 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Hepatitis / May 2005Ping Mr Lurker
Have you enjoyed the show Mr Lurker? Have you seen what I can do? So if the lies told about me are true then why haven't I just told everybody your name, address and telephone number, and archived it all over usenet, or even emailed your employer to complain about you *stalking* me on a company computer, and archiving my posts on a company printer, or the feds for that matter? My Friend stood by me while I went crazy under that TX, something that I hope you never experience Mr Lurker. My Friend stood by me despite all these *lies* that *Liceman* now thinks are facts were thrown at me, and the majority of those who originally told those *lies* are now dead. My Friend was the *only* one who never doubted me. So get this straight Mr Lurker, I *will* stand by my friend, and my in-box had better not ever be empty when it should be full, and *Liceman* had better be seen as the purveyor of *lies* that My Friend told you that he is hadn't he? And you had better realise that My Friend is telling you the truth, because if My Friend is not telling you the truth, then you surely are now in sh.t-street aren't you? And Mr Lurker swearing at me, especially in front of your own children, shows exactly how *low* *class* you are. And nothing bad had better happen to My Friend, because I can buy plane tickets cash down, while you can't even afford a plumber. You do understand plain *English* I hope Mr Lurker? You are listening to me this time, and archiving my post, I hope? But try *proving* where it came from, *Stoopid* Firebird > Have you enjoyed the show Mr Lurker? Have you seen what I can do? > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > Firebird "the lurkers support me in email!!!" LOL  SignatureThePsyko Public Enemy #7 http://prozac.iscool.net > "the lurkers support me in email!!!" > > ThePsyko Not this Lurker! This particular *sociopath* supports *only* himself, what *he* wants to the detriment of all those around him. He even *whines* about people talking to other people and yet expects them to have any control over others without talking. How *twisted* is that? *Nobody* controls me Mr Lurker, my little pet, who is going to dance for *moi*! You want me to shut up then you had better shut me up yourself. Feeling miserable are you? Hey, obviously you are *depressed* But I have frequently heard My Friend laugh for two hours or more at a time, so don't tell me how depressed they are. And if you are feeling depressed like that, I know how fo fix it. Why not have a drink, or a spliff as you drive home? Or even a couple of bottles to escape the paranoia that is going to envelop you all this weekend? *snigger* As you have done, so shall it be done to you, Mr Lurker. Hey, and Mr Lurker, *dream* of *moi* all weekend. After all, your wife certainly will. Firebird >> "the lurkers support me in email!!!" >> >> ThePsyko > > Not this Lurker! This particular *sociopath* supports *only* himself, well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. (I'm sure they aren't 'nonexistant', but you really look like you're talking to yourself.. much like the usenet equivalent of a crazy homeless person rambling down the street) SignatureThePsyko Public Enemy #7 http://prozac.iscool.net > well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. You're right! The lurker must be non-existent cos any *self* *respecting* man whose wife I had claimed ownership off would have been knocking at my door threatening to knock my teeth down my throat wouldn't he? How could any man possibly be that much of a *wuss* ??? So I'm a liar, no a *pathological* *liar* and that Robin, she is just some old nit-picky broad who is married with kids and whom Thomas has the hots for, so I just thought I would wind them both up. Hell I aint had a passport for seven years now so how could it be true and anybody who thinks I have would be a *stoopid* Alan > well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. You're right! The lurker must be non-existent cos any *self* *respecting* man whose wife I had claimed ownership off would have been knocking at my door threatening to knock my teeth down my throat wouldn't he? How could any man possibly be that much of a *wuss* ??? So I'm a liar, no a *pathological* *liar* and that Robin, she is just some old nit-picky broad who is married with kids and whom Thomas has the hots for, so I just thought I would wind them both up. Hell I aint had a passport for seven years now so how could it be true and anybody who thinks I have would be a *stoopid* Alan >> well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Alan Sheyatt Alan, anyone who reads your post knows you're stoopid. > >> well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. > > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Sheyatt Alan, anyone who reads your post knows you're stoopid. Hey we agree for once. And anybody who was stoopid enough to be printing them out and archiving multiple copies would be even more *stoopid* wouldn't they? And how would you know what anyone thinks and what, if, or why, anyone and I said, or didn't say, anything to each other? Hey, maybe I should take up legalese, cos I did