Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Herpes / October 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Partner has HSV, what should I know?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Slam - 27 Sep 2003 13:17 GMT
Hey group,
A week ago, my girlfriend shared the news with me that she has genital
herpes. I don't have the virus and have not been very sexually active.
She shared the news with me after our relationship had started to
become more physical but before we had done anything that would put me
at risk.

I told her how glad I was that she shared this information with me and
that I realized it was probably difficult for her to discuss. But to
be honest, I have been tempted to end our relationship before we get
too emotionally attached. After dating for only a month, I'm not sure
she's a person that I want to risk my health and future for.

However, I've been reading a lot about herpes on the web and I've read
this group and I'm starting to see that this shouldn't be a
relationship killer. Prior to her telling me the news, I had very
strong feelings for her and no desire to end our relationship. I
realize now that I need to give us a chance, regardless of the herpes,
and just be careful for now.

Still, I need to gain some peace-of-mind by talking about this with my
girlfriend and I am not sure exactly what questions I should ask. What
are some important things that I need to know about how the virus
affects her?

A few questions that I'm thinking of asking her are:
- Which type of herpes do you have? HSV-1 or HSV-2?
- Have you ever transmitted the virus to a partner?
- How frequent are your outbreaks?

Any other suggestions? I want to educate myself because I don't want
to rely on her to protect me.

As I said, I've been reading the group and want to thank all the
posters her for their participation. It has helped to calm me a bit
this past week.
M2slo2cht@Yahoo.com - 27 Sep 2003 14:06 GMT
>I don't have the virus and have not been very sexually active.

First thing I would suggest is to find out your status for sure. That
means, bloodtest. As many a 80% of positive people don't know their
status because their symptoms are so slight they're unnoticeable /
unrecognizable, or they have no symptoms at all. And they'll NEVER
know unless they ASK for a blood test.

>She shared the news with me after our relationship had started to
>become more physical but before we had done anything that would put me
>at risk.

That should tell you quite a bit about her honesty and character.
Sounds like she's worth keeping to me.

>I'm starting to see that this shouldn't be a
>relationship killer.

Correct. There are many many discordant couples in the world getting
along just fine without transmitting from partner + to partner -
Plus, who's to say the next girt you date doesn't have it unknowingly?
And there's a good chance she will (1 in 4 or 5 she'll have type 2,
much higher odds of type 1).  And transmission is usually due to
ignorance of status. It's a preventable disease, but you have to KNOW
first.

>A few questions that I'm thinking of asking her are:
>- Which type of herpes do you have? HSV-1 or HSV-2?

And also location of each. Find out the same info for you. For
instance, if she's positive for only type 1, and you are too (most
adults are), that's important to know.

>- Have you ever transmitted the virus to a partner?

At this point, I can't think why this one is important. Maybe someone
else can.

>- How frequent are your outbreaks?

This one's good because it can be an indicator of subclinical shedding
frequency.

You might ask HOW LONG she's been infected. If it's been recent,
you'll both be relieved to know that both symptoms and shedding tend
to lessen over time.

M2
Slam - 27 Sep 2003 16:40 GMT
>First thing I would suggest is to find out your status for sure. That
>means, bloodtest.

I had considered this, but I am not very experienced sexually and
haven't done anything that would've exposed me to herpes. Never even
had a cold sore. I'm afraid my inexperience in this area may make me a
little more concerned that some other people.

>>- Have you ever transmitted the virus to a partner?
>
>At this point, I can't think why this one is important. Maybe someone
>else can.

I hadn't realized this might be such a bad question. I wish to thank
you and the others who responded for pointing that out. It is early in
our relationship and my concern is that she might have not told me
everything yet or that she isn't very careful in controlling this.

