Yes that makes sense Mike thank you. I am just surprised that the human or
animal body hasn't found a way to attack it stronger or even attack the
ganglia area. Maybe these are areas that the antibodies cannot get into. The
herpes and hpv viruses live in the nerves from what I understand, so I guess
this is what makes them different.
Another thought I have is since herpes and hpv are chronic diseases, that
would mean that a person with herpes or hpv is a little more active with
their immune system. I wonder if this can be detrimental in making a person
have a weaker system than a person without herpes or hpv?
BTW Mike...what is your website address? I want to link it in my website if
that is okay.
Thanks,
Al
> The herpes viruses hide themselves where the body's immune system
> can't get at them, in the ganglia near the spine. When they enter
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Mike
M.L.S. - 21 Jan 2006 22:59 GMT
>Yes that makes sense Mike thank you. I am just surprised that the human or
>animal body hasn't found a way to attack it stronger or even attack the
>ganglia area. Maybe these are areas that the antibodies cannot get into. The
Zackly. Antibodies can't enter the ganglia, or other nerve cells,
for that matter.
>herpes and hpv viruses live in the nerves from what I understand, so I guess
>this is what makes them different.
>Another thought I have is since herpes and hpv are chronic diseases, that
>would mean that a person with herpes or hpv is a little more active with
>their immune system. I wonder if this can be detrimental in making a person
>have a weaker system than a person without herpes or hpv?
In the larger scheme of things, no. A person with an immune system
uncompromised by something like AIDS is not substantially taxed by
day to day skirmishes with HSV. On the other hand, you probably
wouldn't want the joy of an outbreak when you're deep in the throes
of fighting something like the bird flu.
Generally, though, the body isn't made weaker by being prepared to
fight new viruses. We are capable of mounting defenses against a
huge number of biological invaders. One or two out of the millions,
even ones in permanent residence, do not make much of an impact.
>BTW Mike...what is your website address? I want to link it in my website if
>that is okay.
Sure thing. It's still sadly unworked on, but, you know, it's all
I've got...
http://web.newsguy.com/sphere/
Take care,
Mike
Al - 22 Jan 2006 02:38 GMT
Okay thanks. I am adding that as a herpes related link to my web page, and I
will post the link to mine when it is done. Its really just a bunch of stuff
thrown together (my site) not really about herpes other than in my bio.
Mostly about the state I live in and some other silly things.
> Sure thing. It's still sadly unworked on, but, you know, it's all
> I've got...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Mike
Grant - 22 Jan 2006 11:51 GMT
Hey there, Al. I don't think having herpes or HPV effects the immune system in
any way. I never get colds...perhaps one small one every three or four years.
And I haven't had the flu in 25 years or so.
ar
>Yes that makes sense Mike thank you. I am just surprised that the human or
>animal body hasn't found a way to attack it stronger or even attack the
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>
>> Mike
Al - 22 Jan 2006 18:50 GMT
Hi Ar,
Well you are lucky! I still get frequent colds and stomach flu's and as far
as the regular flu...well I take the flu shot for that. I have mild asthma
and alot of allergies so colds are something I was always prone to anyway,
but looking back and comparing to when I got herpes and hpv I don't think it
made that much if any difference in how my body handles colds and things.
I'm going to turn 40 in a couple of months so I am getting more aware of
taking care of myself.
Al
> Hey there, Al. I don't think having herpes or HPV effects the immune system in
> any way. I never get colds...perhaps one small one every three or four years.
> And I haven't had the flu in 25 years or so.
>
> ar
Grant - 23 Jan 2006 00:50 GMT
Hi Al,
My allergies were pretty severe. Actually, very severe. They're all gone now,
too. I didn't have asthma so I can't comment on that. Anyway, still not prone
to colds or the flu...
ar
>Hi Ar,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> ar
Tim Fitzmaurice - 23 Jan 2006 08:20 GMT
> Yes that makes sense Mike thank you. I am just surprised that the human or
> animal body hasn't found a way to attack it stronger or even attack the
> ganglia area.
THe neurons that are infected are single cells that stretch continuously
from the spinal cord to just below the skin surface. They don't regenerate
well, if they manage it at all. Taking out the ganglion area would result
in sensory impairment. This sort of cell has specific methods in place to
prevent routine immune recognistion o infection (it plays with the
presentationof MHC molecules)
> Maybe these are areas that the antibodies cannot get into.
Antibody has little to doin viral infections, cell mediated immunity is
usually far more important in dealing with viral infections....mainly due
to their intracellular nature (the things are inside body cells rather
than most bacteria which remain outside).
> The
> herpes and hpv viruses live in the nerves from what I understand, so I guess
> this is what makes them different.
HPV usually targets epithelial cells IIRC.
> Another thought I have is since herpes and hpv are chronic diseases, that
> would mean that a person with herpes or hpv is a little more active with
> their immune system.
In those specific cell clones set up to deal with the virus in question
yes.
> I wonder if this can be detrimental in making a person
> have a weaker system than a person without herpes or hpv?
The short answer is basically no..the log answer is very long, very
technical and I can only really begin to scratch the surface of it with my
knowledge of immunology and even that needs more time than I have right at
this moment.
Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568