Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Herpes / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Still learning , quick question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
WD - 19 Aug 2006 10:45 GMT
damn I am confused with this new found knowledge. Am I to understand
that .....follow me here, since I have genital herpes and at some
point down the road my then to be ...whoever , performs oral sex on me
during  an outbreak on my part ( lets assume she does not have ANY
STDand lets assume that the outbreak is minor and not noticable) that
my genital herpes could ...."mutate" into hsv-1 on her and then down
the road I could get Hsv-1 from her.  (which technically would  be
from myself) and if thats the case ....If I touch myself  today ( as I
am outbroken) and rub my mouth , could that cause it to turn into
Hsv-1?

Is my thought process understandable? Feel stupid asking but damn this
sounds like it could really get out of hand.
grant - 19 Aug 2006 13:47 GMT
Nope, you are confused.  Don't worry, many are.

There are two types of herpes simplex--type 1 and type 2.  Both types can
infect the genitals or the oral region.  So, you can type 1 orally or
genitally.  The same for type 2.  The virus doesn't change, just the
location it lives in.

Now, each virus prefers it's own location.  So, type 1 prefers the mouth.
Type 2 prefers the genitals.  What that means is that if you are infected
with type 1 genitally (as I am), then outbreaks, over time, will more than
likely be less frequent and less severe than people who have type 2
genitally.  And people with type 2 orally pretty much never get outbreaks.
However, we've had two people with type 2 orally come through here and each
was having a horrible time with their outbreaks.  So, with herpes, all bets
are generally off.  :)

If someone has type 1 oral herpes, they can give their partner type 1
genital herpes through oral sex.

So, the virus can't change.  But you can infect yourself orally with your
type 2 as you described below.  It's generally not that common.  But it can
happen.  It's always a good idea to practice good hygiene.

I hope that clarified things a bit.

ar

> damn I am confused with this new found knowledge. Am I to understand
> that .....follow me here, since I have genital herpes and at some
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Is my thought process understandable? Feel stupid asking but damn this
> sounds like it could really get out of hand.
WD - 19 Aug 2006 14:11 GMT
Actually a big help. Damn I,m gonna be as smart as you, Eric, Yoshi2me
and the rest when all this ends. Hell I'll even be able to give
advice. LOL
I am going to find my original report from the doctor back in Oct. I
remember it sayning exactly what I had, kinda blew it off at the time
with all that was going on. Its obvious I have genital but now i'll
have to see which one.
Get back to ya in a couple hours.
Thanks agin ....so much, ya'll have been a huge help.
Now can the three of ya get together and come up with a cure???? LOL

Wayne

>Nope, you are confused.  Don't worry, many are.
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>> Is my thought process understandable? Feel stupid asking but damn this
>> sounds like it could really get out of hand.
WD - 19 Aug 2006 15:03 GMT
OK,  Heres some info that maybe will shed some light.Otherwise come
Monday  I'll have to get a hold of the Doctor and get more specifics.

Handwritten on the lab results page is the Dr's writing "positive for
genital Herpes"  nothing about the hsv-1, or hsv-2.

On the first page
 "hsv2 IGG Type specific AB     out of range 1.57h
<0.90 reference range

So that tells me again I have type 2,  hsv-2 correct?

now  farther down the page it says

hsv IGM AB screen  not detected

Now I take that as meaning  HSV-! is not detected, again , correct?

also it looks like they did all the hepatitis screenings

a, b surface, b core, c antibody....... all non reactive

this is good
I also went out last November to the health clinic and got screened
for AIDS, it came back negative.  Thank God.

So  (whew)  I have genital herpes hsv-2, which through oral sex could
cause my future partner hsv-2 but orally through oral sex , and of
course could give her hsv-2 genital.
Now,   I could also get Hsv-2 oral subsequently through the sex acts,
BUT....Correct me if I am wrong ....if (assuming she has no prior STD)

there would be no way that either of us could get HSV-1 orally or
genitally.....am I yhinking this through clearl???

The reason why I am concerned is ...and I do NOT want to offend those
with the oral when I say this, but especially on my job there is a
stigmatism placed with the oral virus. In other words its out there
for all to see. Wheras genital is ...Hidden.

Thanx I think I finally got a handle on all this.
Next step is to work on the frequency and severity of the outbreaks

And to think I literally brought people back from the dead when I was
a medic,  had to memorize a bunch of drug dosages , protocals etc.
etc.
and I am having a hard time understanding two viruses.(that can swap
living spots) LOL
grant - 19 Aug 2006 15:16 GMT
Hi WD,

Good, I'm glad the confusion is cleared up.  It does look like you have
genital type 2.

Now that we've got the basics down, let's get a bit more detailed.

It would be unlikely for you to pass type 2 to your partner's mouth through
oral sex, only because the virus really hates it there.  It can happen,
let's say, if she has immune system problems or a cut in the oral area which
would allow the virus easy access.

It is far more common to pass type 1 herpes through oral sex than type 2.

Once you have one of the types, it's highly unlikely you will get it again
in another location.  Again, all depending on your health and other factors
like cuts, etc.  But it is still possible to catch the other type of herpes,
though less likely because your body will soon become quite adept at dealing
with the virus and the antibodies you are building up will protect you to a
point.  Those same antibodies will keep you from infecting yourself again in
another location.  It takes about a year of infection for the body to build
up enough antibodies.

It is really difficult to have to wear your disease on your face.  Since
many with type 1 oral herpes had their outbreaks when they were kids, they
probably don't have outbreaks now.  I bet if you asked around the station
who had ever had a cold sore or fever blister, you'd be surprised by how
many have it and probably don't know it's herpes.

You're in a nice part of Florida.  Sounds like a good place to live.

ar

> OK,  Heres some info that maybe will shed some light.Otherwise come
> Monday  I'll have to get a hold of the Doctor and get more specifics.
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> and I am having a hard time understanding two viruses.(that can swap
> living spots) LOL
WD - 19 Aug 2006 15:35 GMT
Thanks again for all this knowledge, I plan to share it with all my
social circle....education, plus it will mke me look smart. (I will
give you credit...LOL)

So on a final note for now, hsv-2 CANNOT in any way shape or form
become HSV-1? Genitally or orally.

