One more question for my friends. His quant count is 900,000. How
does this compare with everyone else count?
He tried treatment once but could not go the entire year due to the
negative side effects.
elmoemerson@webtv.net - 06 Jan 2007 16:24 GMT
Quant count
Group: alt.support.hepatitis-c Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2007, 7:27am (CST-2)
From: kilowatt@charter.net (Terry)
One more question for my friends. His quant count is 900,000. How does
this compare with everyone else count?
He tried treatment once but could not go the entire year due to the
negative side effects.
////////////
That is a relatively low viral load for someone not on tx. Anything
under 2,000,000 is considered 'low' range.
Which tx regimen did he stop because he couldn't handle the sides? Was
it the old 3 times a week shots of Intron and ribavirin or did he do
weekly shots of peglyated interferon? I did both types and found that
the peglyated version was easier on the sides than the 3 times a week
shots. It wasn't so much of a roller-coaster ride. Also, did his doc
take a proactive roll in combating side effects such as depression and
anemia? Was his doc monitoring his thyroid on a regular basis? Having
the right doctor that aggressively manages side effects can mean the
difference between staying on tx, without dose reduction, and not being
able to finish.
elmo
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/TheFamilyAlbum
Terry - 07 Jan 2007 23:27 GMT
>Quant count
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>able to finish.
>elmo
Sorry, but I don't know much of his details. I tried giving the link
to his wife. If she can navigate here, then maybe she will chime in.
I emailed her the link to this message. I am pretty sure she will at
least read this. Time will tell if she wants to test the waters.
I never thought much about dose reduction. I guess that would be
better than quitting. I haven't talked to many people that have tried
this.
elmoemerson@webtv.net - 08 Jan 2007 13:10 GMT
Re: Quant count
Group: alt.support.hepatitis-c Date: Sun, Jan 7, 2007, 6:27pm (CST+1)
From: Kilowatt@charter.net (Terry)
Quant count
Group: alt.support.hepatitis-c Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2007, 7:27am (CST-2)
From: kilowatt@charter.net (Terry)
One more question for my friends. His quant count is 900,000. How does
this compare with everyone else count?
He tried treatment once but could not go the entire year due to the
negative side effects.
////////////
That is a relatively low viral load for someone not on tx. Anything
under 2,000,000 is considered 'low' range.
Which tx regimen did he stop because he couldn't handle the sides? Was
it the old 3 times a week shots of Intron and ribavirin or did he do
weekly shots of peglyated interferon? I did both types and found that
the peglyated version was easier on the sides than the 3 times a week
shots. It wasn't so much of a roller-coaster ride. Also, did his doc
take a proactive roll in combating side effects such as depression and
anemia? Was his doc monitoring his thyroid on a regular basis? Having
the right doctor that aggressively manages side effects can mean the
difference between staying on tx, without dose reduction, and not being
able to finish.
elmo
Sorry, but I don't know much of his details. I tried giving the link to
his wife. If she can navigate here, then maybe she will chime in. I
emailed her the link to this message. I am pretty sure she will at least
read this. Time will tell if she wants to test the waters.
I never thought much about dose reduction. I guess that would be
better than quitting. I haven't talked to many people that have tried
this.
//////////
Dose reduction should be the last resort before quitting altogether. In
many cases, dose reduction is a formula for tx failure, particularly
before the virus becomes 'undetectable'.
If your friend can't navigate her way here, I'd be happy to field her
questions thru email.
elmo
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/TheFamilyAlbum
Puckertoe - 06 Jan 2007 16:30 GMT
Mine was 10.8 million at the beginning of my 48 week tx. At 12 weeks I was
undetectable. I was also undetectable througout the tx. I was tested more
than once due to another med that I was taking. So 900k isn't that bad. I
think that is considered pretty low.
-Puckertoe
> One more question for my friends. His quant count is 900,000. How
> does this compare with everyone else count?
>
> He tried treatment once but could not go the entire year due to the
> negative side effects.
elmoemerson@webtv.net - 06 Jan 2007 16:55 GMT
PT, your viral load was pretty close to the cut-off for what is
considered 'mid-range', which is 10 million. Anything above that is
'high'. You were among the fortunate, starting out with a high viral
load and type 1. I'm betting you get your SVR, bud. Glad I don't have
to put a boot in your a.s anymore. ahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
elmo
////////////
Mine was 10.8 million at the beginning of my 48 week tx. At 12 weeks I
was undetectable. I was also undetectable througout the tx. I was tested
more than once due to another med that I was taking. So 900k isn't that
bad. I think that is considered pretty low.
-Puckertoe
"Terry" <kilowatt@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1168097250.567927.277800@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
One more question for my friends. His quant count is 900,000. How does
this compare with everyone else count?
He tried treatment once but could not go the entire year due to the
negative side effects.
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/TheFamilyAlbum
Puckertoe - 06 Jan 2007 18:00 GMT
I'm actually a genotype 2. My last tx was daft due to some dosage issues.
That's the primary reason I failed the first time. (At least I'm sure that's
why I failed)
I sure do hope that you're right elmo.
> PT, your viral load was pretty close to the cut-off for what is
> considered 'mid-range', which is 10 million. Anything above that is
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/TheFamilyAlbum
elmoemerson@webtv.net - 07 Jan 2007 15:09 GMT
I sure do hope that you're right elmo.
///////
I'm never wrong, PT. ahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
elmo
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile
http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/TheFamilyAlbum
Di Di - 06 Jan 2007 17:13 GMT
> One more question for my friends. His quant count is 900,000. How
> does this compare with everyone else count?
>
> He tried treatment once but could not go the entire year due to the
> negative side effects.
Terry - Mine count was 2,710,000 when I started. It went down to 1130
after 3 months of treatment and then none detected when I was retested
at 6 months. Some people go to none detected much quicker than I did,
but so far, it's stayed that way.
The sides are a bitch, but with support, there are ways to cope. I was
lucky and didn't have to work full time. I cut back to 4 six hour days.
Luckily I still have paid sick time, so I didn't have to worry so much
financially about not working and I could just take care of myself and
rest during treatment. I think that helped alot. If I would've had to
work full time during the treatment, I don't think it would've been as
manageable. The exhaustion was overwhelming.
Good luck to your friend!
Di
greyhackles - 06 Jan 2007 17:32 GMT
>One more question for my friends. His quant count is 900,000. How
>does this compare with everyone else count?
>
>He tried treatment once but could not go the entire year due to the
>negative side effects.
I agree with elmo and 'Toe, 900K (whether copies or IU) is pretty low.
I hit 7 million the week before starting therapy...
Cheers
/greyhackles