>> Well I went in for my ecogram and this time an MD did it. Last time it
>> was a nurse. The machine seemed to be a modern upgrade from what was
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> /greyhackles

Signature
Alias
To email me, remove what's invalid
>>> Well I went in for my ecogram and this time an MD did it. Last time it
>>> was a nurse. The machine seemed to be a modern upgrade from what was
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> decides if I get a biopsy or not. The fact that it isn't inflamed means
> nothing?
In my case, it meant nothing, as did my "within normal range" LFTs. My liver
didn't become inflamed until I got gall stones, and without that little
pleasure, I'd probably still not be diagnosed with hep C. So, when I finally
*was* diagnosed (I think it was year 2000?), my doc assured me that liver
damage would be minimal, because of the normal LFTs and prior, clean
ultrasounds. You can imagine my surprise when the biopsy showed bridging
fibrosis-cirrhosis.
Get the biopsy.
Spidey
Cody - 30 Jul 2007 16:59 GMT
>>>> Well I went in for my ecogram and this time an MD did it. Last time it
>>>> was a nurse. The machine seemed to be a modern upgrade from what was
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Spidey
Unfortunately, it isn't up to me but the doc. I wonder how much it would
cost if I have to pay for it.

Signature
Cody
To email me, remove what's invalid
Cactus Jammies - 30 Jul 2007 17:07 GMT
Right on, Sister! Cody, It won't hurt. You will get past it.
cj
>>>> Well I went in for my ecogram and this time an MD did it. Last time it
>>>> was a nurse. The machine seemed to be a modern upgrade from what was
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Spidey
Cody - 30 Jul 2007 17:12 GMT
> Right on, Sister! Cody, It won't hurt. You will get past it.
>
> cj
After the rhoids operation, I am now confident that it will be a piece
of cake in comparison.

Signature
Cody
To email me, remove what's invalid
>>> Well I went in for my ecogram and this time an MD did it. Last time it
>>> was a nurse. The machine seemed to be a modern upgrade from what was
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>decides if I get a biopsy or not. The fact that it isn't inflamed means
>nothing?
I'm 99% certain one cannot determine the presence or degree of inflammation
from an ultrasound. I'll leave that scant 1% just in case *anyone* can prove
me wrong - but (s)he better be really well armed with citations.
fwiw/fyi:
My ultrasound was "perfect".
My biopsy was Stage 2 going on 3 (scale: 0 to 4) with inflammation Grade 3
(scale: 0 to 5).
And....there were other things going on that were related to my chronically
pissed-off immune system besides frank liver damage. None of these things
would be detected by ultrasound...
Cheers
/greyhackles