>I get my information on herpes by being a professional who actually
> treats people with herpes in a clinic.
Just because you are a "professional" that treats people with herpes in a
clinic doesn't mean that you have your herpes facts straight. How many of us
out there tried to get help from "professionals" in the past and could never
get a straight answer from them? There are many people that can't even get
proper herpes testing from "professionals" because those "professionals"
don't stay up to date on their herpes information. So just because you say
that you are a "professional" doesn't mean that you know what you are doing.
People that take the time to do the real research on herpes are the ones
that can see right through "professionals" such as yourself.
> I don't rely on second and
> third-hand information.
I don't rely on information from anybody on the internet without first doing
my own homework.
> Scaring people into believeing that taking an
> expensive drug with health risks for the rest of their life is the
> best option for treating herpes is not empowerment.
You are not projecting treatment of herpes with a clinically proven herpes
antiviral correctly. First of all... why do you make people believe that
they will have to take the medication for the rest of their life? That is
not true at all. You mention serious health risks associated with taking
herpes antivirials. Please show me the proof that you know what you are
talking about.
> Misquoting my post
> is unfortunate, I in no way state that there is any foolproof-way of
> passing on the virus. It is also extremely misleading to try to make
> people believe that herbal treatments for herpes are unproven when
> there are scores of studies and clinical experience to the contrary.
People are more than welcome to decide what works best for them whether they
choose an alternative method or a clinically proven antiviral to treat their
herpes outbreaks.
> There is no magic wand to managing herpes.
I'm glad you realize that! Especially for those folks reading that would
like to keep an uninfected partner from contracting it.
> You cannot manage herpes by
> popping a pill alone no matter how much you believe in the
> effectiveness of the pill.
Oh really? lol Then why has Valtrex worked so well for me when I was on
suppressive therapy for two years?
> There are emotional, mental and social
> issues connected with herpes that for most people with herpes far
> outweigh the physical symptoms.
Nobody ever said that there weren't emotional issues in addition to physical
issues associated with herpes.
> The drug therapy for herpes does
> nothing to strengthen your immune system to prepare your body to deal
> with the virus on its own. I am biased.
Yes, you are biased. That is what agrivates me the most! You are also trying
to sell a product!
> I believe that if there is a
> natural way to manage a chronic disease than it's preferable to being
> dependent on an expensive drug with negative-side effects.
That's your uneducated opinion.
> I would
> rather learn how to be healthy and in balance through diet, stress
> management and the medicines nature has offered us since the beginning.
Things from nature are not always "better" or "safer." As far as I know...
there is nothing about nature that will reduce your chances of passing the
virus on to a negative partner. If there is clinical proof that something
out there produced by nature will reduce asymptomatic shedding,
transmission, or the intensity and frequency of flare ups... by all means...
please share it with us.
> Drug therapy is a valid choice, I choose to remind people that it isn't
> the only choice or necessarily the best one.
Don't you think the same thing goes for alternative therapies?
Angela