start some of the above sentences with a statement of condition. But is you konfused now? *snigger* Good! Firebird >>>> well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. >>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Hey we agree for once. And anybody who was stoopid enough to be printing them > out and archiving multiple copies would be even more *stoopid* wouldn't they? Is that an indirect slam against Hoof, and while I hadn't heard that you make multiple hard copies I do know you make multiple soft ones. WHOA! That makes you stoopid too, eh? > And how would you know what anyone thinks and what, if, or why, anyone and I > said, or didn't say, anything to each other? I would ask you to rewrite that sentence but I seriously doubt you will do any better. :( > Hey, maybe I should take up legalese, cos I did start some of the above > sentences with a statement of condition. > > But is you konfused now? Nope, you're just a Hoof wannabe. figgers, > *snigger* > > Good! > > Firebird >> well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant >> lurker.. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Alan You're not too bright are you? SignatureThePsyko Public Enemy #7 http://prozac.iscool.net > You're right! The lurker must be non-existent cos any *self* *respecting* man > whose wife I had claimed ownership off would have been knocking at my door > threatening to knock my teeth down my throat wouldn't he? How could any man > possibly be that much of a *wuss* ??? You even speak like a wuss, no man would threaten, they'd just do it. > well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. You're right! The lurker must be non-existent cos any *self* *respecting* man whose wife I had claimed ownership off would have been knocking at my door threatening to knock my teeth down my throat wouldn't he? How could any man possibly be that much of a *wuss* ??? So I'm a liar, no a *pathological* *liar* and that Robin, she is just some old nit-picky broad who is married with kids and whom Thomas has the hots for, so I just thought I would wind them both up. Hell I aint had a passport for seven years now so how could it be true and anybody who thinks I have would be a *stoopid* Alan > well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. You're right! The lurker must be non-existent cos any *self* *respecting* man whose wife I had claimed ownership off would have been knocking at my door threatening to knock my teeth down my throat wouldn't he? How could any man possibly be that much of a *wuss* ??? So I'm a liar, no a *pathological* *liar* and that Robin, she is just some old nit-picky broad who is married with kids and whom Thomas has the hots for, so I just thought I would wind them both up. Hell I aint had a passport for seven years now so how could it be true and anybody who thinks I have would be a *stoopid* Alan >> well whatever.. you look pretty stupid talking to a non existant lurker.. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Alan Heh, a dbl dose of Alan's stoopidity. > Heh, a dbl dose of Alan's stoopidity. Or just a double-dose of double-talk some of which I started with a statement of condition. How does somebody like you get the vote when you don't recognise double-talk when you see it? Like this; "I am a liar and *Liceman* is a really great guy." Now does that say what I mean, or what you want it to mean? Think about it *Liceman* very carefully. It's akin to the "We are going to war because of WMDs" story. Not a single WMD has ever been found yet Shrub got re-elected, but ole smiling boy is now finding out that the people you step on as you climb to the top are the ones who will pull you down when you get there, and he is going down. And those volcanoes keep going off in Sumatra and on the exact opposite side of the earth the ground is now reported to be so hot that peoples shoes are burning, and the man in power there is a proven liar. And I quote from the USGS web-site: The term "supervolcano" implies an eruption of magnitude 8 on the Volcano Explosivity Index, meaning that more than 1,000 cubic kilometers (250 cubic miles) of magma (partially molten rock) are erupted. The most recent such event on Earth occurred 74,000 years ago at the Toba Caldera in Sumatra, Indonesia. Such a giant eruption would have regional effects such as falling ash and short- term (years to decades) changes to global climate. The surrounding states of Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming would be affected, as well as other places in the United States and the world. Such eruptions usually form calderas, broad volcanic depressions created as the ground surface collapses as a result of withdrawal of partially molten rock (magma) below. Fortunately, the chances of this sort of eruption at Yellowstone are exceedingly small in the next few thousands of years. Over the past 640,000 years since the last giant eruption at Yellowstone, approximately 80 relatively nonexplosive eruptions have occurred and produced primarily lava flows. This would be the most likely kind of future eruption. If such an event were to occur today, there would be much disruption of activities in Yellowstone National Park, but in all likelihood few lives would be