he fell in a narrow hole? lol ( humor only, here)
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5382172.stm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>cactus jammies
So, someone raises a drug question here, and if I do some research on the
particular drug, reflect on what is currently known about its activity in the
human body wrt elevating LFTs, cite the manufacturer's precautionary
statements wrt use by someone with liver disease, and observe the current
state of clinical research on this drug - this is "narrow minded" to you?
Interesting construct...
/greyhackles
ghibelno - 04 Dec 2006 16:15 GMT
> [snip]
>> cactus jammies
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> /greyhackles
Hey Grey,
don't mind. Have you already read the other posts from CJ, today?
Cheers,
jeeb.
Cactus Jammies - 04 Dec 2006 16:30 GMT
Grey,
so this is a balance in the discussion, then? I've done that research too.
A lot of it. and a lot of other unconventional methods for needing to live
with the virus. In the end, will this cheap stuff prove to aid in
rejuvinating liver function in those for which tx is not an option? that
was all at the start of the thread. so, there are precautions yes, well
heeded, certainly. there is no acceptable final word either way, but for
those of us that took the tx badly or did not respond or relapsed, or cannot
take it for any other reasons, we need the hope that there may be promise of
keeping the creeping threat of cirrohsis at bay temporarily while Pharma
does it's magic and finds some things we can use to smite the beast once and
for all, that we can tolerate.
well some of us need that hope. and this is hep-c support afterall. :)
maybe I used harsh reactionary language. i will correct that practice.
zero minus one no limit
thanks.
cactus jammies ========
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:27:52 GMT, "Cactus Jammies"
> <cactusjammies@phish.net>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> /greyhackles