Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Hepatitis / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I wonder what happened to this idea...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Cactus Jammies - 18 Jan 2008 01:49 GMT
From Bioworld Today
http://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadli
nes_article&forceid=33048

================

company profile (Energex Systems) http://www.regenerationnet.com/node/1330 
and http://www.energexsystems.com/index.htm   check out the 'about us' part.
===================
'Old' light tech gets update in Energex hepatitis C fight

By Don Long

Medical Device Daily Managing Editor
Developmental firm Energex Systems (Emerson, New Jersey) reported this week
that it has received conditional approval from the FDA to use its
experimental Hemo-Modulator technology in a clinical trial to treat patients
suffering from hepatitis C.

The initial trial with 10 subjects who have failed all other conventional
therapies will be conducted at Eisenhower Medical Center (Rancho Mirage,
California), with enrollment to be launched next month, said Thomas Fagan,
president of Energex.

Fagan told Medical Device Daily that the company needs only approval of the
trial by an institutional review board and other minor adjustments in
protocol to launch the trial. With expected success in the 10-patient study,
Energex will then carry out larger trials, and it has a projected
application filing with the FDA at around 18 months.

The Hemo-Modulator system is a non-pharmaceutical technology that uses
ultraviolet (UV) light that works both to inactivate the virus that causes
hepatitis C while also "jump-starting" the immune system, according to
Thomas Petrie, the system's developer.

The use of UV light to inactivate viruses is actually an "old technology,"
developed in the 1930s as a way to kill viruses, Petrie told Medical Device
Daily. In particular, he says that something called a "Knott machine" was
"put together based on [the structure] of germicidal properties" and had
shown some efficacy in a virus-killing application. But that effort was then
substantially sidetracked by the development of antibiotics, he said.

And then, "Nine years ago, this science was brought to my attention by
someone motivated by their own health," Petrie said. "But there was very
little information about it, just mostly anecdotal research," he noted. He
then went "back into the physics of it and built [the Hemo-Modulator] from
the ground up."

In operation, the machine is a closed-loop system involving the extraction
of a precise amount of blood from the patient, collecting it in a bag and
then passing it through a coil where it is irradiated with UV light in the C
band (UVC) "for a precise amount of time," according to an Energex
statement. After the exposure to the UVC, the blood is then recirculated
back into a bag and returned to the patient's body at the same point it was
drawn from.

From 3% to 4% of blood, no more than 250 cc are extracted, and the whole
process takes "from six to eight minutes," Petrie said.

In the initial trial, patients will be treated five times a week over a two-
or three-week period.

The expected result of the UVC exposure is to inactivate a certain amount of
hepatitis C pathogens in the blood, he said. While the mechanism of action
is yet to be fully known, Petrie referred to one of Einstein's laws of light
that, in general, "if something absorbs a photon from light, it will have a
reaction." The C band of UV light, he says, is a "low invisible light with a
bandwidth of about 254 nanometers" that is "extremely germicidal" and able
to produce "a biological change."

Put another way, he said that the light disrupts the viral cell and it
"becomes stupid - disrupted in its normal course, it can't replicate, it
can't do anything. If [these viruses] can't replace themselves, they'll die
off in a few hours."

A concomitant effect of the light treatment, he says, is to mobilize the
immune system, further protecting against the virus.

As to whether the company will seek a 510(k) or premarket approval (PMA) -
assuming strong trial results - "is a question we're asking ourselves,"
Fagan said.

He noted that because the Hemo-Modulator is based on uses of a light system
commercialized in the past, "technically, we believe we're entitled to a
510(k)" in a grandfathering process. But he said that to support the
robustness of the technology and "for protection, we're leaning toward a
PMA."

Prior to clinical trial application, the system was tested in the lab using
a viral equivalent to hepatitis C in blood samples, because, he noted, no
animal model has yet been devised for this sort of test.

The system was tested on a variety of other viruses, Fagan said, but the
company targeted hepatitis C because of potential value of the application,
the large size of the effected population and the unmet need that the
Hemo-Modulator can address. He quoted World Health Organization (Geneva,
Switzerland) data indicating 170 million infected worldwide and up to 10,000
deaths from HCV in the U.S. each year.

The Hemo-Modulator is the second product for the company, with Energex in
1999 winning FDA clearance for a radiofrequency device that treats temporal
mandibular joint dysfunction (TMJ, or simply jaw dysfunction), a product of
joint inflammation that can cause considerable pain. While it "sells well,"
that market is fairly limited, Fagan acknowledged.

Additionally, Energex is on the verge of completing a study to use its RF
system to treat osteoarthritis, an opportunity offering "huge market sales,"
Fagan said.

But the "big bang" for the company, you might say, is the Hemo-Modulator.
Fagan unhesitatingly projects it as a $2 billion to $3 billion revenue
producer in the hepatitis C application and "north of $10 billion" when
expanded to a variety of other applications.

What those applications are he wouldn't specify in detail, except to note,
"We're only starting with hepatitis C. This will treat any RNA virus. If
it's an RNA virus, we can effectively and safely treat it."

Nor would he lay out his hand when asked about possible applications for
general blood decontamination - but then said, "if you call me back in two
months, we may have a very interesting story for you."

And if there is a barometer for success, he pointed to investor interest,
saying the company is currently turning investors away.

