> SIL is a nurse and I just told her that I was diagnosed with Hep C. She
> talked to the infectious disease people and they said there is a good chance
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Mags
> Happy Easter Everyone
>I have an appointment with a "hepc only clinic" may 31st and have a feeling
>their opinion is going to be very different.
Not necessarily. It all depends on the state of your liver,
unfortunately...
>The gastro doc did say no alcohol, no tylenol & drink lots of water. Which I
>have followed faithfully. He has also advised me to get a biopsy which I
>have not due to being terrified of the procedure.
a biopsy is the only way to really find out what's going on. Biopsies
today are not a big deal, the complication rate has decreased
continually. It isn't exactly fun, but it's not such a big deal, either.
The original post seems to have disappeared, so I'll reply to it here:
>> SIL is a nurse and I just told her that I was diagnosed with Hep C. She
>> talked to the infectious disease people and they said there is a good
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>not
>> even show up.
That is pretty nonsensical. Unless you were freshly infected, there is
virtually no chance of the virus clearing by itself. And if you indeed
were newly infected, you should be treated immediately, because your
chances of clearing the virus are excellent if the infection is still in
its acute stage. Since your appointment with the specialist is far in
the future, I'm assuming you're already chronic.
>> Now is this wishful thinking? My specialsist appt. is not until July 5 so
>I
>> don't know what the heck is going on with me. Is it possible to not treat
>> hep C? Is it advisable to treat it even though I don't have any symptoms?
>> SIL seems to think treatment would be more damaging to other parts of my
>> body.
That, too is nonsensical. Treatment can in some rare cases cause damage.
In the large majority of cases, any side effects are completely
reversible. The Hep-C virus not only damages the liver, it can cause a
host of other major problems, some of them irreversible by treatment. It
is indeed possible to not treat, and it may be an option if the liver is
in good shape and no other damage is noticeable. But only a specialist
can tell you that, most likely after doing a biopsy.
Thomas

Signature
To reach me, complete my last name in the address.
He has also advised me to get a biopsy which I
have not due to being terrified of the procedure.
Good Luck...Cindy in Pa
My biopsy was a piece of cake. They put me under for a brief time and I
felt nothing.
Developed a alergic rash from the chloraprep solution that they
disinfected me with, that's all. Getting the results took some of the
worry of HCV out of it for me. I was told that my liver had no damage and
now I sleep better.
Sue
Cindy in Pa - 29 Mar 2005 05:19 GMT
They won't put me under...I have agreed to it with anesthesia...they say it
isn't possible. I tried not 1 or 2 but 3 doctors in different practices.
They say no period no discussion...Makes no sense to me...
Cindy in Pa
> He has also advised me to get a biopsy which I
> have not due to being terrified of the procedure.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> now I sleep better.
> Sue