Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Epilepsy / November 2004
[OT-beware of spammers fishing]
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Julie - 29 Oct 2004 19:56 GMT Hi gang. I checked my email today - the account I use only for this newsgroup. I was surprised to see that a company I have never used needed me to click on a link and update my information. They were very concerned about a problem with security and wanted to assure me that this was their solution to keep me "secure". The company logo was at the top of the email. The link they wanted me to click on looked like a legitimate thing, it had the company name in the link. But all I had to do was mouse over the link and it went to a different IP address. I checked out the IP address by going to WHOIS with Network Solutions and found their address is in San Diego, California. Who knows where they are really from. Anyway I sent an email off to the real company with hopes they will toss the spammer in the slammer.
Just a warning for all of us to be aware of spammers who fish for information.
Take care, Julie
Theo - 29 Oct 2004 20:25 GMT > Hi gang. I checked my email today - the account I use only for this > newsgroup. I was surprised to see that a company I have never used [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Take care, > Julie yes... its a good reason to mess with your email address. nobody should use their legitimate addess in posts without using something to foil spambots... requiring people to spend about 2 seconds to remove the traps to get the real one.
address@isp.com should be addressIHATESPAMMERS@ispREMOVE.com or something less obvious.
annoying, and not perfect, but needed unfortuately. In one newsgroup I use a legitimate yahoo address (no traps allowed since its moderated), and whoever released one of the swen variants harvested everyones email from that group and used them as the forged addresses. I still get bouncebacks about every other day from different isps because of it.
Satch - 30 Oct 2004 08:08 GMT Hello,
Sorry, but what does "OT" means translated in full English?
Anyway, I use a legitimate E-mail address for newsgroupss, buying things online and stuff. Though I did not yet receive much E-mail on this address, I expect this to happen shortly. The E-mail address itself is a so-called alias of my "real" smtp address I registered with my provider. This means I can retire the address at any times and create a new one at all times. I also download the E-mails directly into my news client and not with my "real" mail client (Outlook 2003).
Though it works for me, I can understand that it is not a perfect solution.
 Signature Thanks.
Marco The Netherlands
Bob - 30 Oct 2004 14:53 GMT > Hello, > > Sorry, but what does "OT" means translated in full English? It stands for "Off Topic" meaning that the post has nothing to do with epilepsy or the subect header. Of course, that's no guarantee that a post is on topic if it doesn't have an OT. :-)
Bob
Satch - 30 Oct 2004 15:03 GMT Ah okay, thx!
 Signature Thanks.
Marco The Netherlands
gaross - 29 Oct 2004 21:07 GMT > Hi gang. I checked my email today - the account I use only for this > newsgroup. I was surprised to see that a company I have never used [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Take care, > Julie G. That's what I suspected this earlier post was (below) since it wanted the 'entire group' to opt- out. The isp who enabled below has the headers. I didn't post that here, as not all the readers pick up all the posts or edit out the ones that look like they're mass mailed or spam. The 'can spam' compliant etc. (below copy) is Fake as was the from address and 'promotionsite.net' implied source. I xx'd out those parts below, so I don't accidentally forward their link. They should be offline now. I think the sender was 'offshore' (i.e. Asia) so they wouldn't care much about U.S. anti spam etc regulations. They didn't care where they went to harvest addresses, why would they care about other than reselling email links? /G. (I don't post any that I see, rarely with this alternate reader since I resubscribed last Fall. They still get reported.)
Copy of post from yesterday/day before on My Groups reader for this group (Holy Vachon!! 4 millions domains !! and it's Successfull too!! )-->
Successfull Internet and Direct Marketing products on www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.net
* NEW * DOMUS Domains Toolkit Fall 2004 - Unique on the Net 4 Millions "Whois" Domains data with Expiration Date and Category*. Ultimate Version (October 2004) - Our best rate starts from US *$149*. A wonderful tool for Internet and Direct Marketing. Available in Basic, Advanced and Full Editions. It contains a domain database with 4 millions *FRESH* October 2004 New records .com, .net, .org. 4 Gigabytes MS Excel data zipped on CD-Roms/Dvd. Compression 3:1. MS Excel or Text tab delimited data files Available!
Each record include the full "whois" fields info and homepage info:
Domain Name, Registrant Company, Contact, Address, City, Tel, Fax, Email, Administrative Company, Contact, Address, City, Tel, Fax, Email, Technical Company, Contact, Address, City, Tel, Fax, Email, Billing Company, Contact, Address, City, Tel, Fax, Email, Zone Company, Contact, Address, City, Tel, Fax, Email, Name Servers until 6 name servers with IP addresses
Record Created on Date, Record Updated on Date, Record *Expires* on Date
Domain Title, Domain Description, Domain Keywords (*Category*), First 300 Words in the Domain Website Homepage.
Download Free Demo, Screenshot, see Products Details or Order On-Line at www.xxxxxxxxxx.net.
Available On-Line many other Promotion Products.
Instant Shipment or Download On-Line Registered Versions available!