She's already mentioned that she stopped taking medication because she
has had herpes for more than a few years and rarely gets outbreaks
(only during times of stress). From what I've read this week, it seems
like the chances of spreading herpes is lower if medication is used
all the time (not just during outbreaks). I'm curious to see if she
will start taking the medication again to lower my risks. [*]

Everything I've read has said that if you're careful there is little
risk of spreading the disease. My question had more to do with finding
out if she is capable of conducting the relationship in a way that
keeps her partner safe. Perhaps the way I worded my question was
incorrect but I would feel better knowing if she has a history of
successfully preventing her partners from acquiring herpes.

>You might ask HOW LONG she's been infected. If it's been recent,
>you'll both be relieved to know that both symptoms and shedding tend
>to lessen over time.

Yes, this is one of the things she told me during our first
conversation. She's been infected for six years and rarely experiences
outbreaks now.

[*] I realize that the risk can not be zero, but I would feel much
better if EVERY possible step was taken to keep the risk as low as
possible.
maree - 28 Sep 2003 00:16 GMT
Hi Slam,

> >First thing I would suggest is to find out your status for sure. That
> >means, bloodtest.

> I had considered this, but I am not very experienced sexually and
> haven't done anything that would've exposed me to herpes.
> Never even had a cold sore.

Does this mean you are still a virgin or have never practised oral sex? It
is possible to contract herpes with your first sexual experience. Just
because you've never had a cold sore does not mean you're not positive for
Type 1. This is easily picked up by most people through kissing and by the
time we are adults, about 80 to 90% of us have oral herpes. But only about
10-15% of us will have regular outbreaks.

I agree with M2, have a blood test and find out your antibody status.
Regards, Maree
Slam - 29 Sep 2003 03:11 GMT
>> >First thing I would suggest is to find out your status for sure. That
>> >means, bloodtest.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Does this mean you are still a virgin or have never practised oral sex? It
>is possible to contract herpes with your first sexual experience.

Yes, this is correct.

>I agree with M2, have a blood test and find out your antibody status.

I would prefer to have this done discretly and easily. Does anyone
have experience with http://www.requestatest.com ? They describe their
test as:

"The accuracy of this technology is comparable to the POCkit,
HerpesSelect, and Western Blot technologies."

I've searched through Google and haven't heard requestatest mentioned
in this forum before.
Tim Fitzmaurice - 29 Sep 2003 08:40 GMT
> >> >First thing I would suggest is to find out your status for sure. That
> >> >means, bloodtest.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Yes, this is correct.

Well that probably does very little to your HSV1 chances, so thats still
at 60-70% lower if you are younger and higher as you get older.

The most recent decent sized population study would then put you in the
bracket of about 3% chance of already having HSV2 - therefore typ may have
more of a bearing.

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
LK - 28 Sep 2003 15:16 GMT
>She's already mentioned that she stopped taking medication because she
>has had herpes for more than a few years and rarely gets outbreaks
>(only during times of stress). From what I've read this week, it seems
>like the chances of spreading herpes is lower if medication is used
>all the time (not just during outbreaks). I'm curious to see if she
>will start taking the medication again to lower my risks. [*]

Where I live, the Rx I was given for suppression cost $227 for 30
pills! (it's not a big city area.)  It is no guarantee of no outbreaks
and while it may lower shedding it does _not_ stop it.  Female to male
transmission rate is 3-4% without suppression therapy (male to female
transmission is 10-11%) based on the CDC website. The 3-4% is
comparable to many contraceptives' effectiveness. (And I think that is
the chance of transmission w/o condoms or other barriers.)

So basically suppression therapy, unless the person has frequent
outbreaks, is paying for the feeling you're doing _something_ rather
than simply avoiding sex just before and during outbreaks.  

And the other bad news was a recently released or soon to be released
study saying after tracking 100+ women with genital herpes for 3 years
there appears to be _no_ pattern to the _shedding_ of the virus. Some
shed more days than others.  Some shed the virus 3 days per month.
Some shed 10 days per month. And it varied month to month for many of
the women. And seemingly no way to predict which days. (I was told all
this at Planned Parenthood in August this year.  I don't have any
cites for the study.)  

