What is the difference? Which one is better? I assume that both are 'humane' ones.
TIA,
Jupiter
> What is the difference? Which one is better? I assume that both are
> 'humane' ones.
>
> TIA,
> Jupiter
There are a number of different categories or types of insulins and you can
divide them up in different ways. This leads to some confusion.
Human insulin is insulin which is identical to that found in people. It is
produced by genetically engineered E-coli or yeast. Human insulin is
distinguished from animal source insulin, beef or pork.
Analog insulins are insulins that have been created and designed to have
certain attributes that affect their absorption rate. They do not exist in
nature. Novolog and Humalog are absorbed more rapidly than Regular human
insulin. Lantus is absorbed much more slowly than Regular human.
Insulin can be combined with different compounds in order to slow down the
rate at which it arrives in the blood stream. Terminology varies but in
the US the compounded insulins are, in decreasing order of absorption, NPH,
Lente, and Ultralente.
The overall list, again in decreasing order, is Humalog/Novolog, Regular,
NPH, Lente, Ultralente, Lantus. The two fastest and the slowest are
analogs. Note this list does not include the animal versions, the
compounds of which tend to be more slowly absorbed than their human
counterparts, for simplicity.
In general,Humalog and Novolog are called rapid acting. Regular human is
called fast acting. NPH and Lente are called intermediate acting.
Ultralente and Lantus are called long acting.
So much for the differences. Which one is better depends on what job it is
selected to do and where the individual patient falls in the significant
range of absorption variability. The number of different insulin regimens
is large and the question of which insulin is best doesn't make any sense
outside of a particular context.
When people say, "This insulin is best", they are often saying, "This
insulin works best for me". We all have a strong tendency to over
generalize our own experience.
Charly Coughran
ccoughran@DELETE-TO-RESPOND-UCSD.EDU
Guy - 22 Oct 2003 17:58 GMT
>When people say, "This insulin is best", they are often saying, "This
>insulin works best for me". We all have a strong tendency to over
>generalize our own experience.
>
>Charly Coughran
>ccoughran@DELETE-TO-RESPOND-UCSD.EDU
Thanks for your usual excellent posts
Hypo Man - 22 Oct 2003 22:19 GMT
agreed...excellent post...very lucid and helpful...

Signature
Steve
Type 1 DM since 1967
MiniMed 508 since early 2002
Toronto, ON Canada
> > What is the difference? Which one is better? I assume that both are
> > 'humane' ones.
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> Charly Coughran
> ccoughran@DELETE-TO-RESPOND-UCSD.EDU
Radioactive Man - 25 Oct 2003 04:53 GMT
>> What is the difference? Which one is better? I assume that both are
>> 'humane' ones.
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>insulin works best for me". We all have a strong tendency to over
>generalize our own experience.
And that depends on many factors, including how many injections per
day you will tolerate, your eating habits, lifestyle, etc. I use
Lantus every night and either regular (Novolin-R) or fast-acting
(Novolog) with each meal. For me, the choice of whether to use
regular or fast-acting with a meal depends mainly on the size and
composition of the meal. For low-carb meals, I find it really doesn't
matter too much which insulin I use. For large, mixed/multi-course
meals, I find it best to use regular insulin about 30 minutes before
hand. For quickly digested foods like pancakes, donuts, etc., it
works best to keep use fast-acting insulin, but keep both the carb and
insulin intake small. If I am in a rush and eating a large, mixed
meal (with vegetables, protein sources, and carb sources), I will use
both regular fast-acting insulins at the same time in order to prevent
both early and late spikes in blood sugar.