>Hi WD,
>
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>> and I am having a hard time understanding two viruses.(that can swap
>> living spots) LOL
grant - 19 Aug 2006 16:00 GMT
Hi WD,

It's our pleasure to share our hard-learned knowledge with the newbies.  :)

You're already smart...you came here!

That's correct.  In no way can type 1 become type 2 or vice versa.  The type
always remains the same.

People can have either type both genitally or orally.  Which is why we like
to make sure people know to get their herpes typed, that way they know what
they are dealing with, exactly.

ar

> Thanks again for all this knowledge, I plan to share it with all my
> social circle....education, plus it will mke me look smart. (I will
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>>> and I am having a hard time understanding two viruses.(that can swap
>>> living spots) LOL
Yoshi2me - 19 Aug 2006 16:40 GMT
> So on a final note for now, hsv-2 CANNOT in any way shape or form
> become HSV-1? Genitally or orally.

No, HSV-1 doesn't miraculously turn into HSV-2 and vice versa.

A person can have HSV-1, HSV-2, both, or nothing at all.

Make sense?

Angela :)

Signature

"By opening up to a partner and talking about an STD diagnosis you are
showing that you respect and care about yourself as well as the other
person."

Herpes Help
http://yoshi2me.com/index.html

Shut Up & Post!
http://yoshi2me.com/phpbb/index.php

Herpes Blog
http://herpes-help.blogspot.com/

Yoshi2me - 19 Aug 2006 16:38 GMT
> OK,  Heres some info that maybe will shed some light.Otherwise come
> Monday  I'll have to get a hold of the Doctor and get more specifics.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> a, b surface, b core, c antibody....... all non reactive

I will shoot Betsy (she goes by Grace on the STD Message Board) an e-mail
and see if she can decipher your test results. As soon as she writes me back
I will post her response for you. She's very good at figuring these things
out. :)

> this is good
> I also went out last November to the health clinic and got screened
> for AIDS, it came back negative.  Thank God.

Glad to hear that! :)

> So  (whew)  I have genital herpes hsv-2, which through oral sex could
> cause my future partner hsv-2 but orally through oral sex , and of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> there would be no way that either of us could get HSV-1 orally or
> genitally.....am I yhinking this through clearl???

If you have genital herpes type-2 and she performs oral sex on you... the
chances of her contracting oral herpes type-2 are not common at all. It's
possible... but not common.

If you have genital herpes type-1 and she performs oral sex on you... it's
possible for her to contract oral herpes type-1.

If you have genital herpes type-2 and you have regular sex with your
girlfriend and she doesn't have herpes then it's possible that she might
contract genital herpes tpe-2 from you.

If you have genital herpes type-1 and you have regular sex with your
girlfriend... the chances of her contracting genital herpes type-1 are not
common at all. It's possible... but not very common.

As far as passing your virus to other parts of your body... it's not likely
going to happen since you have antibodies of your herpes virus built up in
your body.

BUT (and there's always a but here) even with the above senarios... herpes
is so unpredictable that you shouldn't rule any of it out. There is always a
special circumstance to each guideline. It's not a good idea to say "no this
will NEVER happen" OR "yes that will always happen." Herpes is
unpredictable... so the more you know about your status with your partner
the better you will be able to figure out what you would like to do as far
as protection goes. Every couple is different. Some do everything they can
to protect their partners and others throw it all out the window and just
hang from the chandeliers! :)

> The reason why I am concerned is ...and I do NOT want to offend those
> with the oral when I say this, but especially on my job there is a
> stigmatism placed with the oral virus. In other words its out there
> for all to see. Wheras genital is ...Hidden.

I have always maintained that I am glad I have genital herpes vs. oral
herpes. I like that people can't tell when I am having an outbreak. So, I do
know where you are coming from on that note.

> Thanx I think I finally got a handle on all this.
> Next step is to work on the frequency and severity of the outbreaks

Yup ~ and it sounds like you have a bunch of things you can try.

> And to think I literally brought people back from the dead when I was
> a medic,  had to memorize a bunch of drug dosages , protocals etc.
> etc.
> and I am having a hard time understanding two viruses.(that can swap
> living spots) LOL

Hey... no problem. People don't notice the pregnancy commercials until they
are pregnant OR have kids... ya know?

Hang in there,

Angela :)

Signature

"By opening up to a partner and talking about an STD diagnosis you are
showing that you respect and care about yourself as well as the other
person."

Herpes Help
http://yoshi2me.com/index.html

Shut Up & Post!
http://yoshi2me.com/phpbb/index.php

Herpes Blog
http://herpes-help.blogspot.com/

Eric - 19 Aug 2006 22:46 GMT
WD,

 Ok, first thing: your HSV IgM showed not detected. Since IgM's are
the first antibodies produced in response to the little bugger getting
in, it appears that your infection isn't brand new, on the order of
weeks anyway.

 Next thing, your HSV-2 IgG shows a 1.57 with greater then 0.90
positive. This is a pretty low antibody count, my test was a
HerpeSelect and I had a 5.0 for HSV-1 (and nothing for HSV-2). Let me
make this clear, I have no idea why they didn't just run a
type-specific for HSV-1 and HSV-2. If you have HSV-1, it can raise your
HSV-2 count, particularly if your HSV-1 antibody levels are high.

 Ugh, don't talk too much about the stigma of it being oral, my lip
isn't doing too good right now :-(

~Eric

> OK,  Heres some info that maybe will shed some light.Otherwise come
> Monday  I'll have to get a hold of the Doctor and get more specifics.
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> and I am having a hard time understanding two viruses.(that can swap
> living spots) LOL
Yoshi2me - 19 Aug 2006 16:26 GMT
> damn I am confused with this new found knowledge. Am I to understand
> that .....follow me here, since I have genital herpes and at some
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> my genital herpes could ...."mutate" into hsv-1 on her and then down
> the road I could get Hsv-1 from her.