This information did _not_ make my day.

>Everything I've read has said that if you're careful there is little
>risk of spreading the disease. My question had more to do with finding
>out if she is capable of conducting the relationship in a way that
>keeps her partner safe. Perhaps the way I worded my question was
>incorrect but I would feel better knowing if she has a history of
>successfully preventing her partners from acquiring herpes.

Again every previous partner would have to be tested.  Some may have
had it before sexual contact with her.  A "sexy" version of the
question would to ask what she keeps by her bedside and tell what you
keep beside yours.  Be prepared :-)  And experiment.

And again it's timing.  These can be rather intimate questions and why
bother answering if you're not sure the relationship is going to last.
Why should she make herself vulnerable by telling you these details if
she and you are wondering the relationship is worth the risk.

To me--I have children and I know that every September one of them is
going to get sick because it is another new school year.  I can guess
when the first cold will occur but not the second, third, fourth, etc.
Simply being a parent puts me at risk.  Simply being in an adult
sexual relationship puts you at risk for other things including colds
and flu.  And you never know.  All you can do is take good care of
yourself and take _any_ illness in stride.

As you get older your partner may get heart disease or lung problems
that can scare you to wonder if they can live through any sexual
activity.  Getting along day to day is most of what being a partner is
about, not hype about having a great sex life.

(Now if Maxium magazine was as brave and macho about STDs and
contraception I'd be a lot happier.  But it lives in the fantasy of
sex without preparation or consequences, as do so many people.)

>>You might ask HOW LONG she's been infected. If it's been recent,
>>you'll both be relieved to know that both symptoms and shedding tend
>>to lessen over time.

At Planned Parenthood I was told it is only the outbreaks that lessen
over time.  There is no reliable evidence that the _shedding_ is
lowered.  In other words that comforting "fact" was believed true
years ago, but it is incorrect.

Like I said,not a great day.  I've had this for 18 years and didn't
know it for 10, so I thought "18 year I can't transmit this."  <sigh>

Shedding test kits for men and women would be nice so you could do
home analysis to know which days not to have certain kinds of sexual
contact.  And would be a big business!


>Yes, this is one of the things she told me during our first
>conversation. She's been infected for six years and rarely experiences
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>better if EVERY possible step was taken to keep the risk as low as
>possible.

Luck. ...for now.  A congress and administration that takes sex
seriously or maybe fears it less would go a long way to educate and
research these diseases.

LK
M2slo2cht@Yahoo.com - 28 Sep 2003 17:46 GMT
>Where I live, the Rx I was given for suppression cost $227 for 30
>pills! (it's not a big city area.)

Shop around. You can get 100 tabs of 400mg Acyclovir from Drugs.com
for $27.49  http://www.drugplace.com/product.asp?3=17
There are other sources as well.

>It is no guarantee of no outbreaks
>and while it may lower shedding it does _not_ stop it.

Right. Nothing in life is guaranteed. But the whole idea here is to
lower risk of transmission to an acceptable level for most people.

>So basically suppression therapy, unless the person has frequent
>outbreaks, is paying for the feeling you're doing _something

I disagree here. Granted, suppression doesn't stop shedding in every
single person. But it stops it in some and reduces it in most.
Suppression is all about lowering risk for those who would otherwise
shed frequently if they weren't on it. It can lower it in low
frequency shedders to but they just don't have as much room for
improvement. Problem is, as you point out below, we have no cost
efficient way of knowing who is in which category. But it can't hurt
to go on suppression no matter which category one falls into.

>And the other bad news was a recently released or soon to be released
>study saying after tracking 100+ women with genital herpes for 3 years
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>this at Planned Parenthood in August this year.  I don't have any
>cites for the study.)  

