Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Epilepsy / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Convulsion vs. Seizure

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Radium - 15 Oct 2006 02:50 GMT
Hi:

Seizure = abnormal electric activity in brain

Convulsion = involuntary muscle contraction

Yet the terms "seizure" and "convulsion" are use interchangeably as if
the mean the same thing -- when they are clearly different from each
other. Why?

Thanks,

Radium
J.A.Legris - 15 Oct 2006 04:13 GMT
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> the mean the same thing -- when they are clearly different from each
> other. Why?

Actually, I prefer the term "having a cow".

--
Joe Legris
J. T. laurie - 15 Oct 2006 06:00 GMT
lol, well done.

>> Hi:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> --
> Joe Legris
G. - 15 Oct 2006 15:35 GMT
I cut out these groups you **Crossposted this onto. Please *do not*
re-insert the groups on *my reply, as it makes you sound like a
Phisher, while you're probably not.
  You crossposted above subject to these groups -->
alt.support.disorders.neurological,bionet.neuroscience,sci.med.pathology,alt.support.epilepsy,sci.med.nursing

  If someone does "Reply to Group", to **ANY of those over next 4-60
days, without their software Flagging and Pulling those Crossposts,
their Email Addr.(without their consent) and Reply is posted onto **all
groups listed, whether they're subscribed here or not.

 If you can't Cut and Paste the same message to each group separately,
perhaps you should find a Dictionary.  The extra groups just clutter up
this one when someone not subscribed here replies, and keeps adding
comments for the next 4-6 weeks on the thread. G./   ( See ****s reply
below)

> Hi:
> Seizure = abnormal electric activity in brain
*** Seizure= to Grab away from someone ***(seizure of his carrots)?
The original in 1700s? referred to someone being Possessed (seized) by
the Devil.  Many words in English have multiple meanings depending on
their context.  Is that a problem [query, difficulty, concern,
preoccupation] that might cause confusion (puzzlement, confounding,
discomfort)? ***

> Convulsion = involuntary muscle contraction
*** Convulsion is not used in North America to describe an Ep. Seizure
and hasn't for many years, or ever so far as I know. While it might be
common in the UK or parts of Europe, so is "fit",  which people use
there (and sometimes on this group) in common parlance, but is not used
often in other countries.

> Yet the terms "seizure" and "convulsion" are use interchangeably as if
> the mean the same thing -- when they are clearly different from each
> other. Why?

*** In what context are they 'clearly different from each other' ??  It
would appear to be the context (above) or country where it is being
used, as Potato, Potahto. So far as I recall, this is first set of
posts where 'convulsion' has been actively used since <1998?
  They are describing outward symptoms caused by Neurological
(mis)firing produced by injury, illness, or other effects that produce
sporadic electrical firing in various areas of the brain (depending on
the szr. type).    G./

> Thanks,
> Radium
Jeff - 15 Oct 2006 16:48 GMT
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> the mean the same thing -- when they are clearly different from each
> other. Why?

Because when one is having convulsions, he is having almost always seizures,
too.

Or, to put it another way, the convulsion is the activity you see, seizures
are the brain activity that results in seizures.

Not all seizures result in convulsions, however.

Jeff

> Thanks,
>
> Radium
Radium - 15 Oct 2006 17:13 GMT
> > Hi:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > the mean the same thing -- when they are clearly different from each
> > other. Why?

> Because when one is having convulsions, he is having almost always seizures,
> too.

Not necessarily

AFAIK, seizures involving the motor cortex can cause convulsions.

Problems with the spinal cord, peripheral nerves, and even the muscular
mechanism itself -- can also cause involuntary muscle contractions. Yet
I don't see *those* involuntary muscle contractions reffered to as
"convulsions". Why??

> Or, to put it another way, the convulsion is the activity you see, seizures
> are the brain activity that results in seizures.

Involuntary muscle contractions can -- but aren't always -- caused by
seizures.

> Not all seizures result in convulsions, however.

And given the dictionary definition of "convulsion" [i.e. involuntary
muscle contractions], not all convulsions are caused by seizures. Yet
the two terms are used almost interchangeably -- and in a very casual
way.

> Jeff
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Radium
howdydave - 16 Oct 2006 04:54 GMT
Howdy!

As far as epilepsy is concerned, convultions
are seizures that involve involuntary muscle
contractions such as tonic-clonic seizures.

Many seizure types have absolutely nothing
to do with the muscular system -- epileptic
seizures are due to an excessive amount of
electirical activity in the brain.

IOW: All epileptic convultions are seizures
but not all epileptic seizures involve convultions.