No... that's not how the heres virus operates. Check out this page I've put
together with the help of Terri Warren:
http://www.yoshi2me.com/hsv1-hsv2.html

You might also want to read the free herpes handbook over on
westoverheights.com OR you could access that from my std reading materials
page here:
http://www.yoshi2me.com/herpes-hpv-books.html

I think once you do some reading on this virus you'll get this all figured
out in no time flat! :)

> (which technically would  be
> from myself) and if thats the case ....If I touch myself  today ( as I
> am outbroken) and rub my mouth , could that cause it to turn into
> Hsv-1?

Once you build up antibodies to your own virus it's not likely going to
effect the rest of your body unless your immune system is out of whack OR
your personal hygiene is extremely poor... now what I mean?

> Is my thought process understandable? Feel stupid asking but damn this
> sounds like it could really get out of hand.

No... you should not feel bad about asking these type of questions. It's
completely normal and natural to wonder about these things. Especially since
this virus is a new thing for you. I totally recommend that book by ASHA
called "How to Love with a Chronic STD" by Charles Ebel and Anna Wald. I
think you will come to appreciate the material these two have put together.

I hope this helps and I hope you have a great weekend!

Angela :)

Signature

"By opening up to a partner and talking about an STD diagnosis you are
showing that you respect and care about yourself as well as the other
person."

Herpes Help
http://yoshi2me.com/index.html

Shut Up & Post!
http://yoshi2me.com/phpbb/index.php

Herpes Blog
http://herpes-help.blogspot.com/

Diva - 21 Aug 2006 01:46 GMT
hey there.  Haven't posted to the group in a while but I have a new guy
in my life so I'm also looking for info.

I've looked over this entire thread and there's one thing that I didn't
see mentioned.  80% of the population in North America has some type of
Herpes Simplex virus!  Because there is no stigma attached to having
coldsores, people don't realize it's the same virus - even under a
microscope type 1 and type 2 LOOK exactly the same.

I bring this up because your partner may very well already have type 1
and there has been research showing that having antibodies for type 1
can improve resistance to type 2.

I can't believe my own good fortune - after delivering the "um, I
should really tell you this" news in an e-mail, this darling man I met
online spent 4 HOURS researching.

anyway, I hope everything works out alright for you.

Dar
Eric - 21 Aug 2006 06:11 GMT
Diva,

Hi! I'd say actually your estimates of 80% of the people in North
America having  a herpes virus is low. Around 80% of the population has
HSV-1. Around 22% has HSV-2, and that's not even counting other Herpes
viruses.

I agree with you, I don't think there is as bad of a stigma attached to
cold sores, mostly because people are used to seeing them. And that's
honestly the thing that's the most unfair about it - they aren't
totally different viruses.

Yes, having type-1 IMPROVES resistance to getting type-2, but by no
means does it prevent transmission. And yes, some research has
indicated that as HSV-1 prevalance started dropping slightly over the
past few decades, HSV-2 prevalance has increased.

What did you tell him, that you have coldsores or genital herpes? I
have a coldsore on my lip right now and I'm really scared about telling
a partner about it, but I will do it because I care about them and
don't want to hurt them. I hope I meet someone willing to get educated
like you did!

~Eric

> hey there.  Haven't posted to the group in a while but I have a new guy
> in my life so I'm also looking for info.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Dar
Yoshi2me - 21 Aug 2006 13:34 GMT
> Yes, having type-1 IMPROVES resistance to getting type-2, but by no
> means does it prevent transmission. And yes, some research has
> indicated that as HSV-1 prevalance started dropping slightly over the
> past few decades, HSV-2 prevalance has increased.

When the circumstances are just right it's always going to be possible to
contract hsv-1, hsv-2, or both. Having herpes simplex virus type-1 does not
help a person from contracting OR resisting getting herpes simplex virus
type-2.

Angela

Signature

"By opening up to a partner and talking about an STD diagnosis you are
showing that you respect and care about yourself as well as the other
person."

Herpes Help
http://yoshi2me.com/index.html

Shut Up & Post!
http://yoshi2me.com/phpbb/index.php

Herpes Blog
http://herpes-help.blogspot.com/

Eric - 21 Aug 2006 19:20 GMT
Some research indicates that having hsv-1 can offer MILD protection
aginst getting hsv-2 but by no means does it prevent transmission. This
is because the antibodies to hsv-1 can weakly react with hsv-2. So yes,
it does offer a little resistance. Studies also indicate that people
with hsv-1 antibodies who are then infected with hsv-2 tend to also be
asymptomatic.

~Eric

> > Yes, having type-1 IMPROVES resistance to getting type-2, but by no
> > means does it prevent transmission. And yes, some research has
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Angela
Tim Fitzmaurice - 21 Aug 2006 09:17 GMT
> hey there.  Haven't posted to the group in a while but I have a new guy
> in my life so I'm also looking for info.

Congratulations....

> I've looked over this entire thread and there's one thing that I didn't
> see mentioned.  80% of the population in North America has some type of
> Herpes Simplex virus!

Yes, and even more have some kind of herpesvirus of some sort, if you
want to start adding VZV in there or even all the non-alpha herpesviruses.

>  Because there is no stigma attached to having
> coldsores, people don't realize it's the same virus

'the same virus' is a phrase that has to be used very very cautiously
here.
Yes HSV1 and HSV2 can do the same thing in both places but HSV1 and HSV2
are NOT the same virus despite their close relationship and equating
viruses isnt the best way to get the point over IMO. THe issue is to break
the absolute connection in people's minds between disease in one location
and one particular disease agent.

Where saying the same virus can be useful is in breaking that barrier by
making the point that HSV1 (specifically HSV1) causes a lot of new genital
herpes cases these days. THats usually what starts breaking the commonly
held views that are innaccurate (at least in my experience anyway).

> - even under a
> microscope type 1 and type 2 LOOK exactly the same.

'even' is unfortunately meaningless here. Under a light microscope most
viruses wont be visible at all, and under an electron microscope pretty
much any herpesvirus is going to look the same as another includingall the
non human herpesviruses (I got desperate one time helping my boss set up a
practical for students and we used this to our advantage by swapping a
label or two).

However the microscope is not the tool to separate herpesviruses, a brief
look at say equine herppesvirus 1 and HSV1 raises some pretty major
biological differences and hence thats why serology and genetics rule the
day.

