Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Epilepsy / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lightning!!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dave ???? - 24 May 2004 03:15 GMT
Howdy!

Anybody else out there have an affinity for lightning?

Over that past couple of years an indescribable kinship has been developing.

Sorta' like: "Lightning and me... we be mates!"

I'm thinking that this is due to an insight that I, as an epileptic, have
into lightning that "normal folks" can't understand. After all, when I've
discussed the physiology of epilepsy, more than one doc has said that if I
want to describe epilepsy to somebody the closest natural phenominon to
epilepsy is lightning!

We've had a couple of days of incredible thunderstorms where I am. Just this
morning (Sunday) I heard one li'l old lady whimpering about how God is
passing judgement on our wicked society. Meantime, I've just been watching
an outstanding (dare I say heavenly?) light show and attempting to take it
all in!

Wa'ja think: Am I climing the esoteric peaks or sinking into the bogs?

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

turbinado - 24 May 2004 04:48 GMT
Hi Dave:
I am also fascinated by lightning. I got struck when I was 15 through a
phone line (out in the country), and I think, though the docs can't confirm,
that's what caused my epilepsy.

> Howdy!
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Dave ????
> http://www.howdydave.com
Daz_n_Pat - 24 May 2004 21:15 GMT
I love lightning. I can stand at the window...or outside, if it's not
raining...and watch it for ages. Love to get a time-lapse photograph of some
impressive forked lightning. Unfortunately, where I am, we mostly just get
sheet lightning, which doesn't come up too well in photos.

> Hi Dave:
> I am also fascinated by lightning. I got struck when I was 15 through a
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > Dave ????
> > http://www.howdydave.com
MatSav - 24 May 2004 23:04 GMT
>I love lightning. I can stand at the window...or outside, if it's not
>raining...and watch it for ages. Love to get a time-lapse photograph of some
>impressive forked lightning. Unfortunately, where I am, we mostly just get
>sheet lightning, which doesn't come up too well in photos.

"Sheet lightning" is simply the description given to lightning where
what you see is the reflected or diffused light on or through the
clouds. Even with sheet lightning, there will always be a bolt of
forked lightning as the source - even if they are only very small
bolts.

See http://www.wordiq.com/dictionary/sheet%20lightning.html and
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_170a.html or
http://www.lightningstorm.com/tux/jsp/discover/glossary/index.jsp?define=sheet%2
0lightning

for  better definitions.

Signature

MatSav

Mary Fisher - 25 May 2004 09:41 GMT
> >I love lightning. I can stand at the window...or outside, if it's not
> >raining...and watch it for ages. Love to get a time-lapse photograph of some
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> forked lightning as the source - even if they are only very small
> bolts.

I'm glad someone else said that!

Thanks for the links.

Mary

> See http://www.wordiq.com/dictionary/sheet%20lightning.html and
> http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_170a.html or

http://www.lightningstorm.com/tux/jsp/discover/glossary/index.jsp?define=sheet%2
0lightning

> for  better definitions.
Daz_n_Pat - 25 May 2004 23:55 GMT
> >I love lightning. I can stand at the window...or outside, if it's not
> >raining...and watch it for ages. Love to get a time-lapse photograph of some
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> See http://www.wordiq.com/dictionary/sheet%20lightning.html and
> http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_170a.html or

http://www.lightningstorm.com/tux/jsp/discover/glossary/index.jsp?define=she
et%20lightning
> for  better definitions.
>
> --
> MatSav

This I knew. But it doesn't make it any easier to photograph when there's
lots of cloud in the way.
Darryl.
Mary Fisher - 24 May 2004 10:12 GMT
> Howdy!
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Wa'ja think: Am I climing the esoteric peaks or sinking into the bogs?

I never thought about it but I love lightning. I've always made a point of
going out and watching the display if I can. I've encouraged others not to
be frightened but to marvel at it - but never associated it with any
condition other than my being a very small part of a fantastic universe.

I'm more concerned about a related phenomenon which has recently manifested
itself. When I'm sitting here at night, watching the screen which is in
front of my window (never screened by curtains) I often think that I see
lightning or firework flashes to the right. It can never been seen if I
watch that part of the sky and I'm wondering if there's a physiological or
neurological cause which perhaps should be investigated.

