Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Hepatitis / October 2008
Ibuprofen and liver damage
|
|
Thread rating:  |
chardonney9 - 20 Oct 2008 15:02 GMT My doctor, who is my general practitioner as well as in charge of the clinic's Hep C program, has had me on ibuprofen for several years for back pain and was told to take it before taking the Pegasys shot so I'd not feel the side effects as much.
Now I read on several places on line (by experts in this sort of thing) that ibuprofen (and NSAIDs in general) should not be taken by people with compromised livers, that it's worse than taking small doses of Tylenol! I also have some Vicodin that I can take but it does have Tylenol in it. Wouldn't it be better to have meds that don't contain NSAIDs or acetaminophen? What should I suggest?
I did ask her nurse about being there for me to help with side effects and she assured me she would be. I asked about getting on other pain meds and was told my doctor does not prescribe oxycodone to anyone on the hep c program. I talked to her on Friday about changing pain drugs and she not only didn't get back to me, she knew I'd not have anything all weekend.
Doc also said that because I have type 2 that I could most likely stop at 12 weeks although she preferred I do 24. I think she said that just to get me going on her meds.
I also asked nurse about limiting iron and she said it wasn't necessary, that many people in the program actually end up with anemia.
Why are the people I'm depending on in direct conflict with what the experts say?
Char
Waterspider - 20 Oct 2008 21:20 GMT > My doctor, who is my general practitioner as well as in charge of the > clinic's Hep C program, has had me on ibuprofen for several years for back [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Char Sounds to me like they're not up to date on their protocol info, or they're cherry picking theories to suit their office policy, but without knowing why they said what they did I can't say for sure.
Tylenol/aceteminophen is the drug of choice for tx side-effects and, if taken within the recommended daily dosage, is the easiest on your damaged liver... except for opiates. Most docs are reluctant to rx opiates because they're addictive, and opiates will usually wreak havoc with your digestive system, causing nausea and severe constipation and killing what little appetite you'll have. Oxy is an opiate.
I'd do my shot at midnight, taking a generic Tylenol and Gravol about an hour, and I slept through the worst of the side-effects. I know I slept through the worst, because I did an experiment on my last shot: no meds. That was a mistake, believe me, but it proved to me that the T&G was effective. Because I have cirrhosis, I was leery of Tylenol but excellent research posted on this group let me confirm that it was the lesser of evils.
Twelve weeks is the magic number for the viral-load count that determines if your tx is working. If you've not had a two-log drop at that point, there's no point continuing because the tx is very likely going to be unsuccessful. If you achieve the two-log drop, then you should continue for another 12 weeks. Perhaps 12 weeks of tx is successful in some cases, but it's reducing your chances of SVR and I'd be insisting to do the 24 week regimen, presuming the two-log drop. Genotypes 2 and 3 (which I had) are treated the same, and we are happy heppers because we don't have Genotype 1, which requires nearly a freakin' year of tx :-)
The anemia caused by tx is not related to iron overload or hematomochrosis, a condition unique to people of Irish-Scottish descent (something to do with the potato famine). Request a test to determine if your body is storing too much iron and, if it isn't, don't worry. If it is, phlebotomy will reduce the levels. We all generally consume far more iron than we need, so paying attention to the amount in your diet, and limiting it, is never a bad idea. However, if all you can stomach on tx is a baked potato, don't beat yourself up-- nutrition is more important.
Good luck,
Waterspider
greyhackles - 20 Oct 2008 21:32 GMT >My doctor, who is my general practitioner as well as in charge of the >clinic's Hep C program, has had me on ibuprofen for several years for [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > >Char Because GPs aren't necessarily well-read on any specific disease - and particularly in a disease or treatment thereof that they don't specialize in - or see a lot of affected patients. If you're just discovering how little GPs understand about HCV and its treatment, put your helmet on - it could be a rough ride.
