Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Hepatitis / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HEP B

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Adysthemic - 15 Feb 2008 02:14 GMT
Group,
I have received TWO courses of 3 shots each of Hep B vaccine. Subsequent
tests show
non-reactive. It is possible that I cannot develop a titer at all, no matter
how many times
I get vaccinated? I work in a field that involves possible exposure to Hep.
Does the fact that I do not develop anti-bodies mean that I'm already
immune or that
if I do become infected that I never will develop a defense and become a
chronic carrier?
I've been searching for a couple hours and cannot find any definitive
answers. Anyone have any ideas? Adythemic
greyhackles - 15 Feb 2008 03:04 GMT
>Group,
> I have received TWO courses of 3 shots each of Hep B vaccine. Subsequent
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I've been searching for a couple hours and cannot find any definitive
>answers. Anyone have any ideas? Adythemic

Have you seen this article? It covers a broad range of HVB inoculation issues,
both successful and otherwise.

http://www.immunize.org/askexperts/experts_hepb.asp

From this, I gather the answer*s* to your first question are: if after two
3-shot courses you do not develop anti-HBs, it is highly likely you are a
primary non-responder to immunization - and/or possible that you are already
infected (did you ever get tested for that possibility?) and that the SOC does
not recommend further attempts at immunization.

As for the other question, I'm not sure I saw a *definitive* question/answer
covering that scenario, but a logical conclusion matches your conjecture...

/greyhackles
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.