Lynne Lyons you screwed up, again. :)

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Mistiuis - 31 Oct 2005 00:49 GMT

Good dawg gone thing you were never too bright. Especially in light of your
purported knowledge as a legal beagle gained from online legal sights.

Read on, you'll see, as will everyone else.

Oh, and this is archived in case you try another one of your "stupid
tricks".

> Message-ID: <43652A90.98D2BEC6@hotmail.com>
> From: hoofprints <equsphotogophr@hotmail.com>
> Organization: "To Know Thyself Is Hardest", Thales of Miletus, 625-545

B.C.

> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD (CVIP) (Win95; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:18:24 -0800
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.8.215.113
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@csufresno.edu
> X-Trace: nntp.csufresno.edu 1130703489 129.8.215.113 (Sun, 30 Oct 2005

12:18:09 PST)

> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:18:09 PST
>
> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >
> > hoofprints <equsphotogophr@hotmail.com> wrote in
> > news:436502A3.A3310200@hotmail.com:
> >
> > > Kali wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In article <4364FA6A.C77EF899@hotmail.com>, posted Sun, 30 Oct
> > >> 2005 08:52:58 -0800, hoofprints equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> > >> says...
> > >>
> > >> >Kali wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In article <16073920.12b1300@news.bumsport.net>, posted Sun, 30
> > >> >> Oct 2005 07:42:12 +1000, Professeur Von TwoSteps OA. .@. says...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >No doubt about it *Kali* in the eyes of AUK is a *coward*
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Where (MID) did I remove auk from the groups line, Grandma?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Kali
> > >> >
> > >> >Not only are you a coward, but you have violated AUK's own rules
> > >> >regarding 'free speech'.
> > >>
> > >> Goofy, you make me snork!
> > >>
> > >> >When did you violate those rulez? When you told HAM that there
> > >> >was a California Law that could be used to cut off my free
> > >> >speech and had
> > >> >HAM file a false police report to the Sheriff's Dept. in Madera
> > >> >stating that *I* has sent her 3,000 harassing emails. [ I wasn't
> > >> >sending HAM emails, all of our disagreements were in a public,
> > >> >not private NG, therefore, HAM lied.]
> > >>
> > >> Pfffft. She was talking about your posts. Again you try to
> > >> rewrite history. Kim was well within her rights to file a
> > >> complaint with your sheriff after your dirty little prank of
> > >> filing a false report of child abuse with her LEO in *Canada*,
> > >> ffs.
> > >>
> > >> No - no one tried to cut off your free speech, although you
> > >> tried to do that to others with those hilarious "Post Toasty"
> > >> notifications, made up of copy/pasted state statutes for anyone
> > >> who disagreed with you on Usenet. Remember?
> > >>
> > >> >Not only is that a violation of AUK's rulez, but HAM is a foreigner
> > >> >and therefore, cutting off my free speech can be construed as
> > >> >traitorous, especially since that information was handed out post
> > >> >9/11.
> > >>
> > >> ROFL!
> > >>
> > >> >Freedom rider you are not!
> > >> >You hold many AUK awards, and you seem to think that those awards
> > >> >have set you apart from those you nominate as Kooks.
> > >> >hoof
> > >>
> > >> Do you have any complaints to file with the APA today?
> > >
> > > WEll let me see, is this an invitation to file a complaint with the
> > > APA against you?
> >
> > Pleace to include me.
> >
> > > Daedulus aka Jade made the same invitation to me.
> >
> > And you've wussed out both f.cking times. Get on with it.
>
> I see that Cujo wants *closure*!1 hmmmm!!
> 8 years to file and keep your short hairs ruffled up.. don't like it!!
> Too bad, write the APA and tell them to change their Code of Conduct
> regarding their time limit for non members to file complaints. BTW: It
> is 10 years, but 2 years have passed.

Oh really? Not any longer. This post of yours, backed up by other similar
posts just blew any chance you had right out of the water. Why?

You just posted your intent as well as prior knowledge of their rules. Had
you a case and you filed when you 1st new it you may have had a chance for
a hearing but not any longer. This post of yours proves your intent of
malice. It also proves your attempt to intimidate via possible future
actions. Even if you had a new case in the future this post of yours would
negate any actions by you. In fact the whole thread from which this was
taken shows malice, defamation, collusion with others in defamation since
you reposted willingly and even commented in the same veins as the original
poster. This makes you as culpable as they are indeed if even worsens it
due to the nature of your comments followed up with this 10 year threat of
yours.

Nice try, makes about as much sense as what Alan Palmer does. He also is
guilty of extortion, threats, malice, etc. Extortion you ask? Yes, dear,
and to keep it simple for your understanding and comprehension levels, you
were expecting others to behave in a manner which conformed to your
exacting standards via the threats of hearings, job lost/impairment etc.

> > > Guess what, I still have 8 years to file that complaint as I am
> > > not a member of the APA.

Not anymore you don't.

> > Need the membership fee and too broke after splurging on horsey
> > viagra?
>
> > > You have the links that I posted to their ethical rules, yet you have
> > > not read them or cannot grasp that you *violate* and *sneer* at those
> > > ethical rules and regulations.
> >
> > Pleace to send me to teh looney bin.
>
> Look them up yourself, they were posted once before.
> hoof
>
> > > If I file Kali, my complaint will include many violations to their
> > > Code of Ethics made by you towards me.

You can file all you want, you will lose due to what you posted here, in the
original thread it was posted in as well as other numerous related threads.

What a great legal mind you have, huh? LOL

> > Yes!
> >
> > > Are you sure you want to chance not having them *recommend* you
> > > for future employment? Or, is you consistent harassment of myself
> > > only to cover your own unethical behavior?
> >
> > Don't forget to make a lits and publishing it to Usenet firstest.
> >
> > > I bet it's the later and you harass me and claim I am a kook,
> > > knowing that I am correct.
> >
> > But, but, you *are* a kook.
> >
> > >> Make a
> > >> hard copy of this post and send it in right away, Goof.
> > >>
> > >> Kali
> > >> --
> > >> Goofy Message-ID: <3DD56995.C22DD748@hotmail.com>
> > >> "<REST SNIPPED> Live in Fear Jiminez, I may have a cop to your
> > >> place and tell them to arrest you and take you to the nearest
> > >> mental health facility. Please be sure to state to the Psych.
> > >> Tech on duty that you are a danger to others and that you have
> > >> the means to carry out your assault on another human being. Or
> > >> you could always use the I am going to hurt myself statement,
> > >> and then tell them you have ways to off yourself unless they
> > >> admit you."

Oh, and Lynne do not forget the federal law you broke regarding Mom and her
daughters picture which you manipulated in to a porn picture plus that was
defamation numero uno amongst various and sundry other felonious charges
possible. Who knows, perhaps yet you will share a cell with a former inmate
fried of yours on whom you used the zap gun.

Lynne, you can continue to threaten Kali all you want, it will all be in
vain and for naught. Yes, I rather enjoyed writing this post, now do be a
good grandma nurture you ailing body so that your grand daughter might see
you for a year or two longer. But please, do keep your horse tricks to
yourself and do not share them with her else you will be in a heap of
trouble. I believe that fits under child molesting laws in Calif.

Signature

Mistiuis

Reply to this Message

Scar Face - 31 Oct 2005 03:15 GMT

Quite intrigueing and scandalous. Perhaps it should be dubbed the
"Hoof-in-Mouth Affair".
You all should have some of Killborn's sex flu virus and mellow out, I
would think.
Scarface

Reply to this Message

Waterspider - 31 Oct 2005 20:12 GMT

<g>

Reply to this Message