Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Herpes / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dear Joanne

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Angela - 10 Dec 2003 16:22 GMT
Hopefully you have read my latest posts on herpes and pregnancy. Honestly,
the baby is not at risk until the time of birth. The baby doesn't come into
contact with the virus until that time. And only then the virus would have
to be active and present on the surface during labor and delivery.

If you are paranoid or skeptical then go ask Terri Warren.

Angela
www.yoshi2me.com
Joanne - 10 Dec 2003 20:19 GMT
>Hopefully you have read my latest posts on herpes and pregnancy. Honestly,
>the baby is not at risk until the time of birth. The baby doesn't come into
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Angela
>www.yoshi2me.com

Ya know, Angela, I pray you are right.  The midwife I am seeing who
has 25+ years experience is telling me otherwise.  Which is why I am
going to dump her.  Apparantly my situation is a rare one per the
midwide.
Grant - 11 Dec 2003 01:09 GMT
This might be a stupid question, but can you just take an antiviral drug to
keep your outbreaks down?  I believe they are safe to take when pregnant.

ar

> >Hopefully you have read my latest posts on herpes and pregnancy. Honestly,
> >the baby is not at risk until the time of birth. The baby doesn't come into
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> going to dump her.  Apparantly my situation is a rare one per the
> midwide.
Angela - 11 Dec 2003 01:55 GMT
Ar,

That's what I am doing. I started suppression with Valtrex in mid November.
I take 500 mg daily. Back in June or July when I was experiencing a flare up
I treated it with Valtrex. It was gone within two or three days. My doctor
had me take the meds for one week. I'll be sure to keep you guys posted and
let you know how things turn out with my labor and delivery story and
herpes ... etc.

Angela

> This might be a stupid question, but can you just take an antiviral drug to
> keep your outbreaks down?  I believe they are safe to take when pregnant.
>
> ar
Joanne - 11 Dec 2003 03:20 GMT
>This might be a stupid question, but can you just take an antiviral drug to
>keep your outbreaks down?  I believe they are safe to take when pregnant.
>
>ar

She put me on Valtrex after she saw the lesion inside my cervical
canal.  I will remain on it.  But, according to her the damage may
already be done.  She said we will have to just wait and see if the
baby is born with congenital herpes.  Well, that's 21 weeks away and I
am going a bit crazy with worry.

Most of you still don't get what she told me, you seem to think I
don't know the facts.  I have researched this probably more than
anyone on this earth.  I will tell you again what the midwife's
concern is.  I don't expect any replies, I just want to explain again
so that it is understood once and for all.

I went to the midwife because I had a lot of pain with a recent
outbreak.  She did a speculum exam and said she saw a lesion on my
cervix and that it is very rare to see that.  She used some tool (a
tenaculum?) and opened the lip of my cervix and saw another lesion in
the cervical canal.  The cervix is the mouth of the womb, so this
means the lesion is about one centimeter or less from the amniotic sac
containing the baby.  Her concern is that the virus can travel up the
very short distance and penetrate the amniotic sac (bag of waters).
The placenta filters toxins coming from the bloodstream, it cannot
regulate what climbs up the neck of the womb.  (this is where I think
Angela is getting confused).  

Last, the midwife said most women do not get lesions in the cervix, so
she is especially concerned for my baby in utero with the virus being
so close to the baby.

Obviously I have no choice but to wait 21 weeks and see if my baby
will die or not.  In the meantime I will find a new care provider.  
M.L.S. - 11 Dec 2003 04:02 GMT
>Most of you still don't get what she told me, you seem to think I
>don't know the facts.  I have researched this probably more than
>anyone on this earth.

Then what are you doing asking technical medical questions in a
support group for?  You should be seeking professional help in your
own real life community instead of asking "How does the herpes virus
work?" like some dumbass.

Go away.

Mike
Joanne - 11 Dec 2003 17:11 GMT
>>Most of you still don't get what she told me, you seem to think I
>>don't know the facts.  I have researched this probably more than
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Mike

I'd tell you to go away, but that won't work because after searching
you on google, it appears you are addicted to usenet.  You have about
a million posts on a million groups and it appears you love to start
arguments with tons of people.  I will leave this group now, good luck
with your herpes, I hope you find a woman someday who will accept you
for who you are, herpes and all.  You really shouldn't be so
judgemental of other people, you are no prize, Mike.
M.L.S. - 11 Dec 2003 18:33 GMT
>>Go away.

>I'd tell you to go away, but that won't work because after searching
>you on google, it appears you are addicted to usenet.  You have about
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>for who you are, herpes and all.  You really shouldn't be so
>judgemental of other people, you are no prize, Mike.

The ability to exercise one's judgement is one of the most profound
aspects of being intelligent and conscious.

I wouldn't bet a nickel on your judgement.  Considering the evidence
of your posts, it is difficult to discern whether you possess any.

Ta ta.

Mike
Angela - 11 Dec 2003 18:58 GMT
In defense of Mike I will say that no matter how many groups he has visited
(which is no crime by the way) . . . at least he knows his herpes facts and
can participate in a positive way to help folks that actually do listen and
do check out the valid links that are provided. This is a herpes support
group Joanne. If you are not getting what you would believe to be adequate
support then you need to seek help elsewhere.

Angela
Angela - 11 Dec 2003 18:56 GMT
Joanne,

Mike has a point. If you care about your unborn child then you will seek
medical attention and perhaps get a second opinion. I would go to an OBGYN
SPECIALIST or a PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALIST and stay away from
the midwife. If you've already made up  your mind and you intend on doing
nothing I'm hear to remind you that you are not going to change my mind on
any of this . . . it's up to you to take care of yourself and your unborn
child. The object is not to convince the newsgroup . . . the object is to
convince yourself and do what's right for you and your baby. It's time to
move on.