Mary
David Ruether - 24 May 2004 15:08 GMT
> > Howdy!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> >
> > Wa'ja think: Am I climing the esoteric peaks or sinking into the bogs?

As for "Howdy Dave" and lightning - we live not too far apart, and
I have a different reaction (we have two VERY tall spires next to
the house [they were ordinarl blue spruces about a century ago...],
and I fear for them [and the house] during any storm), and we got
hit by lightning about a week ago - knocked out two modems + router +
network + wireless box...

> I never thought about it but I love lightning. I've always made a point of
> going out and watching the display if I can. I've encouraged others not to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Mary

I don't know how old you are, but I'm discovering that there is
a LOT "they" don't tell you about that you can expect when you
get older - they just let it be a surprise, THEN tell you how
common it is "at your age"! ;-) One of those is that the fluid in the
eye can harden along the surface of the retina, and then one day,
you see "lightning bolts" at the visual periphery (usually in a fine
circle at the edge of view), especially when you move your eye
rapidly, and especially when it is dark. This is caused by the
separation of that hardened layer from the retina, and is
considered "benign" - though for me, I had an annoying large
visible "hair" just off the center of vision for quite a while afterward,
and now a permanently stuck mass of floaters in the center of my
"camera" eye, spoiling sharpness (still there several years later - and
with two eye doctors telling me that this isn't true, though I can see
it clearly! [Aaarrrgggh! - see my "rant" on doctors on
alt-support.sleep-disorder! ;-] - though another confirms it). If
you are lucky (I was), this process does not result in the tearing
of the retina. If you see effects inside the extreme periphery,
especially if it is generalized, or like snow or fireworks, get to an
eye specialist IMMEDIATELY - this could be detachment of
the retina, for which there is treatment available if not too
advanced.
Though it could also be "heat lightning" - or a neurological issue
(and I often see "sparkles" over much of my field of view with
bright things like snow - though I also see visual "noise" almost
always, regardless of light level).
Good luck with sorting it out!
--DR
Mary Fisher - 24 May 2004 15:47 GMT
> > I'm more concerned about a related phenomenon which has recently manifested
> > itself. When I'm sitting here at night, watching the screen which is in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> a LOT "they" don't tell you about that you can expect when you
> get older - they just let it be a surprise,

Oh come on! You surely don't expect to be warned of everything which might
happen as you age? I wouldn't like that - and I wouldn't believe Them
anyway. I want life to unfold and give me surprises - even when they're not
pleasant. they're all part of the rich fabric ...

> THEN tell you how
> common it is "at your age"! ;-)

No-one's done that yet.

>One of those is that the fluid in the
> eye can harden along the surface of the retina, and then one day,
> you see "lightning bolts" at the visual periphery (usually in a fine
> circle at the edge of view), especially when you move your eye
> rapidly, and especially when it is dark.

My experiences aren't lightning bolts.

> This is caused by the
> separation of that hardened layer from the retina, and is
> considered "benign" - though for me, I had an annoying large
> visible "hair" just off the center of vision for quite a while afterward,

I had that once, it resolved itself - but I did go to the optician
immediately and had a very thorough examination, she treated me as an
emergency and was prepared to send me to the eye hospital.

> and now a permanently stuck mass of floaters in the center of my
> "camera" eye, spoiling sharpness (still there several years later - and
> with two eye doctors telling me that this isn't true, though I can see
> it clearly!

My optician has always believed me when I've described what I can see even
though she can't. She explains what the phenomena are, why they happen and
what, if anything, can be done about them.

> [Aaarrrgggh! - see my "rant" on doctors on

No - becuase it wouldn't apply to me. From what I read on ngs it seems that
on the whole we are much more favoured with our doctors in UK than you are.
That could be an over generalisation and only caused because people on ngs
often have axes to grind. And do.

> alt-support.sleep-disorder! ;-] - though another confirms it). If
> you are lucky (I was), this process does not result in the tearing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the retina, for which there is treatment available if not too
> advanced.

I know. My optician explained it in reat detail.

> Good luck with sorting it out!

Well, thanks. I don't think there's anything which needs to be sorted out
but I intended telling Mrs Gibson when I see her anyway.

Mary
> --DR
Dave ???? - 25 May 2004 03:01 GMT
Howdy David!

