I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I would
like clarified. The first is my mind. How long after treatment does it
normally take for your mind and body to "normalize"? Post treatment,
assuming you have achieved a full SVR, are you now unable to be re-infected
with your original genotype or is the virus constantly mutating making
immunity impossible? Are you now unable to infect others if your virus has
been "cleared". Could you be a blood/organ donor or would the recipient be
at severe risk? Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there always be
a risk of relapse? There's been some talk that TX causes the immune system
to remain hyperactive for quite some time after TX is finished. Is this
true? I know that infection causes the immune system to work over-time in a
futile attempt at clearing the virus. I was hoping successful treatment
would help with this?
tom - 01 Jul 2009 19:56 GMT
>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I would
>like clarified. The first is my mind. How long after treatment does it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>in a futile attempt at clearing the virus. I was hoping successful
>treatment would help with this?
This site will probably answer quite a few of your questions.
http://www.hepatitisdoctor.com/
greyhackles - 02 Jul 2009 15:16 GMT
>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I would
>like clarified. The first is my mind. How long after treatment does it
>normally take for your mind and body to "normalize"?
As you might imagine, severity of side effects and recovery from treatment
differs from person to person. Some people never experience the "brain fog",
some get it in spades. In my case I never really felt out-of-sorts mentally,
so recovery in that respect was rapid for me, but some folks posting here have
related it took months to shake it off.
>Post treatment, assuming you have achieved a full SVR, are you now unable
>to be re-infected with your original genotype or is the virus constantly mutating making
>immunity impossible?
I believe it is prudent to assume you can be re-infected. I don't believe
anything about HCV infection, regardless of treatment outcome, protects
against re-infection, regardless of genotype.
>Are you now unable to infect others if your virus has been "cleared".
>Could you be a blood/organ donor or would the recipient be
>at severe risk?
I'm fairly certain that a person expressing anti-HCV antibodies will not be
allowed to donate blood or organs.
>Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
>assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there always be
>a risk of relapse?
I don't think there is data extending out to that 20 year level, but
statistics are clear that SVR is extremely durable. If you get through a year
or two the chances of a true relapse (as opposed to re-infection) are
extremely small.
>There's been some talk that TX causes the immune system
>to remain hyperactive for quite some time after TX is finished. Is this
>true?
Interesting. I hadn't read that, and have no idea if it is true.
>I know that infection causes the immune system to work over-time in a
>futile attempt at clearing the virus. I was hoping successful treatment
>would help with this?
Clearly, removing the immune system stimulus (ie: SVR) should result in the
immune system returning to a more normal state...
Cheers
/greyhackles
Metspitzer - 02 Jul 2009 21:54 GMT
>>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I would
>>like clarified. The first is my mind. How long after treatment does it
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>I'm fairly certain that a person expressing anti-HCV antibodies will not be
>allowed to donate blood or organs.
Some Transplant patients at Emory have been giving the choice of
getting a HCV positive organs to allow them to get one sooner.
I don't know if they give HCV negative patients HCV positive organs
but they do give them to HCV positive patients.
Thip - 02 Jul 2009 22:19 GMT
>>>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I
>>>would
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Some Transplant patients at Emory have been giving the choice of
> getting a HCV positive organs to allow them to get one sooner.
WHAT???? Where'd you hear that?
I'm glad I gave Emory the boot and went back to Athens.
Metspitzer - 02 Jul 2009 23:21 GMT
>>>>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I
>>>>would
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>I'm glad I gave Emory the boot and went back to Athens.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VJ0-4H5DR50-21&_user=
10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=946627971&
_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=565
f5ee5b8446cb80d05d9b4b3e8800e
I was sitting in the waiting room in the transplant center while a
nurse was discussing it with a kidney patient.
Emory is a very good hospital IMO.
Thip - 03 Jul 2009 00:37 GMT
>>>>>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I
>>>>>would
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Emory is a very good hospital IMO.
I take it you never had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Harsh Kapoor then.
When I had my last MRI there they used the new contrast, my throat closed,
and I could barely breathe. She called a nurse, who never arrived. That
was really comforting.
I guess my main complaint is that they continually made me feel like I had
one foot in the grave. Pre-cancerous, not quite bad enough for a transplant
just yet, but hey, don't worry, you'll be there soon. I fled back to
Dr.West in Athens (he dx'd me in 2002), whose whole attitude is, "Live your
life, you're stable now and if something happens we'll worry about it then."
And that's exactly what I'm doing.
Interesting to think we might've been in the same waiting room and never
knew it though, isn't it?
