Has anyone seen this article posted on Yahoo today?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20070522/hl_hsn/studysuggestscureforhepatitisc

If I'm understanding it correctly, the 99% pecent seven-year
no-detectable virus statistic they mention only applies to
"...patients with hepatitis C who were treated successfully", meaning
those patients who were not treated successfully were not included in
this 99% figure. Therefore, the actual SVR (sustained viral response)
at 7 years for all patients receiving treatment would be much lower.

This makes the headline of the article "Study Suggests Cure for
Hepatitis C" severely misleading.

It ticks me off, because, for a moment, I got my hopes up.