Dave

> > > Hi:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > >
> > > Radium
Radium - 16 Oct 2006 05:19 GMT
> Howdy!
>
> As far as epilepsy is concerned, convultions
> are seizures that involve involuntary muscle
> contractions such as tonic-clonic seizures.

What if epilepsy is not involved??

> Many seizure types have absolutely nothing
> to do with the muscular system -- epileptic
> seizures are due to an excessive amount of
> electirical activity in the brain.

Yes.

> IOW: All epileptic convultions are seizures
> but not all epileptic seizures involve convultions.

What about non-epileptic convulsions????

http://www.online-medical-dictionary.org/Non-Epileptic+Convulsion.asp?q=Non-Epil
eptic+Convulsion


Quote from the above site:

"Convulsions may also occur in the absence of an electrical cerebral
discharge"

So why are the terms "convulsion" and "seizure" used interchangeably???
According to the quote, convulsions can and do occur even w/out seizure
activity.
partials - 16 Oct 2006 14:59 GMT
> So why are the terms "convulsion" and "seizure" used interchangeably???

Because they aren't? What ever gave you the idea that they were?

.
Radium - 17 Oct 2006 03:47 GMT
> > So why are the terms "convulsion" and "seizure" used interchangeably???
>
> Because they aren't? What ever gave you the idea that they were?
>
> .

They *are* used interchangeably, despite they fact their definitions
are *so* different from each either.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000021.htm quote:

"The term 'convulsion' is often used interchangeably with 'seizure'"
partials - 17 Oct 2006 04:47 GMT
>>> So why are the terms "convulsion" and "seizure" used interchangeably???
>> Because they aren't? What ever gave you the idea that they were?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> "The term 'convulsion' is often used interchangeably with 'seizure'"

Yes, I see the problem.

Their definition of convulsion is fine: "an abnormal violent and involuntary
contraction or series of contractions of the muscles -- often used in plural <a
patient suffering from convulsions>"

It's one possible *symptom" of a seizure, but I think their dictionary writers
were out to lunch when they wrote most of that. But why shouldn't epilepsy keep
to its record for being one of the most misunderstood afflictions?

.
howdydave - 17 Oct 2006 15:58 GMT
> >>> So why are the terms "convulsion" and "seizure" used interchangeably???
> >> Because they aren't? What ever gave you the idea that they were?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> .

People who use the terms interchangably are either ignorant
about what seizures are or they think that the person they
are talking to is too ignorant to be able to differentiate between
the two.

Dave
Rick Morris - 17 Oct 2006 16:24 GMT
On 10/17/06 9:58 AM, in article
1161097095.748632.24360@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com, "howdydave"

> People who use the terms interchangably are either ignorant
> about what seizures are or they think that the person they
> are talking to is too ignorant to be able to differentiate between
> the two.
>
> Dave

Of course it doesn't help when the main course of treatment for people who
have "seizures" are medications called "anticonvulsants".

Signature

The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures
the disease.
            -- Voltaire

RalphRepo - 18 Oct 2006 21:51 GMT
>Of course it doesn't help when the main course of treatment for people who
>have "seizures" are medications called "anticonvulsants".

Try electro-convulsive therapy.

Ralph
howdydave - 19 Oct 2006 12:52 GMT
> On 10/17/06 9:58 AM, in article
> 1161097095.748632.24360@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com, "howdydave"
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>  the disease.
>              -- Voltaire

Howdy Rick!

That's what happens when people take a technical term
with a specific definition (in this case from pharmachology) and
attempt to analyze it based on a non-technical, linguistic basis.

Dave
Entertained by my own EIMC - 19 Oct 2006 16:30 GMT
>> On 10/17/06 9:58 AM, in article
>> 1161097095.748632.24360@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com, "howdydave"
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Dave

He still has a point, in that (roughly considered) doctors more often than
not overlook more or less preventable causes behind many disorders (or
diseases).

P
Jeff - 20 Oct 2006 00:06 GMT
>> >>> So why are the terms "convulsion" and "seizure" used
>> >>> interchangeably???
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> are talking to is too ignorant to be able to differentiate between
> the two.

Or, alternatively, people use the terms correctly, but other people don't
realize this and think they are being used interchangably.

Jeff

> Dave
Jeff - 20 Oct 2006 00:04 GMT
>> Howdy!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What if epilepsy is not involved??

Can you give an example?

>> Many seizure types have absolutely nothing
>> to do with the muscular system -- epileptic
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> According to the quote, convulsions can and do occur even w/out seizure
> activity.
partials - 20 Oct 2006 01:33 GMT
>>> Howdy!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Can you give an example?

