>There is a highly statistical relationship between heavy computer use and
>glaucoma in people with refraction at either end of the scale.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>this conclusion can be generalized to groups of other racial/genetic
>origins.
So, reduce eye strain by using light text on dark background.
Most television is that way, and so was DOS. And get a decent
Web browser like Opera which gives a lot of control over those
bright glaring images which distract from text reading. And
lower screen brightness.
John
ferrous buller - 16 Nov 2004 18:38 GMT
> So, reduce eye strain by using light text on dark background.
> Most television is that way, and so was DOS. And get a decent
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> John
That assumes an understanding of the cause of the relationship. The
subjects used various programs in their work (not necessarily the same as
web browsers). Could the higher incidence of NTG simply relate to the
subjects constantly changing their focus between the screen and the
enviornment?
The "refractive errors" class was not adequately broken down into
"uses corrective appliance {glasses, contacts}" vs "uncorrected".
In additon, without knowing the distribution of NTG suspects in the study
as a function of refractive error it is impossible to even guess at the
mechanism involved.
In defense of the authors, this was a preliminary study. They are engaged
in a follow-on which should answer some of these questions. I'm also
particularly interested in why being a fat smoker in Japan yields a smaller
chance of being glaucomatic than (what we in the west) call living a
"healthy" lifestyle.
John - 17 Nov 2004 15:28 GMT
>> So, reduce eye strain by using light text on dark background.
>> Most television is that way, and so was DOS. And get a decent
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>subjects constantly changing their focus between the screen and the
>enviornment?
If the study were correct, the changes suggested above would be
intuitively the most likely to be effective. "changing their
focus" is not a relevant variable because the same would apply to
watching TV or reading a book.
John
> There is a highly statistical relationship between heavy computer use
> and glaucoma in people with refraction at either end of the scale.
>
> Heavy Computer Use and Development of Glaucoma in Short-Sighted People
> http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/508291/
The actual technical article should be very readable:
http://press.psprings.co.uk/jech/december/1021_ch18127.pdf
Note again:
> and glaucoma in people with refraction at either end of the scale.
The authors cited some BIG caveats:
First, it is a cross sectional study.
Second, the subjects were almost all men (~90%).
Third, "refractive errors were not determined ophthalomogically in all
participants" (sigh)
Fourth, since most glaucoma patients are undiagnosed in Japan (they
assert 50%-75% undiagnosed) family history of optic disorder is
unreliable.(sigh again) If the study doesn't illustrate anything else, it
shows that most of these people were unaware that they had any optic nerve
damage, and the number of undiagnosed glaucoma subjects is alarmingly high.
Strangely enough, if you are Japanese, fat, and you smoke the study
revealed a lower chance of being glaucomatic. This is contrary to studies
done in Europe and the U.S., which suggests either an error in the study or
profound local etilogical differences.
I wouldn't trade in my Dell quite yet.
Rick Cohn, M.D. - 17 Nov 2004 03:25 GMT
> > There is a highly statistical relationship between heavy computer use
> > and glaucoma in people with refraction at either end of the scale.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> I wouldn't trade in my Dell quite yet.
Plain and simple....this is a very poorly done study. It was not done
prospectively, nor was it a randomized trial with controls.
Additionally, myopia is frequently linked with glaucoma, and it does
not sound like careful attention was paid toward a patient's
refractive status. Not only is myopia quite common in Asian patients,
but the general makeup of glaucoma there is different than in the U.S.
(greater percentage of LTG and narrow angles in Asian patients). I
personally doubt very seriously that any link will ever be found
between computer use and glaucoma....I've got thousands of office
workers in my practice who use computers all day long and have no
signs of glaucoma. Likewise, I have plenty of old, suffering glaucoma
patients who virtually never look at a monitor or keyboard. I'm sure
if this is well-studied here in the U.S. it will be shown to be a
whole lot of bunk.
--Rick Cohn, MD
Glaucoma Specialist
Winter Park, FL