> "Don Coon" <coondw_nospam@hotmail_dot_.com> wrote
> Hey Steve,
> When we OE users add you to our "Blocked Sender" list, it blocks by the
> sender's email address. Sooo... when you send a post it gets through; when
> the imposter (baax5@hotmail.com) sends one it gets blocked : )
I figgerd, was just hopin they'd catch the right Steve Young ;)
> However, I (we?) do wish you'd ignore the idiot rather than keeping this
> $hit alive : (
Don, don't blame me for keeping it alive. Lately, I haven't said much, until he
started posting as me. So I was afraid you folks would think it was me, gone
off the edge, (if I wasn't having some of my own fun too ;)
Don't miss this thread for the 'real' cause:
From: "Ted Rogers" <ted@hotmail.com>
Msg-ID: <1066818563.28958.0@eunomia.uk.clara.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:29 AM EDT
Subject: Obscene posts
and more speciffically this post:
> > "Steve Dryden" <sdrydenwithoutthisbit@hotmail.com> wrote >
> > One thing to watch for is not to include words that could be used in
> > genuine subject headers though. Otherwise you'll suddenly find
> > RPD to be a pretty quiet newsgroup!
> "Juan R. Pollo" <jrpollo@worldnet.att.net> wrote
> Another thing to put up with is all the rocket scientists who respond to the
> original post, who maintain the thread after the OP has been blocked.
Yep, unfortunately, that problem can't be cured with as large as the groups are
and the wild crossposting. Somebody will always be seeing the troll for the 1st
time and feel compelled to proffer their 2 cents. How do you control that?
(would you like some examples to examine?)
Steve Young