Angela
Angela - 11 Dec 2003 18:54 GMT
Joanne,

I'm not "confused" about any of this . . . your midwife is the one that is
confusing you.
The baby is well protected. Something else I was thinking about as I read
your post is the fact that your midwife didn't even bother to do a culture
on the lesions that she supposedly saw. She was already there deep inside
doing this exam so why the heck didn't she do a culture that would confirm
or deny that it was herpes? She claims that what she saw were herpes lesions
but unfortunately it doesn't do a whole heck of a lot of good to be
diagnosed by site and I can't believe you took her word for it without
getting a second opinion or at least demanding that she do a culture. Now
... I've already explained to you that you are confused about how the virus
travels and when and where the baby could be at risk but you are still stuck
on this midwife that you said yesterday you were considering getting rid of.
Your posts are really starting to contradict your story and I'm having
difficulties believe that your story is even legit.

Either dump your midwife and get a second opinion or enjoy your pregnancy
and move on.
Stop obsessing and creating things as you go along . . .

Angela
Joanne - 11 Dec 2003 19:27 GMT
>Joanne,
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Angela

I did dump the midwife but until I can get an appointment with an OB,
her words still stick in my mind.  What difference would it make
anyway if she did a culture, according to you and others here, the
virus won't travel up, right?  ANyway, I'm tired of arguing.  Good
luck.
Angela - 11 Dec 2003 01:53 GMT
Sounds like your midwife doesn't know a whole heck of a lot about herpes.
If it will make you feel better . . . keep searching out the answers you are
looking for.
Talk to Terri Warren over on WebMD. She has lots of herpes experience and
happens to know the top herpes researchers across the country. It doesn't
hurt to keep searching for the facts. I won't knock you for that at all.

Angela

> Ya know, Angela, I pray you are right.  The midwife I am seeing who
> has 25+ years experience is telling me otherwise.  Which is why I am
> going to dump her.  Apparantly my situation is a rare one per the
> midwide.
Joanne - 11 Dec 2003 03:23 GMT
>Sounds like your midwife doesn't know a whole heck of a lot about herpes.
>If it will make you feel better . . . keep searching out the answers you are
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Angela

I want this baby to live, so the midwife's diagnosis is making me
neurotic.  I don't want to lose the baby.  Mike does not seem to get
that, but he has not experienced the joy of a child, but that's okay.
People who don't want children shouldn't have them.
M.L.S. - 11 Dec 2003 04:21 GMT
>>Sounds like your midwife doesn't know a whole heck of a lot about herpes.
>>If it will make you feel better . . . keep searching out the answers you are
>>looking for.
>>Talk to Terri Warren over on WebMD. She has lots of herpes experience and
>>happens to know the top herpes researchers across the country. It doesn't
>>hurt to keep searching for the facts. I won't knock you for that at all.

>I want this baby to live, so the midwife's diagnosis is making me
>neurotic.  I don't want to lose the baby.  Mike does not seem to get
>that, but he has not experienced the joy of a child, but that's okay.
>People who don't want children shouldn't have them.

Good grief.  You were neurotic to start with.  You've been neurotic
and distraught in your every appearance on Usenet.  Pity the people
you live with.

Go away.

Mike
Joanne - 11 Dec 2003 17:12 GMT
>>>Sounds like your midwife doesn't know a whole heck of a lot about herpes.
>>>If it will make you feel better . . . keep searching out the answers you are
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Mike

It's no surpise you are not married.  You seem like such a joy to be
around.  So extremely helpful and caring........NOT!
M.L.S. - 11 Dec 2003 19:02 GMT
>It's no surpise you are not married.  You seem like such a joy to be
>around.  So extremely helpful and caring........NOT!

Hmmm, sounds like someone's judgement is being manufactured by
someone's neurosis and pooped out through someone's emotions.

The most helpful thing I can suggest is that you get professional care
for your alleged baby.  Nothing else I or anyone else can say here
will mean anything unless you do that.

If you don't want to believe that the immune system does a dandy job
of protecting the fetus, even under the alleged condtions you've
described, that's your business, but everyone here except for
(supposedly) you knows that the risks to your baby are extremely low.

Naturally, you'd rather believe someone who (allegedly) "is very
negative about this disease."

Have a nice day.

Mike
Angela - 11 Dec 2003 19:01 GMT
Joanne,

You are making yourself neurotic. If you would spend more time on getting a
second opinion instead of posting to this newsgroup I might have a little
sympathy for you. At this point it's clear that posting is more important
than seeking medical attention for you and your unborn child. We've been
having this discussion for several days and I would have hoped you would
have had some sort of update on what you have done by way of seeing other
docs or specialists. If you don't want to lose your baby then do something
important to contribute to that instead of trying to convince the entire
herpes newsgroup that what you think you know about herpes is correct
information. It's time to move on Joanne.

Angela

> I want this baby to live, so the midwife's diagnosis is making me
> neurotic.  I don't want to lose the baby.  Mike does not seem to get
> that, but he has not experienced the joy of a child, but that's okay.
> People who don't want children shouldn't have them.
Joanne - 11 Dec 2003 19:24 GMT
>Joanne,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Angela

Once again, Angela, a person can do more than one thing at a time.  It
is possible to call prospective doctors to check for openings and post
to a newsgroup all in the same day.  It's called multi-tasking.  Don't
you DARE accuse me of not caring for my unborn child (like you did in
another post).  I've been calling OB's for several days now trying to
find one that suits me and takes my insurance.  Enjoy your baby and
get some sleep before she comes.  The night feedings are a killer on
sleep, but it's worth it.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.