I've seen the study written up somewhere. I think Mike may have cites.
Be that as it may, to illustrate my point above, if ALL the women in
that study had been on suppression, then almost all would have lowered
their individual virus shedding frequency rate, which of course lowers
overall risk of transmission. Naturally, the ones who would have shed
the most without suppression would stand to lower their risk the most.

>>I would feel better knowing if she has a history of
>>successfully preventing her partners from acquiring herpes.

>Again every previous partner would have to be tested.  Some may have
>had it before sexual contact with her.

As far as knowing for sure if she had transfered the virus, this is a
good point. Even if you could test them all, there's no way to know
for sure where a previous positive partner's infection came from.
However, if they all tested negative, that might be some valuable (and
comforting) information.

>Getting along day to day is most of what being a partner is
>about,

Agreed.

>not hype about having a great sex life.

hmm ... well, I'd rather have it than NOT have it  ;-)

>>>You might ask HOW LONG she's been infected. If it's been recent,
>>>you'll both be relieved to know that both symptoms and shedding tend
>>>to lessen over time.

>At Planned Parenthood I was told it is only the outbreaks that lessen
>over time.  There is no reliable evidence that the _shedding_ is
>lowered.  In other words that comforting "fact" was believed true
>years ago, but it is incorrect.

Sounds like we've been listening to experts with differing opinions,
which happens a lot.  I wonder what sort of evidence Planned
Parenthood would consider reliable? And does lack of such evidence
mean that current thinking is incorrect? Or does it just mean they're
not convinced one way or the other? <shrug> I have no idea.
But it's been known for a long time that each individual reacts
differently to infection. Some, with few or no outbreaks may indeed
shed fairly frequently. That's not new news. But generally speaking,
frequency of outbreaks correlate reasonably well with frequency of
shedding. That data should be readily available from numerous studies.
Even so, sounds like they're seeing the glass as half empty instead of
half full.

>Shedding test kits for men and women would be nice so you could do
>home analysis to know which days not to have certain kinds of sexual
>contact.  And would be a big business!

Agreed. See google for my first ever post to this group. Give it an
extra second to re-direct if you use the link I've provided below.

http://shorterlink.com/?RMOGBQ

As you will see from the thread and others, there are reasonable
arguments against the idea. None compelling though, at least not to my
way of thinking. I still don't know why somebody isn't working on the
idea.

M2
LK - 29 Sep 2003 20:49 GMT
>>Where I live, the Rx I was given for suppression cost $227 for 30
>>pills! (it's not a big city area.)
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Right. Nothing in life is guaranteed. But the whole idea here is to
>lower risk of transmission to an acceptable level for most people.

What is acceptable?  Depends on the person, I guess. I can't say much
w/o violating privacy of the person, but I had the impression this
isn't something he's had to deal with before.  And my main thought was
how many other people he could "have" w/o this problem (or don't know
they have it). He appreciated me telling him.  I felt miserable having
to tell him.  I think he took the news better than I did having to
tell tell him.

I also felt angry because of the cheating <bleep> who gave it to me
knew the person he got the "back rub" from had the disease and he lied
when I questioned him about lesions/spots telling he had gotten caught
in his zipper.

>>So basically suppression therapy, unless the person has frequent
>>outbreaks, is paying for the feeling you're doing _something
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>efficient way of knowing who is in which category. But it can't hurt
>to go on suppression no matter which category one falls into.

Only my pocketbook because that would make 3 daily medications and I
have no Rx coverage.

>>And the other bad news was a recently released or soon to be released
>>study saying after tracking 100+ women with genital herpes for 3 years
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>overall risk of transmission. Naturally, the ones who would have shed
>the most without suppression would stand to lower their risk the most.

I'd like to see the cites to find if they were on suppression therapy
already.

>>>I would feel better knowing if she has a history of
>>>successfully preventing her partners from acquiring herpes.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>hmm ... well, I'd rather have it than NOT have it  ;-)

We can't always have what and who we want.