Don't be an old fart... leave a little magic and unexpected surprises for
folks to discover for themselves!

IMO:
That's one of the glories of life, there's always something just around the
corner that you've never experienced before. I want to let it be just as
much of a surpise and/or delight to other people as it was/will be to me!

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

>
> > > Howdy!
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
> Good luck with sorting it out!
> --DR
Dawn Compton - 26 May 2004 05:03 GMT
This does seem a little weird.  I also have liked to watch lightening,
but I never brave past from watching from the inside of the house.  This
does seem unnatural.
Dona - 26 May 2004 05:25 GMT
Dawn, several people here (I won't name names) are weird and unnatural.

:P
Mary Fisher - 26 May 2004 09:32 GMT
> Dawn, several people here (I won't name names) are weird and unnatural.
>
> :P

OY!
M - 26 May 2004 15:52 GMT
>> Dawn, several people here (I won't name names) are weird and unnatural.
>>
>> :P
>
>OY!

OOH!
Signature

Malcolm    

Dave ???? - 26 May 2004 18:46 GMT
> > Dawn, several people here (I won't name names) are weird and unnatural.
> >
> > :P
>
> OY!

Howdy Mary!

After all of that lovely intimacy that we 3 shared, you don't suppose that
she's talking about US, do you?

(Herself included of course!)

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

Mary Fisher - 26 May 2004 20:14 GMT
> > > Dawn, several people here (I won't name names) are weird and unnatural.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> After all of that lovely intimacy that we 3 shared, you don't suppose that
> she's talking about US, do you?

Oh - I just assumed that she was ...
...
>  (Herself included of course!)

I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...

Mary
Dona - 26 May 2004 21:08 GMT
> I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...

I told you she wasn't paying attention Dave.
Mary Fisher - 26 May 2004 21:33 GMT
> > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
>
> I told you she wasn't paying attention Dave.

Well, the light was out ...

Mary
M - 26 May 2004 23:07 GMT
>> > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Mary

Can we get back to the subject of flashing, please?

Signature

Malcolm    

Mary Fisher - 26 May 2004 23:20 GMT
> >> > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Can we get back to the subject of flashing, please?

Now you're exposing your hidden self ...

Mary
Dave ???? - 27 May 2004 03:41 GMT
> > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
>
> I told you she wasn't paying attention Dave.

Howdy Dona!

Guess we'll have to do it again until she gets it right, eh?

Malcom's idea of flashing isn't a bad idea either... maybe we could get more
community interest if we did that.

Wa'ja bet that 20% or more of the folks around here are too young (or their
memories are too bad) to know about flashing?

BTW: I saw a show last week with a chorus line of good looking seniors. They
called themselves (honest to Pete) the "Hot Flashes!"

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

Raistlin - 27 May 2004 09:37 GMT
> Wa'ja bet that 20% or more of the folks around here are
> too young (or their memories are too bad) to know about
> flashing?

or maybe both?

Raist

ps: i really thougt about the lightning thing. don`t have no opinion. to
me lightening is just lightening.
but have you ever consciously smelt the air during a storm? or before it?
it's one of *my* turn ons.
Daz_n_Pat - 27 May 2004 12:19 GMT
> > Wa'ja bet that 20% or more of the folks around here are
> > too young (or their memories are too bad) to know about
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> but have you ever consciously smelt the air during a storm? or before it?
> it's one of *my* turn ons.

That's the smell of burning smog
:-)
Darryl.
Dona - 27 May 2004 15:00 GMT
> That's the smell of burning smog

Not here it ain't. I live in a tiny city in Montana. I'd have to go a long,
long ways to smell smog.
Raistlin - 27 May 2004 15:22 GMT
> That's the smell of burning smog
> :-)
> Darryl

huh ... how do you know? :O :D
don't say you can tell from my accent, 'cos i'm sure i don't have one
;-).

Raist
Daz_n_Pat - 27 May 2004 15:29 GMT
> > That's the smell of burning smog
> > :-)
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Raist

LOL.  No, .....I put my face right up to my screen and I could see it
through your window.
Raistlin - 27 May 2004 23:01 GMT
> LOL.  No, .....I put my face right up to my screen and I > could see it
> through your window.

you can see *anything* through these windows? my respect.