Metspitzer - 03 Jul 2009 01:07 GMT
>>>>>>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I
>>>>>>would
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>Interesting to think we might've been in the same waiting room and never
>knew it though, isn't it?
I never heard the name of that doctor before. I guess it is just as
well.
I have been in and out of Emory since the last part of 2000. I think
the chances are pretty good that we have been in the same room. Too
bad we never got a chance to meet. (I am not a big talker though)
Sounds like you had a tough time with your MRI. It could have
happened anywhere though.
Glad to hear you are stable.
greyhackles - 03 Jul 2009 01:15 GMT
>>>>I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I
>>>>would
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>I'm glad I gave Emory the boot and went back to Athens.
Well, first, he's correct - there have been instances where an HCV-positive
donor liver was used on an HCV-positive recipient - with the full knowledge of
the recipient. Sometimes it's the best option available, but it's still an
exceedingly rare solution, definitely the exception to the rule, and I didn't
think it was worth mentioning in the context of the question...
Cheers
/greyhackles
Suri Cruise - 04 Jul 2009 08:54 GMT
> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:16:33 -0400, greyhackles
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> I don't know if they give HCV negative patients HCV positive organs
> but they do give them to HCV positive patients.
Do you know if these are from live donors or from cadavers? If you
could find out, and they use live donors, I'd be VERY interested...
Thip - 04 Jul 2009 13:41 GMT
On Jul 2, 1:54 pm, Metspitzer <kilow...@charter.net> wrote:
> Some Transplant patients at Emory have been giving the choice of
> getting a HCV positive organs to allow them to get one sooner.
>
> I don't know if they give HCV negative patients HCV positive organs
> but they do give them to HCV positive patients.
Do you know if these are from live donors or from cadavers? If you
could find out, and they use live donors, I'd be VERY interested...
Emory doesn't do live donor trransplants. If they did I'd already have one.
Metspitzer - 04 Jul 2009 16:04 GMT
>On Jul 2, 1:54 pm, Metspitzer <kilow...@charter.net> wrote:
>> Some Transplant patients at Emory have been giving the choice of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Do you know if these are from live donors or from cadavers? If you
>could find out, and they use live donors, I'd be VERY interested...
I would say both, although I base that on nothing. I am sure there
are HCV positive organ donors that don't even know they are positive.
If the doctors get an HCV positive organ, they could check the
recipient's preference and use it if they can.
>Emory doesn't do live donor trransplants. If they did I'd already have one.
Emory does do live donor transplants. I know of one guy that received
one from his sister. I also know of another man that got one from his
brother. All 4 were doing fine last time I heard.
Being HCV negative and given the choice of an HCV positive organ or
maybe nothing would be one hard choice to make.
I tried to get you a phone number to Emory but they are closed for
July 4. Try this number after the holiday. 404-788-5000
Thip - 04 Jul 2009 16:20 GMT
> Emory does do live donor transplants. I know of one guy that received
> one from his sister. I also know of another man that got one from his
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I tried to get you a phone number to Emory but they are closed for
> July 4. Try this number after the holiday. 404-788-5000
Thanks much! As of the last time I was there, they weren't doing live
donors and I was told they probably never would because the possibility of
affecting 2 lives negatively. I found a hospital in Florida and one in
Virginia--too far away, but I've had live donor offers up the wazoo. My
brother even offered to pay all living expenses for the donor.
I'm due to see Dr. West soon. I'll definitely discuss it with him as well
as calling Emory.
Metspitzer - 04 Jul 2009 16:40 GMT
>> Emory does do live donor transplants. I know of one guy that received
>> one from his sister. I also know of another man that got one from his
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>I'm due to see Dr. West soon. I'll definitely discuss it with him as well
>as calling Emory.
I heard that you could get a transplant pretty soon in Tennessee.
Steve Jobs did.
Good luck
Thip - 04 Jul 2009 17:58 GMT
>>> Emory does do live donor transplants. I know of one guy that received
>>> one from his sister. I also know of another man that got one from his
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Good luck
I don't have A Name and I'm definitely not rich. :-)
Michael Arends - 04 Jul 2009 21:43 GMT
Smiling Wickedly, Thip answered:
> On Jul 2, 1:54 pm, Metspitzer <kilow...@charter.net> wrote:
>> Some Transplant patients at Emory have been giving the choice of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Emory doesn't do live donor trransplants. If they did I'd already have one.