>>>>You might ask HOW LONG she's been infected. If it's been recent,
>>>>you'll both be relieved to know that both symptoms and shedding tend
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Even so, sounds like they're seeing the glass as half empty instead of
>half full.

Cites for the studies?

>>Shedding test kits for men and women would be nice so you could do
>>home analysis to know which days not to have certain kinds of sexual
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>M2

Absolutely no arguments against.  After how many people really need to
use ovulation predictors.  They are out there.

Ever done a letter writing campaign to get the R&D into doing this?

Especially if you could get stockholders in certain companies to
request/demand their company be the first.

LK
M2slo2cht@Yahoo.com - 02 Oct 2003 20:47 GMT
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:46:16 -0500, M2slo2cht wrote:
>>the whole idea here is to
>>lower risk of transmission to an acceptable level for most people.

>What is acceptable?  Depends on the person, I guess.

Exactly. You might drive your car to the store in a thunderstorm
without giving it a thought when someone else will be afraid to leave
the safety of their home. You might think they're being over cautious.
They might think you are reckless. But it's really just a matter of
how much risk you vs they are willing to accept.

> I can't say much
>w/o violating privacy of the person,
<snip>
>I also felt angry because of the cheating <bleep> who gave it to me

I'm totally in the dark here but I hope you've gotten past the anger
part by now. That'll do nothing but hold you back.

>>>a recently released or soon to be released
>>>study saying after tracking 100+ women with genital herpes for 3 years
>>>there appears to be _no_ pattern to the _shedding_ of the virus.

>>I've seen the study written up somewhere. I think Mike may have cites.

>I'd like to see the cites to find if they were on suppression therapy
>already.

For what it's worth, I don't think they were on suppression. I would
like to know for sure too though.

>>>Getting along day to day is most of what being a partner is
>>>about,

>>Agreed.

>>>not hype about having a great sex life.

>>hmm ... well, I'd rather have it than NOT have it  ;-)

>We can't always have what and who we want.

When there's a will, there's a way  ;-)

>>Sounds like we've been listening to experts with differing opinions,
<snip>
>generally speaking,
>>frequency of outbreaks correlate reasonably well with frequency of
>>shedding. That data should be readily available from numerous studies.

>Cites for the studies?

ugh ... should've known you'd ask for that. No, not off hand. I'm just
recalling info I've retained from rummaging through studies on sites
like Medscape and Pubmed. But my opinion is based on other things as
well. For instance, several expert speakers (doctors, researchers,
etc) at various National events I've attended in the not so distant
past (over the past two years up until as recently as April), have
mentioned the time thing AND the correlation. Plus numerous
individuals that I've met and talked with at said events have
confirmed the same thing (yes, I've also talked with some individual
exceptions). But what I've gotten in general doesn't differ
significantly from the study you referenced above. Which is, with
herpes there are many exceptions to every pattern. For most people 1)
there is a correlation between frequency of outbreaks/asymptomatic
shedding and 2) outbreaks tend to diminish in frequency and severity
over time. But there ARE many exceptions. As we've said here many
times in the past, everybody is different. Many people simply don't
fit the pattern. Seems to me that's what the study confirmed. But if
the study shows there is absolutely NO pattern AT ALL and that
frequency and correllation are totally random, then I'm wrong.  I
don't recall the study's data nor bottom line stats showing that
though. Granted, I haven't studied the study. Just skimmed it when I
saw it. Looked like confirmation of old news to me so I didn't bother.
But you've got my curiosity aroused now and I'd like to take a closer
looksee.

>>>Shedding test kits for men and women would be nice

>>Agreed.

>Ever done a letter writing campaign to get the R&D into doing this?

Nope.

>Especially if you could get stockholders in certain companies to
>request/demand their company be the first.

