at least 45 million
people ages 12 and older or one out of five adolescents and adults
have had a genital herpes infection. Between the late 1970s and
the early 1990s, the number of Americans with genital herpes
infection increased by 30 percent, according to the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. While there is no cure, antiviral
medications can shorten and prevent outbreaks. Daily suppressive
therapy can reduce, but not eliminate, risk of transmission to
non-infected partners.
Medical students traditionally have been taught that herpes simplex
type 1 (HSV-1) infections most often take place above the waist,
while herpes simplex type 2 (HSV-2) predominates below the belt.
More recent evidence, however, suggests that HSV-1 also is an
important pathogen in genital herpes infections, especially in
younger women. HSV-1 is more commonly known to cause infections of
the mouth and lips, often called fever blisters or cold sores. Viral
shedding and disease transmission is possible even in the absence of
a visible outbreak.
"Receptive oral sex and vaginal intercourse were found to be
significant risk factors for the acquisition of HSV-1," said Thomas
Cherpes, M.D., an infectious diseases fellow at the University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the study's first author. "Because
oral HSV-1 infections are less frequent in childhood and
adolescence, future prevention strategies will need to consider
increased susceptibility for HSV-1 among young adults, and the
important contribution of HSV-1 to the growing genital herpes
epidemic."
Researchers enrolled 1,207 non-pregnant women ages 18 to 30 at three
Pittsburgh-area health clinics between 1998 and 2000. Participants
were asked to return for three follow-up visits at four-month
intervals. At each study visit, blood samples were tested for HSV-1-
and HSV-2-specific antibodies, and surveys of sexual behavior and
demographic information were completed.
Initially, HSV-1 was found in 38 percent of women aged 20 or
younger. During the follow-up period, analysis found that women who
had vaginal intercourse had a more than six-fold higher risk of
acquiring HSV-1 than sexually inactive women, or 6.8 versus 1.2
cases. For those who had only receptive oral sex without vaginal
intercourse, however, the risk was even greater 9.8 versus 1.2
cases.
"The low frequency of infection we detected at enrollment is
consistent with other research indicating a reduction in HSV-1
prevalence among younger people," said Sharon Hillier, Ph.D.,
professor in the departments of obstetrics, gynecology and
reproductive sciences and molecular genetics and biochemistry at the
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the study's senior
author. "As a result, a significant number of young adults are now
susceptible to oral or genital HSV-1 infection."
This is important because most current research on genital herpes
vaccine development focuses on HSV-2, added Dr. Hillier, who also is
a senior investigator at the Magee-Womens Research Institute.
The falling rate of childhood HSV-1 infections is complicating the
scenario by leaving larger numbers of young people susceptible to
genital infection with HSV-1, according to Dr. Cherpes, particularly
since surveys show a high rate of participation in sexual activities
that put them at higher risk.
"Lifetime prevalence of receptive oral sex among sexually active
women is 75 percent," he said. "In our group, more than 90 percent
of study participants reported a history of such activity."
Drs. Cherpes and Hillier note that future vaccine development should
include HSV-1 targets to reduce susceptibility.
M2slo2cht@nospam.invalid - 01 Mar 2005 16:34 GMT
Interesting read.
I'll read it again but, on my first read, my impression is that it
almost seems that researchers are *concerned* by the falling rate of
oral HSV1 in children.... huh?? .... Reason being, it puts them at
greater risk of genital infection at a later date as adults. Did you
get that impression?
That sounds like the flip of one of my long held theories which is,
oral type2 infection is almost as good as a vaccine (generally no
recurrences, extremely low rate or no shedding, and even wihen
shedding, oral transmission isn't likely, plus you're protected from
*genital* type2 infection). That's been just my personal unscientific
take on the upside of oral type2. I haven't seen an expert comment on
it ever though.
But anyway, it's good to see the results of another study on real life
herpes issues. Like another piece to a puzzle and more info regarding
a risk factor to consider.
Thanks Mike,
M2
>http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2005/0205/022805-oral-sex.htm
>
>Herpes Risk Rises With Oral Sex
>
>February 28, 2005
>MND NEWSWIRE
M.L.S. - 01 Mar 2005 17:05 GMT
>Interesting read.
>I'll read it again but, on my first read, my impression is that it
>almost seems that researchers are *concerned* by the falling rate of
>oral HSV1 in children.... huh?? .... Reason being, it puts them at
>greater risk of genital infection at a later date as adults. Did you
>get that impression?
Yes, while I'm not sure the *concern* was explicitly expressed as
such, that's the message: Lower rates of childhood oral HSV raises
the risk of acquiring genital HSV once sexual maturity is reached,
expecially in females.
>That sounds like the flip of one of my long held theories which is,
>oral type2 infection is almost as good as a vaccine (generally no
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>take on the upside of oral type2. I haven't seen an expert comment on
>it ever though.
I'd say you have a good theory, and this study may give us some
expert commenting on it.
And now we know what some of those posts here looking for volunteers
near Pittsburgh were about.
A question I have now is, why are oral HSV rates falling among
children?
>But anyway, it's good to see the results of another study on real life
>herpes issues. Like another piece to a puzzle and more info regarding
>a risk factor to consider.
>Thanks Mike,
De nada, big fella. I live to serve. Keep up yo' own good work.
Mike
ps. Agent *3* is in beta/post-beta something.
M2slo2cht@nospam.invalid - 01 Mar 2005 18:29 GMT
>ps. Agent *3* is in beta/post-beta something.
V3.0???
You sure?
But dey haven't even finished Beta 2.1 yet far as I know.
http://www.forteinc.com/news/bulletin.php?id=agent21beta.php
As ancient as its interface is, it's still the fastest, safest, most
flexible and stable of any newsreader I've ever used. With the least
bloat to boot. I sure hope they don't screw it up. Although I'm
looking forward to folder/group management in 2.1 and curious to see
if it works as well or better than AGO (do you use AGO to manage the
order of your folders and groups?).
M2