threatened. The most recent volcanic eruption at Yellowstone, a lava flow on the Pitchstone Plateau, occurred 70,000 years ago. And that polar flip started 300 years ago and polar flips occur at an exponential rate *Liceman* and nobody ever connects the weakening magnetic field with the rise in heat (infra-red), they just go on and on about "global warming". And hey, *you* elected Shrub, and he's an honest man, right? He'd tell you if anything like that was likely to happen, wouldn't he? Yes right. Y'all have a nice day now. Oh just to spice it up a lttle more today is the 3rd day of Passover. Passover is the 8 day observance commemorating the freedom and exodus of the Israelites (Jewish slaves) from Egypt during the reign of the Pharaoh Ramses II. Moses' plea of let my people go was ignored. Moses warned the Pharaoh that G-d would send severe punishments to the people of Egypt if the Israelites were not freed. Again the Pharaoh ignored Moses' request of freedom. In response G-d unleashed a series of 10 terrible plagues on the people of Egypt 1. Blood 2. Frogs 3. Lice (vermin) 4. Wild Beasts(flies) 5. Blight (Cattle Disease) 6. Boils 7. Hail 8. Locusts 9. Darkness 10. Slaying of the First Born Hey, sweet dreams *Liceman* Just an example of *creative* *writing* or is it? Firebird > Have you enjoyed the show Mr Lurker? Have you seen what I can do? > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > facts were thrown at me, and the majority of those who originally told those > *lies* are now dead. Those facts were info posted by your own hand, at least the ones I verified. Why are you still lying, or are you stating that you were lying then. > My Friend was the *only* one who never doubted me. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > My Friend is not telling you the truth, then you surely are now in sh.t-street > aren't you? LMAO! Trying to convince someone via threats that I am a liar? Tell you what, a.shole, if they want to post a question here about something you posted in the past and they cannot find it I will take a look for them. Gratis. It will be my pleasure. If it is not there, I will say that as well. No skin off my bones. It sounds to me like you stuck your wimpy nose somewhere it did no belong, typical for you isn't it? > And Mr Lurker swearing at me, especially in front of your own children, shows > exactly how *low* *class* you are. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Firebird Hope you buy the tickets Alan, then I hope you have the guts to go. And if the "Friend" is one of the woman you slammed so hard and degraded so violently on the net recently and many times before then I wonder about her choices in life. I doubt the "lurker" gives a sh.t about your threats to go RL. If he called you then he has the number and no doubt your address. In any event, a.shole, I have no cloo why you're trying to tie me into your affairs. <shrugs> It only shows your frailty and unstable mind. And if the peeps you speak of live in the USA, then I doubt you could fly here since you have AIDS. I think they are still blocking peeps with that. Alans all pissed, <snicker> Drink? > Those facts were info posted by your own hand, at least the ones I > verified. Why are you still lying, or are you stating that you were lying > then. But *stoopid* she has been here in this newsgroup since 1999 and she *knows* you are lying. > LMAO! Trying to convince someone via threats that I am a liar? Tell you > what, a.shole, if they want to post a question here about something you > posted in the past and they cannot find it I will take a look for them. > Gratis. It will be my pleasure. If it is not there, I will say that as > well. No skin off my bones. It sounds to me like you stuck your wimpy nose > somewhere it did no belong, typical for you isn't it? Like I said, she has been in this newsgroup since 1999 and has been telling her husband that *you* are the *liar* for months now, and yet he chooses to believe *you* Think about that one Iceman. Think about it very carefully. > Hope you buy the tickets Alan, then I hope you have the guts to go. Oh I will and I do. > And if the "Friend" is one of the woman you slammed so hard and degraded so > violently on the net recently and many times before then I wonder about her > choices in life. Blub! Blub! Blub! Have you never quite noticed how the goddess and I didn't really do that much arguing with each other? Quite a lot of noise but no real action. And anytime she is passing through she is welcome to call in for coffee, as long as it is just coffee, and quite frankly that goes for Bev too. And I have no doubt the goddess is still lurking and enjoying watching me make you look the fool. > I doubt the "lurker" gives a sh.t about your threats to go RL. If he called > you then he has the number and no doubt your address. He has my name, address, phone number, and he could even have my photograph. Could I care Iceman, for you remain a *liar* and he either now realises that, or is about to. And I will stand against him any time he likes > In any event, a.shole, I have no cloo why you're trying to tie me into your > affairs. <shrugs> It only shows your frailty and unstable mind. And if the > peeps you speak of live