The safest OTC pain reliever for folks with HCV is Acetaminophen - and no more than 2 grams per day (I'd keep it to 1 gram per day if possible, just to be on the even safer side).
NSAIDs such as aspirin and ibuprophen depress platelets, among other side effects, and folks on anti-viral therapy often are already dealing with low platelet count and don't need the extra aggravation.
Vicodin, Oxycodone, and Hydrocodone are essentially interchangeable, and all contain some amount of Acetaminophen (the versions I've used were typically 350mg, but some were as much as 500mg per dose). Keeping track of any/all drugs you take that have Acetaminophen is important to avoid taking more than the maximum recommended daily amount.
On the up side, I had to do 48 weeks of therapy, and never needed more than a 500mg "Maximum Strength" Tylenol about an hour before my Friday Nite Shot, and another 500mg Saturday morning. After a couple of months on therapy I didn't need the Saturday morning pill, and by the 4th month I didn't need the Friday nite pill, either. The fluish symptoms associated with the aftermath of the injection had nearly disappeared by then, and I never really had any pain that I associated with therapy through the entire 11 months anyway.
I'll note that over the years I've read a few posts here from folks that felt they needed something more substantial than Tylenol to get them through treatment. So it's possible you might be in that camp. Time will tell.
That the GP doesn't prescribe Vicodin/Oxycodone/Hydrocodone for heppers on treatment isn't surprising - it's probably the typical attitude stemming from the automatic association of HCV with drug abuse. It sucks, but there you are.
I suppose I should state now (before it's too late) that I would never recommend hooking up with a GP to handle HCV therapy. I just don't think GPs have the knowledge or experience to look for the associated problems that may crop up, or do the right things to handle them. They typically don't do frequent enough testing, and they're the first to cut treatment meds in light of falling blood counts - instead of treating the falling blood counts with available/appropriate drugs. If there is any way for you to identify a gastro doc that handles significant cases of HCV therapy, I strongly urge you to do so.
That this GP said you could most likely stop at 12 weeks is a huge red flag from where I'm sitting. Do the full course of 24 weeks, no matter what your doc says. The durable SVR statistics do not support cutting back to 12 weeks for G2s, with few exceptions - and I would bet this GP won't do the necessary testing to even know if you fit the exception case in the first place.
Finally, as to the iron intake: has this doctor even tested your blood for iron loading - or even gotten a single Serum Ferritin count? I'm betting he's done neither. Unless you are one of the incredibly few that actually has a low iron load and low Serum Ferritin count, it would be wise to limit your intake of dietary iron - whether you are in treatment or not. Iron is rocket fuel for HCV wrt to liver damage. If you become anemic on treatment because of either hemolysis or marrow suppression, or both, eating iron isn't going to fix it.
No matter what doctor you use to handle your therapy, you should have a detailed plan on how frequently he/she will run blood counts and viral load tests. Ideally, you should have a full blood workup the week prior to starting therapy to know your starting condition and your baseline viral load. This should include a CBC with SDIFF, an Hepatic Function Panel, a Thyroid Function test, and a quantitative Viral Load test.
Within two weeks of starting therapy you should have your full blood work done again to see if any counts (particularly RBCs, WBCs and Platelets) are falling precipitously. At the end of the 4th week you should get your first on-treatment viral load check along with the full blood work. If nothing untoward is going on with your blood tests, you should get another VL check at 12 weeks, and the last one at the end of the 24 weeks on therapy.
You should also have an agreement that if you become anemic - if your Hemoglobin falls below 11g/dl (as a female) - that your doc will prescribe Procrit/Epogen/Aranesp instead of cutting your treatment meds; and if you experience Neutropenia (your Absolute Neutrophil Count falls below say 1.5K/ml) that he will put you on Neupogen instead of cutting your treatment meds. You should also know what his treatment strategy is if your Platelet count falls: some doctors have hair-triggers that will go off far too early.