"This is a very, very interesting technology," said Fagan. "It's valuable,
it's real, and shareholders are very excited about it. We're building either
to do a major IPO [initial public offering] or to partner with a major
company."

Published: June 18, 2004
greyhackles - 18 Jan 2008 02:13 GMT
>From Bioworld Today
>http://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadli
nes_article&forceid=33048

[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>===================
>'Old' light tech gets update in Energex hepatitis C fight
[...]

Hi, CJ.

This is the subject that "UVBlood" was touting the other day. If you look
around you can find what appears to be preliminary results of the mid-2006
trial, which was of questionable "success": iirc, with an 8 person cohort of
non-responders, only 3 of the 8 showed any improvement of liver histology.

I have been unable to find any Energex presentations in any form to the AASLD,
or any medical journals - widely respected or otherwise. It appears vetting of
the concept or the trials is non-existent to this point.

No patient has been "cured" of HCV using this form of treatment - indeed, for
all intents and purposes, it clearly is not a goal. Transient viral load
reductions averaging roughly 90% aren't going to cure anyone, so it leaves one
with the conclusion that Energex is trying to develop a maintenance modality -
similar to dialysis treatments for kidney failure. With the results shown to
this point, even that should be in doubt.

The US trials conducted for Energex are being allowed by FDA under an IDE -
essentially, a special-case exemption of the rules. FDA has provided no
comment pro or con for the concept, or the trials, so anyone using "FDA
approved" or "follows FDA guidelines" is clearly misleading, at best.

I believe Energex will have a tough row to hoe when they try to obtain any
form of approval for use on the general public, because of the deleterious
effects UV can have on blood - not to mention the potential for mutated
virions being pumped back into the unsuspecting patient.

Of course, I could be wrong. If there's money involved, surprising results may
follow...

Cheers

/greyhackles
Cactus Jammies - 18 Jan 2008 04:43 GMT
Hi Grey,
 No I couldn't find anything more about it, either.  And seeing as how
almost three years have passed since the brew haw haw first appeared, it
seems that it has not proven to be beneficial over a fairly respectable
length of time.  Reducing the VL in the bloodstream may mean something to
some folks, but being someone who has been undetectable and then had a
relapse, I wasn't really getting all excited about it.  I don't know enough
about radiology to have an opinion as to the effects of UVC on the blood
supply.  I would have expected to find some technical information or
clinically sound opinion as why it disappeared, though.

cheers

Cactus Jammies

>>From Bioworld Today
>>http://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadli
nes_article&forceid=33048

[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> /greyhackles
greyhackles - 18 Jan 2008 05:58 GMT
>Hi Grey,
>  No I couldn't find anything more about it, either.  And seeing as how
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>supply.  I would have expected to find some technical information or
>clinically sound opinion as why it disappeared, though.

The concept of using extra-corporeal Ultraviolet light as a treatment modality
is anything but new, and has traveled under a number of different "names"
(UBI, UVBI, UV Light Therapy, PCI, Bio-Photonics, etc). Indeed, one can easily
find extensive references dating all the way back to the 1930s, when it was
used to "treat" all kinds of infectious diseases. From the accounts I have
read so far, it all smacks of simple quackery, as one can imagine.

There have been any number of attempts to rationalize "UBI" (ultraviolet blood
irradiation) in the treatment of viral diseases; devices were constructed (eg:
"Knott Hemo-Irradiator" of the early 1950's through the late 1990's - an
obvious predecessor to the Energex apparatus) and a number of lobbying
associations were born (eg: The Foundation for Light Therapy, The American
Blood Irradiation Society, The Foundation For Blood Irradiation, etc). In
spite of their efforts, no UBI treatments have ever been approved by the US
FDA for the treatment of viral infections - not for extra-corporeal
applications, not even for treating collected blood for the general blood
supply.

One would think - if there was demonstrable success for such treatment
modalities - after 70-something years it would have gained FDA approval...

Cheers

/greyhackles
UVC - 18 Jan 2008 10:46 GMT
On Jan 17, 8:49 pm, "Cactus Jammies"
<cactusjamm...@retinal.circus.orb> wrote:
> From Bioworld Todayhttp://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bio...
> ================
[quoted text clipped - 124 lines]
>
> Published: June 18, 2004

For this company go to NYC News channel CW11, www.cw11.com, then click
on CW11 NEWS VIDEOS, then scroll down to FACT FINDER: CURE FOR CHRONIC
DISEASES. They did Phase 1 on humans with 20 people. Knocks down the
viral load and gets the immune system to keep it low long term. Best
is no side effects. Monkey studies on HIV showed positive results.
Russian - 24 Jan 2008 07:33 GMT
> The expected result of the UVC exposure is to inactivate a certain amount of
> hepatitis C pathogens in the blood, he said. While the mechanism of action
> is yet to be fully known, Petrie referred to one of Einstein's laws of light
> that, in general, "if something absorbs a photon from light, it will have a
> reaction."

FINALLY!  Confirmation of one of Einstein's theories!
Cactus Jammies - 24 Jan 2008 16:50 GMT
Kinda makes one feel warm and fuzzy, right?

cj
>> The expected result of the UVC exposure is to inactivate a certain amount
>> of hepatitis C pathogens in the blood, he said. While the mechanism of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> FINALLY!  Confirmation of one of Einstein's theories!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.