Raist
Dona - 27 May 2004 14:57 GMT
> but have you ever consciously smelt the air during a storm? or before it?
> it's one of *my* turn ons.

I love that smell. I wish someone would bottle it.
Dave ???? - 27 May 2004 17:17 GMT
> > Wa'ja bet that 20% or more of the folks around here are
> > too young (or their memories are too bad) to know about
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> but have you ever consciously smelt the air during a storm? or before it?
> it's one of *my* turn ons.

Howdy Raist!

Yup...

That's one of the mysteries of the world -- how come just about nobody but
me can smell when it's going to rain? (Nobody in this part of the woods
anyway.)

Now that you mentioned it, I'll have to check out the smell of the air after
a regular storm and a thunder storm!

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

Mary Fisher - 28 May 2004 10:45 GMT
> That's one of the mysteries of the world -- how come just about nobody but
> me can smell when it's going to rain? (Nobody in this part of the woods
> anyway.)

I've always been able to smell rain before it comes - but not electrical
storms.

Mary
M - 27 May 2004 17:54 GMT
>> Wa'ja bet that 20% or more of the folks around here are
>> too young (or their memories are too bad) to know about
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>but have you ever consciously smelt the air during a storm? or before it?
>it's one of *my* turn ons.

Nitrogen dioxide, from the intense heat of the lightening allowing the
otherwise fairly inert nitrogen in the air to react with the oxygen.
Signature

Malcolm    

Dave ???? - 27 May 2004 19:44 GMT
> >> Wa'ja bet that 20% or more of the folks around here are
> >> too young (or their memories are too bad) to know about
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Nitrogen dioxide, from the intense heat of the lightening allowing the
> otherwise fairly inert nitrogen in the air to react with the oxygen.

Howdy Malcom!

Here I thought it was just ionization!

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

M - 27 May 2004 21:33 GMT
Dave ©¿©¬ <dave@_nospam_howdydave.com> wrote

>Howdy Malcom!
>
>Here I thought it was just ionization!

If you could smell charge we could make a fortune together selling Van
der Graaf Generators?

Signature

Malcolm    

Dave ???? - 27 May 2004 21:47 GMT
> >Howdy Malcom!
> >
> >Here I thought it was just ionization!
>
> If you could smell charge we could make a fortune together selling Van
> der Graaf Generators?

Well...

I've gotten some bills that absolutely stink!

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

Dona - 27 May 2004 21:55 GMT
Okay Gang,

Dave and Malcolm are putting their heads together. Brace yourselfs.

:)
Fifty Hertz - 27 May 2004 22:17 GMT
> >Here I thought it was just ionization!
>
> If you could smell charge we could make a fortune together selling Van
> der Graaf Generators?

But what about O3?

C.
M - 27 May 2004 22:38 GMT
>> >Here I thought it was just ionization!
>>
>> If you could smell charge we could make a fortune together selling Van
>> der Graaf Generators?
>
>But what about O3?

The discharge from the VDGG will also create O3 and help replenish the
holes in the Earth's atmosphere, so we'll probably be able to get a
government environmental grant as well.

Signature

Malcolm    

Raistlin - 27 May 2004 23:08 GMT
>Nitrogen dioxide, from the intense heat of the lightening >allowing the
>otherwise fairly inert nitrogen in the air to react with >the oxygen.

uhm, yes ... :P
Mary Fisher - 27 May 2004 12:00 GMT
> > > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> BTW: I saw a show last week with a chorus line of good looking seniors. They
> called themselves (honest to Pete) the "Hot Flashes!"

Oh yes, I remember those - here they're called 'flushes' though. They do
make us very hot though :-)

Mary
Daz_n_Pat - 27 May 2004 12:20 GMT
> > > > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Mary

Isn't it the flashing that produces the flushes?
Mary Fisher - 27 May 2004 14:53 GMT
> > > > > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Isn't it the flashing that produces the flushes?

No, it's just another example of our different words for the same thing.

Flashing could cause blushes, however ... :-)

Mary
Dave ???? - 27 May 2004 17:22 GMT
> > > > > > I know my memory's bad but I thought the third was Malcolm ...
> > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Mary

Howdy Mary!

Here in the USA they are called both flushes and flashes.

Guess they are called "flushes" by those who are thinking about what they
feel like and "flashes" by those who are thinking about how fast they come
on.