Finally, when you get your treatment drugs, read the Product Information Sheets. You will find a wealth of information therein that will help you converse with your doctor in an intelligent fashion - and may help you avoid a stupid doctor decision that could affect your success.
Good luck!
/greyhackles
Thip - 21 Oct 2008 00:09 GMT > Why are the people I'm depending on in direct conflict with what the > experts say? > > Char They sound like a gang of uninformed nitwits to me. No offense, but when you know better than they do, it's best to follow your own advice.
I found a handout from Quest Diagnostics in Medical a few days ago. It was on STD's, and guess what? They included HCV with chlamydia and syphilis and all the rest. Also, at one point in time Medical was making it a *point* to give all inmates diagnosed with HCV multivitamins with iron. Their rationale? They said they wanted "to see how it affects the biopsy."
All together....one....two....three.....DOH!
Dwight - 21 Oct 2008 00:51 GMT >> Why are the people I'm depending on in direct conflict with what the >> experts say? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > All together....one....two....three.....DOH! Wish I could get rid of a little iron. Six weeks ago my ferritin level came back at 694 so they had me do a phlebotomy and then check again. This time it was 798. I've been doing weekly phlebotomies for the last weeks and I'm down to 543, but hemoglobin is down to 9.2 it was at 14.8 when I started. Don't know how long I can keep giving blood before the ferritin levels drop. I'm already feeling tired and run down. I'm sure sick of needles.
Dwight
Fee Fi - 21 Oct 2008 02:16 GMT > Wish I could get rid of a little iron. Six weeks ago my ferritin > level came back at 694 so they had me do a phlebotomy and then check [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Dwight Ferritin is not a measure of iron. It is high in people with iron overload, but it can be high for lots of other reasons, too. Sounds like someone should make sure they're watching your other tests - maybe iron is not your problem.
Here's a link with some info: http://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/ferritin
HTH,
-- Fee Fi
greyhackles - 21 Oct 2008 03:33 GMT >> Wish I could get rid of a little iron. Six weeks ago my ferritin >> level came back at 694 so they had me do a phlebotomy and then check [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > >-- Fee Fi Testing the serum ferritin level is in fact an appropriate first check for excess iron in the body. If it comes back high, a full iron load test is the next step, along with testing for the Hemochromatosis genetic defect.
One can have a high serum ferritin level but not have an iron overload condition (been there - nearly 400 ng/ml prior to initiating treatment, and hit 1200 ng/ml in the first month on therapy, but my actual *iron load* was in the middle of the normal range for males).
fwiw, webmd is not a particularly sound site to learn about the practice of medicine. One can find numerous errors all through the site.
For example, in the very first paragraph at the link you posted, there is this erroneous statement: "The amount of ferritin in the blood shows how much iron is stored in your body." That is very wrong...
Cheers
/greyhackles
Fee Fi - 22 Oct 2008 05:10 GMT ...
> fwiw, webmd is not a particularly sound site to learn about the > practice of medicine. One can find numerous errors all through the > site. Good points. It was just an illustration of the concept.
-- Fee Fi
Dwight - 21 Oct 2008 04:32 GMT >> Wish I could get rid of a little iron. Six weeks ago my ferritin >> level came back at 694 so they had me do a phlebotomy and then check [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > -- Fee Fi I do have hemochromatosis, I've known about it since 1992. I've been this route many times in the past, but not in the last 5 years or so. Not sure what sent it so high this time, but it sure isn't dropping fast. This is the first time my hemoglobin has dropped this fast. They usually stop the phlebotomies when my hemoglobin drops below 12, the first time it took 18 weeks of weekly phlebotomies to get it down where it should have been. Oh well, another week another unit of blood. Wish they could use it for something useful, but the hep-c makes sure that will never happen again.