> I bring this up because your partner may very well already have type 1
> and there has been research showing that having antibodies for type 1
> can improve resistance to type 2.

True, but I wouldnt rely on it myself.

> I can't believe my own good fortune - after delivering the "um, I
> should really tell you this" news in an e-mail, this darling man I met
> online spent 4 HOURS researching.

Thats good news isnt it.....

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
WD - 21 Aug 2006 15:37 GMT
>> hey there.  Haven't posted to the group in a while but I have a new guy
>> in my life so I'm also looking for info.
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
>Tim

Have to agree with you on this Tim. From all the education recieved
here and elsewhere, I do not believe its fair to say they are the
same. I can say with authority that HSV-2 has been extremely
systemicin nature for me. Since I do not have Hsv-1 I cannot comment.
But the very few people that I know who do have it, their claims (so
far) have been that it is not as systemic in severity. I am sure Eric
is having a rough time and I truly feel for him , but as stated cannot
comment.
Eric - 21 Aug 2006 19:14 GMT
> 'the same virus' is a phrase that has to be used very very cautiously
> here.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the absolute connection in people's minds between disease in one location
> and one particular disease agent.

I agree with you here but I think you are missing the larger
point--most of society is terribly ignorant that HSV-1 can infect
places other than the oral area. And really people tend to be more
forgiving towards oral herpes than genital herpes, most likely because
cold sores are so common and sex almost always isn't involved. So if
people can use coldsores as a metaphor for revealing their HSV-2, I
think it's a rather apt move.

> Where saying the same virus can be useful is in breaking that barrier by
> making the point that HSV1 (specifically HSV1) causes a lot of new genital
> herpes cases these days. THats usually what starts breaking the commonly
> held views that are innaccurate (at least in my experience anyway).

Again, that's pretty much your opinion and most people don't understand
that HSV-1 can infect other regions. And that's a shame, really.

> 'even' is unfortunately meaningless here. Under a light microscope most
> viruses wont be visible at all, and under an electron microscope pretty
> much any herpesvirus is going to look the same as another includingall the
> non human herpesviruses (I got desperate one time helping my boss set up a
> practical for students and we used this to our advantage by swapping a
> label or two).

Ok, this is stupid. I'm not sure anyone on here cares too much about
light microscopes, LOL, but I guess info is always useful..

> However the microscope is not the tool to separate herpesviruses, a brief
> look at say equine herppesvirus 1 and HSV1 raises some pretty major
> biological differences and hence thats why serology and genetics rule the
> day.

Yeah, come back to reality. This isn't exactly
alt.support.herpes.equine..LOL..not too many people care about equine
herpes, although herpes viruses in other species are interesting.

My opinion of course,

~Eric
grant - 21 Aug 2006 20:12 GMT
> Ok, this is stupid. I'm not sure anyone on here cares too much about
> light microscopes, LOL, but I guess info is always useful..
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> ~Eric

Jeez, Eric, how many other long-time contributers to this newsgroup are you
planning on insulting?

My opinion, of course.

ar
Eric - 21 Aug 2006 20:26 GMT
> Jeez, Eric, how many other long-time contributers to this newsgroup are you
> planning on insulting?
>
> My opinion, of course.

I don't know if telling him that he is digressing to talk about horse
herpes viruses under a microscope is insulting him. I just think I'm
telling him his point is irrelevent and most people on here won't even
know or care that electron microscopes vs. light microscopes. No
insults intended.

~Eric
Tim Fitzmaurice - 22 Aug 2006 08:29 GMT
>> Jeez, Eric, how many other long-time contributers to this newsgroup are you
>> planning on insulting?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> know or care that electron microscopes vs. light microscopes. No
> insults intended.

Then leave out words like 'stupid', Eric. Yes equine viruses are different
- that was the point behind mentioning them - discussing the capabilities
of different microscopes is hardly irrelevant when replying to statements
about how  herpesviruses don't differ 'even under a microscope'.

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
Tim Fitzmaurice - 22 Aug 2006 08:17 GMT
>> 'the same virus' is a phrase that has to be used very very cautiously
>> here.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> point--most of society is terribly ignorant that HSV-1 can infect
> places other than the oral area.

Er yes I missed it so much that later on in my post I said pointing out
HSV1 can do just this is what I have found most effective in breaking down
the inaccurate views people hold.

>> Where saying the same virus can be useful is in breaking that barrier by
>> making the point that HSV1 (specifically HSV1) causes a lot of new genital
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Again, that's pretty much your opinion and most people don't understand
> that HSV-1 can infect other regions. And that's a shame, really.

Yes that why I've found it most effective to point out when Im trying to
inform people about the viruses....

>> 'even' is unfortunately meaningless here. Under a light microscope most
>> viruses wont be visible at all, and under an electron microscope pretty
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Ok, this is stupid. I'm not sure anyone on here cares too much about
> light microscopes, LOL, but I guess info is always useful..

Read the damn post in context, Eric.
When you say microscope without qualification, most people are going to
conjure up the image of a light microscope, some will be aware of the
size issues and think electron microscope. At that point and even if they
know enough about microscopes and sizes of things to assume an electron
microscope my point was simple - saying two different herpesviruses look
the same 'even under a microscope' as was said becomes meaningless as neither
form of scope is an appropriate tool for differentiating the viruses.

>> However the microscope is not the tool to separate herpesviruses, a brief
>> look at say equine herppesvirus 1 and HSV1 raises some pretty major
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yeah, come back to reality. This isn't exactly
> alt.support.herpes.equine..LOL

No, I was making a point that you seem to have missed in your rush to take
a cheap shot. EHV and HSV look the same under a microscope (I've subbed
a picture of one for the other in a practical for vet students my boss at
the time ran because we lost a picture) - I was reinforcing the point that
the microscope is not the tool for differentiation of herpesvirus tyes
becauce they all look alike hence my use of the HSV we are interested in
and the EHV - because EHV is so different.

So no I wasnt waving off into alternate reality, it was there for a
reason. You just seem to have missed it.

