Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Epilepsy / January 2006
Edgar Cayce's Epilepsy Treatment
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Dudley Delany - 23 Jan 2006 19:31 GMT Hi Everyone!
I developed multiple sclerosis in 1991 and, over a two year period, gradually overcame it using an alternative treatment suggested by Edgar Cayce, a man many regard as the father of modern holistic medicine. Cayce also suggested a promising alternative treatment for epilepsy. For more information, visit
http://www.webspawner.com/users/ecsepilepsytx/index.html
All the best,
Dudley Delany, R.N., M.A., D.C.
http://profiles.yahoo.com/dudley_delany
G. - 23 Jan 2006 21:19 GMT I did a reply, that is off in etherspace somewhere, so if there's 2 of these, I apologize. I briefly went to that site and as part of the 'features' of webspawner (for people here who might be photo-sensitive), there's a Flashing Advert. Icon in the top corner that's really awkward to have on a site that supposedly is to help people with seizures. Most of the stuff Cayce wrote was in 1930s? before some of the other seizure types had been separated? from Grand mal and recognized as originating in different brain areas or different triggers than that one. While I only briefly read the article, one of several above links on to, it appears to suggest that all forms known then? are treated by the one homeo recipe. Is that not correct (my interpretation) ? Once a particular szr. type is identified by regular medicine, they are often treated by medications that might not work for other forms of szrs, but are more targeted to areas where the initial szr. focus is, of a particular type. I'll read more later. G./
partials - 24 Jan 2006 04:55 GMT > I did a reply, that is off in etherspace somewhere, so if there's 2 of > these, I apologize. I briefly went to that site and as part of the > 'features' of webspawner (for people here who might be > photo-sensitive), there's a Flashing Advert. Icon in the top corner > that's really awkward to have on a site that supposedly is to help > people with seizures. I wonder if that level of his insensitivity isn't some sort of tipoff?
> Most of the stuff Cayce wrote was in 1930s? before some of the other > seizure types had been separated? from Grand mal and recognized as [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > to, it appears to suggest that all forms known then? are treated by the > one homeo recipe. Is that not correct (my interpretation) ? You could buy some of the books he has for sale. Do you know that guy? Sure looks like spam to me.
> Once a particular szr. type is identified by regular medicine, they > are often treated by medications that might not work for other forms of > szrs, but are more targeted to areas where the initial szr. focus is, > of a particular type. I'll read more later. G./ Take a look at the cookies his websites set when you visit. Then look at all the links for various products there are on those pages. If anyone visits those and buys something, he gets an affiliate commission. Some people make big money that way just by making unproveable claims.
Dave Keays - 26 Jan 2006 00:54 GMT > I did a reply, that is off in etherspace somewhere, so if there's 2 of > these, I apologize. I briefly went to that site and as part of the > 'features' of webspawner (for people here who might be > photo-sensitive), there's a Flashing Advert. Icon in the top corner > that's really awkward to have on a site that supposedly is to help > people with seizures. See my post in the "Amazing Information" thread.
> Most of the stuff Cayce wrote was in 1930s? before some of the other > seizure types had been separated? from Grand mal and recognized as [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > szrs, but are more targeted to areas where the initial szr. focus is, > of a particular type. I'll read more later. G./
 Signature Dave Keays
Dave Keays - 26 Jan 2006 01:04 GMT > I did a reply, that is off in etherspace somewhere, so if there's 2 of > these, I apologize. I briefly went to that site and as part of the > 'features' of webspawner (for people here who might be > photo-sensitive), there's a Flashing Advert. Icon in the top corner > that's really awkward to have on a site that supposedly is to help > people with seizures. See my post in the "Amazing Information" thread.
> Most of the stuff Cayce wrote was in 1930s? before some of the other > seizure types had been separated? from Grand mal and recognized as [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > szrs, but are more targeted to areas where the initial szr. focus is, > of a particular type. I'll read more later. G./
 Signature Dave Keays
carl - 24 Jan 2006 05:06 GMT > Hi Everyone! > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > http://profiles.yahoo.com/dudley_delany It seems to me that Edgar Cayce is one odd ball!