I may own a little stock here and there but a financial heavyweight I
ain't  :-(   You lead the stockholder charge. I'm right behind ya  :-)

M2
Slam - 28 Sep 2003 19:06 GMT
>Again every previous partner would have to be tested.  Some may have
>had it before sexual contact with her.

Thank you for your response. I realize that this question really
doesn't tell me what I had hoped to learn. We talked and "played" a
bit yesterday and she took many precautions to protect me. I'm even
more certain know that she understands her body, the risks, and how to
help protect me.

>And again it's timing.  These can be rather intimate questions and why
>bother answering if you're not sure the relationship is going to last.

Yes. I know this has been a big concern for her. She has been worrying
that she told me about it *too* soon (as I said, we've been dating
almost a month). It's too early to say, but there are other reasons
why are relationship might not last. At this point, I don't think
herpes is our biggest hurdle.

I told her that I had read up a lot about herpes on the Internet and
that pleased her a lot.
mishaisacat - 28 Sep 2003 19:58 GMT
It's too early to say, but there are other reasons
> why are relationship might not last. At this point, I don't think
> herpes is our biggest hurdle.

I'd venture to say that herpes itself is rarely the biggest hurdle; it can
just get you to that hurdle quicker.
M2slo2cht@Yahoo.com - 28 Sep 2003 15:36 GMT
>>>- Have you ever transmitted the virus to a partner?

>>At this point, I can't think why this one is important.

>I hadn't realized this might be such a bad question.

I didn't mean to say it was "bad".  Just depends on the situation.
"Delicate" might be a better term, so use your best diplomacy if you
want to ask it.  I just meant that, as far as the here and now is
concerned, and questions relevant to how to prevent the spread to you,
I didn't see how an answer here would help ... unless it's tied to a
follow up question i.e.
How did it happen?
a)No condom
b)Condom came off
c)No suppression
d)All of the above
e)Other
Still, like LK suggested, she might not take the question well no
matter how much diplomacy you use. If that's the case, any concern of
transmission could be for naught at that point.

M2
mishaisacat - 28 Sep 2003 19:53 GMT
I agree that asking if she's ever transmitted it to anyone else might be
tricky.

What's to be gained?  You suggest knowing how good she is at preventing
infection.  I just want to remind you that while there are apsect of
transmission you can control (not having sex during outbreaks, taking those
expensive meds every day, etc), there are plenty of aspects you may have
little control over or knowledge about.

This is a very tricky disease that's designed, in some ways, to be "smarter"
than we are.

1)  You don't have to have the first damn symptom to be contagious,
allthough if you have symptoms it's more likely that you are.

2)  Condoms don't cover everything.  Boy do they help, but they simply don't
cover everything.

It's time for me to insert my standard caveat:  I am speaking from my own
experiece; my experience may not be relative to you.

Without symptoms and with condom use, I DID pass this on to my beloved.  I
think my viral load must have been low and the condom must have helped some
because his case is way, way mild, but it happened all the same, and the
physical symptoms of herpes are often only a fraction of the problem.

What I'm saying is a simple yes or no about whether she's passed it on
doesn't necessarily indicate how vigilant she is about prevention.  And if
she passed it on, it's possible she may have learned from her experience.  I
came to this group because I passed it on -- I thought I knew everything
already, but lo and behold there had been advances since my initial
diagnosis!  And since I found this group.

However, the question might shed some very important light on how she would
DEAL with such an event.  And I think that IS worth knowing.

So I don't think it's an alltogether bad question in itself if you fully
discuss it and bear in mind the limitations of what the answers may or may
not reveal.

I'll also add that I think washing is really important.  If she washes
before and you wash after, that'll also help prevent transmission.  And I
think it's just, you know, a good idea anyway.