>..not too many people care about equine
> herpes,

Oh really....the fairly large number  of people Ive met while working
on a vaccine development program who do must be figments of my
imagination. But hey I just throw up things for no reason it seems.

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
grant - 22 Aug 2006 18:08 GMT
> Oh really....the fairly large number  of people Ive met while working on a
> vaccine development program who do must be figments of my imagination. But
> hey I just throw up things for no reason it seems.
>
> Tim

Interesting.  Everyone wants "someone" to come up with a vaccine and cure,
but will be rude to the people who are doing the research.

ar
Eric - 22 Aug 2006 21:20 GMT
Grant,

You know what? I'm a scientist too, and I have every right to criticize
him. And whatever comments I made to Tim are none of your concern
really. Grow up and realize in the real world people can criticize
other people's remarks and ideas and not be rude.

You seem so worried about defending the scientists and so bent on
condemning doctors and the rest of medicine in the same breath. Don't
you know that physicians are scientists, many of whom are doing
research on HSV and other infectious diseases? Why don't you think
about that for a while..

~Eric

> Interesting.  Everyone wants "someone" to come up with a vaccine and cure,
> but will be rude to the people who are doing the research.
>
> ar
grant - 22 Aug 2006 22:45 GMT
Eric,

You are the one that needs to grow up.  I'm sick and tired of watching you
walk through here being rude and plain old mean to people and then trying to
excuse yourself with double talk.

You are burning bridges at every point.  I don't know why you think you have
a right to criticize people--especially those that have been here for a
decade, helping people.

You are a troll.

You are a child.

You are insolent.

You are rude.

And it's really, really hard to continue attepting to respect you when you
absolutely show no respect for anyone else.  And again, no double talk
trying to excuse yourself.

And yes, any comments you make in this group are my concern.  You walked
into my home, uninvited, and determined to make trouble.  Start your own
group, then you can say whatever you want and insult all the ones who
comment.

> You seem so worried about defending the scientists and so bent on
> condemning doctors and the rest of medicine in the same breath. Don't
> you know that physicians are scientists, many of whom are doing
> research on HSV and other infectious diseases? Why don't you think
> about that for a while..

Eric, take your head out of your butt and grow up.  You have no idea what
you are talking about.  Your narrow-minded one-way thinking is tired and
shallow.

ar
Eric - 23 Aug 2006 01:01 GMT
> Eric,
>
> You are the one that needs to grow up.  I'm sick and tired of watching you
> walk through here being rude and plain old mean to people and then trying to
> excuse yourself with double talk.

You know what? Too bad. I just had a coldsore on my lip and what did
you say to support me? This was the first coldsore I ever had and what
did I get out of you? Huh? Absolutely nothing.  Now you think you're
going to tell me that I am mean and rude? Well fine but at least I
would support you in an outbreak.

> You are burning bridges at every point.  I don't know why you think you have
> a right to criticize people--especially those that have been here for a
> decade, helping people.

Are you serious? I'm criticizing your methods in order for you to see
problems and fix them and continue to help people better. I don't care
if you criticize me, but character attacks are pointless. Tell me what
I'm doing wrong so I can identify the problem.

> And it's really, really hard to continue attepting to respect you when you
> absolutely show no respect for anyone else.  And again, no double talk
> trying to excuse yourself.

Hey, at least I support people in an outbreak. I didn't get one iota of
support or concern from you. That really upset me, Grant..

> And yes, any comments you make in this group are my concern.  You walked
> into my home, uninvited, and determined to make trouble.  Start your own
> group, then you can say whatever you want and insult all the ones who
> comment.

Determined to make trouble? Ha! I'm determined to help folks out and
you're determined to undermine my every attempt. I don't care how long
you are here, this groups isn't yours only. There's room enough here
for a difference of opinions. You use your methods to help people, I'll
use mine, ok? Truce?

> Eric, take your head out of your butt and grow up.  You have no idea what
> you are talking about.  Your narrow-minded one-way thinking is tired and
> shallow.

I'm sick of arguing with you. You use your methods to help people, I'll
use mine. But I guess expecting support out of you during an ob is out
of the question..

~Eric
grant - 23 Aug 2006 01:40 GMT
You are too much.

Support you in your outbreak?  I said to you exactly what you say to others
and you didn't take too kindly to that.  I noticed that you changed your
tune after that.  And, when I asked you what else you thought it could be so
I could address your concerns, you didn't respond.  Remember?  You said you
were hoping it was herpes and so asked you what else it could be.

> Are you serious? I'm criticizing your methods in order for you to see
> problems and fix them and continue to help people better. I don't care
> if you criticize me, but character attacks are pointless. Tell me what
> I'm doing wrong so I can identify the problem.

You're not criticizing my methods.  I'm criticizing YOURS.  This is the
double speak I was talking about.  You are the one who started with the
character attacks.  Your very first post in this group contained a whole lot
of character attacks.  I don't take kindly to people coming in and
criticizing my friends.  I stand up for my friends.

>> And it's really, really hard to continue attepting to respect you when
>> you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Hey, at least I support people in an outbreak. I didn't get one iota of
> support or concern from you. That really upset me, Grant..

I'm not apologizing for using your own words.

>> And yes, any comments you make in this group are my concern.  You walked
>> into my home, uninvited, and determined to make trouble.  Start your own
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> for a difference of opinions. You use your methods to help people, I'll
> use mine, ok? Truce?

No truce.  I'm done trying to get along with you.  You've burned your last
bridge with me.  Undermined your every attempt?  Did you not read the post
where I complimented you?  Don't worry, probaby won't happen again.  There's
nothing wrong with a difference of opinion.  But you've gone way beyond
that.  You've been  mean, condescending, insulting, rude, and just plain
ridiculous.

>> Eric, take your head out of your butt and grow up.  You have no idea what
>> you are talking about.  Your narrow-minded one-way thinking is tired and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> use mine. But I guess expecting support out of you during an ob is out
> of the question..

Insulting the old-timers is not exactly using a method to help people.  And
you getting an out-break is a good thing.  Changes your perception a bit,
and will allow you to actually understand what it truly feels like to have
herpes.

ar
Eric - 23 Aug 2006 02:34 GMT
> You are too much.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I could address your concerns, you didn't respond.  Remember?  You said you
> were hoping it was herpes and so asked you what else it could be.

