Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Glaucoma / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I had an iridectomy...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Stu & Ju - 11 Dec 2003 23:58 GMT
performed by a glaucoma specialist in So. Calif. this morning. I was
diagnosed last week with angle closure glaucoma which, per the doc, is quite
uncommon, especially for a myopic (that's me).

One hour post-op, he took IOP readings. The left eye which was 23 before the
surgery dropped to 20; right eye up to 23 was 20 just before surgery. he
stated that these numbers are meaningless now and can be caused by "debris".
he remarked that next week's readings will be more telling both undilated
and dilated (especially).

Anyone been through this who knows if this sounds about right post-op?

Stu
Rick Cohn, M.D. - 15 Dec 2003 03:22 GMT
> performed by a glaucoma specialist in So. Calif. this morning. I was
> diagnosed last week with angle closure glaucoma which, per the doc, is quite
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Stu

I waited several days to post here to see if any fellow narrow angle
patients would respond.  As no one has, I'll throw my two cents in.
Of course, I've never been through this on the receiving end, but I
have performed more than my share or laser iridotomies.  I have to
say, I've never heard of a surgeon performing an iridotomy on both
eyes at once.  Even though the risk of such a procedure is very low,
performing bilateral surgery is usually frowned upon by insurance
companies.   I usually wait a week or two between eyes.  Nevertheless,
in answer to your question, your surgeon is correct...debris and
pigment released from the iris may temporarily raise IOP after a P.I.
by partially "clogging the drain."  The initial postop IOP is
therefore not as important as the one week postop IOP.  I'm sure
you'll do fine...most do.  Good luck,
Rick Cohn, MD
Glaucoma Specialist
Winter Park, FL
Stu & Ju - 15 Dec 2003 04:44 GMT
Dr. Cohn-

Thanks for your post. I believe he lasered both eyes as he saw the angle
closure upon exam in both eyes AND when dilated both eyes IOP go up
measurably, albeit the left more than the right. I am a pessimist and
suspect the surgery failed based on the one hour post-op IOP readings noted
in my first message herein.

I have a question for you-
Since the surgery, I have noticed while viewing a TV or monitor in a dim or
dark room that a squint of my upper eye lid or actual blink causes a glare
line bilaterally in my field of vision, almost like a floater, move in
tandem motion with the eyelid.  If I hold up the upper eyelid and move my
eye, I do not see this glare line type floater. Similarly, if I pull the
upper eyelid away from the eye and blink a few times, those first few blinks
are absent the glare line type floater. I suspect that the upper eyelid is
moving something on my eye as I blink or squint. This is disconcerting but a
small 'price to pay', if the surgery proves successful. I should mention
that I am using prednisilone eye drops 4X daily until I see the
ophthalmologist on Wednesday. Any idea what this glare floater might be and
whether it is a permanent effect?

> > performed by a glaucoma specialist in So. Calif. this morning. I was
> > diagnosed last week with angle closure glaucoma which, per the doc, is quite
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Glaucoma Specialist
> Winter Park, FL
Rick Cohn, M.D. - 16 Dec 2003 01:08 GMT
> Dr. Cohn-
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> ophthalmologist on Wednesday. Any idea what this glare floater might be and
> whether it is a permanent effect?

    First of all, as I mentioned in my last post, you can't tell
anything based on your IOP one hour after the procedure.  I don't even
check my patients' IOP until the next day in the office because that
number is so irrelevant.  It could be higher, lower, or the
same...don't make any judgements.
   Second of all, the glare you are experiencing is quite common.  It
almost certainly is from light entering the iridotomy.  If the
iridotomy is large enough, light will enter, almost as if another
pupil existed in the same eye.  I've had 2 or 3 patients complain
about this over the years whenever I made their P.I. quite large.  I
now try to avoid that by placing the P.I. far out in the periphery
superiorly (at the very upper edge of the iris), so that it resides
beneath the upper eyelid.  If that is indeed the case, nothing can
really be done about it...I should mention however, that it might
improve with time (sometimes the P.I. gets a little smaller with time
as pigmented cells or inflammatory cells fill it in a little).
Drooping of the lid with age, or squinting a little may cause the
upper lid to cover the P.I. and get rid of the glare.  Those who
complained about it to me a few years ago never mention it anymore
(implying that it got better with time or they knew there was nothing
I could do about it).
   Lastly, Pred Forte 4 times a day is appropriate after a P.I.  Good
luck to you.
--Rick Cohn, MD
Glaucoma Specialist
Winter Park, FL
Nancy Rushing - 18 Dec 2003 23:25 GMT
I just had a Laser Iridotomy today. The nurse at the hospital said I
am the best patient for them today! <smile> The other pateints we
talked to before I had mine done said there is pain.....but I never
felt pain!!
  The surgery is not bad -- and it's painless!  All I have to do is
look at a red light, and I saw flashing lights (like a camera) with
colors (I saw red)....and then my surgery is over! I had a little bit
of pain afterwards but it wasn't bad -- then I had my pressure
checked.  It went up again a little bit...so I was put on some drops
including the medication I usually use.  Then they checked my pressure
again after waiting for 30 minutes -- and it went down to 18!  Good
job!!
  I have to take this new eyedrop medication to work to help reduce
the inflammation so I will use it during my lunch hour....it won't be
a problem for me when I am trying to work.
 I was told I will have my other eye done later -- in January....so I
will let you know ahead of time. :)  I already took the inflammation
eyedrop earlier and boy, does it burn!  I was told that it is going in
the "open wound" to heal it up so that's why it felt like that. :)
  Just want to let you know what I experienced my surgery today. :)

Nancy
Stu & Ju - 19 Dec 2003 01:55 GMT
Nancy-

Good luck!...I had a poor result. In fact my surgery was bilateral and the
IOP's went from 18 (R) and 22 (L) to 23 and 24, respectively, one week later
post-op. The doc sees it as a failure and is pitching a bilateral
iridoplasty. I am seeking at least a second opinion tomorrow morning. I am
back on Pilocarpine, which exacerbates a glare line created when I squint or
blink the upper eyelid. This is a wonderful adverse effect of the surgery!.

Stu

> I just had a Laser Iridotomy today. The nurse at the hospital said I
> am the best patient for them today! <smile> The other pateints we
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Nancy
Ken Mugridge - 02 Aug 2004 17:55 GMT
Has anyone ever had a bilateral iridectomy for preventative reasons for
threatened closed-angle glaucoma?

I am scheduled for this surgery at the end of August and don't feel very
confident about the procedure.  My eye specialist has made me feel like a
"walking time bomb" though I have to date never experienced one of these
acute attacks (I'm 62).

Any comments out there?

Barbara
Canada

> Nancy-
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> >
> > Nancy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.