Good for you for being involved, for not putting all the pressure on her to
discuss it, for being willing to bring it up and keep an open mind.  I know
as the infected partner that I would have felt less of a burden and total
responsibility if a partner asked me questions; otherwise, I'd just have to
guess what he needed to know.

best,
mishaisacat

> >First thing I would suggest is to find out your status for sure. That
> >means, bloodtest.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> incorrect but I would feel better knowing if she has a history of
> successfully preventing her partners from acquiring herpes.
Tim Fitzmaurice - 29 Sep 2003 14:54 GMT
> all the time (not just during outbreaks). I'm curious to see if she
> will start taking the medication again to lower my risks. [*]

FOr the average person it about halves the risks....given the routinely
quote 4% while avoiding outbreaks means that you have a 69% chance of not
picking it up in 9 years of monogamy - well halving the yearly chance by
use of suppression means that chance over 9 years goes to about 83%

Depending on how long you intend to stay with this person - you are either
dealing with changes of very small percentages over the short term - or
stil relatively small ones over the long term given how cumulative
probability goes.

Oh and those rates are TRANSMISSION rates - not disease rates in the
affected partner.

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
LK - 27 Sep 2003 14:28 GMT
>Hey group,
>A week ago, my girlfriend shared the news with me that she has genital
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>too emotionally attached. After dating for only a month, I'm not sure
>she's a person that I want to risk my health and future for.

This sounds familiar.  That's why many don't tell.

>However, I've been reading a lot about herpes on the web and I've read
>this group and I'm starting to see that this shouldn't be a
>relationship killer. Prior to her telling me the news, I had very
>strong feelings for her and no desire to end our relationship. I
>realize now that I need to give us a chance, regardless of the herpes,
>and just be careful for now.

Glad you're getting information.

>Still, I need to gain some peace-of-mind by talking about this with my
>girlfriend and I am not sure exactly what questions I should ask. What
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>A few questions that I'm thinking of asking her are:
>- Which type of herpes do you have? HSV-1 or HSV-2?

Genital herpes is HSV-2 unless that has changed.

>- Have you ever transmitted the virus to a partner?

What kind of a question is this?  Many people who have it are
asymptomatic.  Many don't want to believe so they don't get tested.
And just because a previous partner has it or doesn't have it has
_nothing_ to do with whether or not you get it.

I would be very hurt and very angered by that kind of question as if I
had control over who got it and who didn't. It's a risk.  Just as
contraception _is_ a risk. You do what you can to lower the chances of
conception. Pregnancy is far more life altering and life threatening
than genital herpes!  Yet people chance it everyday.  And only women
suffer and die from the complications of contraception, pregnancy, and
childbirth.

You wash your hands and don't touch your nose or your eyes to lower
the chance of picking up a cold.  The person with the virus does what
they can to help the spread. You don't have to be physically or
emotionally close to someone to get a cold.

>- How frequent are your outbreaks?

Shedding can happens even without outbreaks.  It's a persistent virus
with no sense of morality or kindness.  And sexual behavior is more
than just intercourse and genital kisses.

>Any other suggestions? I want to educate myself because I don't want
>to rely on her to protect me.
>
>As I said, I've been reading the group and want to thank all the
>posters her for their participation. It has helped to calm me a bit
>this past week.

Keep talking to her. It's awful to not know what your partner is
thinking.  You cannot easily deal with silence and guess work.

LK
M2slo2cht@Yahoo.com - 27 Sep 2003 15:37 GMT
Slam wrote:
>>A few questions that I'm thinking of asking her are:
>>- Which type of herpes do you have? HSV-1 or HSV-2?

fountainmdome3 wrote:
>Genital herpes is HSV-2 unless that has changed.

Quick note: It's changing. But this is still one of the widely held
misconceptions regardin herp, not only by the general public but the
healthcare community as well.
Fact is, approx 30% of recently diagnosed genital herp cases in the
U.S. are type 1.  Either type can be found in either location,
although type 2 oral is much more rare than type 1 genital.

>Pregnancy is far more life altering and life threatening
>than genital herpes!

You can say that again LoL!

>Keep talking to her.