Ok, I have been telling everyone who is just diagnosed that "they will
be ok" and "to hang in there" and "that they are still the same person
they were before the diagnosis". Where have you been? How is asking me
if it could be anything else when I'm tired, worried, and confused
helpful? It's not, you made zero attempt to support me.

> You're not criticizing my methods.  I'm criticizing YOURS.  This is the
> double speak I was talking about.  You are the one who started with the
> character attacks.  Your very first post in this group contained a whole lot
> of character attacks.  I don't take kindly to people coming in and
> criticizing my friends.  I stand up for my friends.

And I have no problem with your criticism, as long as it is specific.
You said you've noticed I've changed my methods somewhat. You're right,
and that's from the criticism! I'm constantly changing and tweaking
what I say in order to help people the most.

Drop this bullshit about double-talk and argue logically and
coherently. If you have a specific problem, tell me. If you are going
to call me names, it offers no help, no solution, and it's
irresponsible. If you throw out criticisms and tell me how much of a
"troll" I am, it's just totally irresponsible because you aren't
addressing the root of the problem or even attempting to help fix the
issue.

>  I'm not apologizing for using your own words.

Let me explain something to you, ok? I know I have HSV-1. I knew that
coming here. Many people coming in here have no idea what HSV-1 or
HSV-2 even is. Telling me "having HSV-1 puts you in the majority" is
pointless and NOT support. Giving other people who don't know too much
about what they have facts and statistics, both of which can be found
in medical textbooks and all over the internet, is not pointless. It's
educating and helping people, period.

> No truce.  I'm done trying to get along with you.  You've burned your last
> bridge with me.  Undermined your every attempt?  Did you not read the post
> where I complimented you?  Don't worry, probaby won't happen again.  There's
> nothing wrong with a difference of opinion.  But you've gone way beyond
> that.  You've been  mean, condescending, insulting, rude, and just plain
> ridiculous.

Well, that's too bad. You think not supporting me with my coldsore
didn't "burn any bridges"? And then you have the nerve to tell me I'm
widening the gap between HSV-1 and HSV-2 while you won't even help
someone with oral herpes! Your actions clearly speak louder than your
words here.

I refuse to reply to your personal attacks. They are irresponsible and
you know it.

> Insulting the old-timers is not exactly using a method to help people.  And
> you getting an out-break is a good thing.  Changes your perception a bit,
> and will allow you to actually understand what it truly feels like to have
> herpes.

Now the truth comes out. Do you realize what you just said to me is
hateful? Do you know that you just said my pain and embarassment are
good things? That statement is unconscionable. You should be ashamed of
yourself!

You hate me because of what? Because I disagree with you oftentimes?
Because I present facts and statistics which might not always like?
Because you don't approve of the way I am trying to help folks? Because
I said talking about "equine herpes and electron microscopes is stupid
because it's off-topic"? Because I don't care too much for Angela? Are
these really reasons to say something as hateful as you just did?

I will argue with you all day and everyday and I while I might my
arguments might be cutting and yes sometimes even rude, I won't hate
you. I don't care what you say to me. I will love you and wish you the
best, that you never get another outbreak, that you can continue to
reach out and help people, and that you have a happy, healthy life.

I guess that's the difference between us, huh? I hope not, I really
do..

~Eric
grant - 23 Aug 2006 03:53 GMT
> Ok, I have been telling everyone who is just diagnosed that "they will
> be ok" and "to hang in there" and "that they are still the same person
> they were before the diagnosis".

All the exact same things I said to you when you first came to this group
spewing self-hate and saying bad things about women.

>Where have you been?

Right here reading every word you've written.

>How is asking me
> if it could be anything else when I'm tired, worried, and confused
> helpful? It's not, you made zero attempt to support me.

You were not clear in your post and so I asked you for clarification.  If I
can't understand what you are worried about, then how can I help you?  From
what you wrote, it sounded to me like you were afraid it was something worse
like cancer.  I was asking you what you were worried about.  YOU, it seems,
have decided that's a bad thing.

I asked you to clarify your worries.  You made the decision to make it
negative.  That was your decision.  What kind of support, exactly, were you
looking for?  You can't go around insulting people and then expect them to
be all lovey-dovey with you when you suddenly need their help.

> And I have no problem with your criticism, as long as it is specific.
> You said you've noticed I've changed my methods somewhat. You're right,
> and that's from the criticism! I'm constantly changing and tweaking
> what I say in order to help people the most.

Unfortunately, the only way to get any point through your head is to have a
huge, ugly argument that lasts for days.  And then, when you do finally get
the point, you can't seem to figure out that if you are lacking in one way,
you are probably lacking in another.  And so you just keep going on and on,
insulting everyone, being rude, and trying to blame someone else for your
actions.

> Drop this bullshit about double-talk and argue logically and
> coherently.

Why?  You are unable to.

>If you have a specific problem, tell me.

I have.  Repeatedly.  I've copied and pasted your own words in order to
point out to you what the problems are.  The response from you is more
insults, arguments, and the insistence that no one tells you specifics,
while you are actually looking at your own words cut and pasted.  I tell you
something specific, but you are still too blind to hear/see/understand it.

> If you are going
> to call me names, it offers no help, no solution, and it's
> irresponsible.

Really?  Irresponsible?  Then why do you do it?  I pretty much only respond
when you've started the insulting.  Some of your more recent words were
schizo and stupid.  And, of course, the "get back to reality" which was
pretty odd since you are the one who seems to be missing the reality chip.

>If you throw out criticisms and tell me how much of a
> "troll" I am, it's just totally irresponsible because you aren't
> addressing the root of the problem or even attempting to help fix the
> issue.

Um...are you two different people?  When someone points something out to
you, to your face, blatantly, and holds it up for all the world to see, you
resort to belittling, double talk to try to place the blame on someone
else...OH!  That's what you're doing now.  You're pretty good at finger
pointing, aren't you.

And what do you think is the root problem, exactly?  Considering all the
blatant ignoring you've done of my attempts to communicate with you more
peacefully, I think the root problem is, plainly, you.