Best Regards, www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.net The Best place where to find Internet Marketing Resources on the Net.
--- This is a one-time only information.
The enrolled (final) text of S. 877 as it was passed by the Senate on November 25, 2003, and agreed to by the House of Representatives on December 8, 2003, allows e-marketers to send UCE as long as the message contains an opt-out mechanism, a functioning return e-mail address and the legitimate physical address of the mailer. The bill was signed by the President on December 16, 2003, and takes effect on January 1, 2004.
Your address isn't in any of our archives, however for Can Spam Act 2003 Compliance, you can remove at http://www.xxxxxxte.net/remove.html look like trash.
Theo - 31 Oct 2004 19:55 GMT > I think the sender was 'offshore' (i.e. Asia) so they wouldn't > care > much about U.S. anti spam etc regulations. They didn't care where > they went to harvest addresses, why would they care about other than > reselling email links? /G. this is what the new anti-spam standards were supposed to be about, among other things to be sure that the listed email address (the forged ones) actually match those in the headers. it almost happened. the most likely possibility being from microsoft, but in their infinate wisdom, or lack thereof, they patented the code and would only allow its use under strict licencing agreements (including end users like us) that were too vague in many areas. Too many internet providers said they would never use it because of that, and it was dropped.
gaross - 31 Oct 2004 22:20 GMT > > I think the sender was 'offshore' (i.e. Asia) so they wouldn't care
> > much about U.S. anti spam etc regulations. They didn't care where > > they went to harvest addresses, why would they care about other than [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > many areas. Too many internet providers said they would never use it > because of that, and it was dropped. I expect then in 2? weeks the New U.S. President will be in a Plane to get the Troll dens to comply with the U.S. Canspam standard? I can hardly wait for that.. where will the louts go to post their junk about innocent people they've captured, trying to help their civilians?
You don't really in your *wildest dreams expect APNIC or other International Trolls, Scum or spammers to care about 'new anti-spam standards' set anywhere, much less in N.America do you? Why would the 300th 'Rolex for sale advert.' start using html or other code instead of plain text in the last 2 days? And **who is Buying any of this junk they supposedly sell? Show me someone who'd give an unsolicited stranger their charge card no. online, and I'll show you someone looking for Identity theft or fraud against their credit line. I'd also like to see what a 'genuine replica Rolex' IS exactly.
I don't know why you'd think M.soft is to blame-> if they started discarding all mails that had a listed address different from the Real Sender, 80% of the posters HERE would get discarded in transit from their using 'removethis' or 'delete this' within their Email addresses to try keep the trash out. M.soft have no control which other networks the message bundles are routed through, to get to the Target Addressee or Here -- that's what makes (made?) the Internet faster and more reliable than sending the whole message in one large Bucket, wasn't it?
The Identity theft markets (that Julie started this thread with days ago), are Big Business among crooks and thieves. We've had 2 or 3 operations closed here (Canada) in last ~4 months who had equipment to **Manufacture new Charge Cards, complete with Holograms and imbedded codes from lost or stolen cards that haven't been De-activated yet by people not realizing they had lost their's or that their 'carbons' (stolen from stores who still use those in their invoices) hadn't been shredded before discarding.
Some of above might have changed (wrt. M.soft) -- I can't comment on whether they do or don't have a monopoly on that. The *new Windows XP updates (Service Pack 2) aren't available now to people who've bought computers that had been preloaded with Stolen Win.XP-1 software. How would I know that? The store I got this (2nd) system from is gone now, and M.soft have spent a *large amount of time helping check some things and recommending fixes or what has to be **purchased to enable stuff that won't work beyond Service Pack 1. While some of that is Copyright and Income protection, I'm sure the rest is to close up security issues that get discovered several times a week on the newer code. Cost to me will be about $300. so far as I can tell. If they're (M.soft) spending this amount of time (20-25 minutes) with Each customer who emails them about Failing Upgrades to Svc.Pack 2, on their 800 number (Phone Tolls paid by recipient company), I rate them higher than most of the Businesses I've dealt with in last 20 years. Maybe if 'Bill' sees this I'll get a Discount.... *I didn't know about a Hologram Sticker on outside of **each XP computer, that matches the CD and Manual (got neither) **registration number that's Same as above Sticker.
But that's geek stuff too so that's why above subject was marked off topic ... It's to try help anyone else who might be about to buy a New Computer with Win.XP so they know what to look for (on the computer case) before they take it out of the store. G./
Theo - 02 Nov 2004 09:10 GMT > You don't really in your *wildest dreams expect APNIC or other > International Trolls, Scum or spammers to care about 'new anti-spam > standards' set anywhere, much less in N.America do you? not at all, but if the proposed system followed more of the open standards requirement (nothing to do with any proposed law), spammers and virus spreaders at least couldnt hide behind faked addresses and would be easier to block. The system was to be added to ISP mail servers and all email programs... so long as the ISPs, the email program/server companies, and the end users agreed to the ms licencing terms.
but youre right this is getting waaaaaaay off topic ;o)
|
|
|