Dwight (I wonder what the expiration date is on my procrit from my last round of tx, btw just kidding about the procrit)
Fee Fi - 22 Oct 2008 05:14 GMT > > > Wish I could get rid of a little iron. Six weeks ago my ferritin > > > level came back at 694 so they had me do a phlebotomy and then [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > Dwight (I wonder what the expiration date is on my procrit from my > last round of tx, btw just kidding about the procrit) Understood - but maybe this time the ferritin is not due to iron. Like you said, this episode seems a little different from the others.
Maybe the docs are right on target, but it might not hurt to ask, "is there a chance that my ferritin is up due to something other than iron? Does anything else make the ferritin go up?" See what they say. Maybe they'll think a little bit instead of just reacting.
-- Fee Fi
TX-012 - 21 Oct 2008 03:29 GMT > I did ask her nurse about being there for me to help with side effects > and she assured me she would be. I asked about getting on other pain > meds and was told my doctor does not prescribe oxycodone to anyone on > the hep c program My hepatologist was uncomfortable prescribing opiates for me, especially as tolerance increased and my need for escalating dosages followed. My NP referred me to a competent pain management specialist; I now I take 50 mgs of methadone per day in divided dosages...this has dramatically improved the quality of my life.
Certainly of the opiates I have tried, methadone is far and away the best for _chronic_ pain...prior to switching I was on OxyContin, which has a short half-life which does not live up to its billing, left me feeling much more drugged, is zillions of times more expensive (if that matters), and seemed to provide crappy pain relief even at the ever-increasing dosages my rapidly increasing Oxy-tolerance demanded.
Oddly enough, hydrocodone worked much better than oxy for me, but there is no such thing as pure hydro in the US...
If you want to try something non-scheduled, you might wish to try tramadol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tramadol
...for some, 100-300 mgs of tramadol/day (Ultram) in divided dosages would be sufficient. It's a long-lasting synthetic opiate with antidepressant properties...be forewarned, however, that withdrawal from tramadol can resemble a combo of opiate and antidepressant withdrawal, and it is certainly addictive...
dBo - 22 Oct 2008 21:17 GMT Chardonnay, you just never know as for pain etc. I also read the suggestions to take Tylenol before Friday night shots or soon after, but I never did. I just bit the bullet. I had severe osteo arthritis in left hip that I was basically not taking anything for at that point, either, becuase I just felt it was senseless and my doc would not give me anything stronger. There was no cartiledge left in the hip and the suggested "physical therapy" seemed ludicrous to me - Like "why will that help regrow cartiledge?" DUH!
Once on Tx, I was on so many nasty drugs I was really paranoid about taking anthing more that I could possibly go without - I heard all the pros and cons on Tylenol vs NSAIDS and was so confused, I just refused to take either. Maybe a couple of times I broke down and took tylenol. I'm not trying to sound like a martyr here or anything, I was in a lot of pain constantly, but just chose to "bite the bullet" and try to sleep thru the worst of it, and as often as possible.
Bottom line, I survived. I commend you for trying to sort all these things out and go into TX as informed as possible, I was the same way, but try to take life one day at a time, and cross each bridge as you come to it. Don't waste any more energy than necessary or worrying about the What If's..... Good Luck! Slam that Dragon!!!!
Waterspider - 22 Oct 2008 22:59 GMT > Chardonnay, you just never know as for pain etc. I also read the > suggestions to take Tylenol before Friday night shots or soon after, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > come to it. Don't waste any more energy than necessary or worrying > about the What If's..... Good Luck! Slam that Dragon!!!! I commend you for your "bite the bullet" attitude towards treatment and pain, and I sympathize with your osteo arthritis, but...
1. Refusing to take any/all medication to make treatment more tolerable is a bad idea that can result in the patient giving up altogether. What's worse? A relatively safe amount of Tylenol for 24 weeks and a good shot at SVR or wasting the medication, your time and your health by dumping tx half-way through?
2. Refusing medication to relieve severe pain is often a bad idea because the body's reaction to pain can aggrevate the cause and compromise healing.
|
|
|