>>  I'm not apologizing for using your own words.
>
> Let me explain something to you, ok? I know I have HSV-1. I knew that
> coming here. Many people coming in here have no idea what HSV-1 or
> HSV-2 even is. Telling me "having HSV-1 puts you in the majority" is
> pointless and NOT support.

Again, just using your own words.

>Giving other people who don't know too much
> about what they have facts and statistics, both of which can be found
> in medical textbooks and all over the internet, is not pointless. It's
> educating and helping people, period.

Your opinion.  If it comes from you, it's okay.  But if it comes from
someone else, it isn't.  Interesting.

>> No truce.  I'm done trying to get along with you.  You've burned your
>> last
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> someone with oral herpes! Your actions clearly speak louder than your
> words here.

You decided to not accept any support from me.  And quite frankly, what kind
of support do you expect from someone you insult?  Perhaps you need therapy.
The root problem might be something in your psyche.  My actions over the
last decade speak as loud as yours have.  Before you came here, this was a
good group where people could come to discuss herpes.  But you've managed
alienate the regulars and cause a whole lot of fighting.

> I refuse to reply to your personal attacks. They are irresponsible and
> you know it.

Then perhaps you could stop making personal attacks against others.  Perhaps
you'll begin to see that it's not so nice when you get what you dish out.

>> Insulting the old-timers is not exactly using a method to help people.
>> And
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> good things? That statement is unconscionable. You should be ashamed of
> yourself!

Not hateful, just the truth.  Pain and embarrassment are good things.  It
makes us grow into, hopefully, better people.  I'm not ashamed of myself.

> You hate me because of what? Because I disagree with you oftentimes?

Nope.

> Because I present facts and statistics which might not always like?

Nope.

> Because you don't approve of the way I am trying to help folks?

Nope.

>Because
> I said talking about "equine herpes and electron microscopes is stupid
> because it's off-topic"?

Yep.  And that's not what you said, by the way.  When you insult my friends,
then expect a fight.

>Because I don't care too much for Angela?

Nope.

>Are
> these really reasons to say something as hateful as you just did?

Wasn't hateful.

> I will argue with you all day and everyday and I while I might my
> arguments might be cutting and yes sometimes even rude, I won't hate
> you.

If you're rude, then you're hateful.  And hate is hate.  You dish it out,
learn to take it.

>I don't care what you say to me. I will love you and wish you the
> best, that you never get another outbreak, that you can continue to
> reach out and help people, and that you have a happy, healthy life.

I've never said otherwise to you.

> I guess that's the difference between us, huh? I hope not, I really
> do..

Making assumptions again?  One of your specialties, by the way.  Doesn't win
friends.  The difference between you and me, well, there are many.  And
getting all warm and fuzzy with me will not change the problems you have
brought to this group.  When I see that you've stopped the insults and
stopped belittling others, then I will start to believe you are capable of
even more growth.

ar
Yoshi2me - 23 Aug 2006 13:51 GMT
> You know what? Too bad. I just had a coldsore on my lip and what did
> you say to support me? This was the first coldsore I ever had and what
> did I get out of you? Huh? Absolutely nothing.  Now you think you're
> going to tell me that I am mean and rude? Well fine but at least I
> would support you in an outbreak.

Uh Eric... you don't even know that what you have on your lip is oral
herpes. You've never had the rash on your mouth cultured to be sure that is
what you are dealing with. And for somebody wet behind the ears, wants to be
a doctor, and just out of college you sure are an a.s-and-a-half. You've
insulted ALL the regulars on Picking Up the Pieces, you've picked people
apart on the Herpes Home Page, and now you are being rude to all the
regulars here on the alt.support.herpes newsgroup. You're leaving a bitter
taste in everybody's mouth and then you have the nerve to wonder why nobody
wants to help you when you don't feel good? Why should we help you? You seem
to know everything there is to know about herpes so why would you even have
the gumption to expect help from anybody that you've insulted? I've had
herpes for a very long time, have been on this newsgroup trying to help
people for a very long time and I don't mention my outbreaks.

>> You are burning bridges at every point.  I don't know why you think you
>> have
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> if you criticize me, but character attacks are pointless. Tell me what
> I'm doing wrong so I can identify the problem.

Tell you what you are doing wrong? Are you THAT dense? Pretty soon we are
all going to ignore you and you won't have anybody to pick on. Then what
will you do? For somebody who seems to believe he is a
scientist-soon-to-be-doctor you sure are dumb.

>> And it's really, really hard to continue attepting to respect you when
>> you
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> ~Eric
Eric - 23 Aug 2006 21:21 GMT
> For somebody who seems to believe he is a
> scientist-soon-to-be-doctor you sure are dumb.

Angela,

I'm telling you the same thing I've told Grant. If you wish to continue
with the hateful personal attacks and call me personally stupid and
mock my education and aspirations, that's on your conscience, not mine.
If you wish to say hateful things like "your outbreak is a good thing"
go ahead. I point out problems, criticize ideas and methods, use
statistics and facts, and yes I do get both blunt and rude sometimes
when arguing, but none of this warrants hateful statements and hateful
wishes. We all lose our patience and I am very passionate about the
science and issues surrounding herpes. I express my own opinion and yes
sometimes that does offend others, and for that I apologize. I have
been scared and fearful about my hsv-1, and for that some of my
statements in support groups have reflected that. Again, I'm sorry. But
I won't tell you that you are stupid. I won't tell you that you are a
troll, a child, a horrible person, an idiot. I hope you never get
another outbreak ever. When you have an outbreak, I won't question
whether what you really have is an outbreak or not. I will be here to
support you in every capacity that I know how to. I will continue to
wish you health and happiness regardless of what you say, and I look
forward to critiques of my methods and knowledge for helping people
with herpes so I can learn more and gain more experience to better help
those who really are "picking up the pieces"..

~Eric
Yoshi2me - 23 Aug 2006 13:43 GMT
> Grant,
>
> You know what? I'm a scientist too,

Uh, no you are not a scientist. You know absolutely nothing about this
virus. AND you are rude-to-boot.

Angela

Signature

"By opening up to a partner and talking about an STD diagnosis you are
showing that you respect and care about yourself as well as the other
person."

