I just want to add...
So it is possible for people to get it without a "primary outbreak" as
you call it, or an initial outbreak, as I call it.
What percentage of herpes cases are there (estimated) that do not have
a "primary outbreak"?
In this case, is it common for people to get the virus, not know they
have it because of no "primary outbreak", and spread it to other people
in their ignorance? And how many of these people also do not get a
primary outbreak and spread in a similiar fashion?
Tricky little bug. Perhaps it is "evolving". It seems to be aware of
the fact that if the host is aware of its prescence, it will take steps
to prevent it's spread. It needs to continuously spread from host to
host to surrvive in the long run.
I don't know the percentage but when you consider how many people have
herpes and have no idea...the number must be pretty high.
Yes, you can easily spread it to others even though you don't know you have
it. It reacts different with everyone and has no bearing on how mild or
severe the person's outbreaks who passed it on.
> Tricky little bug. Perhaps it is "evolving". It seems to be aware of
> the fact that if the host is aware of its prescence, it will take steps
> to prevent it's spread. It needs to continuously spread from host to
> host to surrvive in the long run.
Not sure what you are saying here. It's not a bug, it's a virus. Yes, it
could evolve.
ar
> So it is possible for people to get it without a "primary outbreak" as
> you call it, or an initial outbreak, as I call it.
It's possible for somebody to carry the virus for years and not know it
because they just don't get outbreaks that they can see or feel.
> What percentage of herpes cases are there (estimated) that do not have
> a "primary outbreak"?
I would imagine that we could go with the 90% of people that have genital
herpes and don't know it scenario.
> In this case, is it common for people to get the virus, not know they
> have it because of no "primary outbreak", and spread it to other people
> in their ignorance? And how many of these people also do not get a
> primary outbreak and spread in a similiar fashion?
#1 A person could have no signs or symptoms of an outbreak
#2 A person could have no recongnizable signs or symptoms of an outbreak
#3 A person may not know because herpes isn't included in routine std
testing and they just assume that it was
> Tricky little bug. Perhaps it is "evolving". It seems to be aware of
> the fact that if the host is aware of its prescence, it will take steps
> to prevent it's spread. It needs to continuously spread from host to
> host to surrvive in the long run.
Herpes transmission is pretty clear statistically as to what it is and what
it does and why. I don't necessarily agree with how you have described it
here.
Good luck,
Angela :)

Signature
STD Message Board
http://yoshi2me.com/phpbb/
Picking Up the Pieces
http://www.yoshi2me.com/pup/