In the early 90s an opthomologist diagnosed glaucoma (left IOP of 26) and
told me I could be blind in 8 years. I was given samples of a drug (name
unremembered) which I was supposed to put in my eyes for the rest of my
life. Given the warnings about possible heart muscle deterioration and the
understanding I would develop a tolerance to the drug that would gradually
reduce effectiveness, I decided to not to take it. Though the doc told me
eye exercises were futile, I resumed doing them (had been doing them
previously but had stopped). At the same time, my time in front of a CRT
probably lessened as well.
Approx 8 years later and experiencing no loss of peripheral vision, I got an
eye exam from an optomotrist. Eye pressure normal, no glaucoma. More than 10
years now and no noticeable vision loss.
Suggest anyone getting diagnosed with glaucoma wait a few weeks and get a
second opinion before dedicating themselves to dubious medication for the
rest of their lives.
nf
gudrun17 - 14 Apr 2005 18:00 GMT
Personally I think if there is any question, a second opinion is always
a good idea--from a glaucoma specialist. One high IOP reading does not
mean glaucoma. In fact, high eye pressures do not in themselves mean a
person has or will develop glaucoma. Did the ophthalmalogist exam your
optic nerves?
-Gudrun
nutso fasst - 15 Apr 2005 08:42 GMT
It's been a long time. My pupils were dilated and the back of my eyes
examined. I don't recall certainty of damage, only that the pressure would
eventually cause damage. This doc bought my previous doc's practice. That
was my first and last visit.