> Does anyone if you can pass on herpes through donating blood. I've never
> heard anyone mention it. Happy Thanksgiving to all you nice folks from
> Mississippi...Stan
Thanks, Al. I think it varies from state to state because the Red Cross website
states that having herpes is no reason to not give blood. Or something like
that. Same with HPV.
ar
>I actually know the answer to this! I called the RI Blood Center and they
>told me that you have to be outbreak free for 30 days for herpes. The same
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> heard anyone mention it. Happy Thanksgiving to all you nice folks from
>> Mississippi...Stan
Stan - 24 Nov 2005 01:13 GMT
Thanks guys. I used to donate fairly often and once gave blood before
surgery to my (ex) Monther-in-law who is a wonderful person....how many
people can say that about their mother-in-law Ha!! Have a great
Thanksgiving...Stan
> Thanks, Al. I think it varies from state to state because the Red Cross website
> states that having herpes is no reason to not give blood. Or something like
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>>heard anyone mention it. Happy Thanksgiving to all you nice folks from
>>>Mississippi...Stan
M2slo2cht@nospam.invalid - 24 Nov 2005 02:29 GMT
>having herpes is no reason to not give blood.
That only makes sense. Especially considering the fact that most
people that have genital herp don't even realize they're infected. And
there's no telling how many people that realize they have fever
blisters and don't know that *that's* herpes.
M2
>> Does anyone if you can pass on herpes through donating blood. I've never
>> heard anyone mention it. Happy Thanksgiving to all you nice folks from
>> Mississippi...Stan
> I actually know the answer to this! I called the RI Blood Center and they
> told me that you have to be outbreak free for 30 days for herpes. The same
> holds true for HPV. Unfortunately that's not the case with me as I still
> have an active genital hpv case and frequent herpes outbreaks...oh well...
Thats not really due to worries that you can pass the virus on in
donation. Thats a general thing for infections of any kind (hence the
common are you in good health today question). Any infection starts a
whole series of chemicals sloshing round your body via the blood at levels
that will have the potential to kick off reactions they do not want in
patients getting transfusions
Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
Al - 24 Nov 2005 14:01 GMT
Well the funny thing is that I asked them if taking Valtrex was okay for
giving blood and they said it was okay. I guess its probably a general rule
then, because most people who have genital herpes don't even know it, I was
one of them for a long time.
> Thats not really due to worries that you can pass the virus on in
> donation. Thats a general thing for infections of any kind (hence the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
> ICQ: 5178568
Tim Fitzmaurice - 24 Nov 2005 14:55 GMT
> Well the funny thing is that I asked them if taking Valtrex was okay for
> giving blood and they said it was okay. I guess its probably a general rule
> then, because most people who have genital herpes don't even know it, I was
> one of them for a long time.
A 'No current infection' is usually, fairly easy to screen even at the
level of common cold - its (as I understand it) the immune system
responses which if you were to transfuse into say a transplant patient
might kick off all sorts which would be a potential problem...
Im quite surprised about the Valtrex one, most people who have asked and
reported that they've been told that medications tend to drop blood out of
the system - I think you are the first to have been told otherwise and
mention that here from memory...
Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568