Herpes Help
http://yoshi2me.com/index.html

Shut Up & Post!
http://yoshi2me.com/phpbb/index.php

Herpes Blog
http://herpes-help.blogspot.com/

Eric - 23 Aug 2006 20:12 GMT
> Uh, no you are not a scientist.

Um, ok, you're simply wrong. I'm a biochemist.
Yoshi2me - 23 Aug 2006 21:26 GMT
>> Uh, no you are not a scientist.
>
> Um, ok, you're simply wrong. I'm a biochemist.

:: sigh ::

Whatever you say Eric.
Eric - 22 Aug 2006 21:05 GMT
> Er yes I missed it so much that later on in my post I said pointing out
> HSV1 can do just this is what I have found most effective in breaking down
> the inaccurate views people hold.

Ok, I have no idea what you just said.. ;-)

> Yes that why I've found it most effective to point out when Im trying to
> inform people about the viruses....

Well I agree with you here. I think it is very effective too.

> Read the damn post in context, Eric.
> When you say microscope without qualification, most people are going to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the same 'even under a microscope' as was said becomes meaningless as neither
> form of scope is an appropriate tool for differentiating the viruses.

It doesn't matter. I think you're reading way way too far into what she
said about looking the "same under a microscope". I think she was just
making a point about the similarity of viruses and wasn't specifically
referring to actually comparing and contrasting the two viruses under a
microscope. My point is that there is no need to launch into a tirade
about microscope types, you know?

> No, I was making a point that you seem to have missed in your rush to take
> a cheap shot. EHV and HSV look the same under a microscope (I've subbed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> becauce they all look alike hence my use of the HSV we are interested in
> and the EHV - because EHV is so different.

You know what, I think that's very interesting and I'm sure others do.
But just the way that you overkilled the point was what I was laughing
at and calling stupid..nothing else.

> So no I wasnt waving off into alternate reality, it was there for a
> reason. You just seem to have missed it.

I didn't miss it. My only point was that I think you totally blew past
the point and missed what the girl was trying to express, which is that
hsv-1 and hsv-2 are very similar viruses. That's it. Nobody said
anything about electron microscopes. We all know the viruses aren't the
same, but they have similarities. There is no need to go dragging
electron microscopes into this...LOL

> Oh really....the fairly large number  of people Ive met while working
> on a vaccine development program who do must be figments of my
> imagination. But hey I just throw up things for no reason it seems.

You know what? That's fine and great and I'm happy to hear it. But how
many people are coming to a herpes support group to hear the latest on
equine herpes? How many people want to know what frontiers are being
reached in the feline herpes area? Do you get my point? I'm not trying
to be flippant with my earlier remarks (and I apologize if it appeared
that way), I just think you overkilled a point and that while the
information you present is interesting, it's gratuitous.

~Eric
Tim Fitzmaurice - 23 Aug 2006 08:03 GMT
>> Er yes I missed it so much that later on in my post I said pointing out
>> HSV1 can do just this is what I have found most effective in breaking down
>> the inaccurate views people hold.
>
> Ok, I have no idea what you just said.. ;-)

Boiling it down to cases - you criticised me for missing a point, which in
fact I had made a few lines below your section of reply making the
criticism.

>> Read the damn post in context, Eric.
>> When you say microscope without qualification, most people are going to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> It doesn't matter. I think you're reading way way too far into what she
> said about looking the "same under a microscope".

No, not really - this is a technical discipline and one big part of this
newsgroup is about putting the right evidence over in the right way...I
was pointing out a flaw.

> microscope. My point is that there is no need to launch into a tirade
> about microscope types, you know?

1) It wasnt a tirade,
2) I dislike simply dropping answers in from nowhere, particularly where
Im contradicting someone and so I have a tendency to back up what Im
saying with an explanation.

It helps discussion a lot more compared to simply saying 'Thats wrong' and
shutting up.

>> So no I wasnt waving off into alternate reality, it was there for a
>> reason. You just seem to have missed it.
>
> I didn't miss it. My only point was that I think you totally blew past
> the point and missed what the girl was trying to express,

So the entire context about where saying the two viruses were the same was
useful and where it was not was blowing past the post???

>> Oh really....the fairly large number  of people Ive met while working
>> on a vaccine development program who do must be figments of my
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> many people are coming to a herpes support group to hear the latest on
> equine herpes?

Very few, but since that wasnt what I was doing and the EHV was raised as
a contrast to make a point - your criticism falls more than a little flat
- currently you are raising strawmen here.

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
Yoshi2me - 21 Aug 2006 20:56 GMT
Hi Tim ~

I just wanted you to know that I find all of your responses to this
newsgroup to be of the utmost help. I have also really learned a lot from
reading your posts over the years and am grateful that you make time to
contribute.

Thanks,

Angela

Signature

"By opening up to a partner and talking about an STD diagnosis you are
showing that you respect and care about yourself as well as the other
person."

Herpes Help
http://yoshi2me.com/index.html

Shut Up & Post!
http://yoshi2me.com/phpbb/index.php

Herpes Blog
http://herpes-help.blogspot.com/

>> hey there.  Haven't posted to the group in a while but I have a new guy
>> in my life so I'm also looking for info.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
> ICQ: 5178568
Tim Fitzmaurice - 21 Aug 2006 15:50 GMT
> my genital herpes could ...."mutate" into hsv-1 on her and then down
> the road I could get Hsv-1 from her.  (which technically would  be
> from myself) and if thats the case ....If I touch myself  today ( as I
> am outbroken) and rub my mouth , could that cause it to turn into
> Hsv-1?

Nope. You could potentially transfer whatever you have in terms of virus
from place to place but it does not suddenly change.

> Is my thought process understandable? Feel stupid asking but damn this
> sounds like it could really get out of hand.

Yes, its understandable. The way to hop from what you wrote to whats going
on is to separate two things - a disease/symptom set and the agent that
causes those symptoms.

Disease agent is HSV1, HSV2 - these differ by a certain percentage of
their DNA
Disease is genital herpes or facial herpes - these differ by a certain
percentage of your body length ;)

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.