Carl
G. - 24 Jan 2006 05:38 GMT I didn't know that any of his books were still in print. I was reading him in late? 1960s. That's how I know his original stuff and 'visions' ? were in the 1930s. I think he was also one who talked about the 'Genesis stories' had originated from the sinking of Atlantis... As someone wrote earlier, I don't recall any (much) in the books wrt. Medical stuff that would be on topic here anyway. G./
purple-cow - 24 Jan 2006 13:25 GMT Hello Dudley,
First, I want to say congratulations with your results from the multiple sclerosis treatment plan. And thank you, for providing the information about the epilepsy treatment plan, which by the way is something that I started with for myself about this time last year. So far, the epilepsy treatment plant has helped me a bit more than what just the medications I am currently taking have provided.
Do you, or did you, by any chance happen to work and or volunteer at the A.R.E. located there in Virginia Beach? I took a trip out there to the A.R.E. back in April last year (2005) and had the opportunity to personally meet Linda Caputi myself. She informed me directly several months ago about the newest book she wrote. I am planning to take another trip out there once again here shortly, and will hopefully have the chance to obtain a copy of the newest book and asked her to sign it for me.
You know, I'm not surprised about the negative feedback replies that the three members had previously posted on here. Especially part of what one member mentioned, which was "While I only briefly read the article" (G. / aka kayakmom; guitarmom; gaross; G.Ross; and anymore other usernames this one individual person has). I mean, heck, there are many multiple evolutions of treatment available for people with epilepsy, as well as for other various types of medical disabilities people have. So since there still is no cure available for epilepsy, people with epilepsy need to try at least one or more of those treatments that are available in order to see what works best for them. Just because one of those treatments works for a certain number of people with epilepsy doesn't mean that it's going to work for every single person who has epilepsy. You might be surprised with what's available when you read the whole article.
Now I also went to the web site which you provided and did notice that there is a flashing advertisement banner. Obviously, it is displayed there because it is the company who hosts the site, and most likely the cookies are going to show up just like they do when anyone visits other web sites that are sponsored by various companies. It's kind of hard to know the guy, considering the fact that he is no longer alive (Edgar Casey 1877 - 1945).
Again Dudley, congratulations, and thank you.
Bruce (batman, grez-monkey, & purple-cow)
G. - 25 Jan 2006 16:46 GMT You are mistaken. When Rogers cable pulled support for newsgroups mid-December on less than 12 hour's notice, it took ~3 weeks to find another link and provider to *here (this newsgroup). Since *1997 I've signed my posts G. as it's shorter than setting a new signature and this group was being manually harvested at the time by Euro trolls and Asia. Someone else (new) has been also signing some of their posts G. so I changed *mine to /G. again for brevity, not deceit, about 3? weeks ago. gaross is the prefix of my email address-- nothing special or secret there. When I reset my new link early Jan. to here, my main register at my ISP is G.Ross <---- oooOOOoooo X-files ... I use my full name with people I write (new people if they missed the several newslinks I post here each ~2 weeks). I probably sent you one too. Probably sent copies to ALL your Personalities -> Bruce/ batman/ grez- monkey, and purple-cow. The only multiple personality posting here is yourself. At least one of the posts it's spelled Casey. It's *pronounced Casey, but on older post you'll see he spelled his name Cayce. Someone chastising me for not committing the full link to memory would know that, wouldn't they?
I didn't go further into the articles as we had a National Election here and I was watching the results on TV. You know the last seizues I had were Dec. 1997, June 1998, and first was 1993, that my Neuro. said for my type of szrs. I could **hope for* 2-3 C.P. seizures a month. That will be 8 years this June-- seizure free. So long, in fact, that my Neuro has just transferred my Prescription history and info. back to my Family Dr. (I posted here about 2 weeks ago).
That still doesn't preclude me from trying to help others with newly diagnosed CP seizures, or using Dilantin, Tegretol or Frisium from offering them things that worked for me or what to watch out for. I also picked up support links and other information they might not know about (like Grapefruit conflicting with Tegretol). It's also a support group, as you'll see from some of us trying to help people with kids, or that young woman in Poland who was posting for help understanding what the feelings are during seizures and what sorts of things might prevent them or reduce risk of harm to her. People who are newly diagnosed need help and support, not flamewars.
I *don't have Cookies set on, so flashing stuff I commented on wasn't from that. It was graphics put up in HTML or ?? and you'll see a couple of others posted that they found it distracting too. They are regular posters too and real people, not multiple versions of me. Ask Muldar. I know from when I was *photosensitive* (1994-6), that it would have been distracting, and found it *strange to put a flashing icon onto a Health Site where 20? percent of members might be photosensitive. *If it was something they could easily disable, it would make the site more usable for those it's designed for. Or else, why bother doing it? That would be the First ISP in 8 years where something like that can't be disabled, if that's really the case. G./
|
|
|