> > > it should be legalized, it is not nearly as dangerous as some people
> > > would like us to think it is.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Permit me to turn your question around and ask _you_ for "evidence" that
> it is dangerous.
Well, I asked first :-)
> I would imagine that there is the same attitude by the authorities in your
> country as here in the US that marijuana use is the first step in drug abuse
> & is somehow guaranteed to lead to more serious use such as crack cocaine,
> LSD etc.
I haven't made any claims.
> I've smoked it any numbers of times myself, whether a joint was
> being passed around and I took a toke, or when a friend had a stash and we
> both rolled our own from his supply and smoked them. That never led to any
> ongoing use for myself and I haven't had any for years. So much for rash
> conclusions.
That's limited and personal evidence for your claim. I've made no rash
conclusions.
Mary
Bob - 28 Jan 2004 02:19 GMT
> > > > it should be legalized, it is not nearly as dangerous as some people
> > > > would like us to think it is.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >
> Mary
Ok fine. Then what sort of "evidence" are you looking for? :-)
btw - you left out the phenobarbital government paranoia part of my post. Is
that fair? ;-)
Bob
Mary Fisher - 28 Jan 2004 18:13 GMT
> > That's limited and personal evidence for your claim. I've made no rash
> > conclusions.
> > >
> > Mary
>
> Ok fine. Then what sort of "evidence" are you looking for? :-)
I'm not actively looking for it but when someone makes claims which appear
to be based on personal or anecdotal experience or belief I hav the right to
ask for proper, peer review evidence before I'm prepared to accept it.
That's fair enough, I think.
Mary
Bob - 28 Jan 2004 20:29 GMT
> > > That's limited and personal evidence for your claim. I've made no rash
> > > conclusions.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mary
Evidence? :-)
But seriously, the majority of posts here in this newsgroup are personal &
ancecdotal. Must everyone cite a pile of evidence before they can post?
If you want evidence, Google is your friend.
http://www.google.com/
That, and the other info given by Brad, should keep you busy for a while there
down under. :-)
Bob
Brad - 28 Jan 2004 05:12 GMT
evidence?
i have known several people that have dealt with the nausea associated
with chemotherapy. one puff INSTANTLY wards off the nausea--now the
patient can eat without vomiting, allowing precious vitamins and
minerals to be ingested.
the same goes for people who suffer from migraines. one puff gets rid
of the sick feeling and allows the suffering party to take his/her
medication and keep it down.
you're probably licking your chops right now, ready to flame me for
considering these scenarios evidence.
what do you want me to do? hand feed you information like your a
helpless bird?
take a look around the country--i'm speaking about the USA. there are
clinics in some states that openly distribute marijuana to patients
suffering from a score of problems. there is glaucoma, MS, nausea
associated with chemo, migraine, epilepsy, aids wasting syndrome, just
to name a few. even physicians recommend its' use.
scenario 1. you are dumb enough to believe that these sick people who
are willing to be sent to jail are simply faking it.
scenario 2. you have some sort of ignorant bias towards marijuana.
(can't say it's your fault with the amount of propaganda and all)
it's one or the other.
but you still want me to show you evidence because you are too lazy to
find out for yourself. so here you go birdie:
=physicians recommend marijuana use
http://www.aegis.com/news/sc/2002/SC021006.html
=state courts think the evidence is compelling enough.
=drug companies mimic the active ingredient in pot:
http://www.marinol.com/patient/pat03.html#2
=why would they mimic something with no medicinal value? inconsistent
thc levels, mold, spores, smoking is harmful. who cares about
consistent thc levels, if it works it works. as far as smoking leafy
substances, mold etc., the patient could vaporize. this is a much
safer method.
i never said marijuana would cure anything, just treat symptoms and
ease suffering.
in the USA, it is illegal to test marijuana without the consent of the
FDA, that is why there is no scientific evidence, catch 22. show me
scientific evidence and i'll show you a third party group with shady
motives that funded the experiment.
i smoke marijuana for pleasure, and should have the liberty to do
so--so long as i don't drive under the influence of course.