>Recently, /greyhackles wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>~ Alex
I'm not sure the VA has gotten on board this yet. These are emerging
algorithmic assays, able to fairly well define liver damage at the poles (mild
vs severe damage) but not yet very accurate in the middle stages (say,
discriminating between F2 and F3). They are *probably* better than doing
nothing, but I would recommend getting a standard liver biopsy at this point,
until (if) these types of tests are refined to the point that they are more
widely adopted...
Cheers
/greyhackles
amzolt - 14 Dec 2006 18:31 GMT
>... I would recommend getting a standard liver biopsy at this point,
> until (if) these types of tests are refined to the point that they are more
> widely adopted...
> Cheers
> /greyhackles
Thanks!
~ Alex