in the USA, then I doubt you could fly here since > you have AIDS. I think they are still blocking peeps with that. Why don't you ask the goddess, or the Professor, who exactly started that particular rumour, and why, and Chucker Chase, who later poked his nose in where it wasn't wanted, and is now dead, picked it up and ran with it, but I started that rumour myself, and *my* LadyBird has it archived, and she sent the archive to me yesterday, so read it and weep Iceman, and she knows I don't have AIDS, and again, if I had AIDS, then the Goddess has AIDs, and the girl from Alabama has AIDS, but she recently got married and she had one of those blood tests, and anybody else who may or may not have AIDS is none of your business. Oh, but of course, *if* you are telling the truth, and *my* Ladybird is a liar, then she has AIDS too, which may of course mean that Mr lurker has AIDS too, so all he has to do to verify the truth is go and get himself an AIDS test, but then I do hear he has been losing lots of weight recently. Alan From: firebird@cosmiverse.com (Firebird) Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.hepatitis Subject: Re: Hey Lynne....cops came. :)))))) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:24 +0100 (BST) Lines: 57 Message-ID: <memo.20010701122417.39087A@supersparks.freeserve.co.uk.freeserve.co.uk> References: <21895312.14e2f00@news.twosteps.edu> Reply-To: firebird@cosmiverse.com NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-440.hottie.dialup.pol.co.uk X-Trace: news6.svr.pol.co.uk 993986635 19630 62.25.165.184 (1 Jul 2001 11:23:55 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Jul 2001 11:23:55 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@theplanet.net -=- This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services. >> Those facts were info posted by your own hand, at least the ones I >> verified. Why are you still lying, or are you stating that you were lying >> then. > > But *stoopid* she has been here in this newsgroup since 1999 and she *knows* > you are lying. About what? >> LMAO! Trying to convince someone via threats that I am a liar? Tell you >> what, a.shole, if they want to post a question here about something you [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Think about that one Iceman. Think about it very carefully. Again, about what? >> Hope you buy the tickets Alan, then I hope you have the guts to go. > > Oh I will and I do. Yawn >> And if the "Friend" is one of the woman you slammed so hard and degraded so >> violently on the net recently and many times before then I wonder about her [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > And I have no doubt the goddess is still lurking and enjoying watching me make > you look the fool. Not likely. >> I doubt the "lurker" gives a sh.t about your threats to go RL. If he called >> you then he has the number and no doubt your address. > > He has my name, address, phone number, and he could even have my photograph. > Could I care Iceman, for you remain a *liar* and he either now realises that, > or is about to. And I will stand against him any time he likes About what? >> In any event, a.shole, I have no cloo why you're trying to tie me into your >> affairs. <shrugs> It only shows your frailty and unstable mind. And if the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > all he has to do to verify the truth is go and get himself an AIDS test, but > then I do hear he has been losing lots of weight recently. If you had the African strain then she would get it, otherwise it is/was difficult to transmit through normal hetro means. You've been losing weight too from what you posted. > Alan > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > -=- > This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services. I read a thread where you apologized for it, but put the blame on her. I think Nemesis either put the link in there or had enough of the message so I could trace it back. <shrugs> Either way it means little to me, if this is what you've been speaking about the whole time then the blames falls squarely on your puny little shoulders. Not mine, nor Nemesis. It was your posts that created all this. No one else's. Blameshifting is something that irresponsible people do, people who are afraid to deal with their own realities and actions. Much like the current troll de jour. Add to that the way you speak of the past wimmin in your life and you are most despicable. Only a woman who had no self respect and was hard up for something that appeared to be male would have an interest in you. In that regard you are worse than poofie the gummy puddle. > About what? About *everything* > I read a thread *Yawn* Yaknow I read a thread that said Daniel Joseph Min is *Crawdad* The *Klueless* but that don't mean a thing either. >> About what? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Yaknow I read a thread that said Daniel Joseph Min is *Crawdad* The *Klueless* > but that don't mean a thing either. You posted it, but then that doesn't mean much either. <splorf> Now you're asking Hoof to help you do your dirty work. DIY a.shole. Oh, and you really are a stupid a.shole cause if you post stuff to feminazi ng's all he has to do is post your sorry chit about wimmin there and they'd be all over you like stink on chit. > Only a woman who had no self respect and was hard up for > something that appeared to be male would have an interest in you. But *Liceman* have you forgotten what Kali once said, and the post is of extreme interest to you, and you may have observed the *very* efficient way *my* Ladybird tore Thomas to pieces and made him scream that he was being abused, and it must be such a blow to his ego that you have forgotten who he is when he still posts to smdh. And I think that come next Wednesday you may be in for the same thing Thomas got, but in the meantime I get to play with you. Kali's article follows: From: Kali <Kali@nope.not> Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: Re: One stalker down a zillion more needing taking down... Message-ID: <MPG.1b79e81b23294a8698a53a@news.east.earthlink.net> References: <410f9ae3.7365385@news.dreamscape.com> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:21:54 GMT NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:21:54 PDT In article <410f9ae3.7365385@news.dreamscape.com>, posted Tue, 03 Aug 2004 14:03:29 GMT, RSt robinmst@lycos.com says... >Just some related links: > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Robin Hi Robin. I am a bit acquainted with your posts from a little Google diving I did a while back. I'm glad to see you posting here. Welcome. Kali Like I said *Liceman* read it, and be very afraid. And believe me, she is the *very* *best* on this planet at what she does, and she and I have supported each other constantly since the day we met in Aug 1999, and if I knew then what I know now, "the goddess" would not have even got a reply to her emails. And Goddess; right profession; wrong woman. Alan >But *Liceman* have you forgotten what Kali once said, and the post is of >extreme interest to you, and you may have observed the *very* efficient way >*my* Ladybird tore Thomas to pieces and made him scream that he was being >abused, and it must be such a blow to his ego that you have forgotten who he is >when he still posts to smdh. And I think that come next Wednesday you may be in >for the same thing Thomas got, but in the meantime I get to play with you. You are indeed quite delusional. But that's hardly news. It was *very* amusing, though, to watch your complete disintegration in public over the past months. It's called logorrhea, I believe. I must admit it's a morbid kind of humor, I should probably feel sorry for you. But try as I might, I somehow can't get myself to feel much sympathy for you. I wonder why... Thomas SignatureTo reach me, complete my last name in the address. From : Thomas Wagner <tomw@capecod.com> Message-ID : <ctlo61d6lr26g23suadobku7mj7kf3u4j9@4ax.com> >I somehow can't get myself to feel much sympathy for you. I wonder why... Probably because *you* have to much starch in that *pretty red shirt* of yours and yer all stiff and dowdy > From : Thomas Wagner <tomw@capecod.com> > Message-ID : <ctlo61d6lr26g23suadobku7mj7kf3u4j9@4ax.com> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Probably because *you* have to much starch in that *pretty red shirt* of yours > and yer all stiff and dowdy LMAO. How about "I'm so pleased to be debating with you....." LMAO You bet he was, but she and I were laughing on the phone, and you should hear her impressions of Thomas, and you would just die laughing. The Pom > You are indeed quite delusional. But that's hardly news. It was *very* > amusing, though, to watch your complete disintegration in public over [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Thomas She kicked your goddammed arse and she did it good Thomas, and *everybody* saw her do it, and *everybody* say you scream that you were being abused, and on Wednesday she will get her final A all on her own, with nothing other than encouragement from me, for what do I know about the law, amd don't bother giving me any sympathy, you give it to her ole man instead, cos he's even so desperate now he steals my lines, but he can't even come out and tell her that she is beautiful when she is, and he can't even come out and tell her that she kicked your arse good when she kicked your arse good, and he laughed at her when she decided she would follow my lead and go back to college, and while I told her she is the goddam best because she is the goddam best Thomas, he laughed at her, and you and he can call it what you like but she loves me and I love her and I am goddamed going to marry her and there is not a goddammed thing you or anybody else can do to stop us. And who knows, after Wednesday she just might decided to come and kick your arse one last time. And what is it with you and these fancy words? *We* laughed long and hard over "pathological liar" yaknow, and now you have given us "logorrhea". If you could only hear her impressions of you Thomas, as she puts on this deep pompous voice and says "Killfile the Trolls" and then we both roll about laughing, and that stupid jerk who is printing out all my posts trying to prove we have done anything wrong got his panties in a wedgie just because I said we laughed long and hard, and yaknow what? I don't think he has ever made her laugh, and I don't think you