If I wore contacts I would certainly consider it -- it sounds like an
interesting approach.

However, since I don't wear contacts I wouldn't switch *to* contacts
from glasses unless there was some huge advantage over eyedrops.

And if I didn't need glasses at all, I doubt if I would opt for
non-correcting contacts whose sole function was to deliver medication.

If this resulted in a more effective delivery of the drugs that would
control my IOP better, I might consider it, provided it didn't
negatively affect my vision.  I've worn contacts before.  They're a
royal pain, but so is my IOP problem.

First of all, I don't *suffer* from glaucoma.  I live with glaucoma.  
To say one "suffers" from a disease or condition is such a victim
mentality!

I hated contacts when I tried to wear them.  I saw great but couldn't
handle those things floating around in my eyes.

Contacts are a moot point for me now anyway since I've had bilateral
trabeculectomeis and can't wear them because of the blebs.

Sherry

I do not use contact lenses. If you could show longer persistence or
more reliability of medication when applied under a contact lens then
you have a sales advantage. I am an engineer and always interested new
methods if they are truly an improvement.

Ed Patterson

So Robin, If you take 2 Meds --would you need to change twice --?
Unless my DR. was Really enthused about them --I think NOT I wan't happy
with them when I did wear them .