> If you're a prostitute and thus know you're at a high risk of getting
> Herpes, would it be possible or advisable to vaccinate with the live
> virus?
In a word, no. If it were that easy, we'd have vaccines
against everything.
| "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against |
| unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct |
| before reason can act on them" -- Thomas Jefferson |
+-------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---------+
hot_chick1003 writes:
> if you knew you were going to be
>infected, would it thus be better to infect a small place on the skin
>somewhere so you didn't have a huge outbreak?
Here's a copy/paste of an explanation I just gave in another thread.
It may help you understand why your idea won't work.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This is what I don't really understand. In my reading I remember
>something about an outbreak occurring before symptoms, ie virus being
>present on the skin. So can I be active and not know it yet.
Yes, virus can be shed from the skin even when there is no visible
outbreak. I'll explain further below.
>Second thing is where does the virus appear, only on the site of the
>first outbreak. I don't really understand why other body parts are not
>active.
After infection, the virus sets up housekeeping in the Sacral Ganglia
where it lies dormant most of the time doing no harm. The Sacral
Ganglia is at the base of the spine and is the root of the sensory
nerves serving the skin in the boxer shorts area. Occasionally, the
dormant virus reactivates and starts replicating (pumping out new
viruses) at which point the new viruses travels up a nerve (staying
within the nerve) to the surface of the skin. The location where it
surfaces is dependant upon which nerve it travels. Sometimes it goes
up the same nerve it came in on when infection took place. But it can
also travel up a different nerve to surface in a different location.
The mechanism that causes the dormant virus to reactivate isn't fully
understood but a number of possible triggers are identified. Certain
foods, stress, friction, that sort of thing. Everybody has different
triggers. The choice of which nerve to take to the skin's service
seems to be the path of least resistance but that path is impossible
to predict.
As I mentioned, viral shedding can occur without symptoms but at some
point the volume of virus becomes so great that an outbreak is the
result. So that's why you get virus accumulating on the skin surface
before the symptoms appear.
I hope that helps clear things up a little.
M2
hot_chick1003@rock.com - 12 Jul 2008 00:46 GMT
On Jul 1, 8:52 pm, M2slo2...@nospam.invalid wrote:
> hot_chick1003 writes:
> > if you knew you were going to be
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> M2
But I read that people who get Herpes 2 on their mouth don't get it on
their genitals and vice versa. So while it's not the most ideal
solution, it might be better than nothing if it was possible to infect
a small place on your arm or something and then cover it for weeks
until your body developed anti-bodies. This might be better then
getting a full blown case of it in the genital region.
See: http://www.herpes.com/hsv1-2.html
They might want to see if this sort of pseudo-vaccination works. The
same thing could be true for wart and cancer causing HPV. Couldn't
they just infect you with it in a place where you wouldn't get warts
or cancer, and then your body would develop anti-bodies, and then you
wouldn't be able to get oral, genital, or anal warts or cancer.
MamaZ - 12 Jul 2008 01:15 GMT
Hi,
This is so not true. It is entirely possible to get Herpes 2 in more than
one place at the same time: I know, because I have Herpes 2 genitally AND on
the palm of my hand (called Whitlow).
Any more questions?
mama z
But I read that people who get Herpes 2 on their mouth don't get it on
their genitals and vice versa. So while it's not the most ideal
solution, it might be better than nothing if it was possible to infect
a small place on your arm or something and then cover it for weeks
until your body developed anti-bodies. This might be better then
getting a full blown case of it in the genital region.
See: http://www.herpes.com/hsv1-2.html
They might want to see if this sort of pseudo-vaccination works. The
same thing could be true for wart and cancer causing HPV. Couldn't
they just infect you with it in a place where you wouldn't get warts
or cancer, and then your body would develop anti-bodies, and then you
wouldn't be able to get oral, genital, or anal warts or cancer.
alfred - 14 Jul 2008 02:29 GMT
True, because as a matter of fact, I ended up getting genital herpes type 1
when I was 27, and later genital herpes type 2 and oral herpes type 1 at the
same time I got infected with the type 2 genitally. The second series of
infections happened when I was about 39.
Its more likely that you can get type 2 after getting type 1 then the other
way around. Of course as we know with herpes there are no definites! I will
say that when I got genital type one it was quite bothersome. With genital
type 2 it was more frequent and more painful in terms of aching etc. The
oral type one that i seemed to have gotten at 39 (unless i had it all along
and it just came out then) was very mild, and I never got a cold sore aside
from mild redness and tenderness on and around my lips.
Hope this helps,
Al
> Hi,
> This is so not true. It is entirely possible to get Herpes 2 in more than
> one place at the same time: I know, because I have Herpes 2 genitally AND
> on the palm of my hand (called Whitlow).
> Any more questions?
> mama z
M2slo2cht@nospam.invalid - 18 Jul 2008 00:58 GMT
Generally, when looking for a vaccine, you look for something
predictable and reliable that works on as many people as possible. And
although your proposal might "work" in a few cases, it could
(probably) do more harm than good in many (maybe most) other cases.
And there's no way to predict who would benefit and who would be
harmed.
M2
hot_chick1003 writes:
>But I read that people who get Herpes 2 on their mouth don't get it on
>their genitals and vice versa. So while it's not the most ideal
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>or cancer, and then your body would develop anti-bodies, and then you
>wouldn't be able to get oral, genital, or anal warts or cancer.