And i can't think of anyone who deserves one more. 8-)

Signature
*..· ´¨¨))
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ .·´-:¦:-((¸¸.·´(º·.¸(¨*·.¸ ¸.·*¨)¸.·º)
«.·°·. Michael .·°·-:¦:-
Thip - 07 Jul 2009 12:13 GMT
> Smiling Wickedly, Thip answered:
>> On Jul 2, 1:54 pm, Metspitzer <kilow...@charter.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
> And i can't think of anyone who deserves one more. 8-)
Thanks, Michael <<<<hugs>>>>
Suri Cruise - 04 Jul 2009 08:53 GMT
> I am 75% of the way to my end of treatment and there's a few things I would
> like clarified. The first is my mind. How long after treatment does it
> normally take for your mind and body to "normalize"?<<
My last injection was on 02-13-09. I am still recovering. If you
haven't been on opiates or benzos, however, things will improve
dramatically within 2-4 weeks after your last injection.
Post treatment,
> assuming you have achieved a full SVR, are you now unable to be re-infected
> with your original genotype<<
No, you can reinfected with ANY genotype.
or is the virus constantly mutating making
> immunity impossible? Are you now unable to infect others if your virus has
> been "cleared".<<
Possibly.
Could you be a blood/organ donor or would the recipient be
> at severe risk? <<
I found out I had hep c when I tested to see if I could donate a
kidney. You MAY be able to donate to someone who has hep c, but almost
certainly not to someone who does not.
Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
> assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years<<
Yes.
or will there always be
> a risk of relapse? There's been some talk that TX causes the immune system
> to remain hyperactive for quite some time after TX is finished. Is this
> true?<<
For some people, apparently.
> I know that infection causes the immune system to work over-time in a
> futile attempt at clearing the virus. I was hoping successful treatment
> would help with this?<
I certainly hope you recover successfully from both hep c and from
treatment. If you've made it this far without horrid sides, you
probably will.
Waterspider - 04 Jul 2009 19:14 GMT
Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
> assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there always
> be a risk of relapse?
Relapse is the wrong term, and perhaps SVR is too. It would be more accurate
to say, "we think we've erradicated it, but we're not sure."
Hep C, a virus, is either alive and present, or not. It does not "go
dormant." The limitation in definition is that minute quantities of the
virus cannot be detected (yet), and so would replicate to a detectible level
after a period of time, usually within six months. It appears that, after
two years, if there is no detectible HCV, it's dead and you're cured. I
suspect that, in cases where people "relapse" after this amount of time,
that they have been reinfected.
Michael Arends - 04 Jul 2009 21:41 GMT
Smiling Wickedly, Waterspider answered:
> Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
>> assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there always
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> suspect that, in cases where people "relapse" after this amount of time,
> that they have been reinfected.
I haven't been here for a long time, or very much over time since my
SVR. I can't believe it's been 6+ years, and the Dragon is still dead
dead dead.
Happy July 4th everyone.. KILL THE DRAGON.. but keep yourself safe.
Live long and prosper..

Signature
*..· ´¨¨))
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ .·´-:¦:-((¸¸.·´(º·.¸(¨*·.¸ ¸.·*¨)¸.·º)
«.·°·. Michael .·°·-:¦:-
TX-012 - 07 Jul 2009 11:44 GMT
> Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
> > assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there always
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to say, "we think we've erradicated it, but we're not sure."
> Hep C, a virus, is either alive and present, or not
Since it's a virus, it's not alive and present, or not alive and not
present:)
Waterspider - 07 Jul 2009 20:09 GMT
>> Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
>> > assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Since it's a virus, it's not alive and present, or not alive and not
> present:)
The virus is either alive and present, or not.
If the virus is not alive and not present, and once was, then antibodies for
the virus will be present.
greyhackles - 08 Jul 2009 02:08 GMT
>>> Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
>>> > assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>If the virus is not alive and not present, and once was, then antibodies for
>the virus will be present.
I think TX is laying a technical tweak on ya, WS ;-)
Cheers
/greyhackles
Waterspider - 08 Jul 2009 18:31 GMT
>>>> Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
>>>> > assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> /greyhackles
LOL @ Grey :-)
chuck - 09 Jul 2009 17:11 GMT
>> Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
>> > assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Since it's a virus, it's not alive and present, or not alive and not
> present:)
Here's clarification for those of us who don't get the joke.
When you go through it though, it merely muddies the water even more.
http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/yellowstone/viruslive.html
Waterspider - 09 Jul 2009 19:17 GMT
>>> Would an SVR of 1 or 2 years post TX mean that you can
>>> > assume that the SVR will hold for say 10 or 20 years or will there
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> When you go through it though, it merely muddies the water even more.
> http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/yellowstone/viruslive.html
Thanks for the link, Chuck, it's excellent.
Viroids... who woulda thunk!