have ever made your wife laugh, and I seriously doubt that Iceman can make his wife laugh either. And I have a passport that shows I have not left this country since one month before my wife died, which was about the time I found this newsgroup, so do take your pile of archived posts Mr Lurker and put them in that shredder, and then stop being a big baby, and let her go. Firebird - Yes I Do Have The Power. >She kicked your goddammed arse and she did it good Thomas, and *everybody* saw >her do it, and *everybody* say you scream that you were being abused As I said, you are delusional. There's not a word about abuse in any of my posts, not one bit of kicking my a.s in any of Robin's posts. You could at least try to understand the things that are actually being posted instead of making up some dream world in which you are the hero and I am the villain. But I'm probably asking for too much. >[...] and you and he can call it what you like but she loves me and I >love her and I am goddamed going to marry her and there is not a goddammed >thing you or anybody else can do to stop us. Oooh, what a heartbreaking story. Sniffle. I'm all emotional now... >And who knows, after Wednesday she >just might decided to come and kick your arse one last time. You know, I've always had very interesting discussions with Robin, because she actually uses factual arguments and listens to what the other one is saying. You, on the other hand, can't understand a word that's being said, and instead spout arrogant crap. I'll be pleased to discuss any topic at all with Robin. You can take a hike. >And what is it with you and these fancy words? *We* laughed long and hard over >"pathological liar" yaknow, and now you have given us "logorrhea". Which is the best word to describe your posts: "excessive talkativeness, especially when the words are uncontrolled or incoherent". Thomas SignatureTo reach me, complete my last name in the address. <snip cos who cares what you wrote?> Hey I passed your message on, and she laughed *long* and *hard* But what's new about that? Firebird - Flying to the Sun, Sweet Ladybird ><snip cos who cares what you wrote?> > >Hey I passed your message on, and she laughed *long* and *hard* Yeah, riiight. Dream on... Thomas SignatureTo reach me, complete my last name in the address. > ><snip cos who cares what you wrote?> > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Thomas Hey *We* just knew you would say that and we laughed *long* and *hard* about that too. She has a delightful laugh yaknow, but then some people just never get to hear it. And you really should "killfile the trolls" or is it that now you have to pay to post you want to get your money's worth? Firebird > > ><snip cos who cares what you wrote?> > > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Firebird What on earth is he doing in here?? Is he bored now that everyone listened to his advice and 'kill filed' the trolls and must come looking for us, so he can repost, Kill File the Trolls!! Ad nauseum. What is wrong with this picture!! Thomas?? hoof Signature{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.} {If you have a problem with that, take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.} A Free Thinker. > > > ><snip cos who cares what you wrote?> > > > > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > What is wrong with this picture!! Thomas?? > hoof LMAO. Haven't you fgured it out yet? He's got the hots for *my* woman and he always has had, and he can't quite get his head round the fact that she and I were really laughing long and hard while she set him up, and reeled him, in and then slapped him down good. Oh and of course, we all saw her do it, but stoopid hubby grudgingly tells her that she "held her own". What a prick that man is? Alan >LMAO. Haven't you fgured it out yet? He's got the hots for *my* woman and he >always has had, and he can't quite get his head round the fact that she and I >were really laughing long and hard while she set him up, and reeled him, in and >then slapped him down good. Oh and of course, we all saw her do it, but stoopid >hubby grudgingly tells her that she "held her own". What a prick that man is? Maybe I'm confused, but WTF are you talking about?? Nothing of the sort ever happened. What thread do you mean? The one where I botched one sentence in a translation? Thomas SignatureTo reach me, complete my last name in the address. > Maybe I'm confused, Hey *We* have been telling you that you years Thomas. I'm glad you finally caught up. Now I'll teach you the Firebird Strutt, and that has two Ts. You put your left arm in, your left arm out In out, in out, you shake it all about You do the Firebird Strutt and you turn around That's what it's all about Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Knees bent, arms stretched Raa raa raa You put your right arm in, your right arm out In out, in out, you shake it all about You do the Firebird Strutt and you turn around That's what it's all about <chorus> You put your left leg in, your left leg out In out, in out, you shake it all about You do the Firebird Strutt and you turn around That's what it's all about <chorus> You put your right leg in, your right leg out In out, in out, you shake it