I've come across this sort of discussion before. I've just visited four
epilepsy support web sites and each has specifically stated that epilepsy is
NOT a disease but is a disorder. The neurologists and scientists in our
epilepsy research group also don't describe epilepsy as a disease and this
was stressed in the epilepsy section of the neuropharmacology class I helped
teach last year. I suppose the confusion might arise out of different
definitions people are using for disease but I think they were making the
distinction that a disease can cause epilepsy as a symptom but the epilepsy
itself is not a disease. Maybe the term disorder carries a less negative
connotation than disease and that's why they're making this distinction.
> > I didn't realize that Epilepsy was a 'Disease'. When did that happen?
> > G.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> > iron
> > > may be a primary cause of free radical induced degenerative disease.<snip>
> I've come across this sort of discussion before. I've just visited four
> epilepsy support web sites and each has specifically stated that epilepsy is
> NOT a disease but is a disorder.
If that's the way they stated it, then the website authors need to buy
themselves a dictionary and use it.
> The neurologists and scientists in our
> epilepsy research group also don't describe epilepsy as a disease and this
> was stressed in the epilepsy section of the neuropharmacology class I helped
> teach last year.
See above.
> I suppose the confusion might arise out of different
> definitions people are using for disease
There is precedent for words having different meanings in different professions
(an example escapes this poor memory at the moment), but the unqualified word
"disease" is too common to be used that way.
> but I think they were making the
> distinction that a disease can cause epilepsy as a symptom but the epilepsy
> itself is not a disease.
Perhaps they mean "infectious disease" and should say so if that's what they
mean.
> Maybe the term disorder carries a less negative
> connotation than disease and that's why they're making this distinction.
That's called "denial" and they can't change definitions anyhow.
Bob
> > > I didn't realize that Epilepsy was a 'Disease'. When did that happen?
> > > G.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> > > > may be a primary cause of free radical induced degenerative
> disease.<snip>
Klenow - 15 Apr 2004 08:23 GMT
Well, after looking through quite a few medical dictionaries epilepsy is
almost universally described as a disorder and not a disease. I've come to
realize that many dictionaries leave a lot to be desired with respect to
their definitions but some were quite specific. A disorder can be caused by
a disease or by things that aren't a disease like traumatic brain injury or
poisoning. Therefore, it seems to me that epilepsy is much better described
as a disorder which can be caused by many things with disease being one of
them. That is, epilepsy is the symptom of the cause (disease, injury etc.).
Actually, I'm glad I finally looked into this. As I said, I hear this
distinction made at lease twice a year but never bothered to find out what
it meant.
> > I've come across this sort of discussion before. I've just visited four
> > epilepsy support web sites and each has specifically stated that epilepsy is
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> > > > > may be a primary cause of free radical induced degenerative
> > disease.<snip>