Here's one: http://www.aemj.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/296

> Concussive Convulsions Emergency Department Assessment and Management of a
> Frequently Misunderstood
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Address for correspondence and reprints: Andrew D. Perron, MD, Assistant
Professor of Emergency Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery, Box 800699, Department
of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
22908. Fax: 804-924-2877; e-mail: adp9b@virginia.edu

> Immediate concussive convulsions are an unusual but dramatic sequela to head
injuries. Previously believed to be an epileptic phenomenon, they are now
thought to be a brief traumatic functional decerebration that results from loss
of cortical inhibition. With concussive convulsions generally occurring within
seconds of head impact and lasting up to several minutes, patients are initially
in a tonic phase, followed by a clonic convulsion. A postictal phase is
generally brief if it occurs at all with these episodes. Patients with isolated
concussive convulsions have no evidence of structural brain injury as assessed
with neuroimaging studies or physical examination. Neuropsychological testing
often demonstrates transient cortical dysfunction consistent with the concussive
episode. The long-term outcome for patients with isolated concussive convulsion
is universally good, with no long-term neurologic sequelae and no increased
incidence of early or late posttraumatic epilepsy. Emergency department
management should focus on evaluation of the associated concussive injury. The
concussive convulsion requires no specific therapy, and antiepileptic medication
is not indicated.

> Key words: concussion; concussive convulsion; brain injury; head injury;
posttraumatic epilepsy
Radium - 20 Oct 2006 15:55 GMT
> >>> Howdy!
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> > Key words: concussion; concussive convulsion; brain injury; head injury;
> posttraumatic epilepsy

Here are two more example of non-seizure convulsions:

http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/130/1/68

http://www.springerlink.com/index/WL220372R6537X11.pdf
G. - 20 Oct 2006 17:03 GMT
> > >>> Howdy!
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/130/1/68

**G.*  For any who might be sensitive***** this site describes in
detail effects of decapitating animals and how seizures are produced
there.   //    See my comment at bottom.  //

> http://www.springerlink.com/index/WL220372R6537X11.pdf

G.-->   I must remember the next time I have a seizure to tell the
Doctor that I'm not a decapitated cat--- (first of the 2 sites you
listed above)...

  I don't follow what the **value is of differentiating (for most of
us)  between a Convulsion (likely an older term used generally before
the causes were able to be measured by MRIs, CT Scans and other means),
and Seizures, which  most of us use here who have had.

 If people post here from other countries and say they've had a
history of convulsions (or in some cases fits),  I can understand what
they are trying to communicate and look for some sites that might be of
help to them, to deal with their concerns, or treatment they could look
into.    I don't need to tell them,  "Yes, but Fits can also apply to a
Shirt or Shoes, are you Sure you've had one and it's not a tight shoe
that's causing it? "  :-<
  I don't think an extensive review of semantics that might be
different in some countries around the world (~12 timezones), versus
what original poster started with at Subject Line here, really helps
someone newly diagnosed or seeking information wrt. living with
epilepsy.
 That's the main reason I never posted on this thread before, or
henceforth.    G./
G. - 20 Oct 2006 17:16 GMT
> > > "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote in message   <Deleted all>

 You XXXXX TROLL  -->  I sent that reply in good faith to you without
opening the Google headers to see  You had ***Crossposted this Junk
onto these Newsgroups (below).

  WHY DON"T YOU GO OUT INTO TRAFFIC or  find something to do?   I sure
will.

  THIS IS THE GROUP-list YOU CROSSPOSTED YOUR THREAD ONTO -->
(glucegen1 at excite.com  is masked inside the <>s below )

Email:   "Radium" <gluceg...@excite.com>
Groups:   alt.support.disorders.neurological, bionet.neuroscience,
sci.med.pathology, alt.support.epilepsy, sci.med.nursing
*******************************************************************************

    I REMOVED the other Groups on this reply.  Don't put them back.
This is the source of the earlier  Spam loads I posted about earlier
today (below).  If you can't post those to groups specific to the
question or comment, or separately, Go somewhere else.
***I DIDN't want to be on a Nursing, Bionet,  or Med. Pathology Group
you Troll.     G./  //
Jeff - 20 Oct 2006 00:03 GMT
>> > Hi:
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> the two terms are used almost interchangeably -- and in a very casual
> way.

That's because almost all the time, when people speek of convulsions, there
is seizure activity.

Jeff

>> Jeff
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Radium

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.