all about You do the Firebird Strutt and you turn around That's what it's all about <chorus> You put your whole self in, your whole self out In out, in out, you shake it all about You do the Firebird Strutt and you turn around That's what it's all about Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Knees bent, arms stretched Raa raa raa Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Whoa-o the Firebird Strutt Knees bent, arms stretched Raa raa raa Firebird > Maybe I'm confused, but WTF are you talking about?? Nothing of the sort > ever happened. What thread do you mean? The one where I botched one > sentence in a translation? Thomas, believe me, she had you beat before you started. I once scanned an article in a U.K magazine and emailed it to her and within a very short time she knew who had originally authored it and emailed me back with the details. And we have been laughing at you and winding you up just because we think differently to you, you have to plod along and follow reason, while we can make these tenuous links and put them together, and sometimes it works out right and sometimes it works out wrong, but then you just start again, no big deal. But that doesn't make us better than you, and we have done wrong, while you do try to help others, and you can't help being what you are any more than we can help being what we are. And I have been blaming others for geting me booted off the internet, and arrogantly riding roughshod all over you, just because I can, because I can see those tenuous links that specialists miss, and I have misused the gift that God gave me. So I'm apologising to you Thomas, and I won't pick on you ever again, but then I doubt you even understand what I am talking about, but don't bother answering me cos I am gone. Alan >Thomas, believe me, she had you beat before you started. I once scanned an >article in a U.K magazine and emailed it to her and within a very short time >she knew who had originally authored it and emailed me back with the details. I still don't understand why you would consider me "beat" if Robin digs up a source that I didn't find because I searched for it in the wrong language. I thanked her for finding it, and immediately noticed (and publicly stated) that my translation of an ambiguous sentence in the press release was incorrect in one important point. Is making a mistake and correcting it when new information arrives something you consider being "beaten"? That is what politicians think, and it explains a lot about your insistence on sticking to mistaken beliefs even when shown contradictory information. But fortunately for all of us, it's not how scientists, or engineers like me, work. >And we have been laughing at you and winding you up just because we think >differently to you, you have to plod along and follow reason, while we can make >these tenuous links and put them together, and sometimes it works out right and >sometimes it works out wrong, but then you just start again, no big deal. Usenet indeed is no big deal, but that doesn't absolve you from responsibility for your postings. Making tenuous links is one thing, posting ridicule and lies about what I supposedly said is another. >But that doesn't make us better than you, and we have done wrong, while you do >try to help others, and you can't help being what you are any more than we can [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >I doubt you even understand what I am talking about, but don't bother answering >me cos I am gone. I'm answering anyway, because you've been saying that once too often, so it's hard to believe. I'm also answering to accept your apology, hoping that it is indeed a sign of sincerity, and not another ruse. You should know by now that I don't hold grudges against anyone. It can be a lot more amusing and stimulating to have discussions without ridicule and mutual insults, such as those I've had with Robin, than the mudwrestling contests we two engaged in. I'm perfectly willing to forget that past and move on. But it takes two to tango... Thomas SignatureTo reach me, complete my last name in the address. From : Thomas Wagner <tomw@capecod.com> Message-ID : <ppcc71567lbe4uohodp2a6odfr8d69og0a@4ax.com> >I'm perfectly willing to forget that past and move on How very *christian* and magnanimous of *you* Thomas Cast of that *pretty red shirt* of yours and *burn* it, *we* can all then *move on* blindly into a golden free-for-all era of detente and doctor play-acting with lotsa point-n-click expert medical posts >But it takes two to tango... *I* refuse to dance with anyone in a *pretty red shirt* >What on earth is he doing in here?? Is he bored now that everyone >listened to his advice and 'kill filed' the trolls and must come looking >for us, so he can repost, Kill File the Trolls!! Ad nauseum. >What is wrong with this picture!! Thomas?? What's wrong with you?? Alan has been obsessed with me, repeatedly posting sh.t here about what I supposedly said, so I answered. Do you have a problem with that? As for me ever posting "Kill File the Trolls", I never did. Check Google. As I said, Alan is delusional. Thomas SignatureTo reach me, complete my last name in the address. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.