Hi,
I have had the procedure two times, for my traumatic glaucoma.
It had good effect on the pressure, but the second time some retinal edema
evolved. It was taken care of with an injection of Kenalog, as treatment
with tablets had little effect.
This may sound as a dramatic complication, but I have no problems with that
now.
The procedure helped keep the pressure down, until my angle closed and more
surgery was needed.
My experience is that it is a non-invasive procedure, and the worst thing is
the anesthesia needed to keep the eye in a fixed position.
That?s my 2 cents.
Martin Egerup
>I have a question for this forum, and I hope you guys can help me: what are
> the risks involved in a laser cyclophotocoagulation procedure?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Many thanks,
> Sharon
Sharon B. - 25 Jan 2005 10:27 GMT
Hi Martin,
Thanks 4 your comment.
It is more relaxing to know that others underwent this procedure without
permanent complications.
I'm not afraid about the anesthesia, since my doctor wants to put me under
general anesthesia.
Did you suffer from any vision loss / cataract?
Thanks,
Sharon
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> > Many thanks,
> > Sharon
eyeguyrc@aol.com - 26 Jan 2005 03:36 GMT
> Hi Martin,
> Thanks 4 your comment.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > >
> > >I was an author on one of the groundbreaking studies in the
American Journal of Ophthalmology on endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP)
done at UCSF in 1996. While we found pretty good success overall, we
did find a significant number of patients developed postoperative
inflammation and retinal swelling. Many needed repeat treatments as
well. Such swelling can lead to permanent reduction in vision,
although about 75-85% of patients with swelling will have it resolve
with treatment over a few months. As uveitic glaucoma patients are
more prone to inflammation and retinal swelling anyway, I would not
advise this procedure in such a patient. It is also slightly more
risky in one who has not had cataract surgery as the laser probe goes
right over the lens and may increase cataract formation.
I like using valved implants (Ahmed valve) in my patients with
uveitic glaucoma. I have never seen an increase in inflammation with
these implants (they are inert silicone) and they lower IOP
dramatically. As for laser cyclophotocoagulation done outside the eye
(without a probe inside the eye), this can also cause a great deal of
ocular inflammation. I would at least seek a second opinion.
Rick Cohn, MD
Glaucoma Specialist
Winter Park, FL