Being of the masculine pursuasion, this is all hearsay and second hand
information of course!

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

Fifty Hertz - 27 May 2004 22:22 GMT
> Flashing could cause blushes, however ... :-)
>
> Mary

Especially if you're caught wearing your dip-thong!  ;-)
M - 27 May 2004 22:39 GMT
>> Flashing could cause blushes, however ... :-)
>>
>> Mary
>
>Especially if you're caught wearing your dip-thong!  ;-)

The moment I typed that, I knew there would be someone uneducated here.
:)

Signature

Malcolm    

M - 24 May 2004 23:54 GMT
Dave ©¿©¬ <dave@_nospam_howdydave.com> wrote
>Howdy!
>
>Anybody else out there have an affinity for lightning?

LOVE IT. LOVE IT. LOVE IT. I can watch for hours if there's an overnight
storm, and if there's one out at sea it's *super* to watch. Puts
fireworks to shame.

But the only time as an adult that I've been really scared is caught on
a ridge in the Alps with a storm breaking. Not the best place to be. The
map marked a fixed rope to abseil so I found my way to it... only to
discover it was a v.long (50m?) steel rope :(  

So do I sit on a ridge in a thunderstorm or abseil down a lightning
conductor? I went down with the fastest abseil in my life, and huddled
under an overhang on the face whilst the clouds hit and all hell broke
loose around me.

Looking back, I loved it. But I admit I was scared as sh*t.

Signature

Malcolm    

Dave ???? - 25 May 2004 03:07 GMT
> >Howdy!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Looking back, I loved it. But I admit I was scared as sh*t.

Howdy Malcom!

Looking back on it, would there be that much of a thrill without the fear
element?

Glad to know that I'm not the only person who feels this way about it!

NEXT QUESTION: Think this sense of "affinity" (for want of a better word) is
due to the "internal lightning" that we experience as epileptics?

Signature

Dave ????
http://www.howdydave.com

M - 25 May 2004 07:34 GMT
Dave ©¿©¬ <dave@_nospam_howdydave.com> wrote

>Howdy Malcom!
>
>Looking back on it, would there be that much of a thrill without the fear
>element?

I think yes. I love the massive breakers on the sea and there's little
or no fear there. I love the mountains and get a thrill on a really good
rock face. I know one with almost 4000ft straight down - it is awesome
but not frightening. I am comfortable but thrilled. There is no
adrenaline rush.

Put me in a party or make me chair a formal meeting and there is great
discomfort, but still no adrenaline. Maybe social/business/political
control freaks get a kick out of this, I don't.

>Glad to know that I'm not the only person who feels this way about it!
>
>NEXT QUESTION: Think this sense of "affinity" (for want of a better word) is
>due to the "internal lightning" that we experience as epileptics?

No. It's just that I like extremes of Nature, without being an
adrenaline junkie or epileptic. Lighting is one of Nature's best
extremes.

Signature

Malcolm    

Mary Fisher - 25 May 2004 17:28 GMT
> >Howdy Malcom!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> but not frightening. I am comfortable but thrilled. There is no
> adrenaline rush.

I wouldn't be comfortable up there ... I sometimes feel odd while standing
on the kerb. Other times it doesn't bother me.

> Put me in a party or make me chair a formal meeting and there is great
> discomfort, but still no adrenaline. Maybe social/business/political
> control freaks get a kick out of this, I don't.

I don't get a kick out if it, it doesn't present me with discomfort or fear,
I can do it easily, that's all.

> >NEXT QUESTION: Think this sense of "affinity" (for want of a better word) is
> >due to the "internal lightning" that we experience as epileptics?
>
> No. It's just that I like extremes of Nature, without being an
> adrenaline junkie or epileptic. Lighting is one of Nature's best
> extremes.

Indeed - as is the manifestation of the power of air or water.

To an observer ...

I think I'm only frightened for other people when I see them in potentially
dangerous situations. I know it's silly, I know that it's in their own
interest to preserve themselves - perhaps it's the mother hen in me.

Mary
Martin Bell - 26 May 2004 19:55 GMT
Hi Dave,

I like watching lightning. LOSE ,that is to Calgary Flames

GO FLAMES GO

Martin
> Howdy!
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Wa'ja think: Am I climing the esoteric peaks or sinking into the bogs?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.