That again too  ;-)

M2
M2slo2cht@Yahoo.com - 27 Sep 2003 16:00 GMT
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:37:37 -0500, M2slo2cht wrote:

>type 2 oral is much more rare than type 1 genital.

It's technically correct but lemme re-word that.
Type 2 oral is rare.  It can happen though.
Type 1 genital is common, but just not as common as type 2 genital.

M2
Slam - 27 Sep 2003 16:48 GMT
>>As I said, I've been reading the group and want to thank all the
>>posters her for their participation. It has helped to calm me a bit
>>this past week.
>
>Keep talking to her. It's awful to not know what your partner is
>thinking.  You cannot easily deal with silence and guess work.

Thank you for your response. We have talked several times in the week
since she revealed this to me and I've tried to keep things as they
had been before. Still, I do have some questions and concerns about
herpes and I've been waiting for the right moment to have that
discussion again. I don't want to harp on the issue because,
obviously, there's more to our relationship than this. I hope to get
most of these questions out of the way this weekend so that we can get
back to focusing on other things.
LK - 28 Sep 2003 14:31 GMT
>You wash your hands and don't touch your nose or your eyes to lower
>the chance of picking up a cold.  The person with the virus does what
>they can to help the spread. You don't have to be physically or
>emotionally close to someone to get a cold.

Superposed to read "....help stop the spread of the virus."

Ooops.

And it would help if things didn't get hot and heavy so early in
relationships so people would have better ideas if this person is
worth the risk of the getting sick.

I made the mistake of complementing someone's sexiness too early.  And
I was trying so hard to put off the sex aspect but hormones being
hormones and still active in middle age...

Live and live :-/

LK
Tim Fitzmaurice - 29 Sep 2003 08:32 GMT
> >A few questions that I'm thinking of asking her are:
> >- Which type of herpes do you have? HSV-1 or HSV-2?
>
> Genital herpes is HSV-2 unless that has changed.

That is WAAAAY out of date. HSV1/2 defines the agent involved NOT the
location. It was only an assumed difference before the right genetic tools
became available anyway.
Currently about 1/3 of new genital herpes infections are HSV1....

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
Grant - 29 Sep 2003 02:28 GMT
"Slam" <slam@hotDONOTMAIL.com> wrote in message > A few questions that I'm
thinking of asking her are:
> - Which type of herpes do you have? HSV-1 or HSV-2?
> - Have you ever transmitted the virus to a partner?
> - How frequent are your outbreaks?

I have type 1 genital.
As far as I know, I have never transmitted the virus.
I never have outbreaks.
Tim Fitzmaurice - 29 Sep 2003 08:29 GMT
> Hey group,
> A week ago, my girlfriend shared the news with me that she has genital
> herpes.

OK

> I don't have the virus

When did you last get tested for it....80-90% of people who have arent
aware - and which it are we talking here HSV1 or HSv2. If its the first
the odds in the absence of test of having the virus are around 60-70%,
more like 20% for HSV2 if you are blind guessing. HSV is also not in thr
standard US STD panel.

> and have not been very sexually active.

You only need to be in the 2-4 lifetime partners bracket to be sitting in
the average risk group for HSV2 says he as a side note.

> A few questions that I'm thinking of asking her are:
> - Which type of herpes do you have? HSV-1 or HSV-2?

Yup...

> - Have you ever transmitted the virus to a partner?

Hmm, probably a pointless one - she wont necessarily know, and how quickly
it happened in the past doesnt say how quicky it may happen with you. The
odds as a male are around 3-4% per year of transmission avoiding
outbreaks. Add in any suprressive therapy and condom use and you can drop
it further.

> - How frequent are your outbreaks?

Pass - depends on what you want to know for really - that ones up to you.

You might ask f she takes suppressive therapy.....that adjusts issues.

Tim
--
When playing rugby, its not the winning that counts